"That’s because the former first lady recorded her rousing speech before Joe Biden selected Sen. Harris of California as his running mate. The speech was delivered remotely like all others at the DNC because of the coronavirus pandemic, and The Associated Press reports it was filmed before Harris was named last week as Biden’s VP candidate, indicating the choice was so close to the vest and down to the wire that even the Obamas were not in the loop."
The NY Post reports.
So they'd rather have us believe that what was served up last night was pre-recorded a week ago — it was that stale! — than have us think that Michelle Obama didn't want to say anything about Kamala Harris.
६४ टिप्पण्या:
“They” being the New York Post.
Kamala’s family owned 200 slaves.
So they'd rather have us believe that what was served up last night was pre-recorded a week ago — it was that stale! — than have us think that Michelle Obama didn't want to say anything about Kamala Harris.
Moreover, that would mean the favorable press could also be given sufficient lead time to place themselves on the same page.
My prior comment on the Michelle Obama "Fatal Attraction" post:
Did you notice it seems all coverage of Michelle Obama's speech seems uniformly headlined...
"Michelle Obama assails President Trump"?
At least we know how the DNC instructed the press to cover her remarks.
I put the odds of Biden’s speech being pre-recorded and edited at 50/50.
"“They” being the New York Post."
Post got it from AP. AP doesn't even cite a source for the information that the speech was recorded before the VP announcement. It says: "In keeping with the virtual nature of the convention because of the coronavirus, Mrs. Obama’s remarks were recorded before Biden’s announcement last Tuesday that he had chosen California Sen. Kamala Harris as his running mate. But Mrs. Obama wrote lengthy posts on her Facebook and Instagram accounts praising Harris, a Black woman born to Jamaican and Indian parents, after she joined the Democratic ticket."
That bit about Facebook and Instagram is obviously there to anticipate and answer the question whether MO has something against Harris.
I can understand having pre-recorded speeches for many aspects of this convention, but a week ago is a lifetime ago right now. Why pre-recorded so far ahead? Why not 1-2 days ago? Why not coordinate it with the VP announcement?
Further, it was ANNOUNCED 6 days ago and you didn't loop in the leaders of the party - and yes that includes Obamas - before the announcement?
Sounds poorly coordinated to me.
“Joe knows the anguish of sitting at a table with an empty chair"
Clint Eastwood, call your office.
The DNC convention is so important that people should watch, but it is not important for the Obamas to participate live or Biden to attend in person. Inspiring, no?
Harris, a Black woman born to Jamaican and Indian parents,
I see the AP style guide demands her ethnicity be included in her name now.
Best wig she’s ever worn for TV. Lame “speech” that came off as a list of same-old same-old about Trump. Boring. Tiny biden sign on the otherwise empty shelf was a cute touch. Pablum presented poorly, this year’s version of convention er excitement. [gag]
Michele is too busy on a permanent vacation at one of her many mansions to be bothered to tape her segment the day of......This was done weeks ago, and she is still blaming Trump for using the cages her husband had built and used himself. These people are a joke, and America needs to wake up.
MICHELLE OBAMA, on Americans: “They watch in horror as children are torn from their families and thrown into cages.” A heads-up for Michelle: The Obama kennels date back to 2014.
https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/ap-fact-check-michelle-obama-and-the-kids-in-cages/
In the middle of a pandemic--when all the good citizens are staying at home--when would the first lady find a spare moment to re-record her message with less than a whole week's notice?
What's sort of fascinating is even though she did not know who the candidate was, she did know that the candidate was going to be a woman, and almost certainly a person of color. With that advanced knowledge you would think she would have waited a day or two to record her speech so that she could included the selected VP in her remarks. If this selection were as historic and significant as the media and the Biden campaign want people to believe--certainly Michelle Obama would have coordinated her speech with the Biden campaign, right?
Because it’s only 2020 and we lack the technology to have political figures address events contemporaneously.
What frauds!
Has Kamala renounced her Jamaican citizenship?
John Henry
I see one post on her Instagram about Harris. It's a photo of Harris hugging two little girls. (No social distancing, no masks.) The theme of the comment with the post is that it's good for little black girls to be able to see someone who looks like them running for office.
"I’ve been thinking about all those girls growing up today who will be able to take it for granted that someone who looks like them can grow up to lead a nation like ours. Because @KamalaHarris may be the first, but she won’t be the last."
Her FB has the exact same post. All the posts are the same on both platforms. As far as I can tell, that one post is all she wrote. It is lengthy (for social media), but it praises Harris for being dark skinned more than it praises Harris.
Michelle has realized that the less said about Kamala the better.
Michelle was so busy with, um, somethings, that she couldn't make a minor edit to add a reference to VP candidate Harris and rerecord. Is that what I'm supposed to believe?
I see the AP style guide demands her ethnicity be included in her name now.
Imagine if it had been Warren. "Warren, a Native American woman born to white, Anglo parents."
You know what else was missing? Facts and truth.
Oh sure there were a few statements that were probably factually accurate, like joe losing his wife as a young senator, etc.
But so many falsehoods and BS it’s shorter to list the truths....
Does anyone believe Michelle “loves this country”? She said previously that Obama being President was the first time in her life she was proud of her country (or some BS like that). How can you love a country you’d NEVER been proud of?
I wouldn’t watch her speech, but I read through the transcript. Ugh. Total Garbage.
"I put the odds of Biden’s speech being pre-recorded and edited at 50/50."
100% chance it's plagiarized from some Marxist professor.
Oh, c’mon. Michelle wears her resentments pretty plainly. She doesn’t want Barack anywhere near that bitch.
Another election where the Obamas are doing the bare minimum ‘cause it’s not in their interest for the Democrat to win. They’d love to have another four years to monetize their position as Leaders of the Resistance or whatever fantasy the frozen chosen are indulging in this week.
"what was served up last night was pre-recorded a week ago — it was that stale"
OK, true. Anything about Dems in general and the Obamas in particular that isn't stale--besides the riots and TDS issue du jour, that is?
You know what they say: If you can't say something nice about someone, don't say anything."
"Mrs. Obama’s remarks were recorded before Biden’s announcement last Tuesday that he had chosen California Sen. Kamala Harris as his running mate. But Mrs. Obama wrote lengthy posts on her Facebook and Instagram accounts praising Harris, a Black woman born to Jamaican and Indian parents, after she joined the Democratic ticket."
Very passive aggressive, snub in person, then get your lacky to throw some sunshine up Harris' skirt on facebook.
I note the genealogy in Harris' description, Why call her a Black woman, they have told us she is Jamaican/Indian, which contains more information.
Gusty Winds: the odds of Joe Biden's speech being prerecorded and edited are 100%.
I put the odds of Biden’s speech being pre-recorded and edited at 50/50.
Not a prayer he speaks live. Even a fast twitch muscle champ could not kill the feed fast enough if Joe goes off the path.
Don't bet on the odds of prerecording. Instead bet the over/under on obvious editing breaks.
So she recorded last week, and couldn't be bothered to update it after Harris was announced as VP?
Yeah. you know, that story doesn't make things look all that much better for Biden / Harris / Obama
Kamala’s family owned 200 slaves.
And...? That is her only good point because if elected (puke) it'd undermine a lot of the statue-destuction movement.
GingerBeer said...
MICHELLE OBAMA, on Americans: “They watch in horror as children are torn from their families and thrown into cages.” A heads-up for Michelle: The Obama kennels date back to 2014.
https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/ap-fact-check-michelle-obama-and-the-kids-in-cages/
-------===========
all well and good.
which ones had golden fixtures?
If the O's hadn't given Kamala the 'heels up' she wouldn't be there.
pre-recorded speeches : = pre-written obituaries
The AP fact checked Michelle and I am SHOCKED that they told the truth (or even dared to fact check Saint Obamas wife!!)
AP – Michelle Obama assailed President Donald Trump on Monday for ripping migrant children from their parents and throwing them into cages, picking up on a frequent and distorted point made widely by Democrats.
She’s right that Trump’s now-suspended policy at the U.S.-Mexico border separated thousands of children from their families in ways that had not been done before. But what she did not say is that the very same “cages” were built and used in her husband’s administration, for the same purpose of holding migrant kids temporarily.
A look at her remark in the keynote address at the opening night of the remote Democratic National Convention:
MICHELLE OBAMA, on Americans: “They watch in horror as children are torn from their families and thrown into cages.”
THE FACTS: The reference to cages is misleading and a matter that Democrats have persistently distorted.
Trump used facilities that were built during the Obama-Biden administration to house children at the border. They are chain-link enclosures inside border facilities where migrants were temporarily housed, separated by sex and age.
At the height of the controversy over Trump’s zero-tolerance policy at the border, photos that circulated online of children in the enclosures generated great anger. But those photos — by The Associated Press — were taken in 2014 and depicted some of the thousands of unaccompanied children held by President Barack Obama.
When that fact came to light, some Democrats and activists who had tweeted the photos deleted their tweets. But prominent Democrats have continued to cite cages for children as a distinctive cruelty of Trump.
I didn't hear MO's speech, but I wonder, did she express a frisson of pride in her country due to an elderly white man with dementia being selected as her party's candidate? I'm guessing no.
As if doing a "virtual" convention isn't challenging enough (and from what I hear they haven't met that challenge very well, although I sure ain't watching), how on earth do you allow your party's most popular standard-bearer (certainly its most beloved woman) to show up in a pre-recorded speech that's "stale" by a week, and thereby ignore the most exciting thing to come out of the Biden campaign in months?
Back to Princess Bride: Inconceivable.
"It was that stale."
I believe!
"...even the Obamas were not in the loop."
And I thought Joe and Barry were Best Buds!
I didn't watch the convention, but what tells me that it was a dud is the fact that none of the resident Commies here have turned up to blabber about how fantastic and inspiring it was. Had it been at all interesting, Inga would have been here hyperventilating about the glorious speeches of Dem Pols, who all want only the best for us, of course.
