Althouse: A pithy montage of incitement hypocrisy.

February 12, 2021

A pithy montage of incitement hypocrisy.

218 comments:

«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 218 of 218

Achilles said...: Ann Althouse said...

This video is on YouTube, so if Google didn’t want it, it could oust it from there. No reason to come after me.

Are you truly that unaware of how these people work?

Or are you making jokes?; 2/12/21, 9:18 PM
Jon Burack said...: Temujin says: "A manipulation laid out recently (and arrogantly) in Time called 'fortifying' the election."

Ann brought up this piece in Time a while back saying she needed to consider it further. Ann, did you get back to this? If so, I musr have missed it. I am a bit stunned at how little news I have seen on it, from the right as well as the left. I thought the story was very odd and suspect, but it cried out for elaboration and investigation. So where is that?; 2/12/21, 9:35 PM
readering said...: Wow, mass of AA commenters. This is your guy.; 2/12/21, 9:55 PM
readering said...: Too late it will sink in with the GOP Senators who vote to acquit that the last three months will figure heavily in their obituaries. Not necessarily all that far away, since more than half of them are 65 or older.; 2/12/21, 10:05 PM
eddie willers said...: I think the Lincoln Man-Boy-Cult Project /Trump-hate money-whore hole and pedophile ring is about to implode.

Tucker put them through the grinder tonight.; 2/12/21, 10:34 PM
walter said...: readering said...Too late it will sink in with the GOP Senators who vote to acquit that the last three months will figure heavily in their obituaries. Not necessarily all that far away, since more than half of them are 65 or older.
--
You're fooling yourself. The vast majority who hold to facts per the charges will do just fine.
The handful who don't will go down as haters or swing district hedgers.
Your mumbling bud Leahy will likely exit first.; 2/12/21, 11:59 PM
Kelly said...: At this point, what difference does it make? I honestly don’t understand what is going on. By fair means or foul, Democrats won. So what’s the point of this farce?; 2/13/21, 12:17 AM
readering said...: Not a farce, except the whatabout defense and especially lies about Trump that day by a literal ambulance chaser from PA.; 2/13/21, 3:12 AM
Tom Grey said...: Each of the videos should have a small date on them.

Glad to see that Ann sees the hypocrisy of the Dems.

Part of me thinks it's too bad she doesn't condemn it enough to vote against it,
but at least by often condemning actions of Trump, she gets some Dems (no longer "liberal") to read her, so maybe some of them have some ideas of their own hypocrisy.

If she has to avoid taking political sides, but tries to take the Truth side against both sides, that's pretty valuable.
Thanks.; 2/13/21, 5:15 AM
Rusty said...: Readering.
Stick to contract law.; 2/13/21, 7:12 AM
hpudding said...: What did they do that was hypocritical? I mean, besides speak in a way that did NOT invite a response of mass violence committed to overthrowing the government and the constitutional order for transitioning power, of course.

The Trumpanzees have so much integrity! When they speak of violently acting against the constitutional order, they actually carry it out!

How proud you all must be. Your words must really be worth something, after all.; 2/13/21, 9:37 AM
hpudding said...: And a deadly response, at that.; 2/13/21, 9:38 AM
Readering said...: I do much more than just contract litigation, but Trump's newest (!) lawyer clearly has not done much more than personal injury litigation.; 2/13/21, 10:11 AM
Greg The Class Traitor said...: https://www.mediaite.com/news/trump-reportedly-told-kevin-mccarthy-on-furious-call-during-riots-i-guess-these-people-are-more-upset-about-the-election-than-you-are/

So we have "someone says that McCarthy says that Trump said that ..."?

Let me guess (no, I'm not going to give that trash a click): the "someone" is "anonymous".

"Animal House" had "double secret probation". Democrats have "double anonymous hearsay".

Every time I think you people can't get any more pathetic, you prove me wrong.

I just have one question:

What's the point?

If you thought that Trump was honestly beat by 6 million votes in 2020, why in the world would you want him "banned from running for office" (not that impeachment can do that)?

You hate the GOP? Then you should be massively excited at the thought of Trump running for President in 2024, winning the nomination, and then getting crushed by the Democrat.

And dragging the whole GOP down with him.

So, is the reality that YOU believe that the Democrats stole the election in 2020, and you fear that after 4 years of an incompetent Biden / Harris Administration the support for Trump will be so huge that even your skills at fraud won't be able to overcome him in 2024?

What is it that you think "impeachment" will get you?; 2/13/21, 12:33 PM
Jim at said...: And a deadly response, at that.

Again, if we were half as violent as you accuse us of being, shitheads like you would be dead by now.

Now, let's take a look at Pudding Head's people.; 2/13/21, 1:33 PM
readering said...: Trump was honestly beaten by 7 million votes. 81-74.; 2/13/21, 3:17 PM
Greg The Class Traitor said...: No, Readering, Trump was dishonestly beating by less than 43,000 votes:
WI: < 21k
GA: < 12k
AZ: < 11k

Flip those and it's 269-269, Trump wins; 2/13/21, 8:58 PM
loudogblog said...: The video image is now displaying the message "This video is age restricted and only available on youtube."; 2/14/21, 1:24 PM