Nadler ripped final argument away from Schiff, thinks Shifty did a terrible job. They are fighting big time! https://t.co/L2qTV9pWiL
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 31, 2020
३१ जानेवारी, २०२०
"Jerry. Jerry. Jerry."
याची सदस्यत्व घ्या:
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा (Atom)
पोस्ट्स
१४० टिप्पण्या:
That's gold, Jerry. Gold...
"VANDELAY! SAY VANDELAY!"
Nadler’s not going down with the Schiff.
Nadler ripped
That's difficult to imagine, but once you do it's difficult to disremember.
"Jerry, Jerry, your fly is down!"
Keystone Kops, or Three Stooges?
Sekulow: "After 31 or 32 times you said you proved every aspect of your case... [pauses for response] That's what you said."
Schiff: "We did."
Sekulow: "Well then I don't think we need any witnesses."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDOoSOjMG0U
You're a bad man Jerry! Babu Bhatt does not approve!
Touche to Sekulow.
It is saying something when Nadler is faster on the move than Schiff or anyone else on this planet. It is not like there is a bucket at KFC by that microphone.
The night was done
It was time to groove
And Dems were under the gun
You can ask them fondly
And they'll all remember
When 'The Penguin' made his move...
Foolery, sir, does walk around the orb like the sun; it shines everywhere.
~ William Shakespeare, Twelfth Night, Act 3, Scene 1
not Schiff's week.
I expect that in the future, people will insult other people by calling them "egregious nadlers" and "total schiffs" without capitalization.
“Sekulow: "After 31 or 32 times you said you proved every aspect of your case... [pauses for response] That's what you said."
Schiff: "We did."
Sekulow: "Well then I don't think we need any witnesses.
Adam Schiff is Harvard Law magna cum lauda and he walked into that one? Harvard has much to answer for.
Roy Jacobsen said...
Keystone Kops, or Three Stooges?
Why, Abbott and Costello, of course.
Ooooh, call me, teacher! Call MEEEeeeeeee!
Too slow, no go Shiffty.
Kind of like the Jerry Springer show. Jerry! Jerry! Jerry!
I think one of the Marx Brothers (Zeppo, maybe?) said:
Impeachments repeat themselves, first as tragedy, second as farce.
Nadler walked to the mic like Octavio.
Strangers in the night, exchanging glances...
A pretty fitting end to a bunch of democrat clowns.
Twilight Zone --
Tonight's episode: The Last Race to the Impeachment Microphone
Schiff didn't think quick enough to lure Jerry back with the smell of fresh, hot tasty jelly donut.
Someday, it will be Speaker Schiff or Senator Schiff. And, “the late Congressman Jerald Nader.” Schiff has done a really good job. Jeffries too.
It’s such a pity to me that Justin Amash wasn’t also a manager.
JERRY?!...HELLO!!!
JERRY?!...HELLO!!!
Let's just say that the Schiffster was not quick on his feet--mentally or physically yesterday.
Still Lil Adam retains his reputation as one of the smarter tools in the House Democrat shed.
And he's done his best pitching more "spitballs" than the Niekro brothers at their best.
he walked into that one, now Thomas eagar met ciaramella in Ukraine back in august 2019, before alabama, col vindman, was lobbied by burismas no 1 client naftogaz,
Speaker Schiff, Chuck? THAT'S your fantasy? Are we talking son or grandson? Maybe a love child of Pelosi's?
Bill, Republic of Texas: Is that dialogue f'realz? Cuz that is just awesome.
If Schitt wants to pontificate in the Senate, then he should run for that Position.
Check out the women at the desk behind Schiff and Nadler, all laughing at them. Perfect ending to this clown show.
a wronged woman, who was a whistleblower against sberbank, one of the most rotten financial institutions, so truibnikov fed her name to halper,
https://twitter.com/ClimateAudit/status/1223280314476367872?s=20
IMO Jay Sekulow was the strongest Trump Lawyer by mixing a strong argument with underlying passion. The other two were debater types using an intentional downplay of passion. I suppose that comes from Jay being an attorney deep into the fights for our Judeo-Christian culture over the last 20 years.
Nadler’s not going down with the Schiff.
"I'm going down with my health problems, but not with you Schiff-hole!!"
Between Warren, and Nadler, they just shot down the impeachment.
alanc709 said...
Speaker Schiff, Chuck? THAT'S your fantasy? Are we talking son or grandson? Maybe a love child of Pelosi's?
1/31/20, 10:30 AM
Not quite. I think they met at Ed Buck's.
Mattman26: yep. Here's the link with video.
https://mobile.twitter.com/pragmatometer/status/1222691954435284992
That's what Chuckles thinks is a really good job.
"You've given your lies, and we've given you plenty of time to do that. Now it's MY turn to give my lies. So sid down and shut up"
Someday, it will be Speaker Schiff or Senator Schiff.
I strongly suspect that Lil' Chuckles' beloved Adam Schiff will run for Feinstein's senate seat when she retires. Given that it is California, he has a pretty good chance of winning.
Mattman26 asked...
Bill, Republic of Texas: Is that dialogue f'realz? Cuz that is just awesome.
here it is, in the new york times!
That should tell you something about the weakness of their position." "After 31 or 32 times you said you proved every aspect of your case — that's what you said, well you didn't, you ...
he does have his own gravity well like a white dwarf,
Schiff is an incandescently stupid man. I would be embarrassed to have him representing me in Congress. That being said...Nadler...just...wow. That's not balls. That's ignorance and zero fucks given for your fellow travelers.
but Schiff, and Nadler, have the same benefactor in the Ukrainian arms supplier, igor Pasternak, there are interesting stories but the ones you can't talk about,
So much stupid, but all this Harvard??
So Brexit is set to occur at 6 ET. Wonder if they could manage to ring the death knell for this "impeachment" nonsense at the same time. That would be fun.
"I strongly suspect that Lil' Chuckles' beloved Adam Schiff will run for Feinstein's senate seat when she retires. Given that it is California, he has a pretty good chance of winning."
No way. He's too white, too male, and too un-gay. This is California, man!
What's the Frequency, Jerry?
Democrats have never looked worse in their long 3 years of foaming at the mouth insanity. I await with 'bated the Presidential Tweets when an acquittal is finally achieved. He'll mock them mercilessly, I hope.
May the Farce Be with You!
That was funny! I had missed that Schiff tried to get up to do the last remarks last night, and I didn't hear him trying to pull Nadler back. I don't think Nadler has moved that quickly in 3 decades. What a clown show!
What is the Dem's big campaign issue?
Trump. That's it.
This whole impeachment show was created to bolster that issue.
How many voter minds were changed in the Dems favor by the impeachment show?
Likely a net loss.
Individuals probably raised a lot of money for their own campaign chests though.
So are they Laurel and Hardy, Abbott and Costello, or Martin and Lewis? Or is Adam Schiff Jerry Seinfeld and Jerry Nadler George Costanza?
Nadler was fighting with Trump over development projects on the West Side thirty years ago. He definitely wasn't going to pass up the opportunity to deliver the final blow.
Schiff, though, probably should have realized that there might be some blowback if he became the goggle-eyed, pencil-necked face of impeachment.
Sometimes less is more, but when you're a politician and you have the spotlight it's hard to give it up.
Scott M said...
Schiff is an incandescently stupid man. I would be embarrassed to have him representing me in Congress.
Just SHOWS How LITTLE You KNOW!
The SMARTEST MAN IN THE WORLD! Our Poor Chuck said (and i QUOTE):
Someday, it will be Speaker Schiff or Senator Schiff... Schiff has done a really good job.
1/31/20, 10:16 AM
I shit you NOT! Our Poor Chuck thinks (and WRITES!) that Schiff has done a really good job.
Wait Schiff's not gay? I assumed he was since he's so close to Ed Buck. I guess that's why Schiff has never been drugged and killed by Buck.
Schiff needs to resign and allow a persecuted minority have his seat.
Schitt is unlikeable. He would not fare well outside of politics because of a lack of ethics. He has problems with truthfulness, to be charitable. He is too slippery. He is too clever by half.
Nadler may not be much better but he hasn't made it so obvious.
Ok ok ok.
What's it gonna take to get both Nads Nadler and LLR-lefty Chuck onto a track and in a race?
Nads Nadler has the advantage in training terms due to his impeachment "race to the microphone" whereas LLR-lefty Chuck is a more driven runner due to his anger over the enactment of conservative policies under Trump.
I wonder what kind of odds Vegas would give for that?
Someone in the overnight thread gave the perfect description of Schiff- smart, articulate, and completely delusional. I couldn't improve on that.
"I shit you NOT! Our Poor Chuck thinks (and WRITES!) that Schiff has done a really good job."
Our poor man forced our host to vote for Hillary with his rhetoric, so maybe show some respect to your effective betters.
Adam Schiff is Harvard Law magna cum lauda and he walked into that one? Harvard has much to answer for.
Law school does not address courtroom skills such as thinking on your feet. Law school is academic.
I think I can improve on it:
Smart, articulate, and completely dishonest.
Trump signing the Anti-Human Trafficking bill into Law.
Democrats, LLR's and Cartels hardest hit.
*knock knock knock* "JERRY?"
*knock knock knock* "JERRY?"
*knock knock knock* "JERRY?"
Qwinn,
But that last part is an aspect of delusion- Schiff really believes no one sees through his lying and that his lies advance his arguments. In this, he is exactly like Liz Warren, but to her credit, her lies are simply self-serving while his are actively destructive to the polity.
Well, actually, not THAT smart. Schiff could very well be getting away with this farce if Trump hadn't immediately released the transcript. The fact that Schiff didn't and couldn't change or abandon any of his strategy in light of that game changing event doesn't speak well as to his intelligence either. He basically proceeded exactly as if that had simply never happened, and his fake version of the call that he created and smeared Trump with was still the "official" version.
It's like once the Dem script was written, absolutely nothing could change it, with no ability to counter any of Trump's countermoves. Hence all the winning by Trump.
The guy is Chet the Turd with glasses and a tie. I'm amazed his little legs could carry him that fast. What a pair... They deserve one another.
" Schiff has done a really good job. Jeffries too."
True. Trump could not have asked for a better job!
where's the beef
https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2020/01/30/hans-von-spakovsky-john-roberts-doesnt-have-the-authority-to-shield-whistleblower/
Schiff wanted to be the fat lady.
in other news
https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2020/01/28/drag-queen-story-hour-moves-to-public-schools-to-teach-first-graders-about-gender-fluidity-and-family-structures/
Yancey:
I don't think he's under any delusion that no one sees through it. He knows millions of people do (let's call them Group A) He also knows the media will keep other millions of people (Group B) from ever hearing or even acknowledging the existence of Group A. Group B is endlessly told that Schiff is awesome and anyone in Group A is a liar or otherwise deplorable.
Schiff is only looking to maximize Group B (the idiots who he is fooling). He only cares about the existence of Group A to the extent they can influence Group B. I don't think he denies their existence though (at least to himself)
DJT just signed an Executive Order freeing the slaves. And he promised to find and release all of the survivors. Abraham Lincoln has a President like him. And both Presidents were under a continuous attack from the Democrat Party.
That's your boys! Bet you're proud. Ha.
We haven't heard the last of Shifty Schiff.
If witnesses, er, I mean NEW, LATE, ADDITIONAL WITNESSES THAT THE HOUSE NEVER SUBPOENAED, are voted down, and the inevitable acquittal vote is passed, then:
1. The Dems whine and cry "cover-up"
2. Biden is quietly sunk as a candidate.
3. Bernie wins Iowa, then NH.
4. Dems try to stop Bernie, but fail this time. Bernie is nominated.
5. Trump thumps Bernie in Nov 2020 election.
6. But Dems retain House and win slight majority in Senate; and
Shifty Schiff gets to try impeachment again in 2021! But this time, with a Dem Senate majority.
The fun never ends.
Is this fucking show trial about over?
ST: "Is this fucking show trial about over?"
Not until this evening.
traditionalguy: "Abraham Lincoln has a President like him. And both Presidents were under a continuous attack from the Democrat Party."
There are reports of an intruder at Mar-a-Lago with shots fired.
Now would be a good time to call in a Health and Welfare Check on LLR-lefty Chuck.
Bob Boyd for the win!
In Nadler's defense, he is very very very frightened of a primary challenge from an Ocasio-Cortez Contingent Commie. THAT is Nadler's primary concern right now and explains why he wanted the last word.
Drudge now has NEW Bolton details "Shaking the Impeachment". Links to Halberstam at the NYT. The media will fight until the last dog dies.
Ace featured a great homage to Leroy Nadler this morning.
What Schiff really wanted to say: "Jerry, just remember. It's not a lie... if you believe it..."
"Schiff is an incandescently stupid man."
I don't agree, but I do think he is focused on ambitions at the expense of principles. Much like Kamala Harris. Schiff though has stuck it out in the Lower House for a lot of years. My guess is he's never seen a pathway to bigger things until now.
He was my US Rep until 2012. I don't know that I was embarrassed. I've just accepted that after 1982, I will always have a Dem rep.
I don't know if Schiff can win a Senate race in California. It would be fun to watch him beat down by a "minority" candidate whose only qualification is being a minority.
Schiff and Nads were so good, they convinced exactly zero members of the opposing party with their winning arguments. I don't believe that's ever been achieved before in an impeachment trial. Truly historic!
you mean Haberman, Halberstam is 'mostly dead' its disappointing to see Bolton become just another Richard Clarke, is victor pinchuk's (leonid Kuchma's son in law) assistance so valuable,
yes Schiff is not woke enough because an old white man, in a district that is increasingly more latino and African America, kevin de leon, came close to beating kamala harris,
*knock knock knock* "JERRY?"
*knock knock knock* "JERRY?"
*knock knock knock* "JERRY?"
Tech News
Clion Activation Code
Did somebody tell Jerry there was a bucket of fried chicken tucked away in the podium?
I saw quite a bit of discussion yesterday on whistleblowers and anonymity. And wondered why people were confused. Whistleblower laws are designed specifically to bring people forward, with a guarantee of no retaliation. IOW - to bring accusations and accusers out into the open. If you send an anonymous tip that had specifics, for example - "The invoices for this date are fake, parts were never received, and payment was made to a phantom suppler." action can be taken as it describes something real and specific that can be investigated. If an anonymous complaint is filed "On this date I saw this happen!", it's worthless. Can't be admitted into court. And if you ask the people accused about it, well, they can dismiss it as a baseless allegation hiding behind anonymity. Not admissible as evidence in court or any kind of disciplinary proceedings.
Constitution guarantees a right to face an accuser. period. (Campus sexual harassment kangaroo courts have ignored this for years, and are now paying for it....) Whistleblower laws are designed to bring out those accusers. Claiming that whistleblower laws allow witnesses to remain anonymous is, well, an outright lie. A supreme court justice should be well aware of the 6th amendment that states In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; .
The House ran a star chamber proceeding. Witnesses couldn't be confronted. Witnesses were kept anonymous. Testimony was kept secret.
“ Schiff is an incandescently stupid man. I would be embarrassed to have him representing me in Congress.”
I very much disagree with the first, but agree with the second. He managed to gin up a two article impeachment, bought into by over half of the House and close enough to half of the Senate to makes things interesting, even suckering several Republican Senators, including another HLS grad (Romney). He had all of the Democrats, most of the MSM, and even some Republicans believing that he had discovered (instead of fabricating) horrible misuse of power, instead of the same sort of Presidential actions that have been routinely engaged in over the previous 220 years and 44 predecessors. He invented two colorably impeachable offenses out of thin air. At the bottom, he had nothing even questionable by Trump, but managed to make believers out of so many that he finally had caught Trump. That takes genius, not stupidity.
For some time now, I have questioned whether his failure to get delegation of subpoena power from the House as a whole until the end of October was inadvertence or advertence. Initially, I figured that he and his HPSCI were just sloppy. But that gave him his second article of impeachment. If he had actually done it the right way, getting subpoena power, issuing them, then having the President blocking him in court, and they would still probably be in court, with a significant chance of losing, but if he won instead, he probably wouldn’t have gotten his impeachment to the Senate for trial until maybe this summer. Not good timing for the Democrats. Moreover, he probably would have had only a single article of impeachment since Trump’s position in regards to the second article would have been confirmed by the courts. This way Trump never had a chance to assert Executive Privilege, and the courts never had a chance to intervene and affirm his claim of privilege. Both wins by Schifty and the Dems. Which is to say that I am leaning right now to advertence over inadvertence.
(One of my favorite Sci-fi author teams frequently uses “advertence” as the opposite of “inadvertence”, and I like that wording).
You are correct, Narciso. Ooops.
In the Senate, at the bench, there is a nice bald black man in a bow time, reciting a nice prayer, next to CJ John Roberts -- adding solemnity to the Farce!
I like it.
(ps they just did the Pledge of Allegiance).
At first I thought Nadler had taken a knee during the Pledge of Allegiance but then I realized that he had simply capsized to one side.
The Republicans will acquit Trump, none of us are surprised. However the truth is continuing to come out. Today it was revealed that Cippolone was in on the Scheme from day one, yet he stood up there in the Senate as defense attorney for Trump. More shoes will drop and then election is coming.
And, it begins. Schiff starts with a "new" NYT article, sourced by an anonymous leak, discussing the Bolton Manuscript (that nobody has seen), that allegedly says Trump told Bolton to withhold Ukraine aid, that was delayed for 58 days.
Big.Fucking.Deal
The same howling yahoos who made fools of themselves with Collusion, Kavanaugh and now Impeachment will drum up at least one more sham "prosecution" before the next Election. The hatred and ignorance that drive them demand nothing less.
Fernandistein said...
Nadler ripped
That's difficult to imagine, but once you do it's difficult to disremember.
1/31/20, 9:43 AM
Swalwell ripped and we all still remember.
NYT reveals that the White House council attorney himself was in on the Trump dastardly plan in Ukraine, Schiff opens. A lucky leak timing for the Dems.
It's like a vote recount. Once you know what you need, you produce just that many, only with leaks.
"If I can produce one question, at the offset." Rep. Val Demmings (D-Fla)
Admiral Inga: The Republicans will acquit Trump, none of us are surprised. However the truth is continuing to come out. Today it was revealed that Cippolone was in on the Scheme from day one, yet he stood up there in the Senate as defense attorney for Trump. More shoes will drop and then election is coming."
"..the truth.."
LOL
Reality (see BAG above): NYT article, anonymous leak, manuscript that nobody has seen, allegedly says Trump told Bolton to withhold Ukraine aid!!
LOLOL
Sounds SOLID!!
Btw Inga still thinks Carter Page is a russian spy and Kavanaugh is a gang rapist.
That's Inga's "truth"!
These are very comical arguments. I don't know if anybody notices. I think it's from inferring the audience of monkeys that's targeted.
Why aren't the dems running with the "Trump ordered the assassination of Yovanovich lie they pushed last week?
Thats a much sexier lie than the other lies.
Either that or these are the stupidest people on the planet.
If you have any doubt about the evident, the evident is at your fingertips.
I think she's inferring a singular from evidents.
Personally I think tomorrows hoax leaked lie is going to be much better than today's hoax leaked lie.
But thats just me. I'm a "glass half full" optimist!
Dokaments are involved.
“I saw quite a bit of discussion yesterday on whistleblowers and anonymity. And wondered why people were confused. Whistleblower laws are designed specifically to bring people forward, with a guarantee of no retaliation. IOW - to bring accusations and accusers out into the open. If you send an anonymous tip that had specifics, for example - "The invoices for this date are fake, parts were never received, and payment was made to a phantom suppler." action can be taken as it describes something real and specific that can be investigated. If an anonymous complaint is filed "On this date I saw this happen!", it's worthless. Can't be admitted into court. And if you ask the people accused about it, well, they can dismiss it as a baseless allegation hiding behind anonymity. Not admissible as evidence in court or any kind of disciplinary proceedings.”
I am pretty sure that that issue was deliberately confused by Schifty and his Lawfare subordinates and hench people (I used a non sexist term there because one of the Lawfare group working for him was very likely disgraced former DOJ NSD AAG Mary McCord, (now IC IG) Michael Atkinson’s boss during the time that she was overseeing the filing of the four bogus (and at least two illegal) FISA warrants on Dr Carter Page).
Of course Schifty had to hide the “wistleblower’s” identity - disclosing it would have exposed that the entire whistleblower incident had been fabricated by Schifty, McCord, etc, and the “whistleblower” was actually a Brennan protégée, Deep State early Resistance operative, with close ties to former VP Biden. Exposing that the entire whistleblower episode had been contrived and fabricated by Schifty and his staff. The amazing thing is that he was able to suck so many bright people into his legal fable, including, apparently, probably the Republican nominated Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, as well as the Republicans’ Harvard LS and MBA educated previous Presidential candidate.
98% of the nation is currently fixated on fun weekend activities, the massively successful Trump record and the Super Bowl.
So very very many Sad Trombones for Inga and Chuck.
It's an inquisition.
Chuck said...
Someday, it will be Speaker Schiff or Senator Schiff. And, “the late Congressman Jerald Nader.” Schiff has done a really good job. Jeffries too.
...someday it will be "What ever happened to that leftist tool Chuck? He hasn't been heard from since Trump's resounding 2020 re-election triumph?"
Next up for dems/LLR's: Does Trump float?
The lady yields. Sorry to see her go. Better than Rush.
“And, it begins. Schiff starts with a "new" NYT article, sourced by an anonymous leak, discussing the Bolton Manuscript (that nobody has seen), that allegedly says Trump told Bolton to withhold Ukraine aid, that was delayed for 58 days.”
Let me rephrase that: “sourced by an ILLEGAL anonymous leak, LIKELY INVOLVING A BROTHER OF NATIVE UKRANIAN LT COL VINDMAN”.
The next lady wants documents that Trump is hiding.
Dagwood: "...someday it will be "What ever happened to that leftist tool Chuck? He hasn't been heard from since Trump's resounding 2020 re-election triumph?"'
Interesting prediction and it does beg the question: what will the lefty billionaire funders of blog LLR's and FakeCon publications do once re-election has happened?
I think that they are here to stay especially if the dems retain control of the House (likely given vote harvesting and corruption in dem precincts where fake LLR's pretend to be Election monitors).
The theme seems to be documents and Trump hiding them.
Schiff and Nads were so good, they convinced exactly zero members of the opposing party
They did better than Pelosi. Pelosi convinced zero Republicans and one Democrat defected to the Repubs and a Dem presidental candidate refused to vote for impeachment.
What a shit show.
I have many hidden documents myself but it's more not being able to find than hiding. I have a beautiful memo on stationary random processes and statistics I wrote in the 70s that I'd love to locate. My favorite formulas in one place. Hidden.
Drago, yesterday Ace posted the perfect video summing up how LLRs like Chuck, Romney, and Bill Kristol have battled leftists over the past few decades:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8XeDvKqI4E
“Btw Inga still thinks Carter Page is a russian spy and Kavanaugh is a gang rapist.”
What may be interesting is that Dr Page has (re)sued both the DNC, the law firm that they had hired as a cutout between them and Fusion GPS as well as Fusion GPS itself, for defamation. They are claiming actual malice, despite his being a public figure didn’t happen until a year or so after the defamations occurred (and their defamations were instrumental in making him a public figure). They are plausibly claiming economic losses on the part of Page as a result. The major goal of the law suit appears to be discovery. Should be interesting. Their original suit, filed in OK, was rejected based on venue. The new case was filed in IL, with their claim of venue there being more plausible.
"Keystone Kops, or Three Stooges?"
Neither. Abbot and Costello.
Lucid-Ideas said... ]
The night was done
It was time to groove
And Dems were under the gun
You can ask them fondly
And they'll all remember
When 'The Penguin' made his move...
You are pretty darn good at that stuff. Iman also
Impeachment haiku
Schiff got a good whiff
Nadler's wake an oily breeze
When you snooze you lose
More shoes will drop and then election is coming.
Yes. And it will be great fun to shove the results down your throat.
Nads and Stiffy.
it's Kramer's the human fund,
Inga’s boyfriend, Schiff, was dissed by Wadler
So are they Laurel and Hardy, Abbott and Costello, or Martin and Lewis? Or is Adam Schiff Jerry Seinfeld and Jerry Nadler George Costanza?
How dare you besmirch the names of these comedic geniuses by comparing them at all to these 2 stiffs?
The Human Fund was George's fake charity. Kramer created the corporation Kramerica Industries.
"Keystone Kops, or Three Stooges?"
Neither. Abbot and Costello.
I think Laurel and Hardy is a more apt comparison, as it is another fine mess.
Inspector Clouseau and Cato
captain dreyfus, who went mad in the second to last film,
So... predictions for next week's new Bombshell walls-closing-in the-end-is-near-for-Trump story?
I'm thinking they'll go after one of his kids this time -- payback for dragging Hunter Biden's name through the mud. Maybe a rape allegation against Trump, Jr. or maybe Ivanka's getting money from a foreign country?
Trump is the only President that would send a tweet like this.
Just rubbing salt in a wound.
Agree with Bruce Hayden, this impeachment farce/production was carefully planned by lawfare and allies, as a way to hurt Trump.
As usual with attacks against Trump, just like with Coyote and the Road Runner, the attacks backfired. The Democrats and allies, are still not used to an opponent that attacks back. This tweet is just another example of Trump counter attacking, and to judge from the responses above, it was VERY effective. It made it so the MSM was forced to cover the incident.
Inga’s boyfriend, Schiff, was dissed by Wadler
We haven't heard much from Inga today.
I heard that she is down in Florida on vacation and rented a black SUV to drive around ...
... somewhere in the vicinity of Mar-a-Lago.
What could go wrong?
Inga is dumb and nuts, a dangerous combination. I envision her as the Madame LaFarge of the resistance
That Nadler can waddle with the best of ‘em when he has to. I don’t fault him, Schiff thinks he has a golden tongue.
I would expect the only thing that would make him move faster would be lining up for a buffet
I listened to Schiff at today's discussion re calling witnesses. I do believe that the man has a couple of screws loose. Seems to lie with effortless ease.
Don't you sometimes get the feeling that the whole impeachment charade was instigated by Trump to provide him with endless comedy material for his campaign speeches?
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा