"His rethinking of legal doctrine extends to more obscure areas such as the Constitution's commerce clause .... "
The Commerce Clause is obscure?
UPDATED to correct the title: I had L.A. Times, but it was the Washington Post. Sorry. Yes, yes, I know: how can I criticize them when I'm getting something wrong? But, really, what is less obscure in the Constitution than the Commerce Clause? One gets the sense that people think nothing in the original Constitution is supposed to matter, that all the good stuff is in the amendments.
कोणत्याही टिप्पण्या नाहीत:
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा