January 10, 2026

"Rock was the greatest single social changing force of the 20th century..."

"And here we are 25 years into the 21st century, and rock couldn't be less of an influence on the social political order. Does anybody think that that's kind of strange?"

Asks Billy Corgan.

91 comments:

john mosby said...

He's got a rather narrow definition of 'rock.' As a fellow Chicagoan of almost the same age, I sympathize. But it makes his argument boil down to 'my style of popular music isn't popular.' He lists other genres, notably rap, that do have political and cultural influence. I would say that rap/hip-hop is rock, just like rock is R&B. All the genres overlap. Hip-hop producers sample in rock all the time. The 'whitest' heavy metal bands Corgan and I listened to on WLUP were basically blues bands. Pumpkins put orchestral strings in some of their songs; in that way, classical music lives on. &c. CC, JSM

rhhardin said...

I characterize it as drum, as opposed to classical music that has internal harmonic conversations. Africa vs Europe.

Temujin said...

I dunno. Communism/Socialism was a pretty big social changing force in the 20th century. 100 million plus missing who would have backed me on this. As was the Nazi movement. The advent of the internet kind of changed things a bit, don't you think? The iPhone?
People have short memories. Or don't actually pay attention to history.

Elvis and The Beatles were big. But not the same. I mean, I liked Joe Strummer as much as the next guy, but I don't think he changed the world, or society. Nor did Dylan. Ask him.

WPS234 said...

The automobile. The pill.

Eric the Fruit Bat said...

What's weird is Mr. Corgan seems to sincerely believe the things he says in that video without being strung out on drugs.

Not an oldster. said...

Old bald guy buttoned up and sold out. He talked for minutes in your clip, and didn't say anything relevant...

He is not being muted. His money insulated him from having anything relevant to say. Same as you ann. Big platform, no message.

"Hey old kids.... wanna hear me reminisce about dying music and TV stars from my youth? Pay me to get wild and sexually suggestively lick an egg salad sandwich for the cameras?"

Time for your daily walk, ma'am....

john mosby said...

Rhhardin: what about prog rock? CC, JSM

Not an oldster. said...

Young people are the messengers of truth.
Old boomers are trying to stamp out young people for decades. You'll be off the stage in time.

narciso said...

Probably around the time nirvana and inxs became self indulgent

Mike (MJB Wolf) said...

So generic, written by committee (and AI), autotuned dreck has less effect? The Devil you say! Strangely, live music is still selling tickets. Humm. Quite the puzzle.

RideSpaceMountain said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Beasts of England said...

Rock and Roll is near and dear to my heart, but that’s a clueless take, Billy. Television certainly had more cultural and social impact than rock.

RideSpaceMountain said...

The single greatest artistic force of the 20th century was the motion picture, in all its myriad forms.

Mike (MJB Wolf) said...

Second data point: rap fell out of the Top 40 for the first time in 30 years.

Mike (MJB Wolf) said...

Now rock music on TV, that was revolutionary.

Not an oldster. said...

Glory days, glory days, glory days...
Talk it up, oldsters. Lol

Mike (MJB Wolf) said...

Chevy uses Judas Priest in current truck commercials. Old solid rock and roll.

AMDG said...

Social Media

William said...

I think rock music is the single most influential factor in a rock musician's life. For the rest of us not so much. Microwave ovens, Amazon home deliveries, internet porn, the end of leather, hard soled shoes: all of these things have had more of an impact on my life. I like rock music but if it didn't exist, I could make do with Glen Miller or Gilbert & Sullivan......

Joe Bar said...

Hey! It's Bill Burr's brother!

Joe Bar said...

IYKYK

Joe Bar said...

https://youtu.be/ZkkTiRJz07A?si=yvugxR5_FyZFNxx-

Wince said...

When this post first came up on my screen I thought it was one of the old Civil War era death photos. Only thing missing was the sad Ken Burns violin music.

The Vault Dweller said...

Billy Corgan has a high opinion of himself. He deserves to have a high opinion of himself. However, maybe that opinion ought not be quite as high as it is. I say this as someone who really likes the Smashing Pumpkins.

mezzrow said...

Billy Corgan exits his time machine at the Wagner villa in 1877, where he and Richard discuss the impact of rock and opera in their respective golden eras and their influence on culture both in the zenith and afterward.

tommyesq said...

I think it is stranger that rock was a huge social influence at one time (assuming that to be the case) than that it isn't anymore.

gilbar said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
gilbar said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
gilbar said...

i think electronics (thermionic, solid state, semiconductor),
PROBABLY had a slightly bigger bigger affect on social change,
than long haired boys playing g-tars in their garage.

i wonder were this "rock" would have been without amps?

Howard said...

Social Media projecting millions of average people dominates the culture today. It's purely democratic.

gilbar said...

oh! i see,
he means that rock was the greatest single social changing force of the 20th century..
as far as ENTERAINMENT..
well; as far as MUSIC..
well; as far as music for white people..
well; as far as music for white people in northern USA
got it!

john mosby said...

Mezzrow: "Billy Corgan exits his time machine at the Wagner villa in 1877"

Wagner is the progenitor of prog rock and heavy metal. The multimedia Gesamtkunstwerk, the incredibly long multi-episode cycles, the incorporation of ancient legend, the leitmotiv as a recurring signifier in those long cycles, etc.

If the 60s and 70s rock guys weren't classically trained (and lots of them were), they were tapping into that same need for a culturally unifying multisensory experience that Wagner was. CC, JSM

Peachy said...

The Walz Boelter metric of biden illegal entrants... Russia Russia Covid Fauci.

BudBrown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Peachy said...

Billy Corgan has a horrible singing voice.
Not trying to be mean here. He seems like a nice normal guy.

Yancey Ward said...

Rick Beato talks about the decline of pop/rock music very regularly. I find almost all of such music made today unlistenable/boring as all fuck. One thing Beato regularly points to is songwriting by committee. My personal view is that such committee writing shows that combining the efforts of lots of talentless hacks doesn't improve on any one of their singular efforts- a million monkeys typing on computers for a million years just gives nonsense.

Mr. Majestyk said...

I don't know about his claim that rock was the single greatest social force in the 20th Century, but I am intrigued by the suggestion that someone pushed a button and stopped rock from being a social force at all. It always did seem odd to me how quickly rock seemed to largely disappear from the scene once the 90s ended.

Yancey Ward said...

Peachy, Corgan's voice is quite unique and distinctive- I am huge Smashing Pumpkins fan and his voice, however bad it might be from a technical point of view, would be missed sorely by people like me.

Beasts of England said...

’Wagner is the progenitor of prog rock and heavy metal.’

The Ring Cycle is the only piece longer than In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida, so you’re on to something… :)

Achilles said...

"Rock was the greatest single social changing force of the 20th century..."

People need to read up on social contagion.

Much of this is monkey see monkey do.

Beasts of England said...

’It always did seem odd to me how quickly rock seemed to largely disappear from the scene once the 90s ended.’

Some of the best rock music ever made is still alive and well.

h/t Johnny Winter

(see my avatar for details)

Peachy said...

Yancey - Just my opinion. I'm not anti-Smashing Pumpkins!
Heck - they are very popular and he is a rich man because of it.
I'm just a vocal snob - don't mind me.

Anthony said...

The Vault Dweller said...
Billy Corgan has a high opinion of himself. He deserves to have a high opinion of himself. However, maybe that opinion ought not be quite as high as it is. I say this as someone who really likes the Smashing Pumpkins.


They're probably my most-played of the last 35 years. Gish through Mellon are always not far from being listened to. Corgan is, I believe, a musical genius, and can be wrong a lot, but at least he's thoughtful. I've been watching clips from this program of his and he's quite listenable.

bagoh20 said...

I don't know how one would define "Rock". I'm sure it's my favorite genre, but I have no idea where the boundaries of Rock and Roll are.

Mr. D said...

Corgan has done well in life and Smashing Pumpkins have a secure place in the rock pantheon, but if his moment has passed, so be it. His song "1979" came out in 1996 and we're now 30 years past that. And I hear songs from well before those years every day, everywhere I go. The ones that had potency retain it.

Tom T. said...

I would say rather that Rock was a result of the social forces of its time, and not a producer of them.

TaeJohnDo said...

When I first read the headline I thought it said "The Rock was ...." It led to a few interesting thoughts about a former wrestler and which of his acting roles had such a profound influence on the world.... Anyway, I need more coffee this morning.

bagoh20 said...

Imagine choosing your own profession as the "greatest single social changing force of the 20th century".
I could make a case that mine, which is industry, was the greatest, and I think it is. The changes to society from how people work in industry, what they do there, and what they make are pretty profound. A lot of artists are blind to that whole part of the world, although they depend on it for survival like everyone else.

Iman said...

Telecommunications.

bagoh20 said...

I'm always taken by the fact that 50 and 60 year old Rocks songa are still in the air everywhere, and young people still like them. In 1970's you would rarely hear music from the 10's or 20's. Something about Rock has been really strong in the face of all the change, although I've noticed it finally fading a little in the last 5 years.
I attended a high school hockey game last night and all the music was rap or rap adjacent.

bagoh20 said...

Industry built telecommunications.
Industry changed art more than art changed industry. There is no Rock without modern instruments, amps, music playing devices, and the wonderful cars we listened to it in.

Mike (MJB Wolf) said...

One can make a weak case that rock music provided an internationalization of popular culture that was new and fresh. Perhaps it influenced other international cultural exchanges. Sports television flourished afterward with huge growth in many pro sports. Eh. TV as a medium leading directly to the internet is probably a stronger argument.

Howard said...

Good points, Bago. However, to play the smashing pumpkins advocate, it is art that leverages the power of technology to the next order of magnitude to actually change culture. The old saw about a Craftsman shouldn't blame his tools is also true in the reverse that the tools don't get all the credit, otherwise any swinging dick could be a rockstar.

Josephbleau said...

I would claim that folk and rock music was a symptom of the social change that occurred in the 50’s and 60’s, and far from a cause. A “social lubricant” if you will.

Josephbleau said...

This is like saying that Duke Ellington and Glenn Miller caused world war 2.

Jaq said...

"Much of this is monkey see monkey do."

Or Monkee see, Monkee do.

JAORE said...

The thing most important to me must, of course be the most important to you. Was Elvis, for example trying to be a social force? Somehow I doubt it. Are today's artists trying. Some are. And they are trying too hard, often by speeches between songs not the songs themselves. Roll in the fact that "rock" can mean music within a range I never imagined in my youth (kind of like country music). Why would this mish-mash of over produced, sample heavy autotuned drek influence anyone?

Peachy said...

JAORE - indeed. when Rock turns to lecture.. I turn it to... off.

Peachy said...

These days most of it is churned out in a lab. The artists have creativity - but no real musical instrument playing ability. Intuitive talent might be there - but ..

A band I like and listen to, they are somewhat lab created.
Other than the drummer - and the song writer's singing - the others require back-up.

A 80's example of a pop band that had no ability to play anything, is the B-52's. The girls could sing - but the entire production was created in the lab using studio musicians.
It still works. So I don't care.
I miss the anticipation of venturing to the record store to flip thru the goodies and new releases.

NKP said...

SMART PHONES!

Imagine WW II if everyone had one.

Imagine all the information in the world in the palm of your hand - without a clue what any of it meant.

Imagine raising teenagers who really did know everything.

Imagine no sense of excitement and awe about far-away places because you've seen 'em a million times before seeing them for the first time.

If that ain't bad enough, wait till AI hits its stride. The more I think about it; being 83 may be a blessing, not a curse.

ROCK ON!!!!! And don't forget to write Trump and have him send Roger Goodell and Bad Bunny to the Supermax in El Salvador before the Super Bowl.

Bushman of the Kohlrabi said...

Young people set the tone for these cultural changes. Sixty years ago, rock was new and something most parents disliked or feared. That made it dangerous and edgy. Today rock is a quaint form of entertainment associated with parents and grandparents.

G. Poulin said...

Rock died when it settled comfortably into the corporate culture, and learned not to stray too far outside the acceptable lines. Fat, aging rockers aren't willing to rock the boat.

Marcus Bressler said...

I don't know who this man is -- perhaps because I stopped following current music a long time ago. I listen to the songs of my youth and enjoy them. Yes, some were "anthems" but he gives way too much importance to music. I believe (and I am biased) that the music of my generation was the best but look at the baby boomers and the rest that came of that music and what they believed in and how they screwed up America. Very few rock artists are worth listening to outside of their music.

boatbuilder said...

Is anybody "pushing a button and making sure [that] people like [him] don't say things anymore?"
Or is nobody listening because what you're saying is the same tired old stuff?*

*I will concede that I don't know any Smashing Pumpkins songs. Is he singing about, say, the absolute fraudulence of the Democrat's J6 "investigation" and "report?" About how government-funded NGO's are bent on taking over just about everything? (Or were, at least until Trump and Elon knocked out the funding?)

baghdadbob said...

Rap has been a major cultural change agent as well.

It has glorified thug & gangsta lifestyles. Romanticized gun violence. Promoted misogyny and reduced women to bitches and hos. Eroded grammar and syntax and de-emphasized upward mobility through education and industry in favor of sports and, well, rap as career paths. Glorified conspicuous consumption, bling and expensive cars over frugality and long-term saving and investing. And prepetuated the minority grievance industry. Now THAT's social impact!

SGT Ted said...

The rock and roll "rebels" became the establishment and they brook no dissent.

Tom T. said...

boatbuilder, for what it's worth, Corgan is one of the few outspoken conservatives in the music industry.

Skeptical Voter said...

Things change. Deal with it. And not all change is good.

The Cracker Emcee Refulgent said...

“ Very few rock artists are worth listening to outside of their music”

True of any art form. Including, interestingly and ironically, writing.

damikesc said...

"When I first read the headline I thought it said "The Rock was ...." It led to a few interesting thoughts about a former wrestler and which of his acting roles had such a profound influence on the world.... Anyway, I need more coffee this morning."

Even more interesting given that Corgan owns a wrestling company (NWA) with a TV deal on Roku, I believe.

damikesc said...

Not huge on music personally, but I do miss, you know, actual guitars in music. Sampling aplenty gets hella hold hella quick.

tommyesq said...

These days most of it is churned out in a lab. The artists have creativity - but no real musical instrument playing ability.

There are very few real instruments being recorded as well. Most "drum" tracks are fully computer generated and include non-organic sound effects, virtually all vocals are autotuned enough that it is hard to tell one singer from another, most "back-up" vocals are just computer-generated doubles of the lead singer, and (probably most relevant to Corgan's point) most lyrics these days are group/corporate-written and consist of "look at me, I'm so great" drivel.

boatbuilder said...

I just listened to about a minute of "1979." I sounds like something I may have heard as background music before, but it made no strong impression. I have heard the name of the band--a lot--but somehow the music never registered at all.
Also Billy Corgan's voice really doesn't go with his face. Maybe I expect him to sing like Bill Burr (which would be interesting).

boatbuilder said...

Or Bill Barr, which would be even more interesting.

tommyesq said...

In 1970's you would rarely hear music from the 10's or 20's.

A big factor is probably that recording quality hit it's high point around the late-60's/early 70's, rendering much of the music recorded then (and since then) very listenable today. Go back to the big-band era recordings, or even early rock, and the sound quality keeps you from being able to enjoy the music regardless of the quality of the songs or the performances.

Lazarus said...

It was appropriate that the Smashing Pumpkins guy had a head like a giant pumpkin. It would have been even more appropriate if he were always smashed.

War was the biggest influence in the first half of the 20th century, and I'd say that affluence and advertising were the biggest influences in the second half. The upsurge of rock had a lot to do with the coming of affluent post-industrial society. Now that it's here, what's left to be said about it that hasn't been said a thousand times? Literature and other arts have the same problem. It doesn't help that the kids who were jamming in the garage are now on their phones playing videos and videogames all the time.

mccullough said...

Hip Hop’s run of 25 years has come to an end. Doesn’t mean Rock will return to the top.

Smilin' Jack said...

Quantum mechanics. Gave us everything from A-bombs to iPhones to AI.

Lazarus said...

It's also appropriate that his big 1996 song was a bittersweet, quasi-nostalgic paean to 1979. So much of suburban youth culture was mediatized in music, movies and television in the last century. What's left to be said?

Rabel said...

There's only so many ways to bang on a drum.

Kai Akker said...

---- the only piece longer than In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida

Play it on a loop. By the sixth or seventh time, you are in a different place. At 10x, -- is it heaven, or is it hell?

bagoh20 said...

"War was the biggest influence in the first half of the 20th century..."
And again industry decided the war.

bagoh20 said...

I often try to imagine how music could change again as profoundly as it did with Rock, but I'm not creative enough to imagine an answer. Rap changed music a lot, but not for the better, and it's really just a deconstruction retrograde search for edge. It also seems to be the most money driven genre to date, competing with country and pop for formularity, which isn't a real word, but should be.

Earnest Prole said...

All Things Must Pass.

Joe Bar said...

boatbuilder said...
"Maybe I expect him to sing like Bill Burr (which would be interesting)."

Bill Burr and Billy Corgan may be half-brothers. That's what my previous posts were about.

https://ew.com/bill-burr-and-billy-corgan-address-brother-rumors-in-surprise-meeting-8780626

Rocco said...

tommyesq said...
These days most of it is churned out in a lab… virtually all vocals are autotuned enough that it is hard to tell one singer from another…

This guy analyzes Judy Garland singing “Somewhere Over the Rainbow”, contrasting it with Kelly Clarkson’s version. To oversimplify, the subtle things Judy does to make her performance so good would be auto-tuned out in today’s recording studio, causing it to loose a bit of it’s edge.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDJF4lR3_eg

Peachy said...

formularity - put that in the lock box.

chuck said...

Rock was a secondary effect of bigger changes. Which makes me wonder what California will do for entertainment when the electricity runs out :)

chuck said...

Engineers: "Tell me, O Muse, of the men of many devices..."

JIM said...

"I'd love to change the world, but I don't know what to do, so I leave up to you" - 10 years After

Jeff Gee said...

It’s been two days and 90 comments and nobody’s going to mention Billy Corgan told Howard Stern that he was having sex with somebody who shapeshifted— twice— and that the Internet has investigated and deduced it was Tila Tequila? It’s like I don’t know you people anymore.

Post a Comment

Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.