From "Hillary Clinton: How Kamala Harris Can Win and Make History," written by Hillary Clinton (or a ghostwriter), published in the NYT.
I have an aversion to the "making history" argument. And I don't like the idea of whether voters are "ready" for it. It's a visualization of a timeline of progress, in 2 ways. The first way makes perfect sense: The first female President of the United States has a place in history as the first female President of the United States. But the second way is an insidious attack on people: the idea that we voters as a group are in a process of enlightenment, some of us are further ahead than others, and one is most advanced when one is influenced by the argument that we ought to vote for someone because she will be the first.
I do appreciate the "sometimes" in "I sometimes shied away from talking about making history." As I remember it, she and her champions sounded the history-making theme continually.
And now, we've got a new candidate who can use the history-making theme. I'm still irked when I'm elbowed to come on, everybody, let's make history. I may on my own feel myself warming up to a candidate because of some personal attribute that has only a dubious connection to the ability to do the job well, but it's negatively related to this talking about making history.
@seanghedi can we pls go one day without something unprecedented happening😔 #USelection #unitedstates #joebiden #trump #kamalaharris #uspolitics #fyp ♬ original sound - GHEDl
पोस्ट्स
७२ टिप्पण्या:
The less we hear from that C-word the better off the country is.
When will we run out of history to make? How atomized do we have to make our society in order to keep finding historical novelty?
It's true that we haven't yet elected a woman to the presidency. But I can't imagine that Clinton believes - and the pull quote certainly suggests that she doesn't believe - that it was her sex that defeated her.
As a woman said on Gutfeld last night, don't underestimate the efficacy of gift-wrapping.
Shut up film (critical drinker)
to be fair, Kamela WOULD make history..
We've never had a Brahmin Marxist running our country (into the ground) before
Diversity politics. This is why the Lees, after exceeding their DEI quota, are making history subsisting on welfare in the woke of progressive policies.
Women share more than genitals with Kamala - there's brain function. Feelings over structure. That's the structural reason for not feeling good about a fellow woman president.
How about a Democrat make history by not starting new wars this time.
I hope Cumala chooses Buttigieg as her running mate, that way history can be made by having two bottom candidates on the same ticket.
First DEI president. Biden said his VP had to be black and had to be a female. Biden didn’t mention competence.
Kamala would be the first person to win without actually winning.
Bullshit. "I'm with HER!" and all that constant reminder of a "glass ceiling"? Does she think we're this stupid or forgetful? Whether she talked about it "enough" or not it was a relentless talking point for every cable head supporting her, which is 95% of the DNC Media.
When RBG was named Supreme Court justice, I remember a newspaper columnist talking about how she was more important the Sandra Day O'Connor because she was 2nd. The 1st is a big deal--the 1st makes history. The 2nd is when it starts to become normal; the real notable moment is when it stops being notable.
This excerpt, as you point out, is just more Hillary lies. She never stopped talking about making history as the 1st woman. And the "voters aren't ready for it" is crap too. We all know far more people voted for Hillary because she's a woman than voted against her because she's a woman. She benefitted from being a woman.
Hillary wasn’t limited by the glass ceiling, she list because she is unpopular as a politician and a person and a beard. Kamala hock tuah-ed her way to the top, can’t string together one complete sentence and has a low IQ.
Do women really want one of these women to be first?
Do women believe when Kamala is anointed as president Kamala will be president?
Shes writing in the favored rizzotto tray paper the carlos slims times so no.
Lester Holt and his “you’re the Border Czar, but you haven’t been to the border” moment.
Quemala Harris: “I haven’t been to Europe either.”
Harris… appointed Czar of Disneyland… but she’s never been there…
Harris: “I haven’t been to Knott’s Berry Farm either.”
Cackle… cackle… cackle…
This deserves the "things not believed" tag.
Pantsuited Pantloads
deliver us from weezuls
cankles and cackles
Kamala at the border, your civil rights and life don't matter. #SSBLM
"While it still pains me that I couldn’t break that highest, hardest glass ceiling..."
I would think another woman doing what she didn't do, especially a woman Like Kamala Harris --someone that Clinton would never think is more qualified and deserving than Hillary herself was-- will cause a whole lot more pain.
There are plenty of other countries that have elected a woman to be President, Prime Minister, whatever the head job is, so it seems kind of arrogant for us to act as if it's going to be some huge, historic event when it finally happens here. Typical Americans, it's always about us.
There's no glass ceiling. There have just been terrible candidates, like HRC, Harris, Warren, Haley etc. I'd happily vote for a candidate, no matter which of 500 genders they identify as, if I felt they represented what I wanted in the head of the executive branch.
Lord, we beseech thee
deliver us from weezuls
willie and hand jive
Remember during that campaign when she went stiff as a board tilted over and had to be loaded like lumber in a van and taken to a hospital because she was, er, "dehydrated" or "overcome" by the 80 degree balmy weather?
Well, maybe that is what she counts as "shying away" from talking about how fucking historic she was. Yeah, that's probably it.
"Sometimes" implies more than one instance but that's pretty much it, I think.
Make history indeed -- as the worst consecutive pair of absolute TWITS elected since (perhaps) Pierce and Buchanan, also both Democrats. You might remember having studied the results of that, back during your high school history class.
"when I'm elbowed to come on, everybody, let's make history"
Works on many women though.
Hmmmm, gotta be careful with that kind of talk. History can be a double edged sword. Remember, Hitler and Stalin made history in their day.
Shelob lies relentlessly. She and her campaign supporters, as Althouse notes, talked about the "history-making first female Presidential candidate" at almost every single campaign event.
Unlike Harris, Shelob had the intelligence to be President but I wouldn't have trusted her ethically further than I could have thrown her fat ass. Harris, on the other hand, is a dimwit and probably unethical, too.
Hillary must have been delighted to hear Tulsi Gabbard say that Kamala would be the handmaiden of Hillary Clinton, the queen of warmongers. If only that vile usurper Trump had not stolen the crown that was hers by divine right.
I’m proud that my two presidential campaigns made it seem normal to have a woman at the top of the ticket.
Hillary nudges the media to cast her as the giant whose shoulders Kamala is standing on.
IMHO, nothing about Hillary Clinton seems normal.
Was Trump the first entrepreneur to be President? The first real estate mogul? The first builder? The first celebrity? The first Person of Color, of Orange?
Its great to make history at something - but only when you are actually qualified.
Hillary Clinton will never be president of the United States.
It is still wonderful to see that sentence on the screen and know it is true.
The Communist Angela Davis, running as VP in 1980 and 1984, was more a female "first" than this unethical shrew, best known for her grifting skills, whose sole claim to political prowess was staying married to her serial adulterer politician husband. Had she divorced Bill, she might just have beaten Trump.
"As a candidate, I sometimes shied away from talking about making history."
"I wasn’t sure voters were ready for that. And I wasn’t running to break a barrier; I was running because I thought I was the most qualified to do the job. While it still pains me that I couldn’t break that highest, hardest glass ceiling, I’m proud that my two presidential campaigns made it seem normal to have a woman at the top of the ticket."
OMG that is some nuclear level delusion right there! Hillary was not and is not qualified to watch kittens for a day. She has done absolutely NOTHING that she did not do in order to enrich herself, hide a horrible and/or illegal thing she did, denigrate those that actually did accomplish things, and attack other women because her husband was/is a cad and scoundrel.
Just another example of "failing up" and thank the good Lord that she floated up to her limit and did not get into the WH.
The first feminine gender President. The first female sex. The first woman. They canceled Palin, in publication, in broadcast, with a Democratic consensus.
Gee, making history with Obama was epic. Let’s double down with our next historic president, Harris. What could go wrong?
Who?
https://www.frontpagemag.com/who-is-kamala-harris/
Kamala is endorsed by the worst female on earth? Good to know.
"I was running because I thought I was the most qualified to do the job."
And voters rejected you. Not because you are a woman, but because you are a terrible person and terrible politician.
Hillary gave two somewhat contradictory explanations for losing, her opponent cheated and America is a backward, sexist country.
The facts are Hillary is outstandingly unlikeable and she doesn't inspire trust or confidence in either men or women.
If Kamala loses, we will be given the same explanations and Kamala's shortcomings as a candidate will also be discounted.
Read her history She may well be portrayed as a doofus, but her genetics scream out for an Oscar. Best actress?
Hillary has recently smashed her share of oak floorboards.
Moo Moo Land?
Kamala ought to make her campaign slogan, "I'm nothing like Hillary"
Lizzie Borden made history. John Wilkes Booth made history. They keep using that word. It doesn't necessarily mean what they think it does.
I'm all in favour of a woman president. I would prefer it if she weren't a cackling idiot.
Actually, it's becoming obvious that Harris will be president...but not after January 20.
BUMBLE BEE said...
©Hillary has recently smashed her share of oak floorboards.
Moo Moo Land?"
Heh. Reminds me of our tour guide in Hawaii, whom we called 'Michelle Overmodulated' because she kept the mic close to her mouth, at full volume, with the effect that we could barely understand her.
She asked, "What's a muu muu?" Everyone said it was a Hawaiian house dress. "No," she said. "It's a cow. A mu'u mu'u is a Hawaiian outfit."
She is too stupid to know how hated she really is. The only reason she got where she is, is because she married Bill. She has the personality of a wet mop.
Was Trump the first entrepreneur to be President? The first real estate mogul? The first builder? The first celebrity? The first Person of Color, of Orange?
That reminds me. I never voted for an Orange person before voting for Trump the last two times. I admit I was prejudiced and generally disliked orange people, except for my one friend Dan. He can be annoying too, but he's a good guy.
I'm probably still in the generally anti-OP group but make an exception because Trump has won me over.
Funny how all those interested in "historic" are not concerned with the historic asterisk that would accompany a Harris win. Being anointed is not the same as winning a primary.
"I wasn’t sure voters were ready for that" Yes, she's getting her first whiffs of the high-octane support now. Yes Kamala - it's not you, it's us. We're not ready for you. Give us time.
Hillary is corrupt liar who frankly should be in jail for the Russiagate Fraud and having an illegal server full of classified data. But no matter what she does, she still gets to write op-ed in the WaPo and NYT's and be listened to. And everyone acts likes she a respected elder.
Left-leaning LIV's prefer their corrupt morons to be male. Unfair, but there it is.
Margaret Thatcher made history, but her femaleness was the least of it. Same with Golda Meir, Indira Gandhi, Angela Merkel, and today Giorgia Meloni.
Kamala Harris is not a leader. She was installed in her position, initially and openly, because she was a half black woman. Biden said so.
Kamala is not the same caliber a politician and leader as Golda Meir or Margret Thatcher or Marine Le Pen or many other successful or upcoming female leaders who "make history". They made history by what they did as a leader not by being a female.
If you want to "make history" don't do it with a third string player who will poison the pot by making people remember how bad it became when the "history maker" was elected because of their characteristics.
After Obama, I wonder how many people are "been there, done that, not going to do it again".
Kamala = Hillary part II is another winning campaign tactic. A real sleaze-slime job. Should work good on the Trump base, male Reagan democrats and Bernie Bros.
Oh give me a fucking break…. The only thing this bitch EVER shied away from was the truth.
It certainly wasn’t food, or Chardonnay, or a thirst for power
She sure made history. Rich, Epstein, and everyone else around her with dirt are...
...history.
I'm still pleased that the balance of SCOTUS changed because RBG wanted her successor to be named by Hillary, the first female POTUS.
