"... a turnaround over the past year that has notably coincided with a cascade of 91 felony charges in four criminal cases."
Writes Michael C. Bender, reporting from Des Moines, in "How College-Educated Republicans Learned to Love Trump Again/Blue-collar white voters make up Donald Trump’s base. But his political resurgence has been fueled largely by Republicans from the other end of the socioeconomic scale" (NYT).
I'm seeing phrase "91 felony charges" is everywhere this morning. It seems those who loathe Trump don't realize how it can help Trump to stress the overabundance of charges.
But this is another article that purports to understand the Trump supporter, and it's interesting to me because it's got the college-educated going for Trump. I thought that's what isn't happening. So let's read this piece, which is based on "interviews with nearly two dozen college-educated Republican voters":
Many were incredulous over what they described as excessive and unfair legal investigations targeting the former president.
Yes! That's why the phrase "91 felony charges" stirs support for Trump. (Trump's poll numbers have "trended upward ever since" the first indictment.)
The article quotes 2 women:
1. "I know Trump’s got a lot of baggage... But so much of it is make-believe.... ... I prefer Trump because Democrats are trying to find any way they can to jail him."
2. "It’s a little bit like a teenager who’s rebelling — a part of me is like, Maybe I should go for Trump because everyone is telling me not to. Part of my thing is: Why are they so scared? Because they can’t control him."
The article cites additional reasons for supporting Trump (even while college-educated). I'm just highlighting how the "cascade of 91 felony charges" hasn't dragged him under.
पोस्ट्स
७३ टिप्पण्या:
"I'm seeing phrase "91 felony charges" is everywhere this morning. It seems those who loathe Trump don't realize how it can help Trump to stress the overabundance of charges. "
They aren't overly bright.
Instapundit has a good line this morning: "YES, I’D LIKE TO SEE LESS ELITISM AND MORE ACTUAL, YOU KNOW, EVIDENCE OF ELITENESS:"
"based on "interviews with nearly two dozen college-educated Republican voters""
Then again, "reporters" could just read the comments on the Althouse blog.
Anyone who learns in college to go to primary sources is going to be sympathetic to Trump. I remember my first semester, Physics 115, when the prof said on the first day, “don’t believe anything that I say just because I say it, make me prove it to you.” Most anti-Trumpers simply accept what they are told.
I'm in that demo. I'll vote for Trump in the general because he made the economy work, kept the border closed and no wars were started on his watch. Biden's term has been a disaster and a second term would be even worse. Now I read that Iran is close to completing a nuclear weapon. That's on Biden.
I have seen a great deal of turmoil and upheaval over my lifetime. The realization from a Biden aide "that a lot of people are afraid of the American left" is an important comment from the inside.
One reason that I am more concerned this time than in the past is that neither of the two great parties of the country are now clearly committed to traditional liberalism: equality (not "equity"), the dignity of the individual, free association, free speech, universal values (without imperialism).
This is one reason why I was so pleased to read Yascha Mounk's book, "The Identity Trap," which I consider to be a key political book of the year. Mounk's defense of traditional liberal needs to be widely read and put back into practice. Mounk has presented the clearest argument thus far of how much of a challenge and a danger the illiberal left poses to American democracy.
Thus, the telling comment from one of Bide's aides. Perhaps this is starting to reach the elites as well.
There have been moments in the past where one party or the other, or a large faction of a party, veered dangerously away from these traditional values. But there was always an anchor in traditional liberalism within one of the two parties.
The threats from the Trump Republican party are the most clear and widely discussed, so I leave that aside.
The threat from the illiberal left is not as widely understood, but it is a fundamental assault on traditional liberalism. And it is critical to understand this illiberal left and its challenge because its manifestation is feeding the illiberal right.
DEI and equity programs are a disaster, and they have exploded beyond the confines of American universities. They are a full assault on the traditional liberal principle of equality, which actually is part of the American constitution, unlike equity, which is not.
The illiberal left is filled with contempt for the legacy of the Civil Rights Movement, which was deeply committed to traditional liberalism. Things are not moving fast enough for the illiberal left, so more radical measures need to be put in place, from their perspective. Equality needs to be replaced by equity. Free speech needs to be done away with to protect the marginalized. Free association needs to be dismantled so that racial, ethnic, and gender "affinity groups" can build their "natural solidarity." And the dignity of the individual is constantly under threat from a new progressive collectivism that sorts the entire society into categories of oppressor and oppressed.
Yes, I still believe in America.
The discontent with the illiberal left is widespread and Mounk's book is giving the clearest voice to this yet. For the first time in a long time, but the American Left and Right need to renew themselves. The risk is that those upset about the illiberal left feel they have no political home.
I believe this is possible and necessary.
Nothing is more important to the long-term health of our republic than that the tactics being used against Trump fail, with consequences to the perpetrators. That doesn’t necessarily mean voting for Trump, but voting for Trump is the simplest, clearest way to send that message. A truth so plain even college graduates can see it.
I'm in that demo. I'll vote for Trump in the general because he made the economy work, kept the border closed and no wars were started on his watch. Biden's term has been a disaster and a second term would be even worse. Now I read that Iran is close to completing a nuclear weapon. That's on Biden.
They can't squeeze out another 9 charges?
Get him to a nice round 100.
If it can happen to him...
It's the same reason for the college educated as the working-class in the Brook's column. What seems to be forming is a cross-class preference cascade.
Brooks said...
The connection between working-class voters and a shady real estate billionaire is a complex psychological phenomenon that historians will have to unpack.
Aside from everything else, all Trump voters understand the implications of "Fuck You Money," and what it empowers the right, trusted person to do with it.
And, most conspicuously now, the necessity of fuck you money needed in a 91-count law-fare war of attrition against the establishment Deep State.
It's why Trump supporters and others in the working-class will play the lottery. Remember the top-40 hit: "Take this job and shove it"?
Trump, Musk and Ramaswamy level "fuck you money."
Not, by contrast, Niki Bird Brain joins the Boeing board and buys beach front mansion money, much less Biden sell-out the nation to buy beach-front mansion money.
Instead, Real Fuck You Money, combined with a trust in the person to use it in order to fuck with the right people.
One does wonder why they destroyed the video of the deportations on J6, and only provided easily faked transcripts. Isn’t the destruction of Federal records a felony? Not when you are a Democrat.
Vivek will finish second in Iowa. Mark my words.
The number of charges is important to the Left in the same way that more dollars spent is the preferred metric for how well our public school systems are doing, or not doing. Or how many gun laws we pass whether they bring down gun violence or not. (Spoiler: they don’t). Or how many boosters they tell you to get. It’s the effort that counts, not the results. They’re trying really, really hard.
I have a couple of degrees and I would have liked to see DeSantis be the nominee. I do not understand what happened to him. I will admit that the Ds have pissed me off so badly that I will happily vote for Trump both early and often should he be the nominee.
College educated Republicans understand how real estate valuation works.
How College-Educated Republicans Learned to Love Trump Again
We looked into the abyss. We didn’t like what we saw staring back at us.
The problem is that the base has beco.e hard left, and the dems have lost some of the support among working class whites which used to give them a strong floor of support. They now have to thread the needle of appealing to radical progressive activists as well as squishy suburban voters who are sort of left wing, but not die hard fanatics.
Im a college-educated person and I worry about the waitress at the diner and the guy who pumps my gas. Who is looking out for them? For some reason I don’t care as much about a homeless drug addict who’s probably hopeless— and still less for the guy taking in six figures from a nonprofit that’s “helping” them
Whereas the writers at the NYT should face summary executions.
Now they're going to have to distinguish between Ivy-educated and Flyover State U-educated
Discernment, people.
If I were one of Trump’s campaign advisors, I would have him take up this line exactly as Ann has pointed it out.
“91 Felony Charges! 91 Felony Charges! That’s a lot of Felony Charges. But I say, Let’s go for 100. Cummon corrupt prosecutors. You’re fallin’ down on your jobs - you can’t even come up with 9 more bogus charges. You’d think all those fancy ivy league DOJ prosecutors with all their brains and education, and the FBI at their disposal, could come up with nine more bogus felony charges to make it an even 100. What’s wrong with you Democrat prosecutors out there? you’re slipping! no self-respecting democrat prosecutor should be satisfied with 91 felony charges. Do you want to save the constitution? and you’re only bringing 91 felony charges? What kind of support is that for the constitution? If you really want to save the constitution I would think that 100 felony charges would be the bare minimum. At least! I mean if you really love and value the constitution, probably 200 isn’t too many felony charges. In fact, it gets me thinking how many felony charges do you think saving the constitution is worth? You could argue that if the constitution is so important to you as you claim it is, a bare minimum would be 1000 or so felony charges. No self-respecting, corrupt democrat prosecutor would or should settle for less.”
They try to disillusion the Trump supporters as their great grandfathers did the poor and working class of old. But now they have drawn in those of "bourgeois origin" as Orwell said of the leaders of movements.
Worse, the oldest Millennial moms have seen the threat to their families first hand. In past elections, they were the activist angry, white, feminist liberal protester, but now they have to think of the children. They still have the activist training, just that they are slowly coming out of the cult and former cult members are to most ardent opposition to the cult.
This business of petty inconvenience and indignity, of being kept waiting about, of having to do everything at other people's convenience, is inherent in working-class life. A thousand influences constantly press a working man down into * passive role. He does not act, he is acted upon. He feels himself the slave of mysterious authority and has a firm conviction that " they " will never allow him to do this, that and the other. Once when I was hop-picking I asked the sweated pickers (they earn something under sixpence an hour) why they did not form a union. I was told immediately that " they " would never allow it. Who were " they " ? I asked. Nobody seemed to know; but evidently " they " were omnipotent.
A person of bourgeois origin goes through life with some expectation of getting what he wants, within reasonable limits. Hence the fact that in times of stress "educated " people tend to come to the front; they are no more gifted than the others and their " education " is generally quite useless in itself, but they are accustomed to a certain amount of deference and consequently have the cheek necessary to a commander.--George Orwell, 'Road to Wigan Pier'
91 red balloons . . .
I'd like to tell them that there is where they went wrong. They over did it. What comes across is that you not only fear Trump you fear me as well. You're attempt to destroy him means that you'd like to destroy me too.
On a personal note. I resent being told what to do by people who are obviously not the most intelligent people on your side.
They use "91 felony charges" as if it were an incantation: "91 felony charges! Trump begone...!"
In their perverse way, the media and the left have lifted and established the Trump candidacy. In 2016 they gave him a lot of air time. He was entertaining and, early on, said bad things about the other Republican candidates. Later on they were sure he was going to lose to Hillary and they saw no harm in broadcasting what they thought were his gaffes. Surprise, he won....Another surprise, those four years of his presidency weren't--with the notable exception of Covid--were relatively successful. And this despite the fact that all those famous rapists and rapist supporters in the media and show business routinely depicted him as a monster beyond all human imagining. The ferocity and vehemence of their denunciations only serve to highlight their own shortcomings and biases....All of this is not to say that they won't be successful. It's not that easy to win when the media is that biased against you. Maybe the 2016 election was a fluke.....The Democrats used to portray Adlai Stevenson as one of the great minds of the twentieth century and Eisenhower as a doddering old man. They weren't successful in the elections, but that was sort of the judgment of history, i.e. liberal historians, until just recently. I'm not at all sure that Trump will in the actual election rise above the negative way he's portrayed.
In their perverse way, the media and the left have lifted and established the Trump candidacy. In 2016 they gave him a lot of air time. He was entertaining and, early on, said bad things about the other Republican candidates. Later on they were sure he was going to lose to Hillary and they saw no harm in broadcasting what they thought were his gaffes. Surprise, he won....Another surprise, those four years of his presidency weren't--with the notable exception of Covid--were relatively successful. And this despite the fact that all those famous rapists and rapist supporters in the media and show business routinely depicted him as a monster beyond all human imagining. The ferocity and vehemence of their denunciations only serve to highlight their own shortcomings and biases....All of this is not to say that they won't be successful. It's not that easy to win when the media is that biased against you. Maybe the 2016 election was a fluke.....The Democrats used to portray Adlai Stevenson as one of the great minds of the twentieth century and Eisenhower as a doddering old man. They weren't successful in the elections, but that was sort of the judgment of history, i.e. liberal historians, until just recently. I'm not all sure that in the actual elections will overcome the negative way he is portrayed.
Ordinary people (non-leftists) understand that the corrupt left are just that.... the corrupt left.
"I'm seeing phrase "91 felony charges" is everywhere this morning."
And Biden accepts bribes (which everybody knows, even if some won't admit it) but has not been charged with anything. What a country.
Something strange is happening. Trump is not being compelled to put forward specific policies, nor is he being asked to explain why his second term would improve upon the first.
Instead, he preens and riffs as the Dems have placed him at the controls of the Martyrdom Express, the greatest show on earth.
WAtch this please
I guess they never saw "Election Wars": “If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.”
- Obi-Wan Trump
How many from the RICO case prosecuted from Fani Willis office, by her boyfriend, it is reported? How many from the Alvin Bragg case? How many from the secret documents case (where Joe Biden, who as VP and Senator had no excuse for holding any)?
It sure looks like politically, and only politically, motivated charges. How will the justice system ever regain trust?
I expect Hunter Biden to be held in contempt of Congress and the DOJ will not prosecute, and not even bother distinguishing the case from that of Steve Bannon (of who I'm not and never was a fan).
Misinformation, disinformation, malinformation, and irreconcilable information.
Well these are going to be college educated Republicans in say the 40 year old and above range. They missed the full blown indoctrination that has turned young college students and recent graduates minds to mush. They're intelligent enough to realize that some things are just bull dust--91 felony charges are simple wet dreams of progressive prosecutors.
And college educated folks were Never Trumpers in the 2016 and 2020 elections. The Bad Orange Man was just too crude, too rude, and too "icky" to vote for.
Now that they have had three years plus of the Joe Biden Posse's Progressive Politics, the scales sorta dropped from their eyes.
It seems those who loathe Trump don't realize how it can help Trump to stress the overabundance of charges
How to spot a liar: extreme, excessive, exaggerated, over the top language.
The left just doesn't realize how much that "91 charges" is doing to move people from all segments of society towards supporting Trump. From a local attorney who was a Sanders supporter in 2016 to the Hispanic clerk (previous Biden voter) at my local Dollar General store, I'm finding so many people who are now supporting Trump.
The reason stated by the attorney is the law-fare and the reason from the retail clerk is the economy. Plus, the black guys at the tire shop told my husband that Trump is now one of them and knows how it is to be targeted by the police. They also plan to vote for Trump in November.
The attorney noted how so many on the left decried over-zealous prosecutions except when it came to Trump and then they suddenly switched positions and want him jailed for every allegation of wrong-doing. He said he just couldn't support that position and the only way to stop it was to vote for Trump.
Trump is a promise breaker... and a dick-stepper... but he understands most of what works in our nation, and thus is superior to all corrupt leftists.
"The threats from the Trump Republican party are the most clear and widely discussed, so I leave that aside."
LOL (honestly). Shorter Rich: I got nothin'.
"The threat from the illiberal left is not as widely understood, but it is a fundamental assault on traditional liberalism."
He then goes on to explain what no one here needs explained to them.
Rich:"And it is critical to understand this illiberal left and its challenge because its manifestation is feeding the illiberal right."
Illiberal right pounces.
"91 felony charges"
Pairs nicely with "Fifty-seven channels and nothin' on".
The people running the country have lost touch with it.
Blogger tim maguire said..."Nothing is more important to the long-term health of our republic than that the tactics being used against Trump fail, with consequences to the perpetrators. p"
I believe this to be true.
"That doesn’t necessarily mean voting for Trump, but voting for Trump is the simplest, clearest way to send that message."
There's very little else the vast majority of us can do.
The writers of this season of America are absolute geniuses. The Iowa caucus was looking so predictable but they’ve shaken things up with a snowstorm and now no one knows who’s going to turn up. So glad we’ve got a whole year of this show to come.
It could be good for Trump because he has a motivated base that will help others out. His voters are likely to be the ones with trucks and snow chains. But then his polling lead may mean they don’t bother and I’m sure they’re not smart enough to think the next step ahead.
Haley too has a motivated base of anti-Trumpers whatever that means so I think she’d still be able to pull her supporters out.
I think it looks worse for DeSantis who has really worked hard on the state but only gets lukewarm support at the best of times. He has blown money and effort on an Iowa operation in a gamble to convince donors that he is viable. If his people don’t show up he’ll be facing calls to give in.
For Vivek Ramaswamy — the snow is bad news for him as his voters will include a lot of Gen Z who as most of the Althouse commentariat have noted are lazy as hell and won't do anything which requires effort.
"Nothing is more important to the long-term health of our republic than that the tactics being used against Trump fail, with consequences to the perpetrators.". (emphasis added)
Unfortunately, I don't see the perpetrators ever paying consequences. I think the left/democrats have blown past the established behavioral norms of yesteryear because they have learned that there are no consequences. I offer the Russia hoax as Exhibit A.
If you watched the movie Oppenheimer, you saw the same tactics used against Trump described in excruciating detail as they were used against Oppenheimer, the last hour of the movie is a fascinating look at the abuse of power that government insiders bring to bear on naive outsiders.
BTW, it looks like Rich maybe realizes that his sophistry used to try to smear Trump, sophistry that largely depends on omission of key facts, isn’t really flying… Naah!
Trump is an obnoxious cad, like just about everyone else I've ever met from Queens, but he gets shit done. I lived not far from the whor-house his grandfather ran during the Klondike gold rush. Way smarter than grubbing for gold in wet, cold sand. He's a third-generation "get shit done" guy, and he's smart enough to work through and past the failures which are inevitable if you have the guts actually to try new business ideas.
I'm fine with successfully wealthy people seeking political power, whether or not I agree with their politics, e.g. Washington, Jefferson, Jackson, the Roosevelts, Kennedy, the Bushes, or Trump. For that matter, Gates, Buffet, Koch, Bezos, Musk, or whoever.
I'm NOT okay with mediocrities like the Clintons, Reids, Bidens, Pelosis, Obamas, and others getting into power and subsequently becoming fabulously rich, far beyond anything the position itself could possibly have provided.
Myself, I have four drgees in the hard sciences. In an era when the US Constitution has 7,500 words and the the USDA definition of a fucking CABBAGE is 36,000 words, anyone who goes to Washington and eliminates 13 regulations for each new one ... has my enthusiastic vote. I want Trump, unconcerned with re-election to go through that town with a meat cleaver, eliminating entire federal departments and moving others out of Washington completely, like maybe Interior to Boise, Idaho, or even Gopher Gulch, Wyoming.
In 1990, only one of America's Top 10 wealthiest counties was a DC suburb. In 2020, it was 5 or 6, with several others in the Top 20. This is Bolivia, and it must stop.
If not Trump, who else? There will be someone, someday, and the longer we put it off, the greater the chances it ends very, crushingly, disastrously badly.
@Bart Hall ( Kansas, USA) : Bravo! I am with you 100%
"... far beyond anything the position itself could possibly have provided."
Or, maybe-
... far beyond anything their talent could have provided.
"I want Trump, unconcerned with re-election to go through that town with a meat cleaver, eliminating entire federal departments and moving others out of Washington completely, like maybe Interior to Boise, Idaho, or even Gopher Gulch, Wyoming."
I agree with you but the problem with this plan is that when Trump's term is up, a successor with the same approach is needed to carry on. Otherwise, everything will get put back the way it was and it'll go back to Business As Usual.
Oh, and one more thing- not Boise, please.
Rich at 10:47 AM
I have seen a great deal of turmoil and upheaval over my lifetime. The realization from a Biden aide "that a lot of people are afraid of the American left" is an important comment from the inside.
One reason that I am more concerned this time than in the past is that neither of the two great parties of the country are now clearly committed to traditional liberalism: equality (not "equity"), the dignity of the individual, free association, free speech, universal values (without imperialism). ....
Excellent comment!
Wasn’t it nearly 8 years ago they made a big deal about the number of “conservative” pundits that would never support Trump, and almost 4 years ago the number of intelligence officials signed the letter the story of Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation. Many Americans remember 13. The number of American soldiers that died during Biden’s rushed withdrawal from Afghanistan.
"If not Trump, who else? There will be someone, someday, and the longer we put it off, the greater the chances it ends very, crushingly, disastrously badly."
It's not Trump. Getting rid of him does nothing about why he arrived on the scene to begin with. Progressives are so stupid, they'd think if the bulb lighting the "Low Fuel" indicator in their car was removed, they wouldn't be running out of gas anymore.
"Excellent comment!"
No, it isn't. He makes no attempt to defend the assertion as applied to the Republicans. He just declares it to be true.
I'm college educated and spent 25 year voting for Republicans. Then Donald Trump showed up and every Republican I met suddenly wasn't concerned about character and law and order. Trump inherited a growing economy and then ran it hot, not caring about the consequences (sort of like his approach to business, except bankruptcy will crash the world, not just his businesses). Trump spit on our allies and fawned over our enemies and another Trump administration will ruin the world order that has prevented large-scale wars for 75 years. But hey, at least Russia will get its empire back because we're terrified of "forever wars." God help us.
91 big, beautiful charges, our hero might say.
I would have liked to see DeSantis be the nominee. I do not understand what happened to him.
=================
premature electioneering!
Oh, and one more thing- not Boise, please.
=================
NIMBY v NIMBoise
"I'm seeing the phrase "91 felony charges" is everywhere this morning. It seems those who loathe Trump don't realize how it can help Trump to stress the overabundance of charges."
So let's forget honesty and the rule of law and simply ignore that Trump has been racketeering his entire adult life. The problem is not the fact that "No Trumpers" point out his lawbreaking; rather it is the incredible concept that you are willing to unquestioningly accept Narcissus, the sick self-lover, as your leader.
Oh, and one more thing- not Boise, please.
=================
NIMBY v NIMBoise
is IOWA so rustic backyard that they cannot caucus via !!!Zoom!!!
is IOWA so rustic backyard that they cannot caucus via !!!Zoom!!!
- asking for Vivek supporters
Interesting topic. We are all registered Republicans. Myself and spouse plus two adult children. Seven University degrees: Four baccalaureate and three masters. Four votes for Trump in 2016 and same in 2020. No change expected for 2024.
sharon said...
I'm college educated and spent 25 year voting for Republicans. Then Donald Trump showed up and every Republican I met suddenly wasn't concerned about character and law and order. Trump inherited a growing economy and then ran it hot, not caring about the consequences (sort of like his approach to business, except bankruptcy will crash the world, not just his businesses). Trump spit on our allies and fawned over our enemies and another Trump administration will ruin the world order that has prevented large-scale wars for 75 years. But hey, at least Russia will get its empire back because we're terrified of "forever wars." God help us.
1/14/24, 9:05 PM
Character like McCain and Romney who shit on us?? Great character!! It's people like THOSE men who got us Trump when they sat down and let the Progressives walk all over them, and US. I guess you are fine with Biden...so stick with him.
Mike Gallagher
@radiotalkermike
But don’t worry, there’s no such thing as the Deep State……
NBC News
@NBCNews
A network of public interest groups and lawmakers, nervous about former President Trump’s potential return to power, is quietly devising plans to foil any effort on his part to pressure the U.S. military to carry out his political agenda. https://nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trump-military-fears-rcna129159?cid=sm_npd_nn_tw_ma&taid=65a3fdfdbfa495000187e4e9&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
3:57 PM · Jan 14, 2024
So Chuck is calling himself Sharon now? Or did someone else from alt-world show up to gaslight us with stories of how the GOPe was doing just fine until that darned Orange Dude showed up?
Ooooh. Interesting.
"Sharon" (wink wink) pops in right at the very moment the LLR-democratical Brigade (Chuck, Rich, lonejustice) are realizing they are not moving the Althouse blog rhetorical needle in the pro-dem direction at all as is their intent along with smearing and lying about conservatives and attempting to "drive a wedge between Althouse and her readers".
And "Sharon's" little missive reads and sounds exactly like a LLR-democratical and Violent Homosexual Rage Rape Fantasist Chuck post...which is doubly strange for a "woman".
We will continue to monitor the offerings of our "new" Althouse blog "contributor", "Sharon", quite closely indeed to see what unfolds.
"I'm seeing phrase "91 felony charges" is everywhere this morning. It seems those who loathe Trump don't realize how it can help Trump to stress the overabundance of charges. "
I've got two college degrees, one of them a doctorate. That's only really pertinent for the historic perspective it has provided me. This ridiculously unfair and extralegal persecution plainly tells us that the Democratic Party is full of power-crazed Stalinists who will stop at nothing to enslave and tyrannize us. These people are dangerous enemies. The affirmative-action buffoons who are the public faces of these show-trials are bad enough, but behind them lurk our own modern avatars of Dzerzhinsky and Beria. We are living in dangerous and evil times, the outcome of which will affect humankind's destiny for hundreds or even thousands of years.
I have voted Democrat in days gone by when the alternative was clearly worse. I voted for Paul Penzone as sheriff of Maricopa County, for example, when Joe Arpaio's failure to control his deputies and jailers became a measurable drag on my property taxes. But I don't think I can do that any more. The Democratic Party must be destroyed, not just defeated. Anyone who would get in bed with those enemy scum can never again be trusted. The sooner we split the country and drive most of them out, the better.
So let's forget honesty and the rule of law and simply ignore that Trump has been racketeering his entire adult life.
Is this proof by repeated assertion, or begging the question?
In either case: Get lost. You got nuthin'.
"We will continue to monitor the offerings of our "new" Althouse blog "contributor", "Sharon", quite closely indeed to see what unfolds."
C'mon, now- she seems nice.
"91 felony charges" for Trump fails to meet the now-standard maxim that we each and all commit at least 3 felony crimes per day, just going about our normal activities. Trump must be pretty clean to only have racked up 91 felony charges since becoming persona non grata to the left. That can't be much more than 1 per month, at best, for a 7 year statute of limitations. Sad!
Sebastian said...
"Then again, "reporters" could just read the comments on the Althouse blog.
Then again, "reporters" could just read the comments on the Althouse blog. "
Degrees from Trump University don't count.
im in vermont said...
" Most anti-Trumpers simply accept what they are told."
I accept what comes out of Trump's mouth. In the legal biz we call it "admissions".
Maybe 10/7 and the Ivy League Meltdown have also reached a tipping point, causing college educated republicans to question their faith in their understanding as molded by that college education.
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा