Back in the 1970s, before I went to law school, I worked in a job that required me to read a lot of magazines, and I read all the mainstream women's magazines every month, so I know what Glamour was back then: The hippie era is over. The no-makeup look requires makeup. Here's how to transform your office outfit into a nighttime getup that will wow onlookers. Oh, to have had a blog! But back then, you just made jokes with co-workers. I considered Glamour horrendously outdated, but who knew it would take 50 more years to die? And it's not even completely dead yet. It's still squeezing dollars out of Amazon Affiliates links, like a one-person self-publishing writing operation in a remote outpost in the Midwest.
2 जून 2026
"Condé Nast started the magazine as Glamour of Hollywood in 1939... but shortened its name when World War II reshaped the lives and ambitions of American women."
"It instead focused on 'the girl with a job,' which would guide coverage for decades. Its glossy pages contained fashion, beauty and sex tips but also coverage of abortion, sexual violence and women’s growing financial independence.... The magazine’s Women of the Year awards, introduced in 1990, became a cultural touchstone.... Those it recognized included Anita Hill... 'I don’t know very many magazines, neither Time nor Newsweek, that gave me that much interest,' Ms. Hill, now a professor at Brandeis University, said in an interview, adding that it had given her hope. It took a place like Glamour, she said, 'to understand what the moment could mean to women.' But like its peers, the magazine got pinched by the digital age...."

32 टिप्पणियां:
Things that deserve to die never seem to anymore…
…lefties used to lament ‘creative destruction’. Worst thing except for all the others it is…
Good to know a mediocrity like Anita Hill is still working, and still a lesbian. Wonder if she ever learned to tell the truth.
Glamour helped multiple generations of women feel good about being harem girls.
Crazy that a national magazine would put the world "Ch------m-s" on its cover. But then that was 1943.
Here's an intersting tidbit about the Editor of Glamour during WW II -
In 1939, Penrose came to the United States and was unable to return to England due to the outbreak of the Second World War. In 1941 she became managing editor of Glamour magazine until 1954.
"Anita F. Hill teaches courses on gender, race, social policy and legal history."
She has a large number of honorary degrees from places like Emerson, Mount Holyoke and Smith.
This stuff never dies because the clever/predatory adults in the industry figured out the hot buttons for young, ignorant, and inexperienced consumers. Sell, repackage, and sell the same stuff again. Compare to the generations of Boy Bands that followed The Beatles, The Monkees...Boyz 2 Men...New Kids on the Block...
You can fool almost all of the young all the time.
Don't get me started on the economics of the subscription services (e.g., Sell weak acne medication...err "Proactiv"... instead of stronger stuff). Keep the teens buying and buying but too shy to call and cancel.
I always get Glamour mixed up with Cosmopolitan. No doubt because i just saw there covers at the Grocery store. I think Cosmo had "Helen Gurley Brown".
Like teen vogue encouraging communism and prostitution in that order
The publicstion that kept melania off the covers
It's still squeezing dollars out of Amazon Affiliates links, like a one-person self-publishing writer in a remote outpost in the Midwest.
At least one is worth the bytes
Articles with shopping links sounds like something AI could do better. It could be a one-person operation with all the hottest new instagram and tiktok fashion fads.
“As part of the change, Condé cut much of the publication’s already skeletal editorial staff ...” -- this gratuitous body-shaming from the Times came as a surprise.
When I moved to Santa Cruz in 1992, every babyshit yellow Volvo had a "I Believe You, Anita" bumper sticker.
I'm surprised the magazine hasn't changed its name to Slay to rope in more of the Gen z crowd. Hip new socks to wear with those Birkenstocks. How to bedazzle your Crocs that hits every facet of your personality. Septum rings that say I'm still a virgin. How to dress like a lesbian but still look like you love dick. Inclusive tattoos that show my uniqueness.
The devil can no longer afford Prada.
"It's still squeezing dollars out of Amazon Affiliates links, like a one-person self-publishing writer in a remote outpost in the Midwest."
So I'm guessing Meade scouts the shopping tips? I mean, a skeleton crew has to contain at least two people, doesn't it?
…yah maybe, but are they profitable or is it a sugar daddy?
"this gratuitous body-shaming from the Times came as a surprise"
LOL
Anita Hill the feminist champion.
Now a law professor and despite not having a single worthy accomplishment in her life she is a mentor to young students who want to get a worthless degree so they can find a worthless woman job in a cubicle somewhere hectoring productive people.
Anita Hill gets paid 10 times as much as an hvac repairman and provides negative value to society.
This is what feminism means when it talks about the wage gap.
When I first started reading blogs in the late 1990, it became clear that women's magazines were a leading platform for spreading leftwing ideology beyond modern feminism (and for endless blogger material.)
Like feminists in academia, the power of the magazine feminists was waaaaay beyond their popular appeal. The slow demise of these outlets is good for women and men, and the children that used to be the focus of unions that are no longer realized.
Althouse, I think a comment of mine about Hill got blocked?
Bich!
You forget to link to your tip jar and ask people to support your work by begging after that last line...
You slipping, old Annie. Nttawwt
Still the fairest gal of the ball... no really. 👍
Two things to realize about Anita Hill:
1: As my dad commented at the time: we'll know within 5 - 10 years if she was lying. Because the guy she claimed Thomas was wouldn't stop harassing women once he got on the Court. So there will be other cases coming forward.
As there have been none, we know she lied
2: The counter-story was that Hill was an incompetent who made up stories of sexual harassment for "why she left the job", rather than admit she was fired for incompetence.
She's a black female law professor and feminist hero. What did she do with that?
Nothing
Why?
Because she was too incompetent to do anything with all the backing she had available to her
She lied, Thomas was innocent
"Wonder if she ever learned to tell the truth."
Why would she do that? Look where not telling the truth got her...
I remember well Glamour during its heyday. 75% of its covers featured either Cybill Shepherd or Cheryl Tiegs. Eventually I got bored and spent my alllowance on Vogue, which was a little more European and sophisticated.
If Glamour or Cosmopolitan or Guns and Ammo or the National Notary or Modern Transvestite named me their Person of the Year, you can bet I'd talk them up to the skies.
"It's still squeezing dollars out of Amazon Affiliates links, like a one-person self-publishing writing operation in a remote outpost in the Midwest."
NTTAWTT.
Wasn't Glamour the magazine that gote George Costanza in trouble with his mom?
Yup
https://youtu.be/HM-XyALCGXM?si=QXO-KCjrOpTHKZq4
John Henry
We know Hill was lying because Thomas was over 40 when the controversy began. And she, and i believe one other disgrunted woman, were the only ones who said Thomas "Harrassed" them. Every other woman in the office supported Thomas. Biden made sure that the "other women" got put in front of the committee at 9 o'clock at night, so no one would see them. This was before Cable news really took off. And the intertubes didn't exist for most people.
Hill, a lesbian, was so upset at being "harrassed" she took no contemporenous (sic) notes, talked to no one at EEO, and then voluntarily followed Thomas to another agency.
Like the other lying chick Democrat who tried to torpedo Kavanaugh, she was so upset about it, she said zero when Thomas was confirmed for the Court of Appeals, and tried to stay anonymous. "Hey, please destroy Thomas' shot at being a SCOTUS judge but please keep my name secret. I'm too senstive and dont want my name reveled. After all, Im just a girl".
एक टिप्पणी भेजें
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 4 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.