Hillary's endorsement is like a Judas Kiss, repulsing many independent voters.
It is the standard DEI argument.
We keep playing this game about "firsts." One of the reasons that discrimination was so insidious is that highly qualified candidates, sometimes the best candidate, for a position were blocked for no other reason that they were in the wrong demographic. The game was rigged. The solution was to stop the discrimination so everyone could be considered for those positions and compete fairly. The fact that someone was the first woman in a certain position was notable, but it was not important. The person deserved the position. Feel free to celebrate it, but the appointment was purely based on merit.
DEI is about manufactured firsts. If there has not been a woman in such-and-such position, then a woman must be given the position. Any woman will do. Often the person selected is completely unqualified and incompetent - grifters know how to grift - but that does not matter because the entire point was "representation" and merit not being considered at all. This has gotten to absurd situations with things like the first lesbian, black, immigrant woman as Press Secretary, who was obviously in this position because she checks boxes. She's utterly incompetent, laughably incompetent even. We even get declarations of firsts that are not actually firsts, just so they can claim (falsely) that it was a first.
Hillary Clinton, for all her faults and there are many, is a good politician. She is a cruel person who should never have been in any position of power for the simple reason she is a villain, but there have been male villains who reached high offices by being good politicians, so there is precedent. Kamala Harris is incompetent. She is a bad politician and always has been. If not for Willie Brown, her ceiling would probably be Mayor of Oakland or California State Senator at best, and most likely would have ended up as an unremarkable career ADA or the trophy wife of someone with money.
The only good thing about a Kamala victory is that it would give men a boost because she's a flyweight. Her female supporters won't notice because ABORTION.
I had no problem with Hillary being female, but did have an issue with her being dishonest, corrupt, and incompetent.
Do you mean Kamala? Christ, she officially recognized illegals in California as not breaking any laws -- for being illegal.
There are lists of women raped and murdered by these illegals, all much-released in California before these crimes by her official policy as AG and DA.
If one supports her, then they support rape and murder by serial offenders violating many laws repeatedly, released by Kamala's official policy (opposed by 55 of 57 Cali DAs) many times -- because they were illegals.
Dementia would be the kindest interpretation of this flagrant ignorance. But for anyone with brains and resources, that excuse doesn't work. Are they just too lazy or too frivolous -- or too dilletantish to learn her actual record?
My biggest fear is not that Kamala will actually win, but that the "historic first black/southeast Asian woman" schtick will provide cover for the big cheat. No one would have believed record turnout for Biden, this opens the door to claim that women came out in droves, Harris reversed the growing trend of minorities moving towards Trump, etc.
In other words, Kamala comes with a lot of baggage, but those bags may well be full of already-filled-out ballots.
Hillary Clinton: Two Time Loser Who's Political Advise Should Be Buried And Forgotten
Harris isn't just a just a woman, she's a brat:
“Kamala IS brat,” [Charli XCX] tweeted, referring to the title of her latest album. To be “brat,” according to Charli on TikTok, is to be “that girl who is a little messy and maybe says dumb things sometimes, who feels herself but then also maybe has a breakdown but parties through it.”
But is brat Presidential?
I think the "just be yourself" and "anyone can be President" Venn diagram is starting to overlap a bit too much these days. This is all driven, of course by the "don't judge me" culture we've allowed to grow so large it's overriding common sense.
Typical Americans, it's always about us.
First, apples and oranges so your point is invalid.
Second, I'll raise your sardonic comment and see you 3105 Olympic medals.
Third, some other third thing.
A voice from the past--the chardonnay soaked crone from Chappaqua. Glad to know that she's in the rear view mirror of the country. At this point what difference does it make what the geezer in a skirt says?
"Making history." Pfui.
John Wilkes Booth made history. So did Hitler. Bonnie and Clyde. Typhoid Mary.
Kamala can make history as the first Democrat President to never have won a Democratic Party Primary. Yeah Democracy!
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा