That was the strongest moment of the 5-hour memorial, the widow forgiving the murderer — because it is what Christ did.Erika Kirk forgives the man who murdered her husband:
— Daily Wire (@realDailyWire) September 21, 2025
"My husband Charlie...he wanted to save young men just like the one who took his life...that young man...
I forgive him.
I forgive him because it was what Christ did and is what Charlie would do." pic.twitter.com/Pd1yGRMRVw
The other exceptionally strong statement of Christianity came from Marco Rubio:
Marco Rubio summoned his inner Father Mike Schmitz and explained the entire story of salvation history in under 90 seconds.
— Bree Solstad (@BreeSolstad) September 21, 2025
🙌❤️🔥✝️ pic.twitter.com/W7ZO11CjQ3
संदेश
46 टिप्पणियां:
Erika Kirk’s eulogy was quite amazing. So much poise. And what a powerful message she shared.
I hate my opponent and I don’t want the best for them…I can’t stand my opponent.
Erika and Marco were on point, offered a memorable tribute, and an inspiration for our Posterity.
#HateLovesAbortion
Both offered beautiful descriptions of Christ's path.
Trump's admission of his human weakness was a tribute to Kirk, by way of contrast.
"He did not hate his opponents. He wanted the best for them. That's where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponent and I don't want the best for them. I'm sorry. I am sorry Erika."
Trump acknowledges his own imperfection, and honors the effort led by Charlie to realize his Christian principles.
To overcome Diversity and strife.
To overcome adversity through personal responsibility and charity.
To overcome hate's love of abortion.
To honor his Father, follow His religion (i.e. behavioral protocol or model), with faith (i.e. trust) and fidelity.
I doubt Trump sees his hate of his opponents as an imperfection. I suspect he sees it as his strength. He’s sorry that he had to disagree with Erika and Charlie Kirk, but I doubt that he is sorry for harboring all that hate in his heart. It was shocking hearing the POTUS spout such dark shit at a memorial.
"I hate my opponent and I don’t want the best for them…I can’t stand my opponent."
His opponents tried to kill him, you fucking imbecile. If you wanted to encourage him to have concern for your well-being, maybe you shouldn't be supporting the people who did that.
Such a horrific, senseless loss. RIP Charlie Kirk. Long live Charlie Kirk.
"Persecutors" would have been a more accurate word for Trump to use in connection with "hate" than "opponents."
Trump has demonstrated an incredible ability to bury the hatchet with opponents when it moves things forward.
"I doubt Trump sees his hate of his opponents as an imperfection."
I hate the scum who did this too. And I don't consider that an imperfection; I consider it a reasonable response.
"His opponents tried to kill him, you fucking imbecile."
Yes they did.
It's on Trump. He's not required to take a knee to men. If he's right, there will be a positive outcome. If he's wrong, his fate is sealed. He advises people to follow Christ, and that message was reinforced by Charlie.
#HateLovesAbortion
“I hate the scum who did this too.”
Trump used the word “opponent”. If he meant that he hated the killer, it would’ve been more understandable, but he used the word opponent. He again vilified and denigrated people on the left, half of the US. “Radical left lunatics”, Trump stirred the shit pot of hate at a memorial for pity sake! Ugh.
‘His opponents tried to kill him, you fucking imbecile.’
History begins anew each day for the left.
Hating your opponent is an imperfection. Self-defense is also an imperfection. Some imperfections are less imperfect than others. There is no commandment that requires people to take a knee to other men, but rather an imperative to strive for principled reconciliation. Is that plausible, is that probable, time will tell. Denying the fitness of reality is not a good faith opening. So, Trump is not wrong.
Radical left lunatics haven’t exactly shown love for Trump, or Kirk. The reason we voted for Trump was because he knows how to fight these lunatics. Calling them out at a memorial service was/is an easy troll-trigger it appears.
Trump knows his enemy... opponent and himself.
“His opponents tried to kill him, you fucking imbecile. If you wanted to encourage him to have concern for your well-being, maybe you shouldn't be supporting the people who did that.”
No, his “opponents” did not try to kill him. Why do you assume every person on the left supports assassination? You see, this is where you folks have gone too far. You are too immersed in hate to see what you’ve signed onto. Half of the US will not just stand there and accept blame for Kirk’s death, no more so than half of the US not accepting blame for the death of Melissa Hortman and her husband and the shooting of John Hoffman and his wife.
There is a very dark feeling that is coming from the right. You are showing the hate we on the left always knew was there. I am under no illusion that the POTUS has any concern for half of the US.
Inga said...
He again vilified and denigrated people on the left, half of the US. “Radical left lunatics.”
Trump didn't "vilify and denigrate people on the left, half of the US" as “radical left lunatics.”
You just did.
"Hating your opponent is an imperfection."
Only if you're a believer. I can respect those who turn the other cheek. I am not compelled to emulate them.
“Trump didn't "vilify and denigrate people on the left, half of the US" as “radical left lunatics.””
Oh yes, he certainly did. Weren’t you listening to his speech at the memorial?
“Trump noted at one point that Kirk referred to his political rivals as “the left,” adding that he preferred the term “radical left” or “radical-left lunatics.””
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5515013-trump-attacks-opponents-charlie-kirk/
"Why do you assume every person on the left supports assassination?"
Not every person, no. But a lot.
The resolution for Hortman passed unanimously. The resolution for Kirk had 96 Dems vote nay or abstain. The hate from the left is quantified and documented.
I really do not need to read Igna's posts to know that her hysteria is acting up again.
Of course, she knows what Mueller knows.
Inga said
“No, his “opponents” did not try to kill him. Why do you assume every person on the left supports assassination?”
Because we hear so much hate from Leftists. “Every” is a strong word, but like with lawyers, 99% of Leftists make the rest of you look bad.
How many people were murdered because of Charlie Kirk’s murder?
How many riots took over place because of Charlie Kirk’s murder?
How many buildings were looted, burned, or occupied because of Charlie Kirk’s murder?
We are not the violent ones…but that can change quickly if the radical Leftists aren’t reined in. And we’re the side with a lot more guns and veterans who know how to use them.
“How many people were murdered because of Charlie Kirk’s murder?”
How many people were murdered because of Melissa Hortman and her husband’s murder?
“How many riots took over place because of Charlie Kirk’s murder?”
How many riots took place because of Melissa Hortman and her husband’s murder?
“How many buildings were looted, burned, or occupied because of Charlie Kirk’s murder?”
How many buildings were looted, burned, or occupied because of Melissa Hortman and her husband’s murder?
Are you trying to incite people to riot against Tim Walz appointing Melissa Hortman's murderer?
“We are not the violent ones…”
January 6th disproved that.
Let me guess; gophers are responsible for the Minnesota murders.
Jan 6th - who was killed - Inag?
You are such a liar - Inag.
I am not suggesting to "turn the other cheek". An imperfection may be of self, other, or circumstance. We have the capacity to judge and choose our action.
“Let me guess; gophers are responsible for the Minnesota murders.”
🐿️ gophers or possibly rabid squirrels.
"No, his “opponents” did not try to kill him. Why do you assume every person on the left supports assassination?"
I didn't say "all his opponents". "Every person on the left" are words you're using to construct a strawman.
Do you agree that someone who tries to kill you is your opponent? Yes or no.
Erika Kirk and Marco Rubio were speaking at a funeral. Trump was speaking at something akin to the Paul Wellstone celebration which is credited with electing Norm Coleman to the Senate.
Inag - your corrupt evil vile party tried to kill trump, bankrupt him, and imprison him. All based on lies. You and your vile party can fuck right off.
Inga - at this moment 9 of the 35 responses to this post are yours. Do you ever think you should keep it to yourself?
I would rather image that Democrats are more like Stephen. You make it difficult
“Inga - at this moment 9 of the 35 responses to this post are yours. Do you ever think you should keep it to yourself?”
Oh don’t worry, Peachy will surpass that soon enough.
January 6th was a Pelosi-rrection with elements of Whitmer conspiracy. A woman escaping a police-induced riot was summarily aborted in a prone position, in cold blood. Another was kicked while lying incapacitated on the ground, no longer viable. There were self-abortions thereafter while citizens were incarcerated indefinitely, under threat of witch hunts, warlock trials, affirmative actions of American civil liberties unburdened, a chilling effect, an Arctic Frost, a first-order forcing of catastrophic anthropogenic climate change.
You know who doesn't think Melissa Hortman's murderer was of the right? The media. These murders quickly disappeared from their pages.
"Catch this, fascist"
Is leftist.
Indisputable leftist.
- inspired by the non-stop "every MAGA is a Fascist" talk we hear day in and day out from top democrats in power and in the media.
His parents and friends said he shifted left.
There will be more.
The leftist assassin lives with a furry trans.
Inga - still waiting for you to provide the J-6 Trump quote that inspired all those FEDs in masks to instigate the crowd in front of the Capitol.
"You must go into the capitol" says fed. you must.
एक टिप्पणी भेजें
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.