The teachers’ objection was not just philosophical; it was philological. The rule, they said... was a parvenu (it was enunciated in the 17th century and became widely taught only in the 19th century) and politically motivated (it buttressed French laws that denied women equal rights). Besides that, they said, the rule encourages children “to accept the domination of one sex over the other” to the detriment of women.
In its place, the teachers suggested using “the rule of proximity,” in which the adjective matches the gender of the noun closest to it, which was common practice for centuries. Or they said, people could use “majority agreement,” with the adjective matching the gender of the noun with the biggest number of members. Or even, they said, writer’s choice....
१६ नोव्हेंबर, २०१७
"[T]he masculine gender is deemed more noble than the feminine gender because of the superiority of man over woman."
Said a 1767 grammar book, cited in "a declaration signed by 314 teachers in France that they would no longer teach the rule that 'the masculine prevails over the feminine' when it came to plural nouns" (NYT op-ed).
याची सदस्यत्व घ्या:
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा (Atom)
पोस्ट्स
३३ टिप्पण्या:
Prescriptive grammar is subject to whims.
Descriptive grammar on the other hand is a study of what sounds wrong and trying to find the rules.
What do the Muslims think about it?
Just go to Der, Die and Das. For all those sticky situations. And hey, the French always did welcome German overlords...
--Vance
..with the adjective matching the gender of the noun with the biggest number of members.
How about simply matching the noun with the biggest member?
Noted.
But Divine Right of Kings comes into play here. The silly Englaise let Queens succeed to the throne while Le Francais never let a woman rule La France.
French culture under attack by the French. Well, that’s new.
The Muslims will fix that when they take over,
How about doing away with gender in grammar? There's no real need for it - English does just fine without conjugating gender for nouns and adjectives - and it make learning a foreign language much easier.
Tradguy, that is the Salic Law. Catherine d'Medici and Louis XV's mistresses managed to circumvent it.
Interesting and a bit odd. The Academie Francaise has a long history of trying to preserve and protect the purity of French, usually from the dreaded incursion of Anglo-Saxon influences. Hasn't worked out all that well, and efforts of that sort always run afoul of the pleasure so many in France get from dissing authoritarians of every sort. As to a preference for the masculine gender in certain usages, it's very doubtful that native speakers of French are much invested in the idea of the greater 'nobility' of the masculine gender when using plural nouns. They're just trying to make themselves understood. In all events, common usage will prevail over the grammatical rules that partisans of one sort or another try to impose, whether or not teachers of grammar push one rule rather than another.
I'm so sick of people using "gender" instead of "sex." Even the French are doing it.
Actually in this case "gender" is the correct term. Remember all French nouns have a gender and the adjective agrees with the noun it governs. If an adjective governs two nouns, what gender should it use?
"The whole world is getting Californicated!"
Well, until the the emergence of Western Civilization, you know, all that Christian/capitalist/Shakespeare stuff, most of the world was based on the simple principle that "might makes right." So, sorry gals, but you weren't too mighty, back then.
You should be thanking us englightened Christian, white males for elevating your collective station in society.
The nice thing about English (being a mongrel language) is that there is no gender.
The fact that there is no gender, makes it a language of savages, but then Rome fell to savages, so there is that.
The ultimate solution is clear: local tribunals to rule on the application of gender to speech. You can't let people decide these things without any direction. Social constructs don't just destroy themselves.
I'm so sick of people using "gender" instead of "sex." Even the French are doing it.
There is no "sex" in La and Le, but there is gender. Masculine and feminine are genders not sexes.
There is no penis and no vagina. Grammar can't breed.
Recently I watched a lot of YouTube videos in which young women gave instructions about cooking, sewing, making crafts, etc. Obviously the audiences for such videos are likewise young women.
In practically every such video that I watched, the female instructor began her video by addressing her female audience with the greeting: Hey, guys!.
In general a young woman commonly will address a group of other young women as you guys.
rehajm said...
French culture under attack by the French. Well, that’s new."
Yes, and it's very odd. Of all the peoples of Europe, the French always struck me as the least likely to succumb to cultural self-abasement.
In general a young woman commonly will address a group of other young women as you guys.
11/16/17, 11:00 AM
Northerners do that (and in NJ, it's "youse guys.") In the South, "y'all" is used for addressing groups of both sexes. Y'all's gender neutrality makes it very useful.
My two sarcasms and a double entendre apparently were too subtle--or just not very good.
Rome fell to savages
And like the French, they rotted first and invited the savages in.
The romance languages are all much more patriarchal than English...yet English is always the only language attacked as patriarchal.
So THAT'S where all this got started...
"You should be thanking us enlightened Christian, white males for elevating your collective station in society"
All kidding aside, exactly this. And when the bottom falls out, as history insists it will, women will absolutely pray pray for a, um, white knight.
Strange, but in traditional societies, the feminine gender was noble in complementary measure to the masculine. Something changed in the wake of social progress guided by liberal ideology and the Pro-Choice Church. Everything changed since women were denied agency by female chauvinists pursuing wealth, pleasure, leisure, and Democratic leverage.
Well, some traditional societies. Principles matter.
The grammarian used five semi-colons in her article; all correctly. That's just showing off; bitch.
Many rules of English grammar are also relatively recent (two centuries or so) and unnecessary impositions. We are mostly familiar with only the Indo-European languages, with their masculine/feminine/neuter genders. There's a lot more variety in the world than that.
English originally had gender, like the good Germanic language that it is, but lost it in the transition from OE to ME. The reasons are mostly important to linguists.
exiledonmainstreet said...
In the South, "y'all" is used for addressing groups of both sexes. Y'all's gender neutrality makes it very useful.
Thank you for spelling y'all's correctly. There are Southerners who can't spell y'all, much less make it possessive.
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा