Wrote Robin Westman, more or less rejecting trans identity, quoted in "Minneapolis school shooter Robin Westman confessed he was 'tired of being trans': 'I wish I never brain-washed myself'" (NY Post).
I don't understand why we are calling this person trans. If you're saying you "brain-washed" yourself, you've implicitly consigned the belief to the past. You might not reveal the loss of belief to others, but you've put it in writing — albeit in code — and we can read it. Why are people pretending to believe that he believed what he said he didn't believe? And he wrote it explicitly: "I know I am not a woman."
I don't see why anyone wants this person to be a member of their group. What good would it do anyone to have Westman as one of their own?
193 comments:
Why is anybody even interested?
What does the news claim to know that you don't know? It claims to know what is important.
3 children 14 and under die every day in just traffic accidents. That's one more than the school shooting. Surely the daily child death is more important than the school shooting. A permanent above-the-fold fixture.
No entertainment value, is why.
It's about entertainment, a dopamine hit from outrage or empathy.
An audience problem.
Unless it's a child death in a school bus. Then it's entertainment.
Another splitting wedge has added themselves to the gaping 'thing that doesn't happen' axe wound of trans-visibility.
Yecch.
They can try as hard as they might
They can shill as hard as they will
But they will never be a woman
Again
Still
Why is this pretender not really trans when other pretenders are? What does it mean to be 'really' trans? A biological male who goes trans is not a woman. Wishing and pretending and insisting that he is a woman doesn't alter reality. Whether the person believes himself to be a woman or not has no bearing on the reality of his situation. He can pretend all he wants. The rest of us are not and should not be obligated to pretend along with him. Way too many of us are too polite to point out the obvious.
And did he really 'brainwash' himself all by himself, or did he have some help from the larger culture?
"I know I am not a woman." Every man pretending to be a woman knows this. There is a huge industry devoted to denying this. Like the mafia, that industry furthers its interests by purchasing politicians. And the merry-go-round continues.
Or--and I am sure that the Mayor of Minneapolis would chide me for this--simply say that this person was a "wacko bird". Hat tip to the late John McCain for the phrase. As for me I am feeling love and concern for the two dead children and the 17 injured first. My priorities are in order.
"a concerning change of character that could get me reported."
reported to WHOM?
So, our Professor doesn't want to call the murderer a "trans",
so says that is INCORRECT, and that we NEED to call him non-binary.
got it!
Robert Westman had the misfortune to be born male in Minnesota and go schizoid under the anti-psychotherapy Walz administration.
gilbar said, "reported to WHOM?"
There's only one group tranz hate more than TERFS, and that's apostate de-tranzistioners.
I don't see why anyone wants this person to be a member of their group.
Does anyone want this person in their group? It seemed like the goal was to establish that the shooter was in the opposing group.
Being trans is a red flag for mental or emotional distress. It isn't a phase or lifestyle choice like going vegetarian or changing parties on your voter registration.
Westman changed his name when he was 17 years old, but is worried that cutting his hair will get him reported for a concerning change of character. Hearing from the parents would be informative.
See this is what we have been told all along: if we don't give teenagers hormones to confirm their identity they become suicidal. Did they give Robin her hormones or just let her change her name and pretend that was good enough? This blood is on the hands of the transphobic nazis.
(Because, I know some of you are stupid-->this is sarcasm. I'm mocking the left you fucking dopes.)
While I am to the right of John Wayne Jesus is about love... This Westman should have gone to a Christian and confessed, then cleaned up. They do have groups to help him transition back to being a male. And to be accepted.
"...it would be embarrassing defeat, and it might be a concerning change of character that could get me reported...."
Reported to who? Reported for what? Would a haircut trigger Red Flag laws? It sounds like there were things leading up to this tragedy that had set the stage for a potential response.
No way out for the mentally-ill teen. Thank the social and industrial-medical culture that encouraged him all along the way. As for 'I don't see why anyone wants this person to be a member of their group....', well - they still have to validate themselves, and their purpose. It's an intermediate step toward showing that the fault lies all with the teen, not them.
I don't understand why we are calling this person trans.
What is a woman? What is a man? What is trans?
How many trans people feel like this, but we don't have access to their diary or their private thoughts?
It must be very confusing to be in that position or state. I doubt there is a lot of certainty for a young trans person about what they are doing moment to moment, day to day and when there is, I doubt it lasts very long. They might say otherwise, of course, out loud.
Westman wrote those words at a moment in time when he was feeling a certain way. It's likely he was feeling differently at other times.
What is trans? Perhaps it comes with a state of constant doubt and anxiety, especially in a young person. Doubt and anxiety often manifest as anger.
This guy doesn't help the cause, that's for sure. Do the white males get to exclude him as a member of that demographic because he did something terrible? Nope.
History doesn't repeat but it rhymes. Many reassignment surgeries of the 1970s ended in suicides by the 1980s. Biological determinism (i.e., with substantial predicability) is real. Mental illness is real. Jordan Peterson knew all this and rang the alarm, and then got bullied and gaslit by a mass of conformist professionals who truly knew better.
Blame corruption, medical industry greed, the short attention spans of the smartphone era, and the smug arrogance of Obama and his followers.
Everybody always wants the shooter to be a member of a group they don’t like, but the reality is, they are mentally ill. Because they are mentally ill, they have rambling incoherent politics that give fodder to whatever argument a partisan wants to make. But the real is cause is mental illness.
I think it's far more important to note that he felt like he brainwashed himself. He didn't do it on his own. He's had an entire nation encouraging it, pumping it, pushing it on our kids. Making what has been, in any other age, any other time in this or any other country, an abnormal process, a normalized 'transition'. Not only was it normalized, but praised. Celebrated. Given more attention and space than its actual participants merited. And so...they had to grow the numbers and continue to push...push society on it's head. Make people uncomfortable, and get others, especially the young, to sacrifice themselves to The Cause.
Another day, another cause. And when it passes- and it will pass- those responsible for people like Robin Westman will have disappeared back into the woodwork. Or the university. Or their medical clinics.
Lastly, I will note this because I think it's important to say. I am not calling trans people evil. I am not denying that there are some people who do need to transition- or at least they have felt a lifelong need to do so. And if they have reached adulthood, it's their life. But for kids and younger people? Regret is too soft a word for what you would feel.
I would also say that, even though I acknowledge there will always be adults who transition, or feel the need to- it is still an abnormal human psychology. It is not the norm. Doesn't make it evil. But it's not normal.
If you tell people that men can have babies, and you keep telling them that - and abusing them verbally if they try to reject this falsehood ... then a large number of those people will just go insane.
This kid's mother - who worked at the Catholic School that was shot up - has a lot to answer for.
Unknown if her name is Munchausen.
What's amazing to me as well is that the last Minnesota mass shooter said he was hired by Tim Walz to perform political assassinations and the FBI hasn't even questioned Tim Walz.
Hasn't even questioned him.
They call Westman trans, and use "she" because that's the trap the Left has made for itself. Any acknowledgment that any/many/most/all these teen and pre-teen types have been induced to "self-brain-wash" and that therapy to recover their true birth identity is valid and necessary is impossible. (If Minnesota is like Colorado, it may be illegal to even call him Robert or mis-gender her.)
Once Westman exhibited symptoms of gender dysphoria it became illegal to help him recover in Minnesota under the terms of this statute signed in law by Tim Walz.
Westman was a suicidal/homicidal maniac whose crimes could have been avoided if Minnesota wasn't in the thrall of evil forces.
He reached the point of no hope. No one was there to counsel him, to catch him before he fell. What were his parents doing through this? Who was brainwashed? His mother, that’s who, when she signed off on name change.
Transition means being in an unstable state. It's pretty clear from reading the entire excerpt and not focusing on one or two fragments that Westman was still struggling to achieve a stable identity. I have no doubt that he had genuine feelings of confusion over sexuality as those are not uncommon in adolescence. As Quaestor noted, he just had the bad luck to express them at a time when we've normalized extreme interventions to align gender stereotypes with biology.
"Because they are mentally ill, they have rambling incoherent politics that give fodder to whatever argument a partisan wants to make. But the real is cause is mental illness."
Yes Tim ... except we now have a Supreme Court Justice who swore under oath that she couldn't define the word "woman." She was either clinically insane or she was committing perjury. Either way, she should not be on any court anywhere.
The real cause may be mental illness, but we still have to live with the consequences of these fucking corrupt Democrats telling our children that men can have babies (and the rest of the load of bullshit they're pushing down kids' throats today.)
OK, we won't call this person trans anymore, as long as we admit that the attempt to be trans is the mental illness that drove him to this. The fact that he apparently admitted (if only to himself) that it was BS is somewhat irrelevant.
I noticed we have only heard about Mrs. Westman. Is there air. Westman? Or is this another case of “The father could not be reached for comment?”
Magnus Hirschfeld, Arthur Kronfeld (founded the Institute of Sex Research, Berlin in 1919), and dr. John Money are burning in hell. So will everyone since them that's enabled this cultural catastrophe.
Are we at the end or the beginning of Heinlein's "Crazy Years"?
"I know I am not a woman but I definitely don’t feel like a man."
The cultural obsession with "special" has screwed so many young people looking for their place in the world.
Normal has become boring, and worse, a stigma.
Joe Bar said...
I noticed we have only heard about Mrs. Westman. Is there air. Westman? Or is this another case of “The father could not be reached for comment?”
I would imagine we won't hear anything at all; if we do, it will be after the parents have lawyered up.
Would the "manifesto" or whatever it really was have been released so early if Westman didn't stop identifying as transgender? And did Westman really repudiate his trans identity or were these comments part of the emotional downswings, accompanied by emotional upswings?
It seems like everyone wonders after an atrocity if the perpetrator were of their own race, or ethnicity, or religion, or gender, or sexual preference. Then, if the killer isn't one of their own, some people use the tragedy to attack another group that they don't belong to. That's become a national sport. The finger pointers don't make exceptions, so why expect there to be an exception in this case because Westman felt qualms about his transness at some point?
""I can’t cut my hair now as it would be embarrassing defeat, and it might be a concerning change of character that could get me reported. It just always gets in my way. I will probably chop it on the day of the attack."
Almost cut my hair
It happened just the other day
It's gettin' kinda long
I coulda said it wasn't in my way
But I didn't and I wonder why
I feel like letting my freak flag fly
Yes, I feel like I owe it to someone
Dear White Staffers @dearwhitestaff
This is Peggy Flanagan, Tim Walz's Lt. Governor, she cares about trans kids!!! ❤️ She will be Governor upon Walz's victory.
Wearing a knife image T-shirt
"I don't understand why we are calling this person trans."
Because that is the form his madness took. When people go crazy in this bizarre modern fashion, we call them "transsexual", or "trans" for short. Maybe you could look it up in the OED?
"He was a bad apple."
Apples: "Wait a minute..."
The democratics and their sick media have their soviet talking points down.
Innocent children were murdered by a Democrat Party creation - a trans-insanity asshole - so you all better watch it with the Trans-phobia. .
The media (D) do not shed a tear for the children.
I don't see why anyone wants this person to be a member of their group. What good would it do anyone to have Westman as one of their own?
You don't seem to understand how social media works and how it taps into primordial drives to keep our place in the tribe.
Westman was a leader on the left right up to the point where it became politically disadvantageous.
The left will take anyone it can get at this point.
To bolster RHHardin's point via Gemini:
"Approximately 850 to 900 children under 14 drown in the United States each year, with drowning being a leading cause of unintentional injury-related death for this age group. Specifically, it's the second-leading cause of death for children aged 5-14 and the leading cause for those aged 1-4. "
“ Klobuchar: The shooter was a madman. There's no way to pin an ideology on this. ”. This from msnbc.
So a noted dem senator claims that a trans woman is a man, and that painting “kill Trump” is not a sign of ideology. They are not smart, they violate their own code while vilifying others who do so. They are disgustingly swinish.
I don't understand why we are calling this person trans.
In the tradition of another famous Minnesotan who rejected the typically masculine , I propose we call him, "The shooter formerly known as trans."
I don't understand why we are calling this person trans.
Oh dear.
If you want to understand go look up the term "Social Contagion." It is common parlance in psychological discussion.
But Psychologists hate the term because it emphasizes the fact that Psychology is a complete bullshit subject.
I know you hate it when people give you "homework" so all on you.
Maybe at work today I will explain why the number of Trans people has exploded recently while the number of crazy people remained the same.
The question isn't why "we" call this person trans. The question is why the "medical professionals" and "educators" who destroyed this person are allowed near children. They should be in prison.
The school authorities, the media and reasonable people have resolved to give minimum publicity to school suicides. They do this because they know that such publicity only encourages other suicidal people to take the plunge......There's a dark glamour that attaches to school shootings, and you can bet that there are other disturbed young people who are reading about this and thinking why not me......However, no efforts will be made to minimize the buzz around this shooting and this shooter. The anti-gun people think that such publicity helps the cause of gun control . This is now the second trans school shooter, and the anti-trans people will make him famous. Perhaps there are lots of troubled young people, and trans young people are troubled on stilts and steroids.
I'm pretty sure this person was nuts, and therefor what they say or write may not be reliable for anything other than proving they are nuts. You don't wonder why a rabid dog doesn't act normal and bites people.
Sometimes I think I might just be one bad day away from doing something insane, but 99% of the time I think that's completely impossible. I think that's normal, but if the ratio was the other way around. I would hope someone would take my guns and lock me in a hospital.
The corrupt democratic party / progressive soviets.
Created this.
Jesse Waters nails it:
... “Teenagers are confused…. But the Left's weaponizing trans kids and turning them into culture warriors, and they've been turned loose against the Church, schools, and Trump. You see it, I see it. The trans clan has a militant wing, and it's out for blood. They're taking lives, defiling churches, and freaking everybody out.”
"... America’s ruling class knows there’s a disturbing connection between trans ideology and violence, yet they insist on burying the evidence under hollow slogans and woke talking points. The brutal reality is that a disturbing pattern has emerged — one that the Left dares not acknowledge because it undermines their sacred narrative. Instead, the media and politicians run interference, excusing and silencing the truth, while innocent Americans — especially our children — are left exposed as potential victims of an agenda they never asked for."
-Matt Margolis
Someone in my family did the they/them crap on their 6 year old.
Progressive democratic sovietism - is a cancer and a dangerous purposeful social contagion.
Because the lifestyle of trans/homosexual was unappealing, but the social distinction of simulant has an exotic appeal (and novel flag). #MeToo
Why are people pretending to believe that he believed what he said he didn't believe? And he wrote it explicitly: "I know I am not a woman."
Maybe it goes back to a recent experience we (Americans) shared that has gone unresolved?
Wikipedia: "Believe women" is an American political slogan arising out of the #MeToo movement.[1] It refers to accepting women's allegations of sexual harassment or sexual assault at face value. The phrase grew in popularity in response to the Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination.
Jude Doyle, writing for Elle, argues that the phrase means "don't assume women as a gender are especially deceptive or vindictive, and recognize that false allegations are less common than real ones."[1]
Criticisms and "Believe all women"
Rebecca Traister, writing for The Cut, calls the phrase "compelling but flawed": it is often recast as "believe all women", and used as a "deeply problematic" and "clumsy imperative" that has "enfeebled the far more important argument that we should encourage them to speak more, and listen to them more seriously when they talk".[2]
"Believe all women" is a controversial alternative phrasing of the expression. Monica Hesse writing for The Washington Post argues that the slogan has always been "believe women", and that the "believe all women" variant is "a bit of grammatical gaslighting", a straw man invented by critics so that it could be attacked, and that this alternative slogan, in contrast with "believe women", "is rigid, sweeping, and leaves little room for nuance"
And abortive ideation following progressive principles is celebrated in social liberal club and Democratic circles. #MeToo
"I know I am not a woman but I definitely don’t feel like a man."
Previously it was 'affirm my identity or I'll kill your kids'. Is it now 'don't affirm my identity or I'll kill your kids'? Maybe 'I don't understand my identity but affirm my lack of understanding anyway or I'll kill your kids'?
Could any tranz spokespeople kindly just explain what will keep you from killing kids short of shooting you first? Thank you for your attention to this matter.
For once, the social media wasn't scoured and sanitized before people made copies of it to share.
The Left is caught in a trap on this one- to play up the Westman's disavowal of his gender identity would go against the narrative that this was always a deliberate choice with no basis in biology.
I don't understand why we are calling this person trans.
Okay, one, it's only people on the right who are talking about this. People on the left have no idea what's going on, because their media won't say anything about it.
Two, the kid tried to transition, from a man to a woman, and he failed. The liberal culture told him that this was possible. His doctors told him that this was possible. And after following their advice, and their treatment, he had severe cognitive dissonance. His ideas and his ideology was in conflict with his reality. And he was very angry about that.
I don't see why anyone wants this person to be a member of their group. What good would it do anyone to have Westman as one of their own?
Of course nobody wants this child-killer in their group. It's why the media is hiding the fact that he's trans, because it looks bad for trans people.
Dressed to Kill Part Two
When life imitates art it usually does so in the worst possible way. In Silence of the Lambs (book, not sure it made it into the movie) Hannibal Lector gives insight into how they'll catch "Buffalo Bill". He said most of the gender reassignment surgeries in the nation were being done at Johns Hopkins and the University of Minnesota. Check there, and see who badly failed the psych screening tests at both. Today I figure most not only accept any and all who apply, but are quietly out recruiting more. A disservice to the small numbers of people for whom this leads to a happy productive life. The others, the sad, remorseful, angry destructive people are just a side effect.
This boy needed to go on a camping trip, catch some fish, and fry them up in a pan. Get in touch with Nature, affirm his nature. That said, did mom want a girl?
His Choice may have been a rite unperformed. The children aborted would still have viable lives. Rest in peace. And the injured would be whole. Planned personhood is a queer confession but not a weird action.
What is the law in Minnesota? In some states it is illegal for a mental health professional to help a gay person, who does not want to be gay, become straight and live a normal life.
If he had gone to a pcychiatrist or psychologist and said, "I thought I was a woman, now I recognize I am not. Please help me with being a man and not a transgender" would the counselor have been legally permitted to offer help?
Or would they be required to affirm that he really is a woman?
Is help even legally available to someone like him?
John Henry
A similar game of see, hear, speak no evil happened with the couplet who sodomized their adopted sons. Also, the serial trans/homosexual male rape-rapist... rapist/sodomizer h/t Whoopi. The Choice to abort the "burden" of evidence to mitigate projected DEIst progressions. Migrants in England, for one. Illegal aliens, for another. Bag limits in California. Crime in DC. Trans/homosexual males grooming in progressive sects with liberal sanction. Et cetera.
That said, most people do not exercise liberal license to indulge DEIst dogma (e.g. racism, sexism) or bloc ideologies. So, Y was it done? If not for profit and leverage by special, peculiar, and Democratic interests.
YouTube: Robin Westman confessed he was 'tired of being trans'
YouTube: 'I wish I never brain-washed myself'
Killing kids as de-transition therapy.
Althouse, are you suggesting the Post is trying to attack innocent trans people, by suggesting Westman is trans, when he is not?
The problem with that argument is that Westman identified himself as trans ("tired of being trans"). And the other problem, of course, is all the pronoun confusion. The NYT is going with "she" and you are now going with "he."
You could go full feminist and attack the NYT for portraying a woman as a deranged killer, when he's a man. Yes?
Confusion about pronouns is synonymous with trans. There's a whole ideology at work here, and he was sucked into it.
Imagine a world where journalists investigate a school shooter, desperately trying to figure out what pronoun to use. That's the world we're in!
Why are we wasting time on this asshole? If we stopped talking about mass shooters, we'd stop having to talk about mass shooters. People get shot all the time in large cities all over the world and it's not international news. Don't give these lazy, loser assholes a low-effort way to finally get the attention they crave.
"Burden" relief lifts a burden is therapeutic h/t Obama. #NoJudgment #NoLabels #HisChoice
He should have chosen a scalpel, a machete, a bladed weapon to commit mass abortion. The weapon of Choice obviates the action, perhaps. There are precedents.
Did the doctors cut his balls off when he was a minor?
I'm not going to chase an ambulance all the way to Minnesota, but I think it might be a public service to sue whatever hospital and/or doctors fucked this kid up.
All those kids with their cisnormal lives. Why not #MeToo?
""I know I am not a woman but I definitely don’t feel like a man." (emphasis)
I don't know what it "feels like" to be a man and I am one. How can I? I only know what it feels like to be me. Where do these people get the idea they feel like something different than they are?
n.n said...
This boy needed to go on a camping trip, catch some fish, and fry them up in a pan. Get in touch with Nature, affirm his nature. That said, did mom want a girl?
That's not how it works. I live in Minnesota and I have two adult children. Based on the interactions we have had with other families, I can think of 5 different families who have had to deal with the trans issue. One of the kids who decided he is a girl was a member of my son's Boy Scout troop; his father and older brother are both Eagle Scouts and his father was Scoutmaster for a time as well. There was nothing outwardly obvious that would have suggested this individual would become trans, but at some point things changed. We knew other kids who were scouts, a couple who were marching band kids and one who was an all-conference distance runner - all became trans for some reason or other. I didn't see any evidence of Munchausen in the parents, either. Most were male to female, but we also know of female to male trans situations as well. If you try to find common threads, you don't really see any, other than kids being immersed in a culture where if someone starts to question anything about their identity, there's a phalanx of "helpers" who leap into action.
Isn't it rich, isn't it queer,
Losing my timing this late in my career?
And where are the clowns?
Quick send in the clowns.
Don't bother they're here.
"other than kids being immersed in a culture where if someone starts to question anything about their identity, there's a phalanx of "helpers" who leap into action."
I think it's "brainwashing". What I don't get is what do the brainwashers get out of it?
phantommut said...
“Are we at the end or the beginning of Heinlein's "Crazy Years"?”
I think we are at the end of the beginning, at least in the US.
bagoh20 said...
I'm pretty sure this person was nuts, and therefor what they say or write may not be reliable for anything other than proving they are nuts. You don't wonder why a rabid dog doesn't act normal and bites people.
Sometimes I think I might just be one bad day away from doing something insane, but 99% of the time I think that's completely impossible. I think that's normal, but if the ratio was the other way around. I would hope someone would take my guns and lock me in a hospital.
This is a perfect lead in to what I wanted to say about this.
Calling people “crazy” is not the right way to think about this.
The chemical processes we developed to control our bodies and survive in harsh environments with bears and lions around trying to eat us and the need to find food and not freeze to death are hardly understood even at a basic level.
The concept of “crazy” is just a coping mechanism by people who are embarrassed by a fellow member of their tribe acting badly. If a Republican sees someone do something bad then that person was crazy. If a democrat does something bad then democrats will just call them crazy.
It is a means to dissociate the tribe they are a part of from the results of the tribe’s community when those actions will reduce the power and prosperity of the tribe.
This is a very recent development as a member of the tribe going off and slaughtering members of a different tribe wasn’t really much of a problem until about 100-200 years ago when Anglo-Protestant culture became something better than the rest of human history.
Westman with superficial differences that appear bigger than they are would fit right in with the average Muslim Taliban tribe in Afghanistan.
If a kid has tastes or feelings that do not conform with normal gender roles, are not "heteronormative", the delusion du jour is that they need transition, not that they might be gay, God forbid. One would hope that trans mania goes out of fashion as quickly as it came in.
His saying “I know I’m not a woman” strikes me as a straight up confession that he used to make that claim.
For rhhardin and Howard, a Bus Full of Nuns holding babies would definitely make the news: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ao5offHNfI
@Achilles: "This is a very recent development as a member of the tribe going off and slaughtering members of a different tribe wasn’t really much of a problem until about 100-200 years ago when Anglo-Protestant culture became something better than the rest of human history."
Hmmm? Back when tribal warfare was routine? When scalping was a thing? When shrunken heads were a thing? When cannibalism was fairly common...when ancient human butchery places like Herxheim, Germany were a thing...when human sacrifies on altars were a thing in the middle-east and meso-America?
Nah. Not recent at all. It may have been disguised as religion, suppressed, or redirected into wars in the old days.
I’m no expert on gender dysphoria, intersex conditions, or related disorders, but as a child, I knew a farmer who had a 200-pound goat with both a vagina and a penis. The elder farmers speculated that its size was nature’s way of protecting it from attacks by the other goats.
Over the years, I’ve wondered if there was ever a time when a doctor had to look at a new mother and ask, “Whaddya want me to do—snip or stitch?” Raising a child who “lost the coin flip” of the snip or stitch could certainly make for awkward teenage years—for both the child and the parents.
Granted, these occurrences are extremely rare, and there are clearly multiple levels of seriousness in such conditions.
It seems to me—and I’ve argued since this latest revision of the Southern Strategy playbook stuck to the wall—that rather than turning this into a politically orchestrated attack on roughly half a percent of Americans facing these challenges—simply to pump oxygen into the so-called “war on woke,” rile up a base, or muddy public discourse—these matters would be far better left to the parents, the medical profession, and, for those who believe, God, rather than having politicians intrude into their lives.
The only interesting and important thing is this: Why are so many Transgenders violent, sometime murderously so?
Otherwise, we should be centering the victims. Not the mass killer. And also the Democrat politicians who seem more interested in "Protecting Transgenders from backlash" and attacking people who are praying.
"The medical profession" is directly implicated in aiding, abetting, and even promoting the ruination of these children's lives.
One would hope that trans mania goes out of fashion as quickly as it came in.
----------
Or that medical treatment/HRT becomes more accepted and available to trans people. If they begin at earlier ages, it's a much easier to transition and "pass" as who you are in the body you're in...
Westman didn't even want to be in his own group of one. The sad thing is that he killed others before he sent in his resignation slip for himself.
“If a kid has tastes or feelings that do not conform with normal gender roles, are not "heteronormative", the delusion du jour is that they need transition, not that they might be gay, God forbid. One would hope that trans mania goes out of fashion as quickly as it came in.”
Too much money to be made, stoking the insanity induced by the medical machinery, behind the fashionable flash-in-the-pan.
Tat seems to be a bit out of context.
Among Minnesota Democrats, Democrats in Congress, and their MSM operatives, the reaction falls along the lines of…
“What terrifies me is if ISIS were to detonate a nuclear device and kill 50 million Americans. Imagine the backlash against peaceful Muslims?”
—— Norm Macdonald
RJ Ward, the problem is that they (or a good percentage of they) require the participation of the rest of society to affirm their delusions. Nobody is bothered by the true medical oddity of being born with both sets of genitalia. It is the social converts with mental illness who insist on invading women's spaces (sports, bathrooms, locker rooms, jails) who must be dealt with. The parents who allow themselves to be manipulated by children and by an immoral medical community are the primary bad actors here. After adulthood I'm not sure what can be done about it by parents, but fundamentally this comes down to shitty permissive parenting.
Others have said this but “reported” to whom? The trans police? And BY whom? The trans enforcers? WTAF
Ronald J. Ward said...
I’m no expert on gender dysphoria
Yet here you are, opining.
Over the years, I’ve wondered if there was ever a time when a doctor had to look at a new mother and ask, “Whaddya want me to do—snip or stitch?”
Yes they do. XXY and XXXY are things that can happen naturally causing ambiguous genitalia. Doctors do consult the parents on their wishes. Unfortunately, the study into gender dysphoria relies primarily on the research of John Money on twin boys (XY).
Raising a child who “lost the coin flip”
It is a tangent that has absolutely nothing to do with the situation at hand. Neither the Minneapolis or Nashville shooter met these conditions, nor any other trans person. It is just like you to talk about something completely unrelated to events.
Granted, these occurrences are extremely rare,
And have nothing to do with the even rarer school shooting.
It seems to me—and I’ve argued since this latest revision of the Southern Strategy playbook stuck to the wall
And here we go, something you do think you know something about and has nothing at all to do with this post. Do you even know what state this event occurred?
Tell us again how you are not a bad faith commenter, because you seem to be acting exactly like a bad faith commenter. If you don't know about the subject, don't know the basic relevant facts of the subject, and just want to talk about a completely unrelated topic; wait for a post on that topic, use the overnight open thread, or start your own blog.
"these matters would be far better left to the parents, the medical profession, and, for those who believe, God, rather than having politicians intrude into their lives."
What's the limiting principle, Ronald? Where do you draw the line on allowing parents and doctors do interventions on minors? What is acceptable and what isn't acceptable given the approval of at least one parent and one doctor?
Well said, BarrySanders20 @11:36am!
I don't see why anyone wants this person to be a member of their group. What good would it do anyone to have Westman as one of their own?
@Althouse, ask your son Chris. The LBGTQ community seemed very willing to accept Robin as a member in good standing until the hated Christian Normies started their massive pushback. We see it. Jesse Watters saw it. No one can unsee it.
BarrySanders20 said...
RJ Ward, the problem is that they (or a good percentage of they) require the participation of the rest of society to affirm their delusions.
Exactly. This is the research that John Money did. He the parents, the people around them, and later the boys themselves treat the one boy with the mutilated genitalia as a girl. Even after the boy recognized what had been done to him and began refusing to participate, John Money insisted he do otherwise. By age 15, the boy decided to remain representing himself as a boy for the rest of his life. Unfortunately, the trauma caused to him ultimately lead him to take his life at age 38.
Despite all this, Money's research remains the template for gender dysphoria and how to treat it. If we had other treatments that were optional and had these outcomes, we wouldn't use them.
There is a condition called autogynephilia, in which a man does not think he is a woman so much as he is aroused by the idea of being a woman. It is a forbidden topic, but those who subscribe to it, including researchers at Johns Hopkins, believe it could describe as many as half of the men who identify as trans. Data is very hard to come by, because many institutions will ease you out the door or outright fire you if you take it seriously. But at my psych hospital it was muttered that the suicide rate for the group was quite high, so why the hell can't we study it? Answer: a large percentage of trans people consider it too insulting to even consider and accuse you of denying their existence. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blanchard%27s_transsexualism_typology
(correction)... He [demanded] the parents
Dr Az Hakeem is a psychotherapist in the UK who has specialized in the treatment of gender dysphoria for several decades. He has written several books on the subject, but his findings do not find favor with trans activists. He can be found in several places on YouTube.
Ronald J. Ward described this conversation (here on Althouse and presumably everywhere else on the interwebs) as " a politically orchestrated attack on roughly half a percent of Americans facing these challenges". I think this is a fundamental misunderstanding of the premise. It's not an attack on the trans as much as it is an attack on the medical/media/political/social media enablers that are fueling the explosion of this particular mental illness in America.
The unparalleled access to firearms in the US, driven by high gun ownership rates, permissive laws, incomplete background checks, and a cultural affinity for guns, creates an environment where individuals with mental health issues can more easily commit mass killings. In contrast, countries with similar mental health challenges but stricter gun laws and proactive screening experience significantly fewer such incidents.
Achilles said...
..." would fit right in with the average Muslim Taliban tribe in Afghanistan."
8/28/25, 10:57 AM
Does he mention Hamas in his writings?
Homosexuals, bisexuals et al are in the transgender spectrum, along with simulants and transsocials with dreams of authenticity.
The entertainment of abortive ideation and DEIst (i.e. bloc) ideologies for profit and leverage are first-order forcings of catastrophic anthropogenic climate change.
kakiswack… disregard the shitbird excuses and look for some truth:
https://x.com/timurkuran/status/1960923069276361175
Minnesota gun laws…
https://giffords.org/lawcenter/gun-laws/states/minnesota/#:~:text=Minnesota%20has%20enacted%20several%20strong%20gun%20safety,and%20laws%20blocking%20access%20for%20domestic%20abusers.
“It’s never the actor, it’s always the object.”
—— Stephen Green
Those pesky firearms. So crafty. They can't keep getting away with this!
" concerning change of character" sounds clinical. This guy was under observation for something. I suspect we will find out more, probably under some drug regime for some psychosis.
“Robin” Westman is the avatar of fake trans. Nothing about the current mania for trans is real— as their stratospheric rise attests. A few commmenters here have referenced having to deal with the trans in their families…I have as well, young cousins from both sides of our family. It is epidemic. For years I have been asking the clergy at our Catholic parish to ensure that we are standing strong on the Theology of the body— that our kids are getting the message every day that they are made in the image and likeness of God— male and female— and that their sexed bodies play an important role in leading them to their destinies and vocations. Catholicism, more than most religions, I think, is an incarnational faith that takes matter seriously— we use bread and wine for our sacrament, not symbols; water for baptism, etc. We are not simply disembodied spirits floating around a reality that we are free to create ourselves, but, like Christ, a real flesh and blood man or woman who can discover her identity only by living fully her “createdness”. Women are life bearers, men sacrifice themselves for the other. I hope the congregation at Annumciation is holding fast to that. We just get sermons about the moral good of illegal immigration.
Meanwhile, every home is on fire, with an increase of what, 5000 % ? In the trans identification. Don’t teachers realize that ain’t real?
These kids are troubled at the start. Then they are given radical surgery, dosed with hormones, and told that their problems adjusting are because they live in a repressive society. First do no harm. Why is it controversial to say that such a regimen is not just ineffective but actively harmful.
"it might be a concerning change of character that could get me reported"
To whom?
Quite a bit there to chew on. To clear a few things up: I wasn’t equating intersex conditions with trans identity—I brought them up because they remind us that biological sex and gender aren’t always as clean-cut as political talking points make them out to be.
Yancey asked about a limiting principle: I’d say any intervention should be medically justified, evidence-based, and weighed carefully against long-term risks, with the involvement of parents and qualified medical professionals. That’s not a blank check—it’s the same safeguard that already governs most serious pediatric care. What I don’t see is the value in politicians inserting themselves into those private medical decisions.
And as for “enablers”: medicine is a practice, and it has a history of mistakes—from John Money’s case to lobotomies. But if we used every past failure to discredit an entire field, we’d never trust surgery, psychiatry, or even antibiotics. What concerns me is that, rather than an honest debate about standards of care, the medical field has been swept up as just another “war on woke” boogeyman. That tells me this issue is being used more as a political strategy than a genuine concern for children. The real question isn’t whether mistakes happened in the past—it’s whether today’s standards are evolving responsibly, and whether families and doctors are allowed to navigate that without political grandstanding.
"To whom?"
THEM
The Left did this to Westerman. And his mother was an enabler.
Ah yes, Tranzproxy Syndrome by Motherchausen
Ronald J. "Chuck" Ward--Yancey asked about a limiting principle: I’d say any intervention should be medically justified, evidence-based, and weighed carefully against long-term risks, with the involvement of parents and qualified medical professionals. That’s not a blank check—it’s the same safeguard that already governs most serious pediatric care. What I don’t see is the value in politicians inserting themselves into those private medical decisions.
You know this is pure bullshit. What political party/movement has actively and triumphantly promoted and passed laws prohibiting/limiting parental involvement in "transitioning" decisions and actions made and taken by minors?
Go ahead--you can say it.
Nothing has changed. Homosexuals are generally stable. Bisexuals, too. Individuals with fluid orientation are not, and simulant conversion "therapy" has unpredictable outcomes for the minority of the majority of boys and girls passing through puberty dysphoria. Transsocials are just a drag. The normalization of abortive ideation has repercussions for trust and lives lost on a forward-looking basis.
Because they are mentally ill, they have rambling incoherent politics that give fodder to whatever argument a partisan wants to make.
ABC News went to some trouble yesterday to point out that this man painted Trump's name on his rifle, as well as unspecified race hate slogans, obviously doing their best to portray him as part of the MAGA movement.
They conspicuously omitted from their report the fact that the Trump reference actually read "KILL TRUMP", and the "racial" slogan seems to have been "BURN ISRAEL", as you can hear at any leftist pro-Palestinian rally on any campus these days.
If you lived for a million years and began every day by screaming "I HATE THE NEWS MEDIA" a hundred times through a bullhorn from a pedestal in Times Square, you still would not hate them as much as they deserve.
I don't understand why we are calling this person trans. If you're saying you "brain-washed" yourself, you've implicitly consigned the belief to the past. You might not reveal the loss of belief to others, but you've put it in writing — albeit in code — and we can read it. Why are people pretending to believe that he believed what he said he didn't believe? And he wrote it explicitly: "I know I am not a woman."
I don't see why anyone wants this person to be a member of their group. What good would it do anyone to have Westman as one of their own?
You reap what you sow. Transgenderism is celebrated by the left. Loudly, publicly, and with public shaming and denunciation of anyone who dares to question the madness. This guy didn't just "happen" to have a passing phase in which he felt "girly." He joined a movement. A movement you support. You don't get to walk away when things go horribly wrong. Deal with it.
Trans refers to a past, present, or progressive state of divergence. Gender refers to sex-correlated attributes (e.g. sexual orientation).
"Believe women" is an American political slogan arising out of the #MeToo movement.[1] It refers to accepting women's allegations of sexual harassment or sexual assault at face value. The phrase grew in popularity in response to the Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination.
According to a news report I saw, during the Brett Kavanaugh hearings there were more than 2500 women who called the FBI to accuse Kavanaugh of having raped them. Are we expected to believe all of them? If not, what criteria can we use to whittle down the number to something less than laughable horse shit?
Achilles, crazy is a real thing, not just a label. Crazy is when your mind regularly misinterprets reality, often unnecessarily threatening yourself or others, or leaves you unable to contribute to the tribe. This used to be taken care of by predators or the elements, and still is with other species. For humans it's now left up mostly to cops and armed citizens or DIY methods.
@Ronald J. Ward: "What concerns me is that, rather than an honest debate about standards of care, the medical field has been swept up as just another “war on woke” boogeyman. That tells me this issue is being used more as a political strategy than a genuine concern for children. The real question isn’t whether mistakes happened in the past—it’s whether today’s standards are evolving responsibly, and whether families and doctors are allowed to navigate that without political grandstanding."
You sir, are a boiled frog.
Children use soft reasoning, are often unsure, try random new ideas, and are profoundly vulnerable to adult influence and pressure. This was taken for granted just a few decades ago, as there were higher media standards and routine self-censorship (e.g., Disney's old and tame plotlines). Adults with wild imaginations resulted in the farce of the McMartin Preschool case (1980s) -- they coached children into telling absurd stories of abuse and "tunnels" when nothing bad happened and when no tunnels existed.
There is obvious and massive evidence of corruption, double-speak, and medical malpractice with the political transgender ideology. The left bowed down to every radical activist and greedy doctor in drafting the Obamacare rules, and thereby threw out decades of honest (negative) medical findings. As such, post-Obama transgender treatment has NOT been medical at all. It's just lock-step "Sir Yes Sir" blind ideological compliance with corrupt people in power.
Dr. Shayne Seybold Taylor is perhaps the most evil person to live since Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, and Fauci.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/huge-money-maker-video-reveals-vanderbilts-shocking-gender-care-threats-against-dissenting-doctors
Boatbuilder, fair question, but I think you’re flipping my point on its head. I’m not defending every policy proposal that’s ever come out of a legislature or school board. I’m saying that when it comes to serious medical decisions, the default should be parents and doctors in consultation—not politicians writing one-size-fits-all mandates.
If one side is pushing laws to block access altogether, and the other side is pushing policies that sometimes overcorrect, that just proves my concern: this issue has become a political football.
How we got here isn’t exactly new. If you look at the playbook, it’s hard not to see echoes of the old Southern Strategy. Back then, political strategists realized they could take a relatively small issue, inflate it through selective outrage, and use it to polarize and mobilize voters. It wasn’t really about solving problems—it was about creating them, then running on the backlash.
Fast forward: transgender identity affects less than one percent of Americans. Yet conservative lawmakers began drafting “bathroom bills” and bans on medical care years ago. Talk radio, cable personalities, and right-wing media took those rare stories, magnified them, and fed them back to the base as if civilization itself were under attack.
That’s the same mechanics at work—take something complicated, flatten it into a threat, and then use it as political fuel. It’s not much different than how “busing,” “crime,” or “welfare queens” were used decades ago. The labels change—today it’s “woke” instead of “communist” or “hippie”—but the wedge is the same: divide, inflame, and distract.
The tragedy is that instead of letting parents, doctors, and communities work through deeply personal issues, we’re watching the same old playbook get dusted off and repurposed.
"... during the Brett Kavanaugh hearings there were more than 2500 women who called the FBI to accuse Kavanaugh of having raped them."
And we are expected to believe that people of the same ideology would never commit voter fraud. I know they would, and I'd be surprised if the didn't.
bagoh20 said...
Achilles, crazy is a real thing, not just a label. Crazy is when your mind regularly misinterprets reality, often unnecessarily threatening yourself or others, or leaves you unable to contribute to the tribe. This used to be taken care of by predators or the elements, and still is with other species. For humans it's now left up mostly to cops and armed citizens or DIY methods.
I agree.
But my point is we are all misinterpreting reality to one extent or another.
Crazy is a spectrum and everyone is on it.
Dave Cullen wrote an amazing book about Columbine, just called Columbine. The killers were not bullied; one had a disturbing police record, always excused by the courts and his parents, and they tried to make bombs, which they planted on-site, which would have killed many more students. Luckily, the bombs failed, and so they failed to raise the death count by dozens or more. At that point, they committed mutual suicide.
There are more cases of dual killers, or passive criminals following a mob, than we are aware of. The parents share responsibility in this case.
Ronald is the UK National Health Service engaged in the "Southern Strategy"? BTW, the the reason the UK NHS ended juvenile hormone therapy is because the treatment lacks any evidentiary support. If your concern is making sure treatments are "evidence based," you are on the wrong side of the issue. It's not evidence-based. It's emotions based and old-wives-tale based.
A reminder about how other countries are dealing with this issue:
https://metro.co.uk/2025/04/28/children-identify-trans-tested-autism-new-nhs-rules-22987926/
Fast forward: transgender identity affects less than one percent of Americans. Yet conservative lawmakers began drafting “bathroom bills” and bans on medical care years ago. Talk radio, cable personalities, and right-wing media took those rare stories, magnified them, and fed them back to the base as if civilization itself were under attack.
More bullshit, Chuck. Was the canonization of Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner a figment of my imagination? The celebration of Biden's appointment of Rachel Levine? The election of "Sarah" McBride? The explosion of trans "women" competing in womens' and girls' sports? The "rare" incidence of allegedly "trans" "women" raping girls and fellow inmates? The explosion of teenagers purportedly "identifying" as trans?
Did none of this happen? Is this all a "right-wing" plot?
We are calling him trans because the democrat trans culture made him angry and violent.
All trans people need to be declared mentally incompetent and unable to own guns as a result of their mental state.
Sigh.... I'd like an analysis (privacy assured) of the drugs these shooters are or have been using. Starting dates, doses, how the drugs interact, etc. Throw in any and all hormones from trans efforts. Again how long, what doses, what interactions.
I'm not a doc, but I'd bet there are pretty clear paths from what we dose boys with from very early age.
Boatman, I’m not saying none of those things happened. Jenner was indeed celebrated in some corners, Levine held a senior post, McBride won an election, and debates over sports and prisons are real. But scale matters. A handful of highly visible individuals doesn’t equal a tidal wave, and isolated crimes don’t make a demographic.
What’s striking is how those rare stories are amplified and recycled until they feel like a daily crisis. That’s how political wedge issues work: take exceptions, present them as the norm, and then ride the backlash. It’s the same formula that’s been used for decades—whether it was “welfare queens” in the 80s or “migrant caravans” more recently.
So yes, those events happened—but the disproportionate political spotlight on them is what turns them into the issue, not their frequency in real life.
"I don't understand why we are calling this person trans."
Definitions are so pre-postmodern. The whole point is to delegitimize and gaslight anyone suggesting that words have meaning. It's all about wielding power. The Left can claim "her/them" when it is convenient, and it can disavow "him" as needed.
It's interesting that the New York Post used masculine pronouns to refer to Westman from the beginning. This is the first time I've seen them do that for a female-presenting "trans" person. They've been surprisingly compliant with trans pronoun usage.
I noticed that Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara used masculine pronouns for Westman, too, though it seems nearly all of the rest of the mainstream media is using the female pronouns.
Anyone who claims a Catch-22 [“I’m transitioning”] is sane enough not to be discharged [from liability] for insanity. Yossarian knew at least to swim toward his hallucinated naked woman on the wooden platform at sea and later to jump into the sea hoping to escape and be rescued adrift by the women's Swedish swim team in bikinis. Heller's book may be more anti-military than I know, see, or understand - I don’t read it as anti-military, only as anti-abuse of valid military - apologies in advance to veterans here if my blindness in reading Hiller causes offence. The war inside and acted-outside by Robin Westman is a sorry excuse of a case for analogy to military veterans. Westman seems sane enough - or feigns sanity-enough - to know what excuse to make. Or really is tragically disturbed? Samson took a hair cut too. And later redeemed himself inside the MSNBC Temple.
Kakistocracy said...12:23
Say you don't know shit about firearms without saying you don't know shit about firearms.
( show of hands. how many here think the next word out of Kaki's mouth are, " well I own a firearm.")
The elephant in the middle of the room is that the transgendered are significantly more violent than the general populace, on a per capita basis. This wasn’t the first transgendered school shooting. Indeed, roughly half of school shooting shooters in recent years have been trans. So, I wasn’t surprised today to find that most of the Portland ICE protesters arrested appear to be trans.
https://pjmedia.com/victoria-taft/2025/08/28/a-word-about-those-ice-rioters-in-portland-n4943109
Do the hormones and surgeries to make them trans make them so violent? Or are those inclined to violence more likely to be violent sociopaths? Or does it matter?
He lived as a tranny, he died as a tranny
I didn't come across it here in the comments, nor have I seen it mentioned in the news: At what point was the perp, in the 'transition' cycle? Was he just declaring his gender, was he getting hormone therapy, was he under psychiatric care, had he received any gender-related surgery? It would seem clear to me that the expected side effects are different at each stage. Just wondering where this particular case is, on that timeline.
I got the sense that Robin Westman was dealing with "transition regret." And her writings indicated that she was in the stage of accepting that she had been deluded or was willing to delude herself into thinking she was a woman or could become a woman. But she hadn't taken the step of looking for support to de-transition. She hadn't made that choice. There are people on YouTube who are de-transitioners -- and they get a lot of nasty attacks from trans activists.
There are also transgender women on You Tube who readily acknowledge that while they have chosen to live as women they are still biological men. The fact that they are willing to tell the truth without delusions and admit to not actually being women doesn't mean they are not transgender.
Romans 1:24-32 - "So God abandoned them to do whatever shameful things their hearts desired. As a result, they did vile and degrading things with each other’s bodies. They traded the truth about God for a lie. So they worshiped and served the things God created instead of the Creator himself, who is worthy of eternal praise! Amen. That is why God abandoned them to their shameful desires. Even the women turned against the natural way to have sex and instead indulged in sex with each other. And the men, instead of having normal sexual relations with women, burned with lust for each other. Men did shameful things with other men, and as a result of this sin, they suffered within themselves the penalty they deserved. Since they thought it foolish to acknowledge God, he abandoned them to their foolish thinking and let them do things that should never be done. Their lives became full of every kind of wickedness, sin, greed, hate, envy, murder, quarreling, deception, malicious behavior, and gossip. They are backstabbers, haters of God, insolent, proud, and boastful. They invent new ways of sinning, and they disobey their parents. They refuse to understand, break their promises, are heartless, and have no mercy. They know God’s justice requires that those who do these things deserve to die, yet they do them anyway. Worse yet, they encourage others to do them, too."
I can't remember where I read it, but long ago there was this epic post frequently screencapped from a celibate gay penitent describing his debauched sexual sadism during the 80s and 90s and how looking back retrospectively he realized that nothing he did ever gave him any joy. He felt pleasure, but pleasure in the same way a junky feels pleasure from their next hit. He never felt complete, satisfied, or whole and worse still - as with all addictions - the compulsion became less and less satisfactory as time went on. That's when the anger started...
I remember reading that and then thinking about Romans and there's so many parallels with trans-cultism, as with so many other things. They think there's something wrong and their solution is to undertake something totally impossible for them to complete. Then, instead of realizing their solution amplifies their pain instead bringing joy they double-down and blame the entire edifice of the world around them for robbing them of what was never owed.
Unhappiness and anger aren't cousins, they're twins. Incestuous twins, and wickedness, greed, hate, envy, murder, quarreling, deception, maliciousness, gossip, insolence, pride, disobedience, and mercilessness are simply the deformed offspring.
Agree with DD Driver@2:09pm
If you don't want politicians involved in these decisions, then simply don't make it policy that everyone must pay for what is ultimately cosmetic surgery. What made this political was insisting that such surgery be covered, then saying it must be made available to minors, and worse of all, that minors can consent to such surgery even if their parents and guardians do not. Followed shortly after with politicians saying that if parents and guardians tried to prevent such surgery, then the child could be removed from the home, even if the child was also trafficked across state lines. There is one political party in the US that suggested all those things making it a political discussion, Democrats.
Enigma said…
Nah. Not recent at all. It may have been disguised as religion, suppressed, or redirected into wars in the old days.
The recent development I discuss is that Westman is now an embarrassment for the left and they lose power and influence because they are associated with Westman.
In order to mitigate this loss of influence and power they declare Westman “crazy” even though they are constantly talking about violence and instigating riots and trying to kill Trump.
It is only recently and in certain countries this is necessary. If some hamas turd in Gaza goes and shoots a bunch of Jews they have a street party. Those people are just as “crazy” as Westman. Native Americans taking scalps or NAZIs feeding gas chambers were just as “crazy.”
I have seen numerous reports from young people who had been transgenders who disclosed that they had mental problems before they started the transition process. But doctors had ignored there mental problems and immediately diagnosed them as transgender and started treating them with hormones, etc.
I saw a report from a former classmate and friend of Westman that he displayed "erratic behavior," praising Hitler, etc., while they were in 7th grade. She was sorry she didn't have any way of preventing this tragedy, because although she was only a child she knew there was something deeply wrong with him.
It’s like asking if someone is a real clown, or just a man dressed as a clown. If he wears the shoes and makeup, I suppose he’s a real clown. If a man goes to a Halloween party as a clown, he’s a clown. After he removes the costume he is no longer a clown, but John Wayne Gacy in mufti was still a clown. It’s a matter of “ser” or “estar”
@Char Char Binks, Esq., "...It’s like asking if someone is a real clown, or just a man dressed as a clown...."
No, I disagree - it's much worse than that. It's like seeing a person dressed as a clown, on the street, and being forbidden to even notice it or comment upon it, much less ask it they're a clown. And then being shamed and socially ostracized if you did not correctly identify the person's specifics regarding clown personnae.
Guy lefts a manifesto, plus other explicit evidence, explaining that he did this because of the trans stuff and his hatred of Christians.
Cops and lefties, "Yeah, we dun sure be puzzled in trying to find a motive."
Same excuse when a Muzzie acts from Big Mo's instruction from the Qur'an.
This isn’t about trans or binary or male or female, this is about murder. No one and I mean, no one who hasn’t experienced the murder of a loved one has got the slightest idea of the devastation wrought by murder.
On this date August 28, 1968 my brother was murdered. he had spent the previous year serving with the army special forces in the Mekong Delta as both a combat engineer (rebuild bridges or blow em up) and an operator with a special ops unit. His killer died from a shotgun blast in the gut and took three days to die. He died in the Attica uprising. His family received millions of dollars and mine received a military funeral. If this kid was alive and in front of me, I would rip his head from his body
If I think I’m Napoleon, am I Napoleon? Do I have to wear a tricorn?
“I don't see why anyone wants this person to be a member of their group. What good would it do anyone to have Westman as one of their own?”
To seem sane by comparison? There’s probably a lot of weirdos who would appreciate that.
The Bulwark gets it.
Guns don’t cause school shootings, of course. And it turns out that doors don’t cause school shootings anymore, either. Now it’s SSRIs that cause school shootings.
Just ask RFK, Jr.
SSRIs in young cohorts, especially the male sex, are known to progress entertaining abortive ideation. Normally it's a selfie-abortion, but the idea of "burdens" has been fermenting in liberal narratives (e.g. handmade tales).
Simulants have been excluded from playing liberal games with homosexuals and bisexuals in the transgender spectrum.
He knew he wasn't a woman, but went along with the Trans-trend because it made him "special" in today's political atmosphere. I believe the same is true of 99% of other self-proclaimed "Trans" people. They know it's a lie, but they can't get out of it. As far as the true motive, "Kill Trump" is not hard to decipher.
RJW said:
"Fast forward: transgender identity affects less than one percent of Americans."
*****************
There's yer problem, right there.
That less than one percent demands that more than 99% treat them as if they were actually the sex they claim to be.
So, biological men in womens's spaces, biological men competing against biological women in sports...
Unstable tranz committing murder against children in much larger proportions to their cohort population than the general public....
Can't you get that straight? THAT's why it's a political issue.
RSM: St Paul even uses the words “malaca” and “arsenokoites,” which remain Greek homophobic slang to this day. RR - JSM
I have been watching “Alien: Earth.” The main character is a hybrid, the term used for downloading a human’s memories into an android body. But the company doing the downloading for some reason used terminally-ill children and adult-shaped androids. Which means their childish ways of thinking don’t match their adult functionality. For instance, hot girl hybrids still have the minds of 8 year olds. And they can never really enjoy being hot, because the android bodies don’t have the ability to orgasm, or get pregnant, or feel any emotion at the physical level: no heart to race, no stomach to drop.
This is either a really sneaky anti-trans meditation, or the writers not peeking outside their silo. RR, JSM
gspencer said...
Guy lefts a manifesto, plus other explicit evidence, explaining that he did this because of the trans stuff and his hatred of Christians.
Cops and lefties, "Yeah, we dun sure be puzzled in trying to find a motive."
Same excuse when a Muzzie acts from Big Mo's instruction from the Qur'an.
This is the heart of the issue.
Westman's actions were entirely rational. They were as rational as many of the things I saw overseas. I saw more dead kids due to actions we took than this guy killed. 2 dead kids is a slow week in Chicago.
My first thought when I saw all of the guns this guy had was "how the fuck did he only kill 2 people?" especially knowing this was a Minnesota School where there was guaranteed to be no guns around.
People claiming this person is crazy or somehow mentally deviant need to look around the world a little bit.
The only reason people on the left are calling him crazy is because the left has declared war on their political enemies and they don't want us to respond in kind.
The only reason normal people call him crazy is they don't want to admit what the left has been doing for the last decade and they don't want to accept the kind of fight they are in.
@john mosby: "which remain Greek homophobic slang to this day."
"Homophobic" is the most propagandistic and ideological word to enter mainstream US English in 50 years (and it follows the similarly twisted "Fascist").
Non-gay people tend to be DISGUSTED by gay and lesbian behavior, or the mere thought of what gay men do with each other. They are not generally FEARFUL of gays or lesbians. This raw disgust reaction follows from their own strong and "inborn" heterosexual interests, plus a logical determination that same-sex bodies do not function when together.
There is little fear/phobia/anxiety involved. Disgust.
"Homodisgusted"
This is the reality that some people live:
Brianna Wu
@BriannaWu
·
15h
There is ZERO EVIDENCE Robin Westman was a medicalized transsexual serious about transitioning. None.
As best as we can tell from reporting, he was a non-binary person that played with gender presentation for a brief time - and then backed away from that identity.
I know facts won't matter, and the right wing will continue to run with a story - but this man was not on estrogen, he was not transitioning genders. He liked to crossdress sometimes and wanted an ambiguous name.
He wasn't trans! He was non-binary! Huge difference!
Moving goalposts to deny reality is what the left does best.
Enigma said...
"Homodisgusted"
homofastidium
I should have scrolled down X some more. brandon*
@brndxix
so the shooter was a white nationalist and not a trans person? i’m shocked, conservatives have never lied about such a thing before
Well, at least he wasn't a non-binary white CHRISTIAN nationalist who also wanted to kill Trump...
Homosexuals and politically congruent ("=") backers are transphobic, which is why simulants were not allowed to share the albinophobic ("Rainbow") banner and rhetoric. They are homophobic, which is why they appropriated the gay and Lesbos labels to present a more hospitable perception.
This guy exercised liberal license to follow progressive principles and relieve his "burdens" h/t Obama in planned personhood. Whether he was in the past, present, or a progressive state of the transgender spectrum is secondary to His Choice and victims sacrificed in human rites.
Transsexuals are transgender from conception, not through medical, surgical, and grooming intervention to fret his hour upon the stage, signifying nothing. #HateLovesAbortion
Here's a prime dem governance example...
"A California school district has enacted a new rule for young girls who are uncomfortable sharing a bathroom with biological males pretending to be girls, requiring the girls to file a mental health accommodation request."
H/T Ace of Spades
It’s spelled “arseniokoitus”, Mr. Mosby!
“The Bulwark gets it.”
Hahahahahahahahahahaha…HAH!!!
Enigma and Achilles: I think the Greeks may legitimately be afraid/phobic....hee hee....RR, JSM
Iman: Arsenio coitus is what happens in the green room after the show....RR, JSM
If they explain why he isn't trans, it falsifies their whole explanation why anyone is.
@enigma - yes transodium or homoodium have been suggested but the first sounds like an exotic chemical and the second like a treatment for diarrhea. Homomiso and Homomisos have been suggested, but sa.dly, "phobia" has been successfully inserted into the vernacular
I think this young man belonged to the Leopold/Loeb group. These are young people who just somehow achieve something in their own mind by shooting kids, especially kids at their own former school. It's as if they can never imagine any other arena or any other fame than to be important on the playground. They're always eight, listening to stories about the big kids who are twelve and hoping for similar fame and glory.
I remember once back in the '90s when it was a thing, that one of my friends described someone as a "fake Goth". Another wise friend of mine retorted: "There's no such thing as a fake Goth. The pretense is the whole point!" One could equally apply that to Transez. The difference between a "real" and "fake" Trans is semantics. All are trying to be something that they are not.
At the risk of drawing the wrath of all right-thinking people of the commentariat (Tina Trent, I am looking at you), perhaps it will prove in successive centuries that the contemporary conceit of suppressing the sexuality of children ("children" defined here as from the time they first exhibit interest to the legal age of 18) has deleterious effects for individuals and society far in excess of the presumptive damage done to either by a more permissive approach. Let's conduct a thought experiment on me. At the age of nine, I stumbled upon my lifelong (68 now) attraction to naked 20-something women on the purchase of my first Playboy magazine. I think it was maybe the March 1966 issue, for the record. Three days later, my friend's Dad busted us with it, causing a minor neighborhood scandal (today it would have national news and resulted in massive lawsuits against the drugstore who sold it).
Contemporary thought would posit that I was psychologically damaged by seeing dreadful pornography. Perhaps so. But what if my interest had been supported by society and instead of having to masturbate to the women's lingerie section of the Sears catalog for a few more years (no internet back then), a kindly older woman had been available and willing to guide my journey? (preferably Miss March 1966). My sexuality would have been affirmed! (yes, "affirmed") and my expertise at cunnilingus might have been available to my high school girlfriends, instead of the long, self-guided development of that critical skill that ensued.
What difference, at this point, would it make? Would I have been transformed into a juvenile cooze-hound? Pretty much was anyway. Would I have become fixated on 20-something women as objects of sexual pursuit? Was anyway. Fifty years of feminist propaganda has not helped me find post-menopausal women attractive the least. Heaven help me, it appears I was born this way, stuck with 20-something women for sex and companionship and Shakespeare for intellectual stimulation. I manage, somehow.
So. What if instead of counseling and hormones and benzos, or whatever, on declaration of "transhood" young Westman had been sent off to a helpful ephebophile (look it up if you need to) to find out if he REALLY liked sucking dick and taking it in the butt, which of course is all that would be available (sounds a bit like "gay", no?) until he could afford
"gender-affirming surgery"? Maybe he would have liked it and been content to be gay. Maybe he wouldn't have liked it and gotten his mind right. Maybe he would have generally liked it, but thought it could be better if the partner ejaculated in his fake vagina. We will never know. But I feel sure the damage to his community would be less than it has otherwise been.
Leopold and Loeb were a team. So were Harris and Klebold. This killer and so many others, though, were loners. If they weren't loners, they might not have gone down this road.
Some people have commented on this shooter and the Nashville shooter really looking to do away with themselves but looking for a more dramatic and less depressing way to do it. Suicide has been called the coward's way out so often that some people who want to end their lives look to do it in ways that they don't think weak or cowardly.
The hatred of school children is also something this has atrocity has in common with Nashville and Sandy Hook. The shooters hate the innocence of children, but they are also attracted to it. They miss it in themselves and seek it. It's a complicated love/hate relationship. Not for nothing has "The Catcher in the Rye" become the favorite text for assassins and other killers.
In going back to their old schools are the killers trying to go back to a time before things went wrong or to the time when things went wrong? I suspect they identify the children with their own lost hopes and innocence, but also with the world of other people that they couldn't relate to and feel persecuted by. But still, why children? Why not just hate the adult world?
There is more harm in trying to fix people than there is in just letting them go on. Goddam chapel busybodies. Goddam women who get off on ruining lives for fun.
@ Oso Negro
I may also draw down some wrath. I'm not a gun grabber, but if these people couldn't get their hands on guns and expect to get publicity by killing people, the world might be a better place. I say this because your hypothetical world doesn't sound like an improvement over our own. It's only because this guy picked up his gun and brought it to school to kill kids that that world sounds like it would be an improvement.
If in the future, we all had access to compliant sex robots to relieve our carnal urges would there really be fewer mass killings? A lot of it has to do with the desire for connection and meaning and purpose, rather than sexuality.
Put the insane in hospitals. Don’t put tomboys in hospitals to get gender drugs and surgical modification.
For every trans titectomy there is another person who does not get the surgery gallery for a cleft lip or a hip replacement. Help the needy goddmit.
@ Lazarus, I am focusing on the wielder of the implement of destruction in my essay, not on the instrument. If we have a hypothetical world that can somehow prevent access to guns for the murder-minded there are many other modes of killing. I am reluctant to list them all here, for fear of putting ideas in the popular mind, but look at the UK and the stabby nature of the disturbed and dispossessed. Let us recall Andrew Kehoe and his evil in 1927.
@ Lazarus - as long as humans form in groups, there will be group norms, and people who fall outside the norms. The people who fall outside the norms, whether above, below, or just "other" will be made to pay for it by the group. If sex robots or AI friends help them, I'm for it. But it is happening whether I like it or not.
Mom has lawyered up and refuses to cooperate with the police. I think she is worried about buying or supplying the money for the guns for the freak. If she bought the guns for him, she is in trouble. She seems to be the facilitator for his delusion. I hope she lives a long and miserable life.
The only good thing about this child murdering demon is that he is dead.
Democrats make me sick. they want to respect this murderer.
Jen Psaki asked why the children were praying. She's an asshole. Democrats think they deserve to be worshiped. They deserve to eat a dick.
Gadfly - your pathetic and corrupt political party - built this trans rage shit show. It's all on them.
Batya Ungar-S
"The killer: “If I will carry out a racially motivated attack, it would be against filthy Zionist jews"
“Good would be a target of significance—Musk, Trump or some exec”
"killing children of innocent civilians would bring the most joy"
NYT: We may never know why he killed"
john mosby said...
Enigma and Achilles: I think the Greeks may legitimately be afraid/phobic....hee hee....RR, JSM
I don't really have any problems with the LGB.
Was just helping with vocab.
a politically orchestrated attack on roughly half a percent of Americans facing these challenges
The problem is not Americans with abnormal equipment. The problem is the American medical establishment is butchering, and chemically castrating, a lot of children with normal equipment. And they are drugging children with dangerous narcotics. And that number greatly exceeds "half of one percent."
@Achilles, @john mosby, @Oso Negro:
I have nothing against gay people, but -phobia and cisgender are hostile political terms used to stigmatize and belittle biological normals. With statistics, a "norm" and "norming" merely refer to the most frequent or typical status in a dataset. See bell curves. Heterosexuality is indeed the norm, and the species would go extinct if it was not the norm.
The organic, everyday terms people created for gays and lesbians have rarely been kind (e.g., f*g, qu**r, sodomist, etc.), and reveal attitudes similar to scraping sh*t off one's shoe. Still, this has nothing to do with phobias.
While it may not be possible to remove the -phobia term, one does not need to bow down to liars, bullies, and ideologues either. Instead of writing "homophobic terms for gays," write "common terms" or "traditional terms" or "critical terms" or "hostile terms" or anything else that's accurate.
The Greeks of democratic vintage used sodomy to domesticate both boys and girls to take a knee. The modern family uses a combination of surgical, medical, and grooming choices celebrated in liberal culture.
The transgender spectrum, including homosexuals, bisexuals, and simulants have been, perhaps ironically, divided following politically congruent ("=") lines. Transsocials are not transgendered, but green and mocking through visual presentation in drag.
The trans will disown this one and hate him because he let the marks see behind the kayfabe.
Post a Comment
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.