"... conducted a vigil of 21 days, daybreak to nearly midnight, to study the life cycle of a single aphid. At the dawn of the 20th century, the American philosopher William James insisted that voluntary human attention was the linchpin of free will. By that time, some laboratory researchers had begun to
turn their attention to attention as a subject of explicit scientific inquiry. One of the first to undertake such investigations was James McKeen Cattell, a German-trained American at the University of Pennsylvania. Dr. Cattell, the first professor of psychology in the United States, used a fast-snap shutter to flash a few letters for a tiny fraction of a second. The test subjects then repeated back to him as many letters as they could remember. Observing a range of results, Dr. Cattell concluded that they reflected a significant feature of cognitive ability: what he called the 'span' of attention. Subsequent researchers used the attention span metric to identify children’s mental 'deficiency.'"
"Defeating the forces that frack human beings in order to extract the financial value of their attention is going to require... attention activism... a new politics of 'attensity.'"
32 टिप्पणियां:
Heh. This post has been up for twenty minutes and apparently no one is paying attention to it
Ok, Jamie will win this thread.
Close attention was always an essential virtue for manual laborers, because there would be times at their jobs when they could lose a finger, get kicked by an animal, or start a fire if their minds wandered. It took a while longer for the upper classes to appreciate attention, because they didn't face the same pressures.
Look, a squirrel!
No doubt my attention span has shrunk a lot. First reading a book took too much. Then the audio book took too long. Then movies, and then an entire song. That thing with the flashing letters might be good.
I always understood "span of attention" to mean the durational ability to remain focused on a single source of incoming mental stimulation over time, as in Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
Instead, this sounds more like "rate of memory capture" to me. Or is it assumed everyone captures the image memory, but the ability to retain that memory and retrieve it thereafter is different?
Dr. Cattell, the first professor of psychology in the United States, used a fast-snap shutter to flash a few letters for a tiny fraction of a second. The test subjects then repeated back to him as many letters as they could remember. Observing a range of results, Dr. Cattell concluded that they reflected a significant feature of cognitive ability: what he called the 'span' of attention. Subsequent researchers used the attention span metric to identify children’s mental 'deficiency.'
Jamie said...
Heh. This post has been up for twenty minutes and apparently no one is paying attention to it
I saw the picture and was wondering why Ann would start the morning off with a post about democrat parasites sucking the life out of our country.
I know that computing has made the harvesting of attention easy and highly scalable, but I don't see that many ads at all. I don't watch cable. I have premium YouTube with no ads, which is my go to medium. I don't get ads on Netflix or HBO max. I only get ads in my email, which I can control at will with blocking and junk settings. I don't get how they are monetizing me beyond my subscriptions, which I still control.
Attending to a thought and pondering it, is to me, the essence of understanding and later, wisdom. Attention also increases memory span for learning. The key is what you attend to and what goes into the mental round file.
During most of human evolution, paying too much attention to one thing could get you killed. It's still a risk if you are in a public place, especially some urban spaces. "Head on swivel" is what I tell my girls.
Will this be on the final?
It's pretty hard to read the last line of the essay without thinking about Samwise Gamgee but maybe that's the point.
So much of life is a struggle to pay attention to what matters and ignore that which doesn’t. Modern life is maximizing the distraction industrial complex.
Dad was correct about all that “no such thing as a free lunch” stuff.
You are exactly wrong Tom T. It's not close attention. Surviving in an industrial or heavy construction environment requires broad attention. Like Bago said, keep your head on a swivel. Thank God for all the blue collar guys that save college boys on construction sites from killing themselves by teaching them this lesson.
'Subsequent researchers used the attention span metric to identify children’s mental 'deficiency.'
If true, based on my observation: We B Dooooomed.
Journalistic jingoism.
"Attensity" is their book. It's also the name of a company that's doing what they object to.
Attensity was founded in 2000. An early investor in Attensity was In-Q-Tel,[3] which funds technology to support the missions of the US Government and the broader DOD. InTTENSITY, an independent company that has combined Inxight with Attensity Software (the only joint development project that combines two InQTel funded software packages), is the exclusive distributor and outlet for Attensity in the Federal Market.
'InTTENSITY' with capital letters and an extra 't' so you know how InTTENSE it is.
Anyway, it's good to know that the government is monitoring our attention spans.
I hope not OT. I have gotten good at focusing on the first five minutes of a movie, and if it does not seem like something I'd like, I click away and find something else. Likely I'm missing out on a lot. Same with the comments here...I can read the first sentence and very quickly see if this person is substantive or interesting or funny. (mostly none of the three) then I scroll away. IKR TLDR.
bagoh20 said...
During most of human evolution, paying too much attention to one thing could get you killed. It's still a risk if you are in a public place, especially some urban spaces. "Head on swivel" is what I tell my girls.
The reticular activating system is a crazy field of study and a fun topic.
You can train yourself to notice things and to ignore things.
Looks like a Steely Dan cover.
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore"
A man walks down the street, he says, "Why am I short of attention?
Got a short little span of attention and, woah, my nights are so long
Where's my wife and family? What if I die here?
Who'll be my role model now that my role model is gone, gone?"
He ducked back down the alley with some, uh
Roly-poly little bat-faced girl
All along, along, there were incidents and accidents
There were hints and allegations
Howard, I get what you're saying, but I still think the blacksmith is going to focus closely on the molten metal in front of him, the carter is going to focus closely on the harness he's hitching up, etc., because a small error could hurt them really badly. And that these were experiences the landowning classes writing books about attention largely didn't have.
The Times changed the title of the story from one about a big lie (which wasn't substantiated in the article) to one about Nazi's.
I think they were fracking the readers to extract money from their eyeballs.
William James said that by our habits of paying attention we create the reality we appear to inhabit. I think of this often in our polarized times when different sides have their different habits of attention and conflicting views of reality.
Sounds political.
YouTube: You are intelligent because you ignore irrelevant patterns -- John Vervaeke
How good am I at filtering and framing?
“ All along, along, there were incidents and accidents
There were hints and allegations…”
Ha! Perhaps rock music WAS the single greatest influence on humanity.
I am absolutely terrible at paying attention broadly. We lived in the western Philadelphia suburbs for twelve years, traveling frequently along the sort of ring road known as 202 between the Delaware state line and King of Prussia, and late in our time there my husband said something to me like, "Did you see the construction on 202?" And I said, "I kind of did - where was it again?" He answered, "Just after the big hill," and I said, "Hill?"
Literally in twelve years I never attended to the topography of a road I traveled six to seven days a week. It was a freeway. Everyone was moving in the same direction, and there were only very specific and infrequent (by surface street standards) places to enter and exit the flow. Why should I care if I was traveling in a three-dimensional space?
I've said here before that hunter-gatherers needed a mix of OCD and ADD people for tribal survival. A few guys who fixate on tracking that wildebeest, a few gals who can really tell the difference between good and bad mushrooms. But also a few guys who can hear or smell something in the bushes, spin around, and spear a jaguar that was tracking the hunting party, and a few gals who similarly can say "what's that?" while everyone else is scraping hides, and pick up her baby right before some predator walks up on it.
Takes all kinds. CC, JSM
“ William James said that by our habits of paying attention we create the reality we appear to inhabit.”
I won’t go so far as to say that gravity did not exist before Galileo rolled his marbles down an inclined plane, but perhaps if humans did not see anything then for them it did not exist.
As a child I was extremely close to nature and I knew things like how to catch a bee and how grasshoppers had black “tobacco” coming out of their mouths, and how you could take a lightning bug and rub the end on something and it would make a glowing line. I was a true natures child, I was born, born to be wild, but I eventually studied math, chemistry, and physics.
एक टिप्पणी भेजें
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.