A picture is worth 1,000 words. pic.twitter.com/yJog6lsNyq— Amy Klobuchar (@amyklobuchar) November 2, 2019
It's unlikely Amy will be the Democratic nominee, but if she is, this post will be linked in my "How Amy lost me" retrospective. She's talking to me in a mindless cliché ("A picture is worth 1,000 words"), and she's sharing a cartoon that is not devoid of words and that has to label the caricatures "Founding Fathers" because the artist apparently thinks the picture is NOT even adequate to convey who the people being caricatured are, and she thinks a completely partisan vote straining to legitimatize the behind-closed-doors hearings is a cause for giddy, alcohol-soaked celebration.
I remember when Amy Klobuchar was sternly disapproving of beery revelry...
"I think that you’ve probably had beer," said Judge Kavanaugh...
Sen. Klobuchar: There’s never been a case where you drank so much that you didn’t remember what happened the night before?
— NBC News (@NBCNews) September 28, 2018
Judge Kavanaugh: “I don't know. Have you?”
…
Klobuchar: “I have no drinking problem, Judge.”
Kavanaugh: “Nor do I.” https://t.co/yUhhJQiHtI pic.twitter.com/5TEAJET9Sb
पोस्ट्स
१३३ टिप्पण्या:
I'll drink to that!
Someone called for a toast to big-breasted women?
".. and she's sharing a cartoon that is not devoid of words and that has to label the caricatures "Founding Fathers" because the artist apparently thinks the picture is NOT even adequate to convey who the people being caricatured are,"
Because many of her constituents are not familiar with the FF's.
If you don't know, then you're not one of the cool kids!!
A bunch of slave-owning cis-gendered straight old white men toasting Nancy. Good call, Amy. You were doing better when Al Franken was writing your material for you.
I have to say i fell a little in love with Amy that day. I thought Kavanaugh was more than a little condescending to her. If i have been within a few feet of him, it would have deserved a slap across the face for his impudence,and not in a good way.
What a jerk he is. I lost what ever respect I had for him after that exchange
Vicki from Pasadena
She’s toasting Nacy’s defense of the proposition that foreign policy is made in the cheap seats, not by POTUS.
"What a Jerk he is." Like sands through the hourglass, such are the days of our lives.
Imagine George Washington or Tom Jefferson toasting Nancy Pelosi for impeaching a President because he was talking to a foreign leader. LOL.
Observe good faith and justice toward all nations. Cultivate peace and harmony with all. Religion and morality enjoin this conduct. And can it be that good policy does not equally enjoin it? It will be worthy of a free, enlightened, and at no distant period a great nation to give to mankind the magnanimous and too novel example of a people always guided by an exalted justice and benevolence. Who can doubt that in the course of time and things the fruits of such a plan would richly repay any temporary advantages which might be lost by a steady adherence to it? ?
AND PUTIN SMILED.
Gee, Vicki. You've already been through contentious hearings, supplied more documents than all previous nominees combined, and suddenly the Dems pop up with some lunatic who claims she got screwed 30-plus years ago. Oh, and good old Amy knew at least three weeks ago about these claims but decided to be in on the plan to coldcock the nominee.
Might you be a bit cynical and weary? Might you, knowing good old Amy is the most vicious boss on Capitol Hill, get a bit testy when the hypocrite decides to look down her nose?
victoria said...
I have to say i fell a little in love with Amy that day. I thought Kavanaugh was more than a little condescending to her. If i have been within a few feet of him, it would have deserved a slap across the face for his impudence,and not in a good way.
What a jerk he is. I lost what ever respect I had for him after that exchange"
This is like Rashomon. You saw that and I saw a typical left wing Democrat bullshiting politician asking stupid and irrelevant questions trying to score points.
All the sh!t the Donald posts on Twitter but Amy lost you with this cartoon retweet? Typical of AA double standard of scrutiny of crazy (you just say funny) POTUS and others.
Maybe she means the comic strip, "Nancy."
https://www.gocomics.com/nancy/2019/10/27?ct=v&cti=1364806
victoria said...
I have to say i fell a little in love with Amy that day...
Hmm, Last time you commented, you asked for people here to "treat you rough", or something similar.
Beginning to think there is more to you than meets the eye.
could this be our dear Amy Klovenhoov?
defense contractor audits turned up a massive scam a short while ago.
If this comes to light, could it not bode well for someone?
Further tracking the shell company we found that it is owned by another shell company, which in turn is owned by a company which owns 5 luxury car dealerships, a big four professional American Sports Franchise, a VERY liberal movie studio, all of which have been noted as being unprofitable, and this single Navy Contractor.
The family that owns this company has a current Senator and a Current Presidential Candidate in it.
@Althouse, what do you expect from a woman who eats salad with her comb?
A man gets upset at being called a drunken rapist without proof.
Vicki from Pasadena thinks that's worthy of physical assault.
The USA is unique, exceptional if you will, for many things, but one stands out in my estimation. It is the only country in the history of the world which, in crafting the structure of its government, set the principle of limitation as the overriding concern. I would have stayed with the 1777 Articles of Confederation which really limited the created fedgov. The 1787 iteration would be adequate if the words as written were obeyed in the spirit of limitation; cf. the 10th Amendment.
Limiting fedgov, or any government, is the last thing in the world that Democrats want.
So the cartoon "To Nancy" is utterly baffling to me.
If a pig can paint a thousand words
Then why can't I paint you?
Unlike readering I think this is an excellent, and non-obvious, bit of thinking by Althouse. And I agree with her that it reflects a fundamental unseriousness about the constitution and her responsibilities on Klobuchar's part.
The Scarlett/ Rhett rule of heterosexual relationships still applies. Particularly to Klock/Kav.
1. Scarlett defames Rhett.
2. Rhett does not care, and says so.
3. ???.
4. Night of Passion.
Trump doesn’t drink. Angry Amy with the Daddy Issues.
I took beer once.
Thanks for reminding me where I first saw Amy’s face, getting to the bottom of The Judge’s frat boy youth issues.
I’m sure you would have handled that like a champ Vicki!
This is like Rashomon. You saw that and I saw a typical left wing Democrat bullshiting politician asking stupid and irrelevant questions trying to score points.
***********
No, it's not like Rashomon, which offered differing points of view, all grounded in the backgrounds and prejudices of the characters. Those viewpoints were never reconciled with "what really happened", only with one of the characters seemingly attempting to redeem his role in whatever went on.
In Kavanaugh's case, we KNOW that Vesey Ford lied. We KNOW that not a scintilla of evidence for her claims was ever produced or substantiated. We KNOW that the other claims of rape trains were lies offered by people equally as mentally unbalanced as Vesey Ford.
Yet Vicky still hates Kavanaugh. FOR WHAT?
"I think of a man, and I take away reason and accountability..."
https://youtu.be/gjdn2JYZhD8
readering, Trump is crude. You people are batshit nuts.
Althouse is starting to see the difference because she is not batshit nuts.
victoria and readering are very very upset that Justice Kavanaugh fought back against their lunatic gang rape lies.
victoria and readering will never ever forgive Kavanaugh for not being a gang rapist.
Thoughts and prayers for victoria and readering.
Historically valid: Slave owners often toasted Democrats, and wanted Republicans dead. Some things never change.
Speaking of a lota words, does anyone here know of any (at least somewhat) serious pol-pundit/jabberer/typer reviews of DJT’s books?
I’d especially like reviews that say DJT has written brilliantly. Like so many (unlike Althouse) have done re BHO.
Maybe someone in these threads. Doc?
BTW I need heavy quotes/excerpts. So I can judge the judge.
P.S. I’m fine with ignoring ghost writing. Evaluations of the end product.
Amy believes she is saying "See, we're the good guys who respect the intent of the Constitution here." There is no further depth to her statement.
After all, BHO had a terrorist write his book.
[Vicki in Pasadena:] What a jerk he is. I lost what ever respect I had for him after that exchange
I just finished reading Justice on Trial, which is about the Kavanaugh confirmation.
It proves, as if further proof is necessary, that progressives are vile people, for whom a baseless character assassination campaign is just another broken egg on the way to their omelette.
No matter how much damage it does, not just to him and his family, but to our entire civic culture. If D-senators had even an inkling of moral sense, they would have all voted for Kavanaugh. The outcome wouldn't have changed, and they would have made the point that such a morally cretinous horror show can't be allowed to stand.
Absolutely 100% of the available evidence (the Ford-named witnesses, and the version of the account previously recorded by Ford's therapist) agrees that Ford's account to Congress was false. People who believed the account anyway are idiots. And idiots in high office absolutely should be condescended to.
I don't know how anybody could be impressed with any of the Democrats during that Kavanaugh travesty. Cynically and very publicly charging a man with multiple rapes that everybody knows never happened, and yes, Vicky, you know it didn't happen, yet you persist with supporting that vicious lie.
I lost what ever respect I had for him after that exchange
You seem to think that was a perfectly innocent question.
It wasn't. It was a carefully-laid trap. It was even discussed by some in the media beforehand.
If he says he ever blacked out drinking, it "explains" why she said he accosted her even while no one can back up her story.
Kavanaugh: "Yes, I blacked out once, but it wasn't that day. It wasn't at that party. And I wasn't with those people."
Klobuchar: "How do you know, if you can't remember what happened?"
He was right to see the trap and call bullshit on the question.
The Dems had her letter, they had ample time to question him beforehand, and they waited until he was on TV to drop the unsubstantiated claims.
That was the day it was clear these people would stop at nothing to get what they wanted.
Truth wasn't going to factor into it.
Here's an excellent example of our moment. These Democratic contenders are AWFUL and will lose a reasonably fair election against Trump by any measure.
This is the reason, I do believe, that Obama came out the other day warning that Woke Justice Warriors were going too far, and why Harry Reid recently signaled that Trump was actually a genius and hard to beat.
they are trying to prepare their heifers! let their herds down gently. Trump shines greater against these midgets. . . except for Tulsi, but they won't let her play, aye?
Godspeed, America
ZERO Democrats 2020
No Olvidaremos
It’s always good when the dead weigh in on your side!
readering continues with the utter cluelessness:
"All the sh!t the Donald posts on Twitter but Amy lost you with this cartoon retweet? Typical of AA double standard of scrutiny of crazy (you just say funny) POTUS and others."
Did you not read Althouse's posts from this past week about who she voted for, and why she was revealing it? I mean, I understand you don't like Trump- we all get that- but try, just try to understand what people are writing and why they are writing, even if you don't necessarily agree with it.
"I'm trying to figure out what the 1,000 words would be. The Founders are toasting Nancy Pelosi... but...why?"
For not being a cowardly Republican and actually defending the rule of law.
A fork is worth a thousand combs.
Which law Pee Pee Tapes?
According to the anti-US Constitution democratics - it's illegal to say "Do us a favor"
Help us find out about corruption. I thought the left cared? Turns out, no. Democrats FREAK out - because the corrupt road leads to them. So we get this lie-filled fraud. The democrats use the US Constitution as toilet paper.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FECIYlo3KRY
victoria and readering are very very upset that Justice Kavanaugh fought back against their lunatic gang rape lies.
Oh yes. His crybaby tantrums were very forceful and credible. As compelling as a good groping. Everything you look for when you think "judicial temperament."
readering, Trump is crude.
Not only that, he's weird, too. Don't forget.
A good name for him would be "President Creepshow."
It’s always nice to hear from Vicki. Ignorance can be fixed. Stupid is forever.
Yes, the founding fathers would toast Pelosi for being a Democrat and not a Republican.....
What else have you heard from dead people Pee Pee Tapes?
Must have been their 19th serving of ale.
It's a banal cartoon, putting aside the absolute horror and disgust the FF would feel about the current state of the national government they created.
And I thought we were supposed to call them "Founders" now, so American women wouldn't feel diminished.
I lost what ever respect I had for him after that exchange
Hahahahahahahaha. Vicki is trying to tell us she eve respected a Republican. Try another joke, Vicki.
7:18 - Hey Skipper --Great comment.
The collective D-left are all treasonous lying snakes, money grubbing government whores and corrupt lying liars who lie. All of them.
Amy strikes me as a mean drunk.
Kavanaugh demonstrated incredible restraint in the face of diversity, exclusion, and allegations of liberal indulgence.
Actually a picture is worth 1024 words. mansplaining.
I don't know why Althouse (and many others) ever thought Klobuchar was a reasonable moderate. Is it just because she's from Minnesota?
I lived in MN for several years and never experienced Amy as anything other than a standard partisan Democrat. There's nothing exceptional about her.
This tweet doesn't surprise me at all.
I wonder if their slaves filled those beer steins.
Althouse did the big reveal?
I thought she was going to make folks by her upcoming buck if they wanted to read about that.
Amywho, how did she vote?
You can spare me her jabber about whatever lesson she was professing re the reveal. I can figure that already.
P.S. If I had to guess I’d say DJT. And, whatever she did, I’m sure that the faults of nasty libs motivated her mind.
Duh.
GOD, we are represented by the intellectually poorest class in our history.
State of the art editorial cartooning there
[PTPSPPC:] For not being a cowardly Republican and actually defending the rule of law.
Please fill us in. Exactly which rule of law it is that needs defending?
As opposed to, say, weaponizing the IRS, gun running, lying about Benghazi, lying about private servers, rampant rule by executive order, grotesque character assassinations, collusion hoaxes based upon fantasies ...
Some specifics would be nice.
“democracy — crazy though it is — is our beloved system here in the United States of America.”
We are not this. And Althouse has spent lotsa jabber re supporting US not being democratically governed.
It’s like that WSJ gal crying about how it’s not fair for Americans to favor a government that they vote for and is not corrupt. We gota let an undemocratic tyranny sell the country’s future so I can get more planes.
Logic is tricky.
Amy hadn’t lost you with her despicable behavior at the Kavanaugh hearings but this did? Different standards
The message is, "you'd have to be drunk to like Pelosi?"
Suspend Amy's Twitter account! This is outrageous!
If i have been within a few feet of him, it would have deserved a slap across the face for his impudence,and not in a good way.
Why are you so violent?
Should have had the Founding Fathers butt-chugging!
Oh, good grief. It's Mike Luckovich, the 'Atlanta Journal-Constitution's' resident, draws-with-his-feet editorial cartoonist since before GWB's administration. Quit trying to make any sense out of it. It's not there.
The true dynamic of the last election was that group of voters who disapproved of both candidates but picked the one who offended them less. In the key states these folks broke more for Trump than for Clinton. So have the Dems spent the last 3 years trying to win back the anti- Clinton Trump voter? No they have spent 3 years insulting them and calling them names. And better yet they seem determined to chase people link Althouse into the Trump camp. I can't think of a single campaign strategy stupider than that.
Don't excess alcohol results in drooping masculine and rape performance?
tcrosse said...
A bunch of slave-owning cis-gendered straight old white men
______
Any evidence Uncle Ben Franklin own slaves?
Educate me.
Howard (not that Howard) said...
GOD, we are represented by the intellectually poorest class in our history
**********
Yes! The Greeks had a word for it: kakistocracy. The rule of the worst , derived from kaka, the rule of shit.
I took the cartoon as the founder making a sarcastic rebuke of Nancy Pelosi. "Here's to you, Nancy, for proving we were right about creating a republic and not a direct democracy." As Alan Dershowitz writes, "... no matter how extensive the investigation is and regardless of what it uncovers, nearly all House Democrats will vote for impeachment and nearly all House Republicans will vote against it. ... It was because of this fear of partisanship in the House that the framers left the ultimate decision to remove an official to the Senate. The framers intended the Senate, which was not popularly elected at the time the Constitution was written, to be less partisan and act more like judges." https://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2019/11/partisan-impeachment-vote-exactly-framers-feared/
Klobuchar: “I have no drinking problem, Judge.”
Kavanaugh: “Nor do I.”
Extraordinary restraint.
Michael K: "Vicki is trying to tell us she eve respected a Republican. Try another joke, Vicki."
The only way any republican can get respect from a lefty dem like victoria would be to becone an ISIS leader who throws gays off buildings and burns people alive in cages.
The lefties/dems spare no effort demanding respect for those guys.
The Founders are toasting Nancy because, per the design of their Constitution, the Speaker of the House has chosen to shit rather than get off the pot, therefore making Democrats politically accountable for their impeachment actions.
"How Amy lost me"
OMG. Here we go again. One could consider likely policies, the likely team, the likely appointments, the likely "finance." But no: "how Amy lost me." To go with pragmatic Barry, I-hated-Hillary-but, and so on and so forth. And this from a woman who is far more rational about far more things than her sisters. Scary, no?
With fans of my comments like these I shall never lose interest in keeping their hearts racing....
The big reveal on Althouse's vote was 10:16 AM Oct. 29. Worth a read.
I am leaving the Copley Westin. Just fucked a Saudi Arabian business man. He had the entire dress on so hot.
I lifted up his pajamas and unveiled a beautiful hairless brown Saudi ass horny foe white American cock. So fucking hot. He had like 10 wives. I asked of course
I just went by google and facebooks office in Cambridge. Large presence in Cambridge batch
Do you have Facebook and google office to n your flyover deplorable towns.
My Uber driver Mohammed is hot. I am tempted but the Saudi just drained my hog.
The Saudi tried to eat my ass but I don’t like that. I don’t want my ass touched. I have limits.
The Saudi had small sculpted mousyache and beard. Loved watching it devour my hog.
If even 1 Republican had voted for the impeachment rules, the Democrats and the media would have called it bipartisan. But none did. Instead, 2 Democrats voted with the Republicans. So does that make the opposition bipartisan?
Yes. By the rules we play under, it does.
The little old lady from Pasadena writes: What a jerk he is. I lost what ever [sic] respect I had for him after that exchange
We're sure Justice Kavanaugh is relieved.
Gaining the respect of Icki Vicki is like being diagnosed with pancreatic cancer.
Let’s ask the founding fathers!
A well-constituted court for the trial of impeachments is an object not more to be desired than difficult to be obtained in a government wholly elective. The subjects of its jurisdiction are those offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust. They are of a nature which may with peculiar propriety be denominated POLITICAL, as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society itself. The prosecution of them, for this reason, will seldom fail to agitate the passions of the whole community, and to divide it into parties more or less friendly or inimical to the accused. In many cases it will connect itself with the pre-existing factions, and will enlist all their animosities, partialities, influence, and interest on one side or on the other; and in such cases there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.
Federalist 65 Alexander Hamilton
Garden path Drudge headline, figure out which are the nouns and which are the verbs
Illegal drones ground water-dropping helicopters in CA fire battle...
And a fire can grow exponentially over the course of 20 minutes, let alone one or two hours, Gardetto said.
Mathematical sloppiness in the news. Fires grow quadratically, not exponentially; and they do it over the course of any time. People complain about the perfectly legitimate use of "literally" figuratively but don't give a shit about math mistakes that actually are mistakes.
It's no wonder we're electing women.
Thanks, Titus, but, remember, a picture is worth 1,000 words.
1,000 words or it didn't happen.
Ann, be careful on what you ask for as you just might get it. Eewww.
This is from Daniel Henninger's WSJ article Sep. 18, 2019,... "An argument against such a dire interpretation is that the activists’ anything-goes politics is precisely what is at stake in the struggle between the party’s left and “moderates” such as Joe Biden and Amy Klobuchar. I’m not sure I believe that now, and the reason is Minnesota’s Sen. Klobuchar.
After the Times piece appeared Saturday and her fellow candidates outputted their serial impeachment demands, Ms. Klobuchar somehow felt compelled to say the Kavanaugh confirmation “process was a sham.” This from a candidate who has tried, like Mr. Biden, to present herself as the adult in the room. That Ms. Klobuchar caved says a lot about the requirements of party membership now."
So Amy is bending her moderate positions to fit into the group. So sad.
With fans of my comments like these I shall never lose interest in keeping their hearts racing....
Just think of yourself like the only woman in a mining camp. Similar dynamic. We wish we had better, but you are it.
Theresa Kelley💞Trump2020@Kelly2Teresa·13h
Replying to @amyklobuchar
ok,boomer
I'll rework a quote from Woody Allen describing what Jesus would think if he came back today and saw what was going on.
“If the Founding Fathers came back and saw what was being done in their name, they'd never stop throwing up.”
Upthread it was said: "Oh yes. His crybaby tantrums were very forceful and credible. As compelling as a good groping. Everything you look for when you think 'judicial temperament.'"
I am an appelleate lawyer in DC. I actually appeared before Kavanuagh as an advocate when he was on the D.C. Circuit. (He voted in the majority against my client, but at least I got a dissent.) I have gone to the Supreme Court to observe arguments and seen with my own eyes his temperament in that setting. I have read transcripts of other Supreme Court arguments in which he has participated. I can say unequivocally that Brett Kavanaugh has as good a judicial temperament as you can ask for in a judge.
I said to others at the time of the confirmation hearings that his emotional response to the outrageous personal attacks upon his character told you NOTHING about how he would perform in his judicial role. I was right.
Is it FF =>> "Founding Fathers" or Framing Fathers or Founding Framers or
Framing Framers
https://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2019/11/partisan-impeachment-vote-exactly-framers-feared/
Klobuchar: "There's nothing exceptional about her." Yes there is. She may be the most unattractive woman in DC.
If we go back to the Declaration of Independence one of the abuses that King George 3 visited on the colonies was the use of star chambers. Congressional democrats like the use of star chambers. This, of course, does not concern the usual suspects.
Any evidence Uncle Ben Franklin own slaves?
Educate me.
Do you see Ben Franklin in that cartoon? Hard to tell who they are, which is why there's a caption.
readering:"With fans of my comments like these I shall never lose interest in keeping their hearts racing...."
Your time would be better spent distributing flyers for your anti-jew hero Corbyn. He's going to need all the help he can get and there are only so many pro-ISIS types like you around.
Hop to it! Chop chop.
It’s that “national conversation” art that Klobuchar obviously enjoys, and finds many conversational words in.
Blogger Andy said...
The true dynamic of the last election was that group of voters who disapproved of both candidates but picked the one who offended them less. In the key states these folks broke more for Trump than for Clinton. So have the Dems spent the last 3 years trying to win back the anti- Clinton Trump voter? No they have spent 3 years insulting them and calling them names.
Good observation. There is a good speech by Tucker Carlson (which I can't find right now) in which he describes the 2016 election as a man's wife running off with the postman. He says a normal man would ask himself why. The Democrats don't do that. They assume Putin made her run off.
it will be "Fondling Fathers" if Slo Joe Sniffengroper gets in
...or 'Fondling Finders'-- w/ this FBI dump
https://operationdisclosure1.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-finders-fbi-document-dump-from.html
The Patriarchy drunkenly salutes Amy!
"With fans of my comments like these..."
The descent into trolldom continues apace.
"Do you see Ben Franklin in that cartoon?"
I think maybe Franklin is the third from left. #2 is obviously Washington, #4 I assume is Jefferson, #1 is... John Adams, possibly. As noted, all so poorly drawn that they have to be labelled as "Founding Fathers". Or maybe the cartoonist assumes his audience is poorly educated enough that without such a label they won't know who these old white dudes are.
And why are they all obviously drunk? WTF is this cartoon trying to say?
From the left, Adams, Washington, Franklin and Jefferson.
Do you see Ben Franklin in that cartoon? Hard to tell who they are, which is why there's a caption
_____
Thanks cavalry for rescue.
I shall load some Cannon Balls (did ladies wax them for smooth faster ejaculation?!)
Middle guys look like Geo. W and Uncle Ben lost his glasses in revelry.
Also choice of beer as evidence of God's love for Man.
I'm sorta Edumacated.
My bucket list to drop -ma-
And why are they all obviously drunk? WTF is this cartoon trying to say?
_______&&&
It's Wrap party after Constitutional Convention
Uncle Ben is getting them ready for air bathing. Yeaaa
Signs of a poorly thought out editorial cartoon is when you have to label the characters in your panel. It could be because their audience is just so blinkedly stupid you have to spell it out for them and the cartoonist knows that. Because the modern left swerves between decrying the founding fathers and revering them you get dreck like this.
I have to say, this is what cracks me up. The righties rush to say that I "hate" Kavanaugh. Never said that, said i had lost all respect for him, totally different.
I feel he is an inferior jurist, a mediocre attorney and altogether inappropriate person to be on the highest court in the land. I know a number of people who have attended prestigious law schools, graduate 1 or 2 in their class who Kavanaugh is not fit to be in the same room with. But,I don't hate him.
You jump to those conclusions, righties, just proves how ignorant you all are.
Vicki from Pasadena
The founding fathers wrote the founding documents in secret sessions. Klobuchar 1, Althouse 0.
Amy's magic surname doesn't cross the Saint Croix very well. She wants to advance beyond the Barbara Mikulski zone, but she might not manage even that.
So does Ann prefer the thousand words to the picture? Probably safer given poor Katie Hill’s victimization via revenge porn.
It is interesting how quickly the media memory holed the anti-kavanaugh book from a few months ago when it unexpectedly turned up the fact Blasey Ford's friend was being pressured to change her testimony to say she remembered Blasey's groping/rape incident. She has now stated for the record that she is pretty sure it didn't happen as she would have remembered how they got home from the party. This witness tampering is striking but has gone uncommented on by many lefties. I wonder why?
So doing a quick headcount of the 4 supposed "witnesses" to this incident NO ONE would confirm it except Ditzy Ford. Yet the left gets to pretend it was a credible charge only because they want it to be. That any democrat running for office believed Ford is disqualifying enough.
"Just think of yourself like the only woman in a mining camp. Similar dynamic. We wish we had better, but you are it."
That was glorious, Skylark.
Do we know if Adams, Washington, Franklin, and Jefferson were ever in the same room together?
anti-de Sitter space said...
Althouse did the big reveal?
I thought
Assumes facts not in evidence.
You can spare me her jabber
That's another buck you owe me.
P.S. If I had to guess I’d say DJT. And, whatever she did, I’m sure that the faults of nasty libs motivated her mind
That's our adSs: always wrong, never in doubt
victoria: "I feel he is an inferior jurist, a mediocre attorney and altogether inappropriate person to be on the highest court in the land."
LOLOLOL
Yes, your "feelings", devoid of substance, facts, evidence. At least none that you can detail, because there is not detail.
Just more lefty lunatic caterwauling.
The little lefty dogs bark, but the caravan moves on......
I don't see Klobuchar drinking a beer? Wine, yes! Anyway, AA, that was not her question, that was a question and script provided by the Democratic Tribe to everyone of their "Spanish Inquisitors". That we are discussing this as real life versus pure fiction from a Hollywood movie is amazing.
But,I don't hate him.
No. You just want to hit him in the face. I don't know how we misread your intentions. My apologies.
So doing a quick headcount of the 4 supposed "witnesses" to this incident NO ONE would confirm it except Ditzy Ford. Yet the left gets to pretend it was a credible charge only because they want it to be. That any democrat running for office believed Ford is disqualifying enough.
Yup.
And on the Impeachment/Ukraine matter, then left forgets all about Bill Clinton's 1998 treaty with Ukraine on cooperating on investigations.
Drago,
She is a follower of the "wise" Latina. Nuff said
The "wise latina" and Kagan aren't mental giants. Thurgood Marshall, Sandra Day O'Connor, Stevens, Souter, and william O dougas, Whizzer White, brennan were all medicare minds.
"But he's wasn't smart enough", is just another lefty lies. The only reason the Liberal/Left opposed Kavanaugh is because he was somewhat conservative and Trump nominated him. To believe otherwise, is to be a boob.
SomeoneHasToSayIt said...Someone called for a toast to big-breasted women?
--
More like Beer Goggles.
But hey, those guys aren't around to comment on Pelosi's actions...or the cast of characters involved in spygate.
Klobuchar seemed to stumble in response to Kavanaugh's.
That he got testy dealing with that pathetic inquisition shouldn't have surprised her.
He boofed in her general direction.
Who knows whether he will be able to match wits with towering intellects like Wise Latina.
Actually i shouldn't have said that i feel. i actually have proof, from people who have worked for him in the past.
Drago, do you know the facts? You are just spouting the right wing platitudes your "friends" have instructed you to say, not an original thought in your head.
As usual, your connection with the truth is tenuous at best, just like your boss, the Cheeto.
Arf,arf, righties. As usual, you are barking up the wrong tree.
Vicki from Pasadena
woman in a mining camp
_______
Paint Your Wagon
Lee Marvin, Clint Eastwood, Jean Seberg
Marvin can sing. Impressive.
Sources say..
Blogger Ingachuck'stoothlessARM said...
it will be "Fondling Fathers" if Slo Joe Sniffengroper gets in
_______&&&
Wasn't Uncle Ben ladies man + air baths
SloJoe learned some history?!
i actually have proof, from people who have worked for him in the past.
Vicki knows some billionaires in NYC who have the inside dope. Sure you do, Vicki.
I can probably think of a thousand words to describe Nancy, starting with an Arrogant, Opiniontate, Anti-Democratic Shrew...and then work my way down from there.
Kavanaugh doesn't have a drinking problem.
Kavanaugh has a quitting problem.
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा