That's the way they put it over at Think Progress. I've watched the video. Rand Paul asks a question. It seems histrionic to equate asking a question with pushing a conspiracy theory, and the truth is Hillary Clinton's answer has the ring of... lying.
The effort on the left to stereotype Rand Paul as a nutcase is so strenuous that it stimulates my root-for-the-underdog instinct. And makes me suspicious. I feel a Rand-Paul-must-be-destroyed conspiracy theory blossoming within.
याची सदस्यत्व घ्या:
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा (Atom)
पोस्ट्स
१३६ टिप्पण्या:
Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Don’t try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.
President Rand Paul has a nice ring to it.
As to Hillary, mendacity is as natural to her as breathing. I don't see how you can she's lying when she lies routinely, and as her basic preference. If Hillary said that the sky over Washington, DC, is blue, I'd dash to a window on the east side of my office building because whatever color the sky was, if Hillary says it's blue it has to be some other color.
Rand Paul asks a question.
So what is the question he asks? Maybe that would help us to evaluate the truth claims.
As much as we would like, we can't follow Mitt Romney around to the grocery store, gas station, and amusement park forever.
I feel a Rand-Paul-must-be-destroyed conspiracy theory blossoming within.
JournOlist isn't just a theory.
You have to read between the lines when she refers to Argo. Also I believe Hillary said she called Petraeus to see what was going on with his operation the night of the attack. And she made a reference to Argo! Obama and co have already hung her out to dry on Benghazi. The stupid Republicans instead of asking probing and intelligence questions to draw out Obama's culpability in this matter, went for the plain vanilla hearing. What do you want her to do? Even her scream 'What difference does it make now?' has a ring of exasperation about both the Obama administration and the cowardly Republicans -- I bet she meant it like 'yeah, it would have made a difference before the election but you were all too incompetent to go after Obama'.
But for her own sake, I wish she had volunteered more incriminating info and thrown Obama under the bus.
Histrionic? Think Progress? Say it ain't so!
Sorry about the missing link.
It's up now.
Watch the video.
I feel a Rand-Paul-must-be-destroyed conspiracy theory blossoming within.
Yup. Let's see if he gets the full Palin treatment. Not only mocking his words and ideas as being obviously too stupid to be believed, but also his hair, clothing, speech patterns. He probably has a dog that has been whacked with a newspaper or a cat that has been kicked at sometime in the past.
The machine is being warmed up to grind him into little bits before anyone has a chance to think for themselves.
Brave New World.
Wow. If not "lying", evasion.
According to the Cult of the Left, telling the truth is a "conspiracy theory."
Thanks, Althouse, for ruining our country! Seig Heil, Mein Obama!
How many times do I have to tell you this - I have posted on Think Progress here numerous times:
Think Progress Lies in every headline. Every headline. They cannot tell the truth. It's their leftist nature.
Headed for hell, energized by evil and hate, Think Progress is seeking to take as many people with them as they can.
THAT is the truth.
That;s the truth.
It was about shipments from Libya to other places, perhaps Turkey.
Yes, there will be a movement to discredit Rand Paul.
Yes, Hillary has been lying and avoiding. She knows a lot more about what happened before, during, and after Stevens was murdered in Benghazi. It would not be like her to not want to know.
@pm317:
You fool. Obama, an unknown nothing who's ruined the country, beat the Mighty Clinton Machine in 2008, remember? She's not stupid enough to cross it again.
You fuckers think Obama's just some empty suit. He's not---he's full on evil and knows exactly what he's doing to destroy us all.
Seig heil, mein obama!
Rand Paul/whoresoftheinternet 2016!
Stereotyped as a nut case...
The Republicans are cowed by this tactic. They are afraid to be effective against the administration.
Nobody wants to be the next Sarah Palin. Nobody wants to be called a Tea Partier.
And as long as the press is with Obama, its going to be very hard for individual Republicans to stand up.
Boehner is wrong to say Obama wants the Republicans gone. He already has them where he wants them. Their role is to be the bad guys Obama protects the people from.
I feel a Rand-Paul-must-be-destroyed conspiracy theory blossoming within.
Why not? It worked for his father, and it worked for Sarah Palin.
Just like Palin. Must be destroyed.
Hey garbage....
heard your daughter was sick...
couldn't have happened to a nicer guy. And Obama will let her die.
Enjoy the decline!
I hear you Brent, and I like the Professor's highlight on this point.
It makes me think I should force myself to go to Think Progress more often. I used to surf around DemocraticUnderground and regularly read Matt Yglesias. It's a slog. I lost the motivation to read Andrew Sullivan years ago, a few years after I tossed a few dollars into his tip jar.
I, I, I...too many of them in my writing up there. It's a personal thing. I would like to find a few reasonable, considerate, debatable leftists to read regularly. Kirsten Powers and Juan Williams seemed like good sources for a while, but ever since they've been on FNC, they seem to have acquired the rightist version of DavidBrooksitis. They've gone native.
Of course I recognize that I could be a right-wing wacko, incapable of persuasion by the left. That thought makes the search even more difficult.
A good leftist is hard to find.
And as long as the press is with Obama, its going to be very hard for individual Republicans to stand up.
Then you might as well give up.
The press is never going to abandon their Magic Negro.
And, after that, it will be a female president (obviously only if she is a Democrat).
Then, all opposition will be proof of hatred of women.
Next, a gay president (again, must be Democrat).
Then, all opposition will be proof of hatred of gays.
What a system!
...because, you know, this Administration would never run guns to, say, the Mexican drug cartels.
Say it ain't so, Bob, you vote against your own self-interest?
This is why my Democratic Facebutt friends have convinced themselves that the Republican Party is now extinct.
They believe that there is no answer to the "bigotry" gambit of the Democrats.
You hate women, gays and blacks unless you are a Democrat. It's self-evident.
The bigots must die!
So, if Rand Paul were to say,
"Madame Secretary, is there any truth to the claim that when you were recently hospitalized for a blood clot, the CIA surreptitiously implanted a computer chip in your brain for unknoown purposes?"
that would just be a question, right? No conspiracy theory implied in any way. Just curious.
"I thought using the Ayatollah's money to support the Nicaraguan resistance was a neat idea."
It made no difference to Oliver North that there was a law cutting off aid to the Contras... so they cooked up a weapons sale to keep money flowing to the Contras... circunbenting the will of Congress... the law.
Oliver North went to jail.
Anyway.. thats old hat.
Oliver North also may have run for the Senate seat Ran Paul now occupies... he is probably familiar with the scandal that now everybody seems to have forgotten.
...and the truth is Hillary Clinton's answer has the ring of... lying.
It's the blood clot. It's why Hillary! couldn't remember who hired Craig Livingstone and didn't know the Rose Law Firm billing records were on the conference room all along.
Of course there's a conspiracy to destroy Rand Paul.
And one to destroy Marco Rubio.
And, if Susana Martinez or Scott walker starts looking good in a couple of years, there will be one to destroy them.
just as there was one to destroy Sarah Palin and, before that, Dan Quayle.
The only young nominees must be sociopathic, telegenic empty suits from the Democrat Party.
And the "conspiracy" is no weirder than Iran-Contra.
I'm convinced Leftism is a religion satisfying some deep genetic requirement for a religion in humans. You don't get far attacking someone's religious beliefs.
- Facts don't matter.
- Science doesn't matter.
- Laws don't matter.
- The rights of other people don't matter.
Very much like Islam.
Oliver North ran for Senate in VA in 1994, losing to Charles Robb.
"And as long as the press is with Obama, its going to be very hard for individual Republicans to stand up."
They get targeted all the same, whether they stand up or sit down. Their mistake is thinking that there's a way to avoid being attacked by the press, when really the only way forward is straight through and out the other side.
whores blog is enough to make Stormfront blush.
Nobody wants to be the next Sarah Palin.
Yeah, that's right. The vast left wing conspiracy to destroy Sarah Palin has succeeded beyond our wildest dreams. Last I heard she was destitute and living in the school bus from Into the Wild and surviving off of caribou and moose she killed with her bare hands (since we also succeeded in confiscating her guns).
whores blog is enough to make Stormfront blush.
Fortunately, there are times when even garage and I can agree.
To blush, one may be embarrassed, shamed.
That's so 50 years ago.
Now it's hipster.
What difference does it make?
The vast left wing conspiracy to destroy Sarah Palin has succeeded beyond our wildest dreams.
Palin made her own decision to exit public office.
Being a public figure brings with it some of the most godawful crap you can imagine. Your opponents don't recognize any rules or limits. And, the crazies will target you for good and bad reasons.
I wish Palin had not made the decision to exit public office. But, she did. And, I understand her decision not to face that firestorm of hatred. If you want to be in public office, you have to face that firestorm.
Yes, Freder, that's what obsesses you morons.
She's still out there and people listen to what she says and vote for whom she endorses (about 2 for 3 success rate, last I looked; what's Barry's? Kiss of death?)
And Freder pulls back the curtain again, it's not good enough until certain people are sackcloth and ashes.
that would just be a question, right? No conspiracy theory implied in any way. Just curious.
Actually, that is exactly Althouse's position. You can ask any crazy assed question you want and always come back and say "I didn't actually say I believed Hillary was faking her blod clot, I was just asking a question. It's a free country, isn't it? Why do you hate freedom so much?"
Palin made a decision that made sense for her and her family.
She makes a very good living and she controls how and when she's in the public eye.
Good for her.
If she decides again to run for public office, she'd better be prepared to run the gauntlet. That's the price you have to pay.
The great feminist defends her men again.
ITA with that Insty post.
Beautiful post, Professor Althouse. Brava.
The same thing, in a milder version, has been going on, on National Public Radio for the last 24 hours, as Secretary Clinton was portrayed as well prepared, capable, and with empathy toward the vicitms of the terrorist attack. Senator Ron Johnson has been protrayed as caustic, combative and challenging.
In fact, watching his questioning and Secretary Clinton's response in full context, it is clear the if Johnson had been a Democrat and Clinton had been a Republican -- and even more particularly if their genders had been reversed -- the national press corps would be wondering if Clinton were mentally competent to hold high office, so hysterically unhinged was her blowup to one of the simple basic questions of the last several months; why did Secretary Rice go on national television with a virtual script to blame the Benghazi attack on a video-inspired riot? Because Secretary Clinton herself participated in that charade, with her own international video.
The way she said Turkey?! was too much for me.
garage, how about you just take it as a given that everyone despises what nazisoftheinternet says about your or anyone else's family, so we don't give it what it wants?
And Freder pulls back the curtain again, it's not good enough until certain people are sackcloth and ashes.
If it wasn't obvious, I was being sarcastic.
I also loved Drudge's juxtaposition of women to combat frontline but Barry's surrounded by men.
Unfortunately for you, some of your fellow travelers give that impression of conservatives.
So whether you may or may not have meant it, it was there.
Only if you're a republican, ST.
Freder Frederson said...
that would just be a question, right? No conspiracy theory implied in any way. Just curious.
Actually, that is exactly Althouse's position. You can ask any crazy assed question you want and always come back and say "I didn't actually say I believed Hillary was faking her blod clot, I was just asking a question. It's a free country, isn't it? Why do you hate freedom so much?"
Actually this is garage's tactic.
edutcher said...
Of course there's a conspiracy to destroy Rand Paul.
And one to destroy Marco Rubio.
And, if Susana Martinez or Scott walker starts looking good in a couple of years, there will be one to destroy them.
just as there was one to destroy Sarah Palin and, before that, Dan Quayle.
The only young nominees must be sociopathic, telegenic empty suits from the Democrat Party.
And the "conspiracy" is no weirder than Iran-Contra.
You forgot to mention Paul Ryan.
I wonder if Think Progress linked to yesterday's Salon article that touted as credible 9/11 conspiracies and JFK conspiracies?
http://twitchy.com/2013/01/23/salon-piece-says-give-truthers-a-chance-twitterers-offer-up-other-salonpitches/
They seem like the type.
@Chips:
Not a nazi, fucker. Not even close to a socialist. Besides, I like Israel. Gotta have some civilization in the shithole of extremism Obama's created there.
But it's cutely depressing how you think leftists have to be treated civilly. lol. As if they're human.
@Garbage Pail:
lol. Your daughter is going bye-bye. And Obama will be happy to shove her off.
lol at the fools trying to "show" leftists it's not a "kooky conspiracy theory."
You're playing their game, fag-lovers.
It's like with the Clinton impeachment. They knew the fucker was a purgering rapist, but it was all about the W to them. So they denied, called names, called you stupid, called you hypocritical----and Slick Willie sailed right back into office, wrists unslapped.
With cult members and evil doers is to ignore their obfuscations ---otherwise known as shuckin' and jivin'. Just lay the hammer down and be done with them. They're not intelligent, worthy adults---they're children and savages.
Hold. Your. Frame. Bitches.
P.S. isn't it cute how daring to claim that Holder ran guns to Mexico is now = being a Stormfront member in the left's eyes? Everything is racist! lol.
the force is strong with this one
Feinstein conspired with the DC Police to break DC law.
The whore has a temper, too!
Who could have predicted that?
I feel a must-destroy-nonspineless-conservative conspiracy theory blossoming within.
@Shouting Thomas:
You think calling someone "fucker" means I'm angry?
lol.
Boy, you don't know the meaning of angry. I just love the hilariousness of your right-wing beta-ness and garbage's left-wing lies as civilization slowly collapses around us.
Now go back to pretending that left-wingers deserve civility whilst they fart in your face, ignore facts whilst they rant, and put you under lock and key.
There's a good boy.
Now go back to pretending that left-wingers deserve civility whilst they fart in your face...
The farting in your face part ain't so bad, depending on the gender and overall attractiveness of the farter!
Spot on Althouse!
@Shouting Thomas:
Ah, the sound of a gimp bitch of the left.
Enjoy the decline, gimp!
Take in some water, carbs, and a little sodium. It helps.
whore:
This reminds me of the old joke:
Q: How are cigarette smoking and oral sex the same?
A: The closer you get to the butt, the stronger the taste!
@Shouting Thomas:
Tell us, gimp, when Garbage fucks you up the ass with a metal rod while wearing an Obama mask, do you smile? Or does the ball gag prevent it?
Hilariously awaiting your answer...
That Sen. Paul would use his first hearing on the Foreign Relations Committee to push this theory, despite the fact even if it were true it would fall outside of Secretary Clinton’s purview, does not say great things about his future on the body. - Think Progress
They're just sayin'.
Whew, whore!
Not exactly my cup of tea.
I prefer pretty young female things, preferably of the Filipina or Thai persuasion.
Confer with Ritmo. I'm more the Slaver, Mail Order Bride, Oppressor of Women type!
Cheers!
@Shouting:
Now, Now, gimpy, we all know you want to be a David Brooks, feeling up Obama's pants creases. Just admit it. Garbage pail and his dead daughter are waiting....
Lots of good, meaty topics today, Professor, some give me chills, but, very engaging.
I try to be efficient in my butt kissing, whore.
Since my band, The Old Dawgz, has been gigging consistently and is starting to get some attention, I restrict my butt kissing to the areas where I think it will do the most good.
So, only those who are influential in the music biz in one way or another can expect a greasy, sloppy kiss on the ass from this Old Dawg for the foreseeable future.
I am old and gimpy so there's only so much I can do.
I don't have any moral reservations about butt smooching, but I try to get the most bang for my buck.
So the SOS isn't to know what her ambassador was doing there? Or the topic of conversation with the Turkish Ambassador?
Talk about "need to know." LOLOLOL
don't have any moral reservations about butt smooching, but I try to get the most bang for my buck.
Or the most buck for your bang :D
@Shouting:
Still in denial, eh, gimp? So sad. At least if you admit you're nothing but the left's sextoy, they might let you lick Garbage Pail's dead daughter's shoe.
Maybe.
phx said...
They're just sayin'.
We already know Think Progress are just sayin' things. The extent of their influence would be more enlightening. Do you have any first hand knowledge on that?
I see large amounts of fertilizer and a rental truck when I read whores comments. I can only imagine what website he was reading before he came here.
BDNYC said...
You forgot to mention Paul Ryan.
I stand corrected.
Of course, there's also Nikki Haley, Tim Scott, Rick Scott, Allen West, Tom Corbett, the list goes on forever.
That's why the Demos are doing this big mind game. They have to convince everybody no Republican can ever win the Presidency until they can elect a new generation of pseudo-Kennedys.
phx said...
They're just sayin'.
Actually, they're just lying.
But of course you can't grasp that.
@whore: You should save some of your invective for the less personable lefties around here rather than focusing on garage mahal. I've spoken to garage on the phone and so have first hand knowledge that you're overstepping thing here. By all means go after his insipid politics, but please leave his daughter out of things.
chickelit,
I'm sure garage can handle it.
Ritmo (and a number of others) have urinated on my late wife's grave so many times I've lost track.
It's the internet!
@Chicklit:
No lefty is a decent human being. Remember that. Civility is for the civilized---not leftists.
Garbage deserves all the misery the world can throw at him. Including having whatever jizz execretion of his took up shop in some worthless streetwalker's rotten eggs disappear off the earth by the hands of fate.
Just like Inga, when her worthless spawn comes home in a body bag, it will be a fate she richly deserves.
I save my invective for 2 kinds: 1) leftists and 2) those who think left wingers deserve any kind of civility.
In conclusion, bite me.
Or, as we used to say during the dotcom era:
Enter Not, Ye with little courage!
You exceeded all expectations on that last post, whore!
Congratulations!
... the truth is Hillary Clinton's answer has the ring of... lying.
Of course it does. That's because she is flat out lying.
CIA regularly use State and USAID as *beards*...frequently basing their stations within an embassy or consulate, or in an "annex" (ubiquitous term for CIA facility in or near an Embassy) and the Ambassadors and Secretary of State damn well know about and enable it.
Too cute by half again was Hillary's answer to Paul when she *deferred* to the agency that operated the annex. The question was about gun running and she didn't answer it...she deflected it by alleging she had no knowledge of the other guys doings....and there-in is the lie. Outright lying. Period.
For a good view of State Department & CIA connections, especially in crisis, as I've suggested before, read "Decent Interval" by Frank Snepp. The government tried mightily to stop publication and ban the text. That's a high recommendation.
Note how gimp treats the destruction of freedom as a joke. It's quite funny, watching him pretend it's all ok even though all is lost.
He quite enjoys being the gimp of the left. But he's not the only one. There's a whole sea of David Brookses out there.
T"he truth is Hillary Clinton's answer has the ring of... lying."
Very lawyerlike!
Garbage deserves all the misery the world can throw at him
You would have to up your game way beyond what you've shown here to make me miserable. The only people you are making miserable are the people that don't want to be associated with a filthy subhuman racist like you.
Decent Interval is recently available as a paper back edition. the original hardcover edition (1978) is hard to find pristine.
It is a worthwhile read. Much has not changed since Vietnam.
What phx said - what's the question?
One certainly can push a conspiracy theory by "asking a question" ...
I don't know if Paul did so, because I'm not watching the video here, and you didn't quote the question...
(That said, I suspect he didn't, simply because of the heuristic "ThinkProgress is always wrong", which has served me well every time I've checked it.)
The Belmont Club is a must-read today:
...That doesn’t mean Assad won’t implode at some point anyway. But when he does it won’t be where the State Department wants it.
Obama has kept the true import of Benghazi from everyone but America’s foes: it was the moment when the Obama administration realized it had been duped into arming al-Qaeda. The ship of Obama’s state is now beached on the shoals. It’s full back and dump the ballast. He has no appetite for “forward” in international affairs, just “forward” into the taxpayer’s wallets.
What Obama will try to do now according to “the foreign policy expert and former Obama official, State Department official, Anne-Marie Slaughter” is to “find the happy medium between not committing us to a decades-long ground war and choosing not to do anything”. Like referring Assad’s crimes to the international criminal court and similar initiatives. Such PR exercises will appear “bold” to Candy Crowley but they will fool no one in the region. Syria will remain aflame while the administration hunker downs in the firehouse. Foukara added:
...And therefore it is on the Kingdom that any struggle for the region must ultimately center. Even though the Obama administration has obtusely been content to fritter away American strength with a whack-a-mole strategy in Afghanistan, Mali and elsewhere, America’s enemies will have long recognized that the center of gravity, the linchpin of the area, is the money and religious authority of Saudi Arabia. They may do what Obama could never do: focus on the point of weakness, go for the jugular.
There to stop them is the champion with the faked muscles. President Obama’s announcement that ‘a decade of war is now ending and an economic recovery has begun’ will cut ice with no one but his tame press. To America’s enemies it must signal the exact opposite. It must sound like Obama will not coming out at the bell. He may try to declare himself the undefeated champion of the world and hope he gets away with it, like he got away with everything else. Chris Matthews will hear in those hollow boasts “the Gettysburg Address”. But to others the message will be plainer. “No mas! No mas!”.
I wish I knew where Saul Alinsky's grave is so I can go and piss on it.
Because it's really crazy at this point to suggest this administration would secretly funnel guns to dangerous criminals in another country... oh wait.
So what is the question he asks? Maybe that would help us to evaluate the truth claims.
“Is the U.S. involved with any procuring of weapons, transfer of weapons, buying, selling, anyhow transferring weapons to Turkey out of Libya?”
Which is a perfectly reasonable question considering "Fast and Furious".
PAUL: It’s been in news reports that ships have been leaving from Libya and that they may have weapons and what I’d like to know is the annex that was close by, were they involved with procuring, buying, selling, obtaining weapons and were any of these weapons being transferred to other countries, any countries, Turkey included?
So what doesn't this George Soros website not understand about "It’s been in news reports?"
Only if it fits the agenda.
The effort on the left to stereotype Rand Paul as a nutcase is so strenuous that it stimulates my root-for-the-underdog instinct.
They probably honestly think he's a nutcase. He's the closest thing to a libertarian the Republicans have, and there's nothing a left-winger hates more than libertarians.
I can only imagine what website he was reading before he came here.
There's an echo chamber inside his mind.
purgering
He was guilty of purgery!
He should be sent to purgertory then.
My point earlier was that if selling weapons to governments we publicly did not support was done before... and the Iran Contra scandal was not about the sale of weapons perse... it could be happening right now. Iran Contra was about the violation of something called the Boland amendment.
Ran Paul's question is not out the realm of some 9/11 conspiracy or UFOs.
Its stuff our government does all the time... covertly and not so covertly.
Yo know, we dont like something and we say its truthing or conspiracy and that's it... to silence and intimidate debate.
Its Chavez/banana republic like political tactics.
The sad part is that it seems to work.
"*Whores* ... what the flip is wrong with you? You make verbal attack on peoples' kids...don't you get it that the kids are not the people you oppose, or even know in an Internet way. Mother/Father versus kids = different. Damn it.
Neither Garage nor Inga deserve what you are doing, regardless of their opinions...most that I regularly disagree with....and damn sure their kids don't. For the record, in Inga's daughter's case, no one serving with US Marines in a combat zone as a medic, and earning the Fleet Marine Force Warfare Specialist badge, deserves your vitriol...she, the daughter, never said word one to you, for starters.
And yes, for the doubters, Inga's daughter is real and a Navy corpsman attached to the USMC. She doesn't post here but she has tracks in many other Internet places relating to her profession."
1/24/13, 12:57 PM
THANK YOU, thankyou, thankyou Aridog! Obviously you were able to corroborate what I have said here about my daughter. But I doubt the attacks by Edutcher, President Mom Jeans and Whores will end.
@ garbage pail:
"You would have to up your game way beyond what you've shown here to make me miserable."
---lol, oh I don't think you're smart enough to ever fully grasp what I say here, garbage pail, so I don't exect to even touch your cold, shrivelled little heart.
But when that bitch of your daughter croaks...heheh...sweet justice will be your misery at your genes dying out.
"The only people you are making miserable are the people that don't want to be associated with a filthy subhuman racist like you."
---The only subhuman here are the lefties, biatch. You're not worthy of dogs.
@ Ari dog:
The left has destroyed this country; in return, I hope their entire gene pools are eradicated by some happy accident from heaven. Inga the Whore's spawn and Garbage's miserable genes are worthless, as are their existences.
Note: I am not encouraging or stating that anyone should attack them or their families. Just saying it would be sweetly awesome if Al Queda guys who escaped water-boarding and were freed by the ACLU blew their homes and families to Allah-come.
p.s. also note that Garbage pail's argument that I am "subhuman" rests in my being "racist."
Because noting factual patterns in human behavior based on race is subhuman behavior.
This is what civility brings you, righties! Enjoy the decline!
In short, you are the exception that proves the progressive rule.
Well, if he is the exception, how do you explain Cedarford and Jay?
Freder Frederson said...
In short, you are the exception that proves the progressive rule.
Well, if he is the exception, how do you explain Cedarford and Jay?
Cedarford is no conservative.
How does the left explain shiloh and Jack Diamond?
It's a trick question: they don't. Nor do they explain why they don't enforce the other principles they hold against the right amongst their own supporters.
How does the left explain shiloh and Jack Diamond?
Neither one spews the hatred of Whores. Have you looked at his website!?
Freder, it's enough to make any normal person's skin crawl.
Cedarford is no conservative.
Hey, don't try and pawn him off on me.
Freder Frederson said...
How does the left explain shiloh and Jack Diamond?
Neither one spews the hatred of Whores. Have you looked at his website!?
No, I haven't. Interestingly until today the only person who had ever responded to him was Inga - who wants him around to feed her victimhood posturing and enable her sliming others by association.
And I didn't compare shiloh and Diamond to whores. You asked about Jay. And if you recognize whores is unique why are you comparing others to him? There's a line between whores and Diamond but not between whores and Jay? Only among those whose standards vary based on which party is being discussed.
Have you looked at his website!?
Who looks at one of his posts and thinks "hm, I think I'll go check out his website now"?
Revenant said...
Who looks at one of his posts and thinks "hm, I think I'll go check out his website now"?
Those hoping to slime everyone else with his ravings.
I see large amounts of fertilizer and a rental truck when I read whores comments.
I see large amounts of fertilizer when I read whoresoftheinternet's comments too. The organic kind of fertilizer.
"Sorry about the missing link. It's up now."
What difference at this point does it make?!
Inga said...
You aren't that different than Whores
I'd say someone who believes the religious right intends to force most women into sexual slavery and the rest into permanent subservience here in America is much closer to whores than I am.
But I'm not insane so naturally your conclusions will differ.
"the truth is
Hillary Clinton's answer
has the ring of...
lying.
The lying ring of her answer is the truth! Best sentence ever.
"the truth is
Hillary Clinton's answer
has the ring of...
lying.
The lying ring of her answer is the truth! Best sentence ever.
Marshall said ...
Interestingly until today the only person who had ever responded to him was Inga ...
For the most part, that's a true statement.
Therefore I've deleted my comments to *whores* as a waste of time.
U.S.-Approved Arms for Libya Rebels Fell Into Jihadis’ Hands
The Obama administration secretly gave its blessing to arms shipments to Libyan rebels from Qatar last year ... No evidence has emerged linking the weapons provided by the Qataris during the uprising against Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi to the attack that killed four Americans at the United States diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya
The same lack of evidence which permitted Obama to lie about arming cartels, and his Justice Department to sustain the lie.
The same lack of evidence which permitted Obama to lie about Americans (and Afghans) sacrificing their lives to appease terrorists.
The same lack of evidence which justifies disarming law-abiding Americans while empowering criminals and illegals.
The same lack of evidence which leaves people ignorant to the devaluation of capital and labor at a rate of 10% per annum.
The same lack of evidence which comforts women when they commit murder to preserve their wealth and welfare.
The same lack of evidence which permits Obama to cry for America while exploiting Americans.
The preponderance of a lack of evidence suggests that they posses ulterior motives and that they are greedy, unconscionable bastards.
til I saw the bank draft 4 $9874, I did not believe that...my... neighbour could really receiving money part-time on-line.. there uncles cousin had bean doing this 4 less than 18 months and resantly paid for the depts on there appartment and purchased a top of the range Car. this is where I went,.... http://BIT40.com
Help me out. I've looked at this three times now and as hard as I look I just don't see this source as Fox News or Glenn Beck. Can someone help become Think Progress crazy so I can see this source as Fox News?
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/06/world/africa/weapons-sent-to-libyan-rebels-with-us-approval-fell-into-islamist-hands.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Is your mother a whore?
Hey, I'm just asking a question here. Let's not get all histrionic.
I've always thought Ron Paul was a kook. BUT, I'm more impressed by Rand. He doesn't seem quite a far out, and some of his views seem a bit more nuanced.
He's good on the economy, but I'm still wary of the Paul brand on foreign policy.
Hockey great Brad Park wrote a book called 'Play the Man.' That's how you win in hockey. A good defenseman doesn't play the puck, he plays the man. Politics is the same way, to a large extent. You have to play the man. Too often Republicans get caught up in theory and numbers -- they play the puck. Democrats play the man.
So yes, we will see a non-stop attempt to demonize Paul, Rubio, Palin, Ryan, Christie and anybody else who looks like a potential contender for 2016. Play the man and you don't have to worry about the puck.
within.... what? You?
Why would anyone interested in thinking or progress read ThinkProgress?
Most misleading name EVER.
They'd better change it to "Regurgitated Leftist Dreck" or I'm contacting the FTC.
"I'm convinced Leftism is a religion satisfying some deep genetic requirement for a religion in humans."
Yes, it's called superficial Vedanta. English translation: the unitarian smirk of bitter gray, compelled as by gulag. It satisfies not genetics but the power of delusion, not quite the same.
Evil is relatively easy to recognize, check and avert. Evil self-promoted as good is all ways difficult and dangerous. "Democrats" and their trolls and sock puppets are masters of superficial Vedanta. They *are* an apparent religion, now to include The Episcopal Church in the USA and other ecclesial judicatories.
Basically SOP for the Hive. Anyone who opposes their agenda for turning the US into Venezuela del Norte is either stupid, villainous or a nut case. Part of this is tactics; part of it is their own insularity. "How could anyone believe other than what we believe? Only dolts, dastards or ding-a-lings could dare question our revealed wisdom!"
Whores is a false flag.
Whores is a false flag.
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा