"A pomodoro, once started, must not be interrupted, otherwise it has to be abandoned. But in this stringency, there is relief: You are not allowed to extend a pomodoro, either. After a set of four 25-minute intervals are completed, you’re supposed to take a longer break of 15 to 30 minutes before continuing.... We waste hours keeping on going when our concentration’s long gone, caught in drowsy, drawn-out moments staring glumly at a screen, and not only when we’re supposed to be doing our jobs. Leisure time has also taken on a timeless, hypnotic quality lately. Everything our culture produces feels at once never-ending and meaningless — or perhaps meaningless because it’s never-ending. Movies explode into cinematic universes; series are designed to be binge-watched; every video, song or podcast tips over and auto-plays another; social media scrolls toward infinity and the news never stops broadcasting. An everlasting present expands around us in all directions, and it’s easy to get lost in there — all the more reason to set some boundaries. Now that my breaks are short and fleeting, I think more carefully about what I’d like to do with them, and I’ve found it’s quite different from the unimaginative temptations I would otherwise default to (flopping on the sofa, scrolling on my phone, becoming annoyed). Instead I’ll make a sandwich, do a quick French lesson, reply to a few texts, have a shower, go to the laundromat; and such humdrum activities, now that they’re restricted, have become sources of great pleasure."
From "This Time-Management Trick Changed My Whole Relationship With Time" by Dean Kissick (NYT).
"Pomodoro" is just the Italian word for tomato. The technique was invented by a guy who used a tomato-shaped kitchen timer. These are quite common. Here — you can buy one on Amazon. Perhaps that would make the technique feel more real, more tangible. Oh, now I want a tangerine timer.
And here's the inventer's book, "The Pomodoro Technique." I bought that. I'm interested in breaking my concentration and getting little things jauntily done.
And I like the way it interlaced with something I heard David Mamet say in his Master Class "Dramatic Writing." It was something like: It's hard-wired in the human being to fall into a minor lull every 7 minutes and a major lull at every third interval of 7 — basically every 20 minutes — so it's best to think of 7-minute-long scenes and 20 minute acts.
I have a vague memory from my college years of calling out "7 minute lull!" when a conversation fell into what was about to be an uncomfortable silence. That was based on some sort of scientific study we'd heard about that said conversations have a rhythmic cycle with a lull every 7 minutes. Was it 7? I'm not sure. Does anyone else remember calling out "X minute lull" back around 1970?
Ah! I did some research. It is "7 minute lull" and George Carlin has something to say about it:
June 23, 2020
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
30 comments:
I'm interested in breaking my concentration
You need that like another hole in your head.
That would not have worked well with some of the 12 hour operations I used to do. I knew neurosurgeons who did 24 hour operations. They wore a G suit to keep their legs from swelling.
"That would not have worked well with some of the 12 hour operations I used to do. I knew neurosurgeons who did 24 hour operations."
I'm like that with blogging sometimes!
Imagine living your life in so constrained a way that you'd follow that! Wow! Sorry, have to stop this foreplay. It's been 25 minutes. Time for a 5-minute break. You want some oat milk?
>>Now that my breaks are short and fleeting, I think more carefully about what I’d like to do with them...<<
>>a quick French lesson,<<
A five minute French lesson - talk about inefficiency!
>>have a shower,<<
A five minute shower is an abomination.
>>go to the laundromat;<<
He lives next door to a laundromat with really fast machines?
I bought one of the tomato timers years ago. I use it when I have to force myself to do something I don’t like to do. On most things I start working and when I look at the clock again, three hours have passed.
I had trouble reading this because my mind kept searching for what we were doing with a tomato. Was this about cooking? Stewing tomatoes? Ahh...concentration. But then I didn't feel like reading it again.
This is why blogging plus commenting is better: never a lull moment. Except when moderation kicks in.
When I stop returning to check in with the Althouse blog it'll change my relationship with time.
Yea, I'm not seeing it, but I'm not from your planet, or at least I don't recognize the place lately.
Have you seen all the craziness in CHAZ lately. All kinds of stuff happening at 2 or 3 am. Does everybody just sleep all day?
I remember About a Boy, a mostly regrettable Hugh Grant movie. His character was a rich idler who managed his time in half-hour segments. He wasn’t trying to be productive, but it was a way for him to cope with his boredom due a lack of urgency in his life of luxury.
I agree with Nich. This arrangement would simply put the brakes on whatever I was doing just as I got rolling. Maybe it helps with some small, mundane activities, or for planning ahead somewhat, but it seems to me it would mostly have the opposite effect of the supposed time-saving benefits. It reminds me too much of school, and having to stop whatever we were doing, or learning, just because a bell rang and we had to do some other required bullshit, unable to accomplish anything because we had to do everything.
These techniques are necessary for blank page anxiety of keyboard cowboys. Working with your hands/body is a different story as Doc Karen points out.
This video maker explains using settled (jk) science how structuring your environment is a more successful technique to create good habits than brute mental force.
Will Power is for Losers
That's a book? Everybody with an idea has to have a book. Never mind that a book has to be at least 200 pages and most ideas can be fully described in 10 to 20 pages. The self-improvement aisle is loaded with books that are 90% time-wasting filler just so you can feel okay paying $15 for them.
Here's a website I use to implement the pomodoro technique:
https://tomato-timer.com/
One of the things I really liked about being a reasearch chemist in a lab was that the work wasn't monotonous at any time. Most of my work was never more than 30 minutes at a time doing any particular task, and you could interlace experiments so that the task always changes from one 30 minute period to the next.
Now, for other pursuits, as I have gotten older, I find my ability to concentrate on things gets shorter. When I was 20, I could study chemistry, physics, and math for hours at a time without a break, but I don't think I could manage more than 30 minutes at a time at age 53. I find the same thing with reading novels- when I was 20, I could read a book all evening, now, about an hour at a time is my limit- the eyes get tired more easily.
I use the Pomodoro technique when I see that I have things accumulating on my to-do list that I keep not getting to. Works like a charm. I only have to resort to it about once a week.
yeah, no... as a software engineer it sometimes takes me at least 20-30 minutes of mental runway just to get completely focused and have all the thread-lines of the problem mapped out in my mind so I can start methodically working each one until I determine the best solution...
every time my kids come into my office or there's a knock at the door or the phone rings, its like a gust of wind blowing down a house of cards or someone knocking over your precariously built Jenga tower... its extremely frustrating and depending on the severity of the interruption and complexity of the code, you can spend another 20-30 minutes just picking up all the pieces and getting back to where you left off...
As a software developer, for heads-down coding, you need hours and hours of uninterrupted focus in order to make real progress... I think that's why most coders do their best work late at night after everyone is sleeping...
With my ADHD, I have been doing this for quite a while. Except when I finish one 20 minute chore/task, I switch to another totally different one. I believe that you can do any boring (to me, most become boring because of my condition) task for 20 minutes. You can buy into that. Any more than that time period, I resent it and most time, fail to even start.
THEOLDMAN
Now that I have Medicare and supplemental insurance, I am hoping to get back to medication: Strattera and Vyvanse.
I get up and get coffee.
General TJ (Stonewall) Jackson had a marching rule that supposedly Was NOT open to interpretation
50 minutes Marching... 10 Minute rest (whether you needed it or not)
1 hour for lunch
so, if you marched from dawn to dusk, call it 13 hours
minus 1 hour for lunch, leaving 12 hours
minus 12 ten minute breaks, leaving 10 hours of marching
figure 2.5 mph, and you got 25 miles a day
Of course, TJ liked his men to get up at "false dawn*" (about 4am* in the summer), and march until dark (9 or 10pm), so more like 15 hours of marching. But, SUPPOSEDLY, those 10 minute breaks made it work
false dawn* first light
4am* i'm using DST so y'all don't get confused)
This is the kind of content that keeps bringing me back.
"You need that like another hole in your head.”
When I see comments like this, I always think of what Thoreau wrote in Walden:
Perhaps these pages are more particularly addressed to poor students. As for the rest of my readers, they will accept such portions as apply to them. I trust that none will stretch the seams in putting on the coat, for it may do good service to him whom it fits.
I remember in the old days we used to think conversation lulled at quarter to and quarter after the hour.
I don't remember 7 minutes.
But then, I'm from Texas where things are a bit more laid back.
your Chelsea neighbor
In 1995 when we first started so videos for the web, the rule was 20 minute max with about 5 minutes for each point (rest being intro, outro and transition material). By early oughts this was down to 14 minutes and it continued to decrease. Latest I've heard is 3 minutes. So imagine telling a GenZ to concentrate for 25 solid minutes on a single task.
Char Char Binks said...
tim in vermont said...
This is the kind of content that keeps bringing me back.
"You need that like another hole in your head.”
When I see comments like this, I always think of what Thoreau wrote in Walden:
For good or ill, I think you've misunderstood me. In fact the technique may have its uses for some.
Ann Althouse, however, is such a hummingbird, such a distractible flibbertigibbet, so easily diverted by any shiny object, that the notion of her needing to *break* her concentration? You can't break dust.
It's one of her shticks, that she treats a serious topic for a few words, then "Squirrel!"s herself and starts talking about the spinach in someone's teeth and then maybe what Dylan sang about dental hygiene. The only thing that really holds her attention is Ann Althouse.
Concentrated tomatoes are tomato paste.
I've been working through the Coursera class "Learning how to Learn", and one of the major ideas they talk about is focused versus diffuse learning. I think focused learning is pretty self-explanatory, but diffuse learning is where you take a break from studying, which has the effect of letting your unconscious mind work on a problem, giving your mind a chance to consolidate what you've already ingested (and possibly have an Archimedes-style eureka moment, bathtub not required).
The idea that you can solve a problem while taking a break from focused studying is not new (and I think something most people have some experience with), but making it a deliberate part of your study regimen isn't really something I've thought about before taking the class.
Having read the article, and delved into the comments, this is exactly the opposite of Flow. Best for drudgery.
+1. There used to be a free app on the iPhone I used, but it stopped working in one of the updates.
>Happy Warrior said...
>
> Here's a website I use to implement the pomodoro technique:
> https://tomato-timer.com/
Nichevo: Drudgery, Yes! Flow, No! Brilliant observation. It's perfectly simple like an exact solution to a non-linear partial differential equation.
I mention it, Howard, because AA has posted on Mihaly C's concept before. As her leading art-appreciating jill-sniffer (now that Chuck is gone), you need to know these things.
Just looking out for YOU, buddy! Can't wait till you break it off in her.
Post a Comment