[A]t every campus event, Charlie asked the people who disagreed with him to come forward, and instead of silencing them, he handed them a microphone and let them speak....
Shortly before Charlie arrived on campus the day he was assassinated, his staff member texted him that there were many critics and students who were opposed to his views and rather strenuously in the crowd.... Charlie wrote back to the staff member saying, "I'm not here to fight them. I want to know them and love them, and I want to reach them and try and lead them into a great way of life in our country."
In that private moment on his dying day, we find everything we need to know about who Charlie Kirk truly was. He was a missionary with a noble spirit and a great, great purpose. He did not hate his opponents. He wanted the best for them.
That's where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponent, and I don't want the best for them. I'm sorry. I am sorry, Erika. But now Erika can talk to me and the whole group, and maybe they can convince me that that's not right, but I can't stand my opponent.
Charlie's angry. Looking down, he's angry at me now. He wasn't interested in demonizing anyone. He was interested in persuading everyone to the ideas and principles he believed were good, right and true.... But he and I shared a certain motto, never back down and never, ever surrender. Just don't surrender, never back down....
So Trump is like Charlie in that he has an intense commitment to struggle with adversaries over deeply held strong beliefs. Charlie was about endless one-on-one conversation aimed at reaching individual minds and changing their beliefs. That isn't Trump's mode of struggle. Trump fought to get his hands on the levers of power, and once he got about half of the people to agree with him or at least trust him with the power that had to be given to someone, he vigorously began to impose his beliefs on everyone, whether they agreed with him or not. There would be no way to get everyone to agree first. The struggle for power would necessarily continue, and he had to act while he held his grip
Trump has opponents, and he "can't stand" them. He doesn't "want the best for them." And yet, he expressed openness to the idea of loving everyone. He apologized to Erika for saying he hates his opponents and invited her to talk to him and maybe convince him he's wrong. That is, he imagined himself in the position of a student at a Charlie Kirk event with Erika standing in for Charlie. He envisioned himself debating with Erika about the central Christian precept love your enemy. In that view, Trump was confessing his sin. He doesn't live up to the highest calling of Christianity, but he knows about it. He knows enough to apologize for not meeting it and to picture Charlie in heaven angry at him.
Can anyone succeed at high-level politics without hating their opponent? How many of us stay out of politics because we don't want to ruin our capacity to live with equanimity toward others? When Trump was 34, he said he didn't think he wanted to enter politics, "because it's a very mean life." Like Jesus, Charlie Kirk did not live even to the age of 34.
Posts
89 comments:
"'I Hate My Opponent': Trump’s Remarks at Kirk Memorial Distill His Politics/President Trump has been fueled by grievance and animosity over the course of his political and public life."
They did shoot him in the head and try to kill him you know.
They are evil people and now they complain about being hated by people they kill and try to kill.
They can complain but they absolutely earned the hatred.
Your mission, NYT, is to take a flying roger at a rolling donut.
Trump didn't say he hates half the country like Biden did in his RED speech. Trump zeroed in on hies "opponent"
Biden trashed half the country as MAGA extremists - openly.
Similar to Democratic left's non-stop obsession with calling everyone a racist. Calling everyone a fascist.
Trump has every right to HATE his "opponent"
He is talking about ADAM SCHITT, NANCY PELOSI, BRENNAN, MSNBC, THE EVIL SOROS FAMILY WHO FUNDS ANTIFA AND CORRUPT PRO CRIME DA's etc..
Achilles said...
They are evil people and now they complain about being hated by people they kill and try to kill.
They can complain but they absolutely earned the hatred.
9/23/25, 8:58 AM
Exactly. President Trump is making it very clear that Charlie Kirk was a good man even as NPC scum demonize him, and that he will be much harsher on them than Kirk was. Enough carrot. It's time for the stick.
I bet Trump Hates Democrat-Antifa terrorist Nazi-thugs.
I'm OK with that.
That's where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponent, and I don't want the best for them. I'm sorry. I am sorry, Erika. But now Erika can talk to me and the whole group, and maybe they can convince me that that's not right, but I can't stand my opponent.
The left has to be stopped.
They are not going to peacefully stop. They will keep killing us until we make them stop.
There is a key step when people like Erika realize that people like Trump are necessary to stop evil.
If anyone "hates their opponents" its Biden and Hillary. Biden tried to jail Trump on bogus charges, going against 200 years of Tradition that we don't use the power of the DOJ against our opponents. Hillary paid for the fake Dossier, and spent 8 years calling everyone a "Russian Asset" and "Putin's agent".
But the Liberal/left NYT's projects that on Trump.
Anyway, I'm with Trump. He's POTUS, he's not there to debate, he's there to wield power to impose his agenda on the country. That's what he was elected for. Charlie could "love his enemies" because all he was doing was talking to them. Trying to get them over to his side.
Repeating my recent comment in the overnight post for a slightly different take:
A stray thought re Trump and his hating his opponents line…. It’s possible that it was an intentional distancing from the evangelical sect of Christianity that was embodied by Kirk et al. Trump effectively made sure people outside that group still felt a part of the overarching coalition, the MAGA coalition. We all know he was truthful in that moment, and his decision to remind us of that was strategic, I think.
Considering that progs tried to ruin, imprison, and kill him, Trump is actually pretty mild, especially in the context of praising the Kirks as better people. Any movement needs people who can do the hard, "hateful" things.
Kirk was the nice person. They killed him.
Sometimes we give the nice guys a chance to make things right.
But if you had listened to us earlier we wouldn't have had to let the left kill Charlie and prove us right.
All you have to do is read any post by Tea Bag Hag or Inga or RJW to see where this is going.
Democrats/MSM: We hate Trump. He's a Nazi/Fascist. He's corrupt and the FBI/DOJ should put him in jail. Maybe some one should assassinate him. He's not our President, he's not worthy of any respect.
Trump: I don't like you either.
MSM/Democrats - See, he's full of hate and bile!
Excellent analysis of Trump’s eulogy by David Tate, an evangelical YouTuber who usually does recap videos of The. Chosen:
https://youtu.be/DffnVEqztuo?si=CcygBVEisnsn-LHp
CC, JSM
The country is in a prisoner's dilemma with people that hate each other. One side dehumanized the other far earlier than the other realized they'd been dehumanized. The side in a prisoner's dilemma that 'cooperates' with a 'defector' first loses. Both side must 'cooperate' for there to be success.
So, which side does anybody here think would be willing to consider 'cooperation' first? Charlie sure did, and he was shot for it
You're not dealing with rational actors. They have a religious cult of their own. And its blue-haired acolytes have been teaching preschoolers to hate 'cooperators' like Kirk for 50 years.
In the political arena, being nice to the left just gave them more latitude to undermine you. There was little difference in how they demonized you, so why not treat them with contempt. Charlie reached out to them and was murdered for it. The left does not respond to love, only obedience.
The left isn't being stopped, they are self destructing themselves. Personally, Trump doesn't seem like a hater, rather it's an act. Hate is irrational mental and destructive. His overall strategy is to make his opponents hate him. And they do so with mucho gusto. Then to service and maintain that hatred, they take the 20% side of any and every issue Trump gets behind.
Ju Jit Su
Achilles said...
"'I Hate My Opponent': Trump’s Remarks at Kirk Memorial Distill His Politics/President Trump has been fueled by grievance and animosity over the course of his political and public life."
They did shoot him in the head and try to kill him you know.
They also used lawfare to try to put him in jail, bankrupt him, and keep him from running for office. Sorry, but if someone did that to me, I'd hate them, too.
There's no hate like leftist hate. When they say, "Your speech is violence. Our violence is speech.", those are the words of people who want to intimidate everyone else from disagreement.
#LoveTrumpsHate
And its opponent:
#HateLovesAbortion
I think it really should be read as a confession of weakness of character. Especially with the "I'm sorry" part. He's chiding himself to do better and act with wisdom and compassion instead of motivated by hate.
The evil left build the young man who assassinates.
then the same corrupt left have the gal to lie and say "oh - Conservatives like to kill other conservatives"
Mental illness does not begin to explain their demon minds.
Like him or not, Trump is the most transparent person to ever be President in my lifetime. It comes from confidence and success, especially in defeating liars. The left hates that, because they don't know how to do it.
Most politicians lie, even when they don't have to. It's knee jerk from facing media who are always trying to trap you. Trump has confidence in his positions and really just doesn't give a shit what they say or do.
“You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.”
And: “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”
I’m not seeing where President Trump broke either of those commandments when he said, in essence, our enemies are trying to kill us and they just killed one of ours. No, I do not love our enemies who clearly want us dead. They believe murdering and assassinating us is what’s best for them. Therefore, I strongly do not want what is “best for them.”
You know, Jesus was God of the New Testament... and the Old Testament. He preached love your fellow man, do good to those who hate you... and also, He preached that He will come and burn the world with fire and slay all the unbelievers and evil doers.
There's a time and a place to turn the other cheek. And there's other times, where you raise the Title of Liberty, arm everyone, and go marching off to war.
In fact, the Lord was quite specific, both in ancient times and even today, as to when it is right, just, and even commanded of the Lord to go forth to war. Essentially, it is after the third or fourth "provocation."
So yes, turn the other cheek... but God is not going to allow His followers to be massacred, and He will justify defending ourselves. So we need the grace, kindness, and mercy of an Erika Kirk... and we also need the warriors to defend the covenant people of the Lord.
And I make no apologizes for flatly stating that Jesus will justify defending our families, our wives and children and our religion from those demons who seek to destroy it.
As others have pointed out upthread, he has vastly more reason than most to hate his opponents. The biggest risk that follows from hating your opponent is danger of underestimating that opponent, as the extreme left has been doing for the past decade because they hate Trump do much.
@Meade, well put.
“I hate my opponent,” Mr. Trump told the crowd at the memorial in Arizona, “and I don’t want the best for them.”
This is why we voted for him. 3 times.
And by “we” I mean the majority of Americans.
All the people who are seizing on Trump hating his opponents hate their opponents.
Meade said...
“I hate my opponent,” Mr. Trump told the crowd at the memorial in Arizona, “and I don’t want the best for them.”
This is why we voted for him. 3 times.
------------
Speak for yourself, old kept man on Social Security begging for tips...
Many voters had more practical concerns.
Have you tried gaming to get the aggression out?
Some people find more regular sex helps too... ;-)
Meade said...
“I hate my opponent,” Mr. Trump told the crowd at the memorial in Arizona, “and I don’t want the best for them.”
This is why we voted for him. 3 times.
------------
No, no fellas...
Hate didn't get Trump elected. It's why JD won't win either. He only hateful, none of Trump's charm...
Believe it or not, meade,
the majority of Americans voted the issues: the economy, immigration, and yes..."No More Wars".
Spin away. Christmas is coming and yall could use the tips. Madison is overpriced for what you get... ;-)
Weariness and self-defense are lesser imperfections, not necessarily wrong, let alone wicked choices.
Trump identified the most difficult thing about being Christian.
One of the most satisfying feelings in live is exacting revenge from one’s opponents. The problem is that Christians are called to turn the other cheek when every fiber of our beings is telling us that doing so is a time of week mess.
The most common Christian prayer asks God to forgive us in the same manner that forgive others.
As Trump was making his statement I was sitting in Mass where the closing line to the day’s Gospel was “You cannot serve both God and mammon”.
Our refreshingly honest President was at his best there, self-deprecating even in that remark in order to hold Charlie up as a good example. But then he also admitted his stance would require Erika to talk o him (maybe the whole group) and straighten him out. What other president could be so human to say that?
All the people who are seizing on Trump hating his opponents hate their opponents.
Yet they will NOT follow it immediately with "I'm sorry" like Trump did. He knows that to hate is wrong. Even joking about hate compels him to apologize. Instantly.
Human. Unlike the robotic and mean Obama, for example.
One of the things I like about Trump is how he doesn't try the usual politician's "I'm just a humble believer trying to do my best for everybody" bullshit.
He barely pretends to be a Christian; maybe the electorate doesn't need that kind of cant anymore, and future presidents won't be expected to mouth pious platitudes.
I rarely predict the future, but I would bet a collection-plate full of US dollars that Trump's religious beliefs will be as idiosyncratic, amorphous and uncertain on the day he dies as they are today.
Here is another great peroration by a man who was assassinated shortly thereafter:
"With malice toward none with charity for all with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right let us strive on to finish the work we are in to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan ~ to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations."
That is the tradition that Charlie Kirk was operating in. Charlie was an evangelist. Lincoln was a humanist. Trump is in the tradition of the Old Testament--an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.
"Meade said...
This is why we voted for him. 3 times.
Meade said...
And by “we” I mean the majority of Americans."
Said with no evidence :-)
Admittedly, I'm a vengeancy kind of guy myself, here in the late imperial period.
But he and I shared a certain motto, never back down and never, ever surrender.
Trump needs to make sure that the distinction is clear. A parent doesn't hate their child when the kid needs discipline.
92% of the voters in Washington DC chose Harris. He didn't send in the troops to punish them, but to reduce crime so they were safer.
Trump did not up the cost of H1B visas because he hates Elon Musk and the tech guys. He did it because they were abusing the system.
Trump didn't yank security clearances from the 51 intelligence officials who signed that letter to cover for Hunter Biden. He did it because they abused the privilege.
I doubt that Trump hates illegal immigrants, they just can't stay here.
Trump is so amiable, the Left tried to say that he doesn't hate Putin, Kim Jun Un and Xi Zinping enough.
If there were people actively trying to kill you or wishing you were dead, would you NOT call them your enemies?? Would you NOT hate them, or would you bow down and let them??
‘The left isn't being stopped, they are self destructing themselves. Personally, Trump doesn't seem like a hater, rather it's an act. Hate is irrational mental and destructive. His overall strategy is to make his opponents hate him. And they do so with mucho gusto.’
I met him before he was President, and he is genuinely kind. I don’t care for his shtick, to be honest, but I understand the need for it. He is a master of communication and promotion.
"Trump didn't say he hates half the country like Biden did in his RED speech. Trump zeroed in on hies "opponent."
It's aways different when we do it. Always.
There are some levels here, real and inferred. It was a comic routine, a joke of sorts, something not to be taken at face value. The problem is that some people will take it seriously and literally.
Dig a little deeper, and consider that there were people who tried to put Trump in prison and cost him millions for what were (no pun intended) trumped-up charges.. Why wouldn't he be angry, or at least say he's angry?
And the deeper levels? Is he saying he's petty and vindictive, or ready to explode with anger? Is Trump's the politics of anger? Some people will jump to those conclusions. The rest of us don't see it and are waiting to see what he'll do next.
Trump almost ruined the event because he wouldn't shut up, and because he wanted to make it all about himself. How pathetic.
Governance, at any level, be it nation or family, requires a reconciliation of purpose and power. Good luck.
The TImes' interpretation of that statement is shallow and stupid, written by shallow, stupid people for other shallow, stupid people.
The time for reconciliation and contrition was 9/9/25.
Post 9/9/25 reconciliation is possible with reconstruction, apologies acceptable after surrender. We are willing to accept their unconditional surrender at any time, publicly, and in writing. White flags raised after further violations thereafter will not be honored.
I'm sure our terms are not acceptable. So much the better.
Excellent. Ann: you are one of a kind.
You often write about one's inability to know what is going on in another's mind and yet,
"He envisioned himself debating with Erika about the central Christian precept love your enemy."
I would guess that he envisioned himself fucking Erika with a stack of Big Macs and a Diet Coke on the table next to her but YMMV.
It's a classic everyday way to pay a compliment by making a distinction between one's failings and another's virtues, known to every married couple.
"Hating" is what Republicans do, and it's bad.
Democrats are righteously angry warriors for justice and that's considered good.
"Politics, as a practice, whatever its professions, has always been the systematic organization of hatreds." -- Henry Adams
Organization of animosity, opposition, conflict, hostility and the negative passions certainly, whether or not you want to call that "hatred." That's certainly truer than Nancy Pelosi's "I don't hate anyone."
The Clintons showed us the way to demonstrate you are a good, religious Christian: Just ostentatiously carry a giant Bible into church on those Sunday mornings when you attend.
It works best when you are going through a public crisis regarding morality.
If there were people actively trying to kill you or wishing you were dead, would you NOT call them your enemies??
I'm so old I remember when Obama refused to call the Taliban "the enemy" and refused to label Isis "the enemy" but he was excited, gleefully calling Republicans "the enemy" when Congress resisted his thuggery. Yes, the "Get in their faces!" speech where he preached political violence upon his political opponents.
Again, Trump trolls the Democrats and their Brown Shirts, but leaves himself an out. I didn’t like it, but it keeps the lefties stirred up which is okay. It wasn’t necessary for conservative politicians to hate their enemies when Democrats seemed merely stupid. Now that it is clear that they are also evil it is difficult not to hate them.
Righteous anger has its place, including in the New Testament - Jesus and the money changers as an example
Trump has opponents, and he "can't stand" them.
Trump doesn't choose his opponents -- they choose themselves. They believe "what's best for them" would be his death, and I certainly don't begrudge him wanting them to fail.
It's aways different when we do it. Always.
Yes, when the meaning and purpose differs we call it "different." Biden literally read a prewritten speech in a red-lit Nazi-like stage setting where he called Trump "voters" a literal "threat to democracy" and said all of MAGA were enemies of the state while his DOJ was literally naming parents who yell at school boards and Catholics praying for abortion-seekers "domestic terrorists." He put FBI spies in churches.
Trump set up a remark about how loving and forgiving Charlie is by making a joke about his "opponent," who went unnamed. So yes, Mr. Pedant, a joking aside illustrating a dead man's virtue is NOT the same as a primetime Presidential address where the Commander in Chief labels everyone who voted for his opponent an enemy of the state.
Generally the rest of us reserve "it's (D)ifferent" type comments to things that are similar in weight and subject matter that are not in fact very different at all except for party ID. These two things, like the songs goes, are not like each other.
And as I said above, Trump immediately apologized.
Biden never has. (D)ifferent.
I think is Trump is using the word "hate" where "trust (or lack of trust" is more appropriate. When dealing with people on a daily basis, you get a sense of how they will react. Occasionally you will be surprised but not always negatively. But when you have someone change the statute of limitations (but just for one year) for the purpose of enabling someone to civilly sue, you probably didn't see it coming. Now you have to spend time and money to deal with the suit but also have to wonder what else is coming and from whom.
Erika Kirk dissented from the prevailing spirit of vengeance. In the spirit of the Christian Gospels, she forgave her husband’s killer. Immediately afterward, Trump publicly contradicted her, stating he could not forgive his enemies and, in fact, hated them. His words drew cheers from tens of thousands of self-professed Christians in the stadium. In terms churchgoers might recognize, Trump’s America appears to be exchanging the New Testament’s teachings for those of the Old Testament.
For the last effing time, forgiveness in spirit doesn't mean forgiveness from consequences. Sinners can be forgiven AND receive the consequences due them. Unrepentant sinners can be hated for their sin as God hates all sin. Hatred of sin can be remedied by forgiveness, but not if the sin doesn't stop.
Neither God, nor man, is that gullible.
Yes. These are not people Trump is trying beat in a ten dollar Nassau, these people tried to kill him and killed Charlie. His anger towards them is justified. It feels odd having to point that out...
"I would guess that he envisioned himself fucking Erika with a stack of Big Macs and a Diet Coke on the table next to her but YMMV. "
As would the "mileage" of anyone with an ounce of humanity. But YOU do you. And seek therapy. Those voices in your head are not your friend.
I love henge2243. I'd love him even more if he died in a fire.
NYT The Daily pudcast on the Kirk memorial. Comedy Gold. They obviously think of themselves as Jane Goodall observing chimpanzees in their native habitat. However, they are clueless that they themselves are the "they" is that the right claims killed Charlie. They are also clueless about how this assassination is an inflection point. I'll give them a hint, the midterms are owned by Trump, it's the beginning of the end of legacy Media power and the DNC's plan to dominate the USA like they do in California is in the shitter.
https://youtu.be/vFWmHw4GW9Q?si=T2FyOgpKj_r_dmnb
Love your enemy, opponent, but do not celebrate or tolerate their affirmative action. Take a knee to God, and your wife, once, with a proposal.
Yamada: Condon San... you have saying..."Forgive your enemies". I am willing.
Cagney: Sure... forgive your enemies!
But, first, get even!
Meade and MJB Wolf: ✅
RideSpaceMountain: For the last effing time, forgiveness in spirit doesn't mean forgiveness from consequences.
There is also another element to forgiveness: Erika will not let hatred of the assassin plague her for the rest of her life.
You know who else hated his enemies, right?
Coincidence?
When your ass gets send to hell, does that mean God hates you?
Thank you Skipper
Forgiveness is for the benefit of the victim and his family, not the perpetrator. It is not the prerogative of busybodies who are not victims but claim to offer forgiveness on behalf of others. It also has nothing to do with the administration of justice.
Kakistocracy said...
Erika Kirk dissented from the prevailing spirit of vengeance. In the spirit of the Christian Gospels, she forgave her husband’s killer. Immediately afterward, Trump publicly contradicted her, stating he could not forgive his enemies and, in fact, hated them. His words drew cheers from tens of thousands of self-professed Christians in the stadium. In terms churchgoers might recognize, Trump’s America appears to be exchanging the New Testament’s teachings for those of the Old Testament.
It is as if you try to say the dumbest possible thing in the most ignorant way possible.
The presidential perp said opponents ,not enemies. During my martial arts competition days I had many opponents who when across from me I would seek to kick them into submission but never hated them and after the fight we would shake hands showing respect with a bow. Don't know what these people up in here are talking about. ENEMIES OPPONENTS here's a helping tool for the blabberers
Enemy: An enemy is typically someone who harbors hostility towards another person or group, often with the intent to cause harm or injury. This term implies a deeper, more personal animosity and can be associated with conflicts that are ideological, political, or even physical. Enmity can be long-lasting and is often characterized by a lack of trust and a desire to undermine the other party.
2
Opponent: An opponent is someone who competes against you in a structured context, such as a game, debate, or contest. The relationship with an opponent is usually more neutral and can even be respectful, as it is often based on agreed-upon rules and fair competition. The rivalry typically ends with the competition, and opponents may even share mutual respect outside of the contest.
HATE is the key word from the perp in chief ,and that is instilled in HIM Its all for stirring up the rabble as is his MO. NEXT SUBECT tom holman AND the Epstein files LETS GO...
Opponent: An opponent is someone who competes against you in a structured context, such as a game, debate, or contest.
Indeed. We used to have that structured context, before the Democrats and their Deep State co-conspirators decided that the American game was now Calvinball, and knowingly fed false information to the FISA court so they could spy on their opponents, and changed the statute of limitations temporarily to facilitate the most flimsy civil suit ever filed, and laid criminal charges and civil penalties based on the most novel and unprecedented and tortured interpretations of the law, and screamed with one voice that their opponent was the reincarnation of Hitler, and let off thousands of violent leftist criminals with a wrist slap or no prosecution at all, all while persecuting grannies who walked through the capitol at the invitation of the police as if they were the Dalton Gang.
No more structure. No more context. No more opponents. Only ENEMIES who must be totally defeated if America is to survive.
Hey Meade, check your translation. It's not "all your mind", its "all your intensity" (literally " all your very-ness"). Shanah tovah!
Trump almost ruined the event because he wouldn't shut up, and because he wanted to make it all about himself. How pathetic.
Did you watch? I suspect you didn't. Yet you still opine on what he said and did. How pathetic.
The corksoakers at the NYT just can’t soak enough, can they…
https://x.com/mkhammer/status/1970561648248451493
What's the word for people who want you dead, and proudly tell the world.
Obviously pregnant women are now posting videos of themselves gobbling Tylenol. We are not the same.
Do you hate such people? Do you forgive them for trying to harm their children?
"Obviously pregnant women are now posting videos of themselves gobbling Tylenol. We are not the same."
I commented some time ago that Trump could get the insane left to eat their own shit.
I stand by that claim.
The deal with the Left is that they never appreciated the love which Charlie displayed, they called him a hater. They can not tolerate differences of opinion and good faith debate.
"They can not tolerate differences of opinion and good faith debate."
If you look at the things they believe, it's not hard to understand why they don't want a good faith debate.
@Mason G, Trump got the most virulent anti-gunners to defend the 2nd Amendment when he chortled about adding hormone junkies to the 4473. I immediately checked FlightAware for G-OINK.
RSM- Trump's super power is the ability to get people to demonstrate their inability to think clearly right out loud in public, and to do so proudly.
Bagoh20: "When your ass gets send to hell, does that mean God hates you?"
No, it means you hate God. C, JSM
You can bet that trans-women, hearing about Charlie's killing and the "reasons" for it , wished they still had the equipment to enjoy a schadenboner.
"Schadenboner." Amputees often report 'phantom pain.'
Phantomschadenboner might be possible.
The Way Forward…
https://x.com/LiberalHivemind/status/1970291110397518295?s=19
“What's the word for people who want you dead, and proudly tell the world.”
👉 Mulch.
Post a Comment
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.