She must have fallen asleep after the first 15 minutes. We know Joe did.
"Biden Campaign Warns That For Debate Biden Will Need A Mask That Completely Conceals His Face And He Might Sound Different"
Bob said...
"...even the Obamas were not in the loop."
And I thought Joe and Barry were Best Buds
The question is: was Biden in the loop?
Harris campaigned in the past as an Indian now as a Black. Girl can't make up her mind. I didn't watch. What for? Same old DemCom emo and envy politics. I'm old, White, male, hetero and have a seven figure net worth. They hate me and make no effort to disguise it. DemComms have larceny in their hearts, that's why they vote the way they do. They always assume it will be some evil Republican who they will rob blind and are surprised when they too are robbed blind. A few California DemCom idiots in the state legislature are pushing for a wealth tax and will tax Californians who leave with their money for ten years.
Leland said...The DNC convention is so important that people should watch, but it is not important for the Obamas to participate live or Biden to attend in person. Inspiring, no?
Michelle couldn't appear live because Monday is canasta night.
The Obamas really don't care about a third term I guess, at least Michelle Obama doesn't. If she cared, she would have made time last week to record the speech. So much of this seems like a zombie campaign, but the national media says he's a shoo in. Hmmmm.
Further, it was ANNOUNCED 6 days ago and you didn't loop in the leaders of the party - and yes that includes Obamas - before the announcement?
Politico knew the choice for weeks! Have we forgotten their errant post? I haven't.
"So they'd rather have us believe that what was served up last night was pre-recorded a week ago — it was that stale! — than have us think that Michelle Obama didn't want to say anything about Kamala Harris." I can believe both...
Would it be rude to yell out, "run Forest, run!" when Kamala Harris is speaking?
Ann Althouse said...
"That bit about Facebook and Instagram is obviously there to anticipate and answer the question whether MO has something against Harris."
It doesn't answer the question. It only deflects it. Who knows what she says about Kamala Harris in private?
Either the speech was a left-over from last week, or Michelle is a really petty bitch.
I’m thinking she’s a petty bitch!
Trump attacks Obama for citing old covid death count. Hmmm.
Left Bank of the Charles is strangely absent on the felony assault head kicking thread.
Left Bank votes for the mobs, happily, in previous elections.
Your complicity in these crimes is noted.
Using the word "glaring" anywhere in a story involving Black women reinforces an insidious racist stereotype. There's an editor at the NY Post who needs to be cancelled.
And we should be surprised by this, why?
People on one particular end of our political spectrum can do or say anything without fear of being criticized or outed.
They can be lazy; they can be deceitful; they can twist things out of shape; they can slough things off. It really doesn't matter, because the mainstream media has their back.
In the immortal words of that oh-so-eloquent speaker, Michelle Obama< "It is what it is."
Or, if you don't like Michelle's statement, you can go with this one: "What difference at this point does it make?"
Like I wrote last night in the penultimate thread- I expect Biden's acceptance speech will be inter-laced with video montages to cover the editing breaks which cannot be hidden these days.
I will guess that they have been putting Biden's "speech" together for the last two weeks, one line read at a time.
Them puzzles don't just do themselves.
Harris, a Black woman born to Jamaican and Indian parents,
I see the AP style guide demands her ethnicity be included in her name now.
Harris, a mixed-race woman born to Jamaican and Indian .
Two types of foreigner, each uniquely oppressive to the minorities in their respective countries, are the people who taught kamala Harris her values and beliefs.
All of Michelle Obama's speeches that I've heard/read feel like they were written by a verbal abuser. Shaming, belittling, criticizing, condescension, oblique threats, and gaslighting.
I'm not saying she's verbally abusive, just that she uses the same style of speaking.
I don't like a millionaire telling me about bogus systematic racism from their mansion on Martha's Vineyard. Especially one who claims not to like politics while doing politics. Someone whose jobs and book deals are a direct result of politics.
How weird that they didn't do a re-do or an add-on when Harris was chosen.
That's sending a message, no?
What is it about Democrats that motivates them to continue their con well after their sell-by dates?
They never give their festering gobs a rest.
Michelle Obamas judgement?
https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2020/08/18/awkward-in-one-fell-swoop-james-woods-reminds-the-world-what-a-horrific-judge-of-character-michelle-obama-really-is/
Didn't Barack at one time say what a hotty Kamala was when she was AG of CA? I am sure Michelle hasn't forgotten.
At 6:30 pm ET, the Michelle speech post and the Korean dog post each have 61 comments.
minnesota farm guy: "Didn't Barack at one time say what a hotty Kamala was when she was AG of CA?"
Yes, every now and again Barack goes into full Cory Booker Fierce Heterosexual mode....if you know what I mean....
Children were not just separated from their families but they were separated from their human traffickers and sex abusers, which was the reason for the policy in the first place. Why does no one ever mention that.
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा