February 7, 2026
"Is it inappropriate for a mother to suggest two naked women carrying a surfboard for my 15 yr old sons wallpaper?"
Crown Princess Mette-Marit of Norway asked Jeffrey Epstein in email quoted at "The Truth Is Out There/How the Epstein files turned everyone into conspiracists" (NY Magazine).
Posts
87 comments:
Uff da!!!
No. Surfboards are dangerous.
Women or girls? Sims? Is the concern pedo progress, #MeToo liberalism, or political [in]congruence?
Well, she's their mother, but I've never heard of naked women carrying wallpaper on a surfboard. And in my experience, 15 year old boys don't have much interest in wallpaper, at least not red-blooded Americans.
John Podesta.
Anything would be better than that poster illustrating the similar contours of a woman's torso, a bottle of wine, and a sports car.
Conspiracy theorists? That's a funny way to spell popcorn distributors.
The Epstein files are the gifts that keep on keeping on, no matter how mundane.
Epstein comes off as uninterested and uninteresting. Maybe he had an intern handle his e-mail.
Imagine how disappointed her boys were when they found out Mon was talking about wallpaper.
Qanon was right about everything.
There is a reason the democrat media went so hard against Pizza gate.
It is because there was a ring of mostly democrat fixers like John Podesta using a Pizza Restaurant to organize their kid fucking and everyone in Washington DC knew about it.
And yes they were all in the Epstein files.
So, Epstein was a manager of hookup culture, who hit the wall with pedo indulgence. The first rule of social liberal club... a progressive path and grade. #NoJudgment #NoLabels
It's not inappropriate if you are a member of the elite ruling class, no point in instilling hopelessly manipulable middle class morals in your children.
Leftists don't give a damn if their precious Democrats were in the hot tub with the naked 17 year old.
Only Trump matters to them.
Another reason why planned parenthood is an imperative fetus... feature of sustainable social progress.
So that's the new framing. Lets not talk about Epstein being a Mossad asset. Or all his crimes. Or all the powerful people who were his friends. No, lets switch the subject to QAnon. And "Conspiracies". LOL.
Its a variation on "Republicans pounce", whereby the liberal/Left MSM changes the focus from the crime or bad policy to the Republican's attack and how they're using the issue. The MSM framed issue stops being "Democrats have a bad policy or committed a blunder/crime, whats up with that?" to "Republicans are attacking the D's over X, why are the R's doing this and are they being partisan or unfair?".
In the UK, the Epstein files are now a Government scandal. The current UK ambassador to the USA, Lord Mandelson (name? close enough), has been fired and drummed out of the House of Lords for his lies about his relationship with Epstein.
Meanwhile, in the USA, the MSM refuses to discuss Epstein and his activities in any real manner or do any invesigations. Unless its Musk or Trump.
RCOCEAN II said...
So that's the new framing. Lets not talk about Epstein being a Mossad asset. Or all his crimes. Or all the powerful people who were his friends. No, lets switch the subject to QAnon. And "Conspiracies". LOL.
Everyone knows Epstein was a Mossad front now.
The fun part is watching the ducking and dodging.
Epstein was a CIA asset, MI5 aligned, with Zionist contacts.
The release of a massive file provides plenty of shiny objects to dazzle the public and keep them from asking the important questions.
It looks like Starmer is done for, based on this release, and the trick for the globalists is going to be getting a new PM in there who is as gung ho fixated on keeping the war in Ukraine going. Now the Brits are saying that Epstein was a Putin asset, you know, to keep the pot boiling, but the problem is that there was an email from Epstein asking Mendelson for help using his government position to get him a visa to go to Russia.
Plainly the files were never released before this because of the interests of the globalists, and obviously had nothing to do with "protecting" Trump.
Age of consent in Norway is 16. So, the kid and the mom have grown up with that as the norm.
Yes, it's inappropriate. Children do not require sexual education, let alone lessons from their parents. Teach them biology, not ideology. Personal, not shared or shifted responsibility. Nature and moral awareness will prevail over selfie indulgence and ethical ambiguity.
All of this stuff was an open secret among the people who rule us through constant manipulation of whatever they decide the narrative is today.
Well, she's their mother, but I've never heard of naked women carrying wallpaper on a surfboard. And in my experience, 15 year old boys don't have much interest in wallpaper, at least not red-blooded Americans.
2/7/26, 9:43 AM
Are you kidding. Mother To Teenage Boys is almost a rite of passage. Native Americans call it the OMGWTF. First comes the reach under the bed for a sock so stiff it cuts her hand. Followed by a 3 hour reality check where husband redefines the term "normal" when applied to males. Then comes the Processing Phase (which can last up to a year) where she realizes every perverted reference re male sexuality she's heard lowballed it so badly that it's almost criminal.
Naked women wallpaper? Jesus. He'll be jerking off 5 times a day, leave the poor kid alone.
The Scandis have a much less puritanical attitude toward nudity. Not many opportunities for sunlight, so have to maximize that Vitamin D when you can. Plus the coed saunas. Add that to the general European post-wars loosening of attitudes towards sex. CC, JSM
Also, I don't have a subscription to New York Magazine, so I don't know if or how much the article mentions this, but Mette-Marit's son is currently on trial for rape. CC, JSM
“Conspiracists?” How about perverted voyeurs? Pakistani Muslims in English towns make Epstein look like a piker. By comparison, the leftmedia and their Democrat masters barely noticed. Presumably, Trump had never been to Rotherham.
I've read the email correspondance she had with Epstein and the worst is when she wrote, after his first conviction:
"Google U after last email. Agree it didn't look too good :)"
Living here in Norway, I see her on TV fairly often. She comes across as being a warm, open hearted person who is incredibly naive. But with her party girl past before marrying the Crown Prince, she appears to be a silly girl who never grew up.
I do feel sorry for her. She has lung problems and will most likely need a lung transplant and the son she had out of wedlock before marrying the Crown Prince is on trial now for multiple rape charges and voilence against former girlfriends. So there are now daily headlines about that and the Epstein connection, which she had previously downplayed.
Bagoh20 said...
"How do we know any of this is true? These records have been hidden for years. In that time, they could have been edited, destroyed or created out of nothing. We are simply trusting people and organizations that we already know lied shamelessly for years. The same people who made up Russia collusion, laptop is fake, most secure election in history"
The funny part has been watching the Left chase the red dot. All those attempts to jail, murder and knock Trump off the ballot and Democrats believe their Top Men left a Kryptonite Bomb secured in the vault as insurance against a rainy day? How stupid do you have to be to still hope there's something in the Epstein Files that hurts Trump? Worse, this recent discovery of welfare fraud funding voter fraud is the capstone to SYSTEMIC CHANGES Trump has made to the Electoral Battlefield. He's stripping away all the Left's exploits and cheat codes - I don't think the Democrat Party will be alive in 2 years. Maybe as a Regional Power. Leadership knows they're fcked, that's why they're risking a civil war over Minnesota. Trump has the Democrat Party by the jugular, they're bleeding out. Soros is about to catch a cruise missile. If a Kryptonite Bomb existed, it would have been detonated by now.
"Living here in Norway"
Thank you for putting a human face to this. I'm sorry she's having to endure this.
The new dodge in the UK Daily mail is to claim Epstein was a "Putin Asset" - LOL. IRC, Alex Jones is doing the same thing. Epstein was "KGB". Others are trying to muddy the waters with "CIA". The memo must have gone out.
The only people who want to mention Epstein and Israeli intelligence are...Israelis. Go read their newspapers.
BTW, wasnt it interesting that until the recently released JFK files all mentions of Israel and Israeli intelligence in JFK assassination files were redcacted. They even kept the Jewish CIA guy who was supposed to be following Oswald a secret. Curious.
BTW BTW, you can understand why Trump fought the release. It wasn't for himself. It was for a lot of people he knew. He loves the Brit Royal Family and now Prince Andrew is toast. And he liked the Brit Ambassador to the USA - and now he's gone. Even Musk has taken some hits.
"Living here in Norway, I see her on TV fairly often."
Thanks for the info. Its amazing how many of European and Brit Royalty can't keep away from sketchy characters - especially if they have $$.
Recommend? Yes. That would definitely be inappropriate. Allow?
Recommend? Yes. That would definitely be inappropriate. Allow?
There lies the question. In private? Observe and analyze behavioral cues for dysfunctional progress.
In public? Exhibition? Social progress? In some religious states the female is kept affordable, available, reusable, and taxable. A prop of sexual rigor mortis or penile pleasure with em-pathetic appeal.
Fen is back!
Or at least someone is using the name; since I don't read and follow all the posts I may have missed it until now.
I'm with the skeptics here. It's obvious that The Epstein Files are a compote with many cooks, eminently and possibly infinitely manipulable to prove or disprove everyone's favorite theory.
But folks love their dramatic distractions.
The likely response of any normal 15-year old boy would be: "Mom! Ewwww! Lalalalala I can't hear you!"
I'd have to see it.
How hot are they?
"Is it inappropriate for a mother to suggest two naked women carrying a surfboard for my 15 yr old sons wallpaper?"
Given the surfing motif, knowingly giving him a Woody would be entirely appropriate.
1. We Americans and the French have the right idea about royalty. Worthless.
2. My big takeaway from the Epstein files is that many in the elite who run this country are deeply immoral. Terrible people. I hope they all get ruined. Larry Summers deserves everything he gets.
3. There’s a new Epstein running around today doing the same stuff with his buddies, but we don’t know that person’s name yet.
4. Do we really know how he got so rich?
The escape key link suggests why
Gosh those nordics are dim
Like the spinal tap cover
Robert vesco wasnt as big a player, but be was involved in many ways
Remember Scandecor wallpaper, from the 70s? Huge photos of forests, etc? Maybe it never went away in its home countries? CC, JSM
With all the resources she must have, going to Epstein for parenting advice (with a weirdly worded question) seems more like a "I like to sexualize teenagers too" statement more than it does a question. That it's her son makes it creepier.
I'm still slightly thrown by the "for a mother" instead of "for me" wording. I wasn't sure if it was another mother suggesting this for her son. I'm going to assume it's an 'English isn't my first language' artifact.
Not in the same creepy way
The cabal in kingsman which involved nordic royals seems more on point
Were the two naked females carrying surfboards in exchange for the son’s wallpaper? I’m confused. Was the wallpaper already hung? If so, that seems like a bad deal…
To be sure: I’m not an expert on surfboard / wallpaper economics.
What I’m trying to say is this: if you’re a fifteen year old dude, and two chicks wanna parade around nekkid carrying a surfboard in exchange for your wallpaper - hung or not - you should probably take the deal. Hope this clarifies my free market assessment.
why IS IT? that our elites are ALL pervo sicko creeps?
It's better if you're hung.
Phrasing
When do they take you in the room and tell you all the immoral stuff you will be involved in? Does that happen at HOA member, or city council member, or do you get all the way to state government before you know?
’When do they take you in the room and tell you all the immoral stuff you will be involved in?’
In my experience, that’s typically the second date…
There was a line like that an episode of midsome4 murders
Depending on the women, it sounds like a decent trade, if the offeror doesn't mind that the wallpaper is in kind of rough shape after having been removed from the son's walls, and it does have the human trafficking aspect, maybe that's where Epstein comes into it.
Bagoh, it's "hanged"
"Is it inappropriate for a mother to suggest two naked women carrying a surfboard for my 15 yr old sons wallpaper?"
Yes, yes it is
At least she didn't ask Epstein about Naked IDF soldiers on the wallpaper.
A rhetorical question
Bagoh, it's "hanged"
Hee…I remember one day my high school English teacher got weirdly insistent on that point: “Clothes are hung, men are hanged!” About the only thing I remember from that class.
Re the actual topic here: I wish my mom had been more like that.
Is this "wallpaper" as in wallcovering or decor of a room? Or is it "wallpaper" as in a transient choice for the default image on the computer-screen?
I'm somewhat amused at a Scandinavian asking an American for advice on the propriety of something nudity-related, unless it's jokingly to prove that even the most worldly Americans will say "you must keep that sort of thing hidden from teenagers".
“Turn everyone into conspiracist” sounds like a gaslighting to me.
Men are either hanged or hung, depending on what you are talking about.
Epstein was also great friends with the guy in charge of the Nobel Prize Committee. Of course, he was a "people person".
I wonder if that's why so many Jews have gotten the literature prize in the last 25 years. Maybe a few stock tips here and there did the trick.
You had to make it weird (er) arnaut the west african
I suggest lining the walls with Trucker Girl mudflaps.
Given the weirdness of the UK Royal family, I thought they should start over with another Royal family. They did it before with the Hanover's aka George I.
But it seems they're all weird and corrupt. You'd think if there was one normal one, its be Norway or maybe Sweden. But no... they're all strange.
Grace Kelly tried to improve the group that ruled Monaco, but look at her kids. LOL.
Epstein files - you gotta go to the foreign press to see the impact. Israeli, Iranian, indian, UK, etc. The USA press just wants to run cover for the US establishment. Bob Wright actually brought up Elon Musk. Yeah, that's the ticket.
RC wrote: I wonder if that's why so many Jews have gotten the literature prize in the last 25 years. Maybe a few stock tips here and there did the trick.
You really are a piece of shit.
Nude or naked? Form, silhouette, or explicit depictions? Female sex or feminine gender sim? Diversity (e.g. racism)?
If you are an adult asking "Is it inappropriate...", you have already lost.
Theres a hanoverian prince in germany
Don't they have to fight it out on the battlefield, broadswords, cavalry with longbows, halberds?
IIRC it's not that easy to switch royals in the UK, viz The War of the Roses.
Two naked women carrying a surf board:
https://www.seabreeze.com.au/Photos/View/9811349/Surfing/Nudegirlssurfboard600x466/
https://youtu.be/ZBgI2PLj0pA?si=im_F_wU_WCiU2MmI
Anglo-American writers who recieved Nobel Prizes for Literature since 1987:
-Jewish: Gluck, Bob Dylan, Pinter, Gordimer, Brodsky.
-Communist married to a Jew: Lessing
-Black: Toni Morrison, Walcott
-Other: Munro, Naipul.
English south african Russian
https://www.seabreeze.com.au/...Nudegirlssurfboard
The feminine form is a celebrated work of art.
Mark Steyn mentions the Crown Princess and her son: https://www.steynonline.com/15956/paedos-all-the-way-down
The gal had/has issues and appeared to pass them on to her son.
Post a Comment
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.