१८ मे, २०१४
"The House Ducks on Defense."
Headline on an editorial at the NYT that I don't think is about vicious mallards patrolling the periphery of the suburban homestead, but that's what I pictured....
याची सदस्यत्व घ्या:
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा (Atom)
पोस्ट्स
१४ टिप्पण्या:
The Donald on the Left, the deceased Arafat on the right?
Peace in our time. Another Obama surrender dividend. No enemies left to surrender to means no wars.
This has nothing to do with Ducks. It is all about Wart Hogs which is the best system in existence for killing enemies on the ground...like in those flat desert places called the middle east.
You missed a duck. One that is a bit more current than Daffy. Stefan Pastis's Guard Duck in the strip "Pearls Before Swine".
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3273/116/1600/PearlsGuardDuckShootDickens.jpg
When did it become the Hagel administration?
Conspicuous by his omission, NYT editorial reads like Obama is the only one ducking ownership of his policy.
Chuck Hagel's nomination was a clear signal to the world that President Obama intends to dismantle the United States military to the extent that he can get it done in the time he has left in office.
Is your confusion in any way related to pronoun trouble?
Plus, once you start talking about "house ducks", then the "field ducks" start crowing about how much better they are ...
Hoist by their own canard.
Oh, just more Times BS. Sorry I clicked the link.
I may start that Mandarin class I quit ten years ago. I think I still have the tapes and books. It may come in handy before too long.
Heavens to Murgatroid!
Because the only budget cuts possible are from the defense budget.
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
Nothing. Else. Can. Be. Cut.
Da Won has SPOKEN!
As Daffy would say, "J.W. will hear about this".
And Kevin, Daffy Duck is never current.
He's TIMELESS.
Donald goes Full Metal Disney. Probably NSFW unless muted. But then you can't hear it. And you REALLY need to hear it. -CP
The obvious example.
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा