“It is incredibly upsetting to think that you have to go and subject yourself, to put this type of proof forward,” the lawyer said. “It is a process that she will have to subject herself to in a very public way. But she’s willing to do it. She is firmly resolved to do what it takes to set the record straight,” he told the BBC. The court in Delaware would hear expert testimony that will be “scientific in nature.” Photographs would show Mrs Macron pregnant and with her three children, he added.So... these are not nude pictures, just photographs in maternity clothing. Macron brought the lawsuit and is seeking damages, so she's responsible for her own predicament. I'm unsympathetic because she's a public figure. Object to the lies (and the truths) told against you and move on.
At the bottom of the page:
"Le Slapgate" — I hadn't seen that expression before. Didn't know the "-gate" suffix — the all-purpose designation of scandal — had reached Europe, and it's funny to see it with "Le" — the all-purpose designation that we've got something French... French and masculine.
संदेश
60 टिप्पणियां:
You don't need photographs...
A DNA swab would take care of this...
L'IA à la rescousse
"A DNA swab would take care of this..."
Careful. That kind of talk might get you shot in the neck.
Wait. The French are squeamish about nudity?
Reminds me of the “civility bullshit” tag.
Seriously, who would want to swab that?
DNA will prove the case. Trust the Science 😉
Howard said...
Seriously, who would want to swab that?
Better than naked pictures.
It's funnier if you punch her in the face and then rip the wig off.
Way, way too late. It's not even that "Brigitte" Macron is going to have very unconvincing maternity pictures, it's that there is almost no photographic evidence of her before she became famous- until there was. Then again, it speaks to how bad President Macron's problems are that his "wife" being outed as an obvious transgender is a lesser concern.
Just looking at a picture of that couple sets off alarm bells.
I just throwed up in my mouth
Ridiculous! She’s had three children before divorcing her first husband to marry Macron. Male members of nh. sapiens do not have a uterus.
"Male members of nh. sapiens do not have a uterus."
Careful. That kind of talk might get you shot in the neck.
A bit of pedantry regarding "scandal". In the Christian Testament, written in Greek, which was the overwhelmingly dominant language of that time and place, Jesus and some apostles cautioned repeatedly about not placing (or being) a "stumbling block" for other believers.
The Greek word used is ...scandalon.
Candice Owen's presentation of French journalist's apparent evidence, and odd lack of reasonable visual documentation for Mrs Macron's years prior to her 2nd marriage to Macron, is perplexing. Mrs. Macron current appearance does visually present as an elegantly dressed scrawny old drag queen. Most women have many photos of their children, with their (1st) husband; Mrs Macron doesn't. Many French people believe she's trans. Many French people know that Macrons socialize with odd group of trans/gay/pedo folks --- all documented in photos, news articles, et al. In fact, Mrs Macron is a pedophile herself (himself?), having initiated a sexual relationship with MAcron when he was 14. Yes, 14, not 16, now documented. To support her claims of slander, Mrs. Macron's DNA evidence should be submitted to court, along with chain-of-custody documentation, so as to ascertain actual genetic gender of Mrs. Macron. Don't be surprised if lawsuit is retracted.
Her large hair/head resembles a sunflower or a palm tree to me. Neither one is human, but I like both.
Why wouldn't the typical DNA report be sufficient?
40 year old photos of Mrs. Macron in maternity clothes aren't "scientific in nature". If she doesn't get a DNA test, then she's a man, baby.
just photographs in maternity clothing
I don't know anything about this case and I don't really care, but how does a picture of someone wearing women's clothing constitute any kind of proof of sex?
🫃
Here’s the photo that was supplied: 🫃
I wonder if any of the people that attacked Candace Owens in the first iteration of this story will apologize.
Maybe her(?) lawyers didn’t adequately explain to her(?) that she(?) has the burden of proving the alleged defamatory statements are false.
Owens has moved to have the lawsuit dismissed, which is exactly opposite what she told Tucker last year.
Wait, is she trying to say that giving birth makes one female? Cancel her!
Maybe her(?) lawyers didn’t adequately explain to her(?) that she(?) has the burden of proving the alleged defamatory statements are false.
That standard didn't seem to apply in the E. Jean Carroll suit.
But Candace Owens is very interesting //// LOL.
You can Trust Candace Owens.
She is now a Charlie Kirk conspiracy lunatic , too.
BTW - May Candace Owens pay the price for her ridiculous insanity. Comeuppance. Karma.
Viva la France and do it the old fashioned way.
The over/under on her being a dude is yes.
In the old days this would have led to a Playboy spread.
Peachy said...
She is now a Charlie Kirk conspiracy lunatic , too.
9/18/25, 9:08 AM
As is Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, and even Megyn Kelly. That group is going to get bigger as attempts to suppress them inevitably fail. The problem with ruling by blackmail and assassination is that at some point you become paranoid enough to turn even your supporters against you.
I know men are objects of scorn these days, but I hadn’t realized that being called one is now grounds for a defamation suit.
Yes, why photos? Why not a DNA test? We'd finally know for certain if she's a woman, or Dr. Zira.
I was gonna say, something about this smells fishy, but...
WT literal F- a quick DNA test would answer this question immediately and convincingly. I bet Pete Buttuvwxyz has private photos of him and/or his husband "pregnant" with their kid.
Candace did a stupid thing, but she seems to dialed past eleven in the last year or so,
I still love that the "cover story" is that she was just a pedo who married her student. That's the cover story. France isn't a real place.
That said, all Candance wanted was to see a picture of Brigette as a child. No maternity photos necessary. It's super weird that she can't just pull out an old family album and point to a photo of herself a young girl.
Candace demands something - and is owed nothing. Candace can go F herself. She's a zit.
Soul Corruption: Tucker, Candace & Steve
"I’m pretty much a free speech absolutist but if there’s one person I’d block from online it would be Candace Owens because she appeals to much the same folks the alleged assassin Tyler Robinson appears to have hung with—the paranoid, schizoid, sexually ambiguous violent wierdo crowd in chat rooms you never heard of. She’s actually dangerous."
she should wear a kaffiyeh with her broadcasts,
Roger Simon says “I’m pretty much a free speech absolutist but if there’s one person I’d block from online it would be Candace Owens“
Why do people say stuff like this? If you’d block Owens then you’re not a free speech absolutist.
How is Candace Owens dangerous? That’s lefty speak.
Candace who,? Graham Chapmans martinet should show up
like fat boi Conway hes not worth the candle,
If it were within my power I would make certain that any future comments regarding Brigitte would include the following statement “who is definitely not a man”
Foolish to claim Bridgette is a man. Go for claiming she’s a pederast, then she could fight the claim of being male into young boys.
What is interesting about Candace is that she is following the same arc as Tucker, Nick Fuentes and many other notable "right wing" influencers who step out of line with AIPAC.
There is a pattern in "right-wing media" that has played out several times now and they all end up turning against Israel.
And Charlie did not like Netanyahu at all. Charlie was starting to lose "donations" from people because he let people like Tucker speak on his platform.
"proving that she is a woman"
???
doesn't she CLAIM that she is a woman?
doesn't that MAKE her a woman?
I'm sure i DON'T understand.
what is she attempting to "prove"??
She can provide pictures of herself as a child with her family, but then the response is that maybe she's the boy (her brother) in the family pictures and not the girl, so she has to produce other evidence.
Of course, nowadays, photographic evidence isn't trustworthy. You can find pictures online of the 70 year old Brigitte pregnant. Obviously fake. Looking at some of the pictures, I begin to wonder if she's actually a muppet. I hope I don't get sued for that.
Here in SF, that is so meh.
"Show us your tits!" in French.
The lawsuit over her biological sex distracts from the ephebic, essentially pedophilic, nature of her early relationship with Macron. Or at least it fills the news with a suit which she is fairly sure to win, depending on French laws and French judicial procedures (always a wild card, back to the time of Rabelais). So she has that going for her, which is nice.
Wouldn't a simple DNA test be more revealing in terms of data, and less revealing, in terms of visual privacy?
What is interesting about Candace is that she is following the same arc as Tucker, Nick Fuentes and many other notable "right wing" influencers
Saying stupid slanderous shit that gets you sued?
There has to be a new way to talk about our politics differences then left and right. Both Republicans and Democrats have a vested interest in keeping those labels but they’re not really accurate anymore. Cenk Uygut was on the Tucker Carlson Show yesterday and he listed all the points of agreement between Kirk and himself. (Vehement disagreement on others.) There should be a better way to label the Trump political movement and its opposition.
Let me add, I made the above comment because Candace Owens has very little in common with the Trump movement. I wouldn’t classify her to the right of Trump either.
There has to be a new way to talk about our politics differences then left and right.
Two-party Manichaeism is an elite plot to make smart people stupid.
Eva Marie said...
There has to be a new way to talk about our politics differences then left and right. Both Republicans and Democrats have a vested interest in keeping those labels but they’re not really accurate anymore.
9/18/25, 3:25 PM
Cool. Is that why they killed Charlie Kirk?
I think we can all agree They did it.
Sorry doctrev, I don’t understand your comment.
they don't want a conversation, our words are violence, yadda yadda,
except for possums, like david french, who roll over on cue,
एक टिप्पणी भेजें
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.