२४ सप्टेंबर, २०२४

"First, starting in the early 1970s, he led the effort to import into American circles the critical perspectives of Western Marxism..."

"... a diverse set of ideas, popular in France and Germany, arranged around the notion that culture was closely related to a society’s economic base, though not completely constrained by it.... Then, in the mid-1980s, he [applied] that same arsenal of ideas to... a critique of postmodernism, which, beginning in the 1970s, had taken hold in academic departments to describe what many saw as the breakdown of grand narratives about history, culture and society. In response, Mr. Jameson argued that postmodernism was itself just one more grand narrative, albeit one that tried to disguise its own status.... Postmodernism, he said, was special in that it signified the commoditization of culture itself, replacing history and progressive visions with irony, cynicism and pastiche, or mixing and matching cultural artifacts and forms without respect to their historical contexts. It meant... that 'our entire contemporary social system has little by little begun to lose its capacity to retain its own past, has begun to live in a perpetual present and a perpetual change that obliterates tradition.'" 

११ टिप्पण्या:

rehajm म्हणाले...

I think about this movie scene a lot lately:

Basil Exposition: A lot's happened since you've been frozen. The Cold War's over!

Austin Powers: All right! Finally those capitalist pigs will pay for their crimes, eh? Eh comrades? Eh?

Basil Exposition: Austin... we won.

Austin Powers: Oh, smashing, groovy, yay capitalism

Dave Begley म्हणाले...

Was he friends with Kamala’s dad?

rhhardin म्हणाले...

There's postmodernism and there's academic postmodernism. The underlying discovery is that truth is not where you're looking for it. The difference is that the former (e.g. Derrida) analyses systems that he likes, and academic postmodernism analyses systems that it hates. The insights are different - interesting vs useless.

Mike (MJB Wolf) म्हणाले...

“Rigor.” LOL

Big Mike म्हणाले...

Fredric Jameson, Critic Who Linked Literature to Capitalism, Dies at 90

The phrase “good riddance” comes to mind.

JK Brown म्हणाले...

So the world is much improved by this death, like when Hitler or Stalin died.

Though we should not forget the impact the German professors who brought the world the later two and we might wonder if also this guy.

"For more than seventy years the German professors of political science, history, law, geography and philosophy eagerly imbued their disciples with a hysterical hatred of capitalism, and preached the war of “liberation” against the capitalistic West. The German “socialists of the chair,” much admired in all foreign countries, were the pacemakers of the two World Wars. At the turn of the century the immense majority of the Germans were already radical supporters of socialism and aggressive nationalism. They were then already firmly committed to the principles of Nazism. What was lacking and was added later was only a new term to signify their doctrine. "
--von Mises, Ludwig (1947). Planned Chaos

Lazarus म्हणाले...

Somebody pointed out that you can do anything with the concept of the "political unconscious" of a text. You can write about all the things going on in the world at the time a work was written that the author doesn't mention and then think that you've written a critique of the work, when you haven't actually said anything about it at all.

Anyway, he went to the same school my brother went to, though not at the same time. Dad was penny conscious, so I only went to pre-school there before moving over to public school. I might have had a very different life but for that: Quaker schools do tend to turn out radicals.

PM म्हणाले...

In a Western Marxism, everyone has six-shooter but only a few have bullets.

YoungHegelian म्हणाले...

It's funny to watch how when it comes to the intra-left battle of the orthodox Marxists vs the Post-Moderns that the Marxists come off looking very much like conservatives. This is not an illusion, since the Marxists consider themselves good sons and daughters of the Enlightenment, trying their best to "rationalize" society, while for the Post-Modernists the Enlightenment is the source of most of what they consider wrong with Western culture (e.g. they consider the boogieman of "binary thinking" to be a product of the Enlightenment).

FunkyPhD म्हणाले...

When I was in graduate school in the late 80s-early 90s, he was a living God. Mention his name in your seminar paper: automatic A.

Grant म्हणाले...
ही टिप्पणी लेखकाना हलविली आहे.