3 జూన్, 2026

"Yesterday, you hijacked my first meeting with staff to disparage me, my qualifications, and my intentions with remarkable incivility and contempt... a performative display of hostility...."

"Your antipathy to the future of the show has come through loud and clear. And I have heard you."

Said Nick Bilton, "60 Minutes" executive producer, quoted in "Scott Pelley fired from ‘60 Minutes’ after confrontation with new boss/The termination marks the latest shake-up during a tumultuous period for the iconic newsmagazine" (WaPo).

What did Pelley say at that meeting?: "[Bari Weiss is] murdering ‘60 Minutes.... She does not love this place. She was brought in to kill it, and she’s been doing exactly that. She has no qualifications for her job.... What qualifies you [Bilton] to be in this position?... You have slender qualifications for this job. The changes that she’s made at the ‘Evening News’ have been catastrophic. So why should we expect that any of this is going to be any better?"

She does not love this place — How important is it that the insiders to a show love it? That could lead you awry. Outsiders were brought in to look at it critically — not through the eyes of love — and perhaps to put journalistic principles above catering to insiders who were enjoying the lovable place they had built and maintained. Maybe those erstwhile outsiders are actually terrible, and they are reshaping the place into something that suits them and ruins it for the longtime insiders. But Bilton is charged with running the place, and Pelley chose to insist on getting fired.

98 కామెంట్‌లు:

Mike (MJB Wolf) చెప్పారు...
ఈ కామెంట్‌ను రచయిత తీసివేశారు.
Mike (MJB Wolf) చెప్పారు...

Pampered boy says what? Pelley can now test his theory in the Media marketplace. If he IS a valuable addition to a news op they will hire him and pay him like 60 Minutes did. If not, he can twist in the podcast wind with Colbert. I notice none of the high-minded lefties crying over Colbert's show have reached out to hire him. Why not?

Achilles చెప్పారు...

Learn to code you globalist sellout traitor quislings.

Be happy that you aren't getting what you actually deserve.

rehajm చెప్పారు...

Apparently she’s making them remove their skin suit and they feel naked…and it’s only about how they feel…

Lucien చెప్పారు...

Insider insurgents leaving CBS are like deep state lawyers leaving the DOJ civil rights division under Harmeet Dhillon.

rehajm చెప్పారు...

They’re proud they’re Woodward and Bernstein it’s just that that game has been exposed, over-exposed. So either Weiss is in charge of returning some journalism to the show or giving the impression she’s returning journalism to the show so the viewers will go back to consuming the propaganda. I stll say it’s option 2 but we’ll see…

Enigma చెప్పారు...

Easy way to get yourself fired: show loyality to a dead king. The king was dead and Pelley defended a corpse.

If only 60 Minutes could "take back" decades of Mike Wallace's propaganda and partisan smear jobs.

RCOCEAN II చెప్పారు...

Weiss was brought in by the Ellisons because they are on the same page. Zionist, Big-business friendly, and not woke. She used to belong to the same club as Scott Pelley but now she doesn't - so Scott Pelley is upset.

And who cares? What great journalism has 60 minutes been doing, the trash interview with Trump? The softballs thrown at the Bidens and Kamala? Or if we go back a few years, all the "Russiagate Trump is a Russian Asset" lies.

Sixty minues is/was just an unpaid arm of the DNC. An liberal/left propaganda machine. Remember "Fontgate?".

RCOCEAN II చెప్పారు...

If you look at 60 minutes Demographics, nobody under 60 watches. That's why they still have 1000 y/o Lesley stahl on the show.

Jamie చెప్పారు...

I can't remember the name of the iron law I'm thinking of, but its essence is that in time, any organization's mission morphs into preservation of the organization itself at the cost of its mission.

I think maybe Jefferson was intuiting this law with his "tree of liberty" observation. On the face of it, a "tree of liberty" is an organization that is worthy of being motivated by its own preservation. But maybe he recognized that the analogy is imperfect and this tree is more like a factory, and the organization charged with operating this factory is like any other organization, eventually devolving into self-preservation at the cost of the actual product of the factory.

Or maybe I'm just torturing Jefferson's thought into a shape that pleases me. Anyway, Pelley seems to think that 60 Minutes rightly deserves to exist in a particular form simply because it's been existing in that form for years, regardless of whether it's actually fulfilling its original, stated mission.

RCOCEAN II చెప్పారు...

Woodward and bernstein was really just woodward. Bernstein was a red diaper baby, a leftist who didn't do much after Watergate except live off his fame and go "This is worse than Watergate!" after every Republican POTUS got into a controversy.

RCOCEAN II చెప్పారు...

Yeah, if you look at it from a business angle, Pelley has no case. New boss, new rules. Dont like it, leave. I'm going further. I'm saying 60 minutes "Mission" was always crap. Pelley loved it because he's a leftist and he thinks Weiss is going to micromanage and make it more objective.

Its amazing how people have bought into the "objective Giants of Journalism" myth, speaking "truth to power", when most of them were just Leftwing political activists with Journo Degrees.

Thats true of cronkite and murrow. And even more so of Wallace and Rather. They seemed "objective" because they had to be, and because society has constantly moved leftward in the last 85 years.

Spiros చెప్పారు...

An employee venting doesn’t necessarily signal malicious intent. Maybe he's stressed or burned out or lacks clarity or whatever. But an employee openly criticizing the boss? That's a no go. Good to see Pelley go! He can take his brand of toxicity somewhere else, like NPR or Substack or something.

Mr. D చెప్పారు...

Scott Pelley is a brilliant, indispensable journalist. He's told us this many, many times.

Wince చెప్పారు...

“Good night and good luck… you ignorant slut.”

narciso చెప్పారు...

Woodward was just mark felts spittoon now pelley has not abetted fraud as much say rather or miss aaron latham leslie stahl

Enigma చెప్పారు...

Woodward used Bernstein for credibility marketing: "Not one guy did this, but two indepdendent pros with different skills worked together to find the truth."

See later iterations of this in the tech industry, with Apple Computer (Jobs & Woz), Microsoft (Gates & Ballmer), and iD Software (genius John Carmack & buffoon John Romero).

Howard చెప్పారు...

Wince, for the win.

narciso చెప్పారు...

The airplane parody was best

narciso చెప్పారు...

More like the james gamg

Paul Zrimsek చెప్పారు...

Tough out there for prima donnas.

Amadeus 48 చెప్పారు...

Good riddance.

Michael చెప్పారు...


Bari Weiss is] murdering ‘60 Minutes.... She does not love this place. She was brought in to kill it, and she’s been doing exactly that.

After several decades of mentoring leaders tasked with turning an organization around, my advice has always been, Do not be afraid to kill that which needs to die

Money Manger చెప్పారు...

David Ellison, CEO of CBS owner Paramount, is currently marketing a mammoth debt deal to finance his acquisition of Warner Brothers. The market views it as a huge, leveraged stretch. He will have to scrimp and shave every penny if the deal, and his reputation, is not to go down in a historic collapse.
He calculating cold heart has no room for the childish emotions of Pelley, or the sloppy, money-losing business of CBS News.
Tell Scott it was strictly business.

RoseAnne చెప్పారు...

What skills and experience does Scott Pelley have in running an organization with the size and history of CBS? He apparently doesn't do well working with women who don't kow-tow to his opinions immediately.

narciso చెప్పారు...

They need to fire the whole lot

Indefinitely Extended Excursion™️ చెప్పారు...

One suspects Mr Pelley’s intentionally chose the loudest possible form of good-bye.

This article misses the story

On May 10th, CBS aired an interview with Bibi booked personally by Bari Weiss herself.

The real scandal is how Bari got it: she went behind Lesley Stahl’s back and let a foreign head of state choose his own interviewer like he was ordering off a room service menu.

Bibi rejected Stahl and hand-picked Major Garrett because Bibi wanted a softer ride and CBS corporate gave it to him just to secure the "exclusive."

When Scott Pelley stood up and called this exactly what it was, they fired him.

Who Bari Weiss actually is? Why was she picked by Larry and David Ellison? This all seems central to the story, so why was this not in the article?

But don’t worry this whole business will be restructured in a few years: too much debt for declining cash flows.

In a decade, Scott Pelley’s rookie card will be much more valuable than Bari Weiss’s.

Ann Althouse చెప్పారు...

"If you look at 60 minutes Demographics, nobody under 60 watches."

I'm 75, and I watched it circa 1980, when Mike Wallace was the main person and Andy Rooney did his thing. I didn't have cable TV yet, and there wasn't much on. I watched the nightly news around then too. I haven't watched either in the last 20 or 30 years.

RoseAnne చెప్పారు...

"After several decades of mentoring leaders tasked with turning an organization around, my advice has always been, Do not be afraid to kill that which needs to die." Michael

Good advice for life, not just organizations. Of course, I am not speaking of actual people, but relationships, habits, repeating bad decisions, etc.

Ann Althouse చెప్పారు...

40 years really.

Cappy చెప్పారు...

A well deserved heave-ho.

Krumhorn చెప్పారు...

Tell Scott it was strictly business.

Not to mention that Sundance still needs to get fed approval of the Warners deal. Self-important smug lefties need to be bitch slapped with the ho hand.

- Krumhorn

William చెప్పారు...

I understand that ,unlike the Colbert show, the 60 Minutes show makes money. It's a Golden Goose but it looks like it's laying the wrong kind of eggs. Maybe with the right kind of stuffing and roasted at the proper temperature, Weiss can hit on the proper way of having her Golden Goose and eating it too.

Krumhorn చెప్పారు...

….er Skydance

- - Krumhorn

Smilin' Jack చెప్పారు...

“... a performative display of hostility...."

Performative? The hostility seemed pretty sincere to me.

I think the last time I saw 60 minutes it was in black & white.

Dogma and Pony Show చెప్పారు...

Mainstream journalism self-immolated a few years ago when the whole industry decided their job was to promote progressive viewpoints rather than simply report events and let the public form its own opinions. This served not only to advance their own ideological agendas, but also to elevate their self-perceived importance to society.

Maynard చెప్పారు...

“Performative” is the word for today.

And tomorrow. It’s what they do.

Oh Yea చెప్పారు...

"Ann Althouse said...
"If you look at 60 minutes Demographics, nobody under 60 watches."

I'm 75, and I watched it circa 1980, when Mike Wallace was the main person and Andy Rooney did his thing. I didn't have cable TV yet, and there wasn't much on. I watched the nightly news around then too. I haven't watched either in the last 20 or 30 years."

Ditto. Watched religiously from the earliest days while I grade school. Started falling out of love with it while watching it with college friends as we started noticing the contradictions and inaccuracies. Finally gave up for good in late '80s when they produced a totally stilted feature on a subject that I intimate knowledge from work.

Enigma చెప్పారు...

@IEE and his AI-generated drivel: Bibi rejected Stahl and hand-picked Major Garrett because Bibi wanted a softer ride and CBS corporate gave it to him just to secure the "exclusive."

So, this is now "balance" after decades of 60 Minutes giving lefties boosts far in excess of a soft ride for exclusives? A dirty pot calls off-white paint black.

Jay Vogt చెప్పారు...

The classy way to do this, is to retain McKinsey to come in and do an evaluation & recommendation. They'll know where you want to go. This way, you can get rid of everybody you want and you can strongly emphasize that you'd hired experts and this is their plan.

William చెప్పారు...

Scott Pelley, Don Lemon, Stephen Colbert. You could fill a hall closet in the Broadcaster's Hall of Fame with the talent that has been rudely ousted by the MAGA movement. Where will it end? I fear for the future of Joy Behar,

Dogma and Pony Show చెప్పారు...

Can anyone enlighten us as to what changes Weiss has made to the Evening News that Pelley is calling "catastrophic?"

Jimmy చెప్పారు...

The show started in 1968, and like a great many ideas born at that time, is way past time for it to go away.

Indefinitely Extended Excursion™️ చెప్పారు...

Call it "3600 Seconds" so new generations think they're getting more news for their time.

narciso చెప్పారు...

Hans Mahncke on X: "One of Scott Pelley’s most infamous moments came when he attacked President Trump for defunding Peter Daszak, claiming Trump was standing in the way of a cure for Covid, when in truth Daszak helped create it in the first place. It was a total inversion of reality. Good riddance. https://t.co/BR3mhzCsy0" / X https://share.google/zAjGNwnF9K1pF4auO

friscoda చెప్పారు...

And the letter states that he was fired for cause, so no severance package without a fight

Dogma and Pony Show చెప్పారు...

"Bibi rejected Stahl and hand-picked Major Garrett because Bibi wanted a softer ride and CBS corporate gave it to him just to secure the 'exclusive.'"

As if newsmakers don't have the inherent ability to choose whom they sit down with for an interview.

If that's Pelley's main grievance, he's a buffoon.

narciso చెప్పారు...

I stand corrected

Aggie చెప్పారు...

He thought he was the brave defender & owner of the Legacy. I wonder how many millions of dollars he walked away from with those stunts, gone because he could be fired 'for cause'. I bet those were exciting meetings in the corner office, reviewing the events with the lawyers.

Welcome to the exciting new world of Substack, Scott. Let's see. There's Jennifer Rubin.... Don Lemon..... Jim Acosta.....Chris Cuomo.... Dan Rather..... Brian Seltzer...Chris Wallace..... Andrea Mitchell.... Gosh I hope there's room for all of you.

narciso చెప్పారు...

That clown car is getting crowded

Bob Boyd చెప్పారు...

Dumping Pelley will probably increase audience share. You catch more flies with honey than vinegar and water.

Bushman of the Kohlrabi చెప్పారు...

Pelley sounds just like your typical run of the mill government employee, which is what he was.

Iman చెప్పారు...

Pelley can continue his panic and meltdown in retirement.

Good riddance to bad rubbish.

bagoh20 చెప్పారు...

I've had to do similar firings and seen them done with other employees like this. The initial concern about the negative effect of losing that person is quickly replaced by relief and excitement about replacing them and moving past the obstacle they were. I've never seen it regretted by the company. Executives that let it fester always fail, or sometimes they get lucky and the person leaves on their own.

bagoh20 చెప్పారు...

If this is a mistake, we'll soon see Pelley making millions on his exceptional talent and journalistic skill.

mezzrow చెప్పారు...

Looks like everyone involved got what they wanted.

To this reader, Pelley's future would seem to be more Troy McClure than Eric Severeid.

bagoh20 చెప్పారు...

It impossible to keep an employee who acts out like that in front of other staff.

RCOCEAN II చెప్పారు...

It seems like a million years ago, but back in Feb 2025, 60 minutes had to publish the transcript of the Kamala Harris intereview because it was obviously edited to make her look good.

RCOCEAN II చెప్పారు...

Eric Severaid. Walter Conkrite both gone at 65. Lesly stahl - she gets to work till 84!

Earnest Prole చెప్పారు...

Your terms are acceptable.

Goldenpause చెప్పారు...

Insulting your new bosses generally is a guaranteed ticket out the door. So Pelley either pulled his stunts with the intention of being fired or believed his own hype that he was indispensable and expected to get his way. In two weeks he will be as relevant as Don Lemon.

Mike (MJB Wolf) చెప్పారు...

I'm with Althouse. I DID watch the show in my 30s and 40s but stopped before the Pelley era, maybe about the time that Anderson Vanderbilt joined the team. It sucked and wasn't getting better. Not one clip I've seen since then has changed my mind. Wife used to DVR it but we never watched so she stopped.

They made it very obvious they HATE any GOP who comes on or gets profiled. Pure hate. It was hard to watch. Then they'd give Joe a tongue bath for naming his fave ice cream. I try to avoid haters.

Good luck Bari! Remember when she left NYT because the wokies revolted? And why? Because they published a Senator recommending we make the demonstrations more peaceful less rioty.

Scientific Socialist చెప్పారు...

A boss fires an insubordinate employee, as if that’s been proscribed by Rome.

Michael చెప్పారు...

bagoh20 said:

The initial concern about the negative effect of losing that person is quickly replaced by relief and excitement about replacing them and moving past the obstacle they were.

Without fail, whenever I had to terminate an employee, one or more came to me afterward to say , What took you so long?

mikee చెప్పారు...

Much like other revenants of the second half of the past century, 60 Minutes has not survived the changes in media wrought by much more available, much more creative, and infinitely much more individualized outlets that can get millions of viewers. Why watch a show that had to light a truck on fire to pretend the gas tank was unsafe? And so on, for years of examples of not just bias but BS on the show.

SNL is rarely funny, late night talk is dead, 60 Minutes has no purpose other than to stroke the egos of its creators. And CBS has no need to fund it and its prima donna staff in perpetuity. Good riddance.

Aggie చెప్పారు...

BeGone

Fred Drinkwater చెప్పారు...

Michael, long ago I has a director whose staff management philosophy included this, about problem employees: "You can shoot them, fix them, or move them. But you can't wait."

Joe Bar చెప్పారు...

Jamie said...
"I can't remember the name of the iron law I'm thinking of, but its essence is that in time, any organization's mission morphs into preservation of the organization itself at the cost of its mission."

That's Jerry Pournelle's Iron Law of Bureaucracy.

Joe Bar చెప్పారు...

I anxiously await reviews of Pelley's upcoming podcast.

gilbar చెప్పారు...

do people REALLY think, that their new boss HAS TO "love" their current work?
REALLY?
If your work is REALLY that lovely.. WHY do you have a new boss?
why aren't YOU the new boss?
hmmm

Lazarus చెప్పారు...

Mike Wallace was 60 minutes (with help from Morley Safer and Andy Rooney). That's why they kept him around until he was mummified with age. He did hard-hitting interviews with America's corporate rulers. 60 Minutes and CBS aren't willing to go after our new government, NGO, and media rulers. Have they even done any exposes of corporate wrongdoing lately? I wouldn't have heard anything about 60 Minutes at all if there weren't a movie based on their earlier exploits a few years back.

Woodward and Bernstein were just conduits for the Deep State -- or for one resentful bureaucrat's vengefulness. Investigative reporters just do the work that leakers want done.

Josephbleau చెప్పారు...

The cemeteries are full of indispensable men.

narciso చెప్పారు...

https://x.com/greg_price11/status/2062195621017387126

narciso చెప్పారు...

Tom Elliott on X: "Recall how Scott Pelley used 60 Minutes to run cover for Andy McCabe lying to the FBI during his anti-Trump witch hunt. He's always been a progressive activist masquerading as a professional journalist." / X https://share.google/7tXMquSvdRalBZrVA

Butkus51 చెప్పారు...

Seems Pelley doesnt love "this place".

"This place" meaning the USA.

Clyde చెప్పారు...
ఈ కామెంట్‌ను రచయిత తీసివేశారు.
Clyde చెప్పారు...

Unlike a baseball manager who throws a tantrum and gets ejected from the game, Pelley will not return tomorrow night.

bagoh20 చెప్పారు...

I can remember well that everybody I knew, and I would naively swallow the "investigative" stories 60 Minutes would feed us back in the day. We never questioned that they were the good guys catching bad guys. The reason I stopped watching years ago was when the stories started getting exposed as fraudulent. I never went back, but for a while there we swallowed it all. They made us feel good for not being successful businessmen, or dedicated Christians, or Republicans. I guess a good number of people are still drinking that Kool-Aid, but Bari is looking to go with a more nutritious drink, but the kids got used to the sugar.

narciso చెప్పారు...

About 20 years ago with rathergate but appsrently many of the reports from the iraq war the couric interview etc etc

loudogblog చెప్పారు...

I've had a lot of jobs in my life, but I can tell you from experience that it's psychologically dangerous to believe that the place that you work at is "yours." (Unless you are self employed.) For most people there will come times when your employer will not agree with you and you need to do what they want you to do. Some people are lucky to work in a place that values their opinion highly, but don't ever delude yourself that you are in charge of the people who outrank you.

Rabel చెప్పారు...

You can go out showing your ass or you can go out with class.

Quayle చెప్పారు...

IEE1.8K whatever said: "One suspects Mr Pelley’s intentionally chose the loudest possible form of good-bye. This article misses the story"

As usual IEE misses the story. We live in a day that the content CREATORS (here Bibi) have all the power. CBS has zero power. CBS has cameras. So does every person on the street. CBS has a network to broadcast. So does every person on the street. Broadcasting is a commodity now. If you want eyes watching (i.e. revenue), you have to get to content that people want to see. If you want to speak to Bibi, you agree to Bibi's terms to be able to generate the revenue based on who watches. Or put differently, CBS needs Bibi to generate revenue, but Bibi doesn't need CBS to get his word out. Pelley and the old guard apparently don't know that. They had convinced themselves that they were the deciders of fact - the purveyors of the truth. It was always, and always should be, that the people are the deciders of fact, not the intermediaries.

Rick67 చెప్పారు...

At first I thought Pelley was fired unjustly and somehow it was all Trump's fault. Then I read what actually happened.

When I left the church where I served for 18 years my wife and I were determined to leave as much as possible on a positive note. Even though there were several unspoken reasons why I was grateful to escape that setting.

john mosby చెప్పారు...

Lodogblog, I get what you're saying, but:

Your family is 'yours,' even though you sometimes have to do what your parents (as a kid) or your spouse (as an adult) want to do.

Your country is 'yours,' even though you sometimes have to do what the majority of voters want, when that majority doesn't include you.

I guess the difference is you can leave the company a lot more easily than you can leave the family or country. CC, JSM

narciso చెప్పారు...

https://x.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/2062264952380067937
should be remembered that the context of Pelley “leaving” CBS evening news in 2017 it was because of his agitating inside the operation on “Me Too” issues against his bosses. He was warned by Pres. of CBS he could cost himself his job, but he kept it up.

So he was removed as both anchor and managing editor.

Yesterday was the second time he was canned for his attitude.


James K చెప్పారు...

"If this is a mistake, we'll soon see Pelley making millions on his exceptional talent and journalistic skill."

Like Bari Weiss did after she left the NYT. Best career move ever. But it won't work out like that for Pelley, who will likely end up on MSNOW or worse.

I tend to think this is all rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Shows like '60 Minutes,' and network news in general, are in their death throes, fighting over a shrinking audience. If Bari can carve a niche for CBS News as a more objective, down-the-center organization it might have a fighting chance.

bagoh20 చెప్పారు...

I think 60 Minutes could be a hit again. Fire everyone and start over with young independent journalists. There is more dirt today than ever before, and millions are thirsty for someone to expose it. That's why people like Nick Shirley, Matt Taibbi, and dozens of others are making individual careers on it. It's easier than ever to find and expose dirt. If you had a major news organization to work with, you could rock the genre.

rehajm చెప్పారు...

Did CBS News just do a story about the extent of the fraud in California, the kind Nick Shirley exposes? That’s probably why Pelley is so mad…

narciso చెప్పారు...

No they savaged the cajun navy relief workers though

narciso చెప్పారు...
ఈ కామెంట్‌ను రచయిత తీసివేశారు.
Tina Trent చెప్పారు...

The problem with Scott Pelley, and pretty much everyone else on 60 Minutes, is that he went into every story thinking the story was about Scott Pelley. And the bias.

Tina Trent చెప్పారు...

Bagoh20 for the win. Taibbi needs a wider audience. The only other way to increase the audience is to bring back old Andy Rooney tape.

Dave64 చెప్పారు...

The inmates thought they ran the asylum. They were consumed by their egos. They forgot rule #1: he who signs the checks gets to make the rules.

Lazarus చెప్పారు...

I guess Bari, David, and Larry weren't as much in love with the sound of Scott Pelley's voice as Scott Pelley is.

Tell your boss and his boss exactly what you think of them and you are likely to be fired. I wonder if unionization makes a difference.

60 Minutes won't be a hit again. It's like IBM. Their moment has come and gone. People have too many other ways of getting information.

Marcus Bressler చెప్పారు...

I also had not watch 60 Minutes in 40 or so years. The only reason I knew it was still on the air was the news they had interviewed Trump, Biden and Harris.

Original Mike చెప్పారు...

"There is more dirt today than ever before, and millions are thirsty for someone to expose it. … If you had a major news organization to work with, you could rock the genre."

I agree.
What are they waiting for?

Mason G చెప్పారు...

"What are they waiting for?"

Maybe nobody wants to get killed by the left for exposing their fraud?

Left Bank of the Charles చెప్పారు...

“Pelley chose to insist on getting fired.”

Pelley did invite getting fired, and probably wanted it, but what he did wasn’t necessarily a firing offense.

I’ve seen a lot of corporate meetings get hijacked by angry tirades against the management that don’t result in anyone getting fired, and have done it once or twice myself. I find it best to save the really angry part for one on one after the meeting - it makes it easier for the boss to save face when they don’t want to fire you.

Donald Trump himself has recently gone off on his bosses in Israel, Oman, and such. They didn’t fire him because they still want his mercenary services, our country’s military.

For another example, CBS didn’t fire Stephen Colbert, they just let his contract expire without renewing it. That probably saved them a contract buyout fee, and kept the ad revenue coming in for several more months.

CBS probably thinks Scott Pelley gave them cause and won’t have to pay him the contract buyout. Does CBS have cause? It seems to me the Pelley rant falls into the protected categories of workplace grievances and working conditions. But Pelley has his FU money, and may let it go.

కామెంట్‌ను పోస్ట్ చేయండి

Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 4 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.