"Several of the faculty members use the blogs as a teaching tool, and students often contribute substantive analytical posts. Students learn from the feedback they get not just from their classmates and professor, but from outside readers as well. While the arguments in blogs may start out less formed than those in a journal article or op-ed, the ensuing discussion can help sharpen salient points, advance conversation and open up alternative points of view."
From "Harvard Law Faculty Use Blogs To Expand Their Influence: 'The Audience And Impact Per Word Are Large Compared To Traditional Academic Work'" — in the Harvard Law Bulletin (Winter 2019). It's funny reading that now, because it sounds like all the talk about blogs we heard 15 years ago. I hope blogs are coming back! And I say that as a lawprof (emerita) whose blog has always been freewheeling.
याची सदस्यत्व घ्या:
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा (Atom)
३३ टिप्पण्या:
Freewheelin blogs can be very arousing to one's thoughts.
The Freewheelin Ann Althouse
(Blood on the Comments Section is a better album...)
The Freewheelin' Ann Althouse.
It's a fine line between freewheeling and the wheels coming off.
Yeah, those Free-wheelin' Harvard Law Profs - who knows what those crazy guys will say!
Why some of 'em might say they hate Trump, while others might just dislike Trump.
They're crazy! And Freewheelin' all over the intellectual map!
I'd like a list of the blogs the Harvard law professors promote.
Should the World Court repossess the US for war crimes or just jail all all non-Left politicians for war crimes?
People always think that blogs inevitably head to hell in a handbasket. Many do. Especially most freewheeling ones. Not AlthouseBlog though. It just shuffles to purgatory in a attache case.
I prefer blogs to Twitter.
The three blogs I read religiously are Althouse, Instapundit, and Powerline. All are written by lawyers (and two by law professors). None are by Harvard law professors.
I went on law prof blog hiatus after the Kavanaugh hearings, when it became clear that too many law professors had lost sight of the fundamental purpose of many of the attributes of Anglo-Saxon law in favor of rationalizing their vigilante preferences. One fellow over at the Volokh Conspiracy made a complete fool of himself.
Physician, heal thyself.
They won't get the right answer except from retired people. They can't be fired. Everybody else can be.
"They won't get the right answer except from retired people."
Assumes facts not in evidence. Left-wingers will give you the wrong answer no matter who's paying them. And our Left-wing Billionaires are more PC than anyone.
Let's hope the the new Freewheelin Blog title doesn't mean Meade has to practice a duet as your Tenor voiced Joan Baez?
It's a Phineas, Fat Freddy and Freewheelin' blog.
a fabulous furry freak brothers reference! well played sir.
Blogs are fine and all for casual thinking and all round wrongness.
As an adjunct to a scholarly endeavor it promotes sloppy writing and opinion based thinking - groupthink - based on the current social climate.
Don't forget our lawprof is one who produced the likes of Michael Cohen. Client lawyer privilege saw it's death yesterday. The law profession is becoming cesspool.
Have to agree with Ann, she does let freewheeling at her website up to a point.
Have to agree with Ann, she does let freewheeling at her website up to a point.
She freewheels on her electric bike up to Picnic Point.
The advantage to having that lot posting in public, is that the public can get an accurate picture of the sort of people they are, and the sort of things they are up to.
Assuming of course that what they write is penetrable to non-law professors.
Can't say I have much interest in what is said or done at Harvard lately since some of their undergrads have decided the Sixth Amendment is as fungible as the First and the Second.
Don't forget our lawprof is one who produced the likes of Michael Cohen. Client-lawyer privilege saw it's death yesterday.
Ethical lawyers are born, not made.
In theory, it sounds like a great thing - a forum to argue and debate freely. However, in practice, comment sections often get nasty and I wonder how long before the law professors find themselves on the wrong side of a social justice warrior type at their academy?
I taught several online courses for Southern New Hampshire University's MBA program 10-12 years ago.
We used an online system called Blackboard that included a blog module. Each student was required to make 2 substantive posts per week to the blog.
It was a very useful teaching tool.
In a Strategic Management course, each student as a term project had to pick a company and do a strategic evaluation of it. This was structured and each week they had to post a portion of the evaluation in the blog. For example, competitive threats one week. Future opportunities another week and so on.
At the end of the term they had to submit the analysis as if they were acting as a consultant to the company. The idea was that the report was to be done by stitching together the various blog posts.
It was one of the more interesting classes I taught.
I wanted to do something like that in my Packaging Technology course where the term project was to design a packaging line. Unfortunately this school did not use blackboard. Students would turn in a paper assignment each week.
I think blogging can be a very powerful teaching tool.
John Henry
In the blogging, each student had their own blog so they did not get mixed together. However each student could read every other student's posts and could comment on them. Sort of like here.
John Henry
Who are they kidding? It’s a hoity outlet for their Trump derangement.
I wonder how long before the law professors find themselves on the wrong side of a social justice warrior type at their academy?
22.075 milliseconds.
It’s a hoity outlet for their Trump derangement.
Formerly hoity. Harvard's been recruiting from the left side of the curve recently. It won't be long before the Crimson beats the Crimson Tide.
It's a Phineas, Fat Freddy and Freewheelin' blog.
It's a Phineas and Ferb blog, and it's *so* going to get busted.
I hope blogs are coming back!
Blog posts and comments can be a forum to think out loud, to form and solidify thoughts and principles, to make a positive contribution to the marketplace of ideas.
Or a few shit-throwing people can ruin it. Particularly when they hijack things and go on and on and on and on and on.
This will mean fewer Harvard educated lawyers nominated as federal judges in 15-20 years.
I see little downside.
A free-wheeling blog populated by free-range commenters.
Free-wheeling, stuffy Harvard bloggers!
I love it. I hear Larry Tribe is a laugh riot.
Blogs, government, any institution, is only as good as the people they occupy. The Founders made the point that the Constitution, this system of government only works if the preponderance of people are moral and good.
Look around. Everything seems broken. 'We the People' broke it.
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा