23 જૂન, 2016
"tribal-court jurisdiction, affirmative action, DUI tests without a warrant, the interpretation of a federal law prohibiting possession of firearms by individuals convicted of domestic violence, abortion, Bob McDonnell, immigration...."
A "really short version of what's left" for the Supreme Court to decide, from SCOTUSblog, which is live-blogging the release of opinions this morning.
પોસ્ટ્સ
8 ટિપ્પણીઓ:
huh, I thought I was reading a list of the ways in which our country has departed from basic principles of limited government and the ideals of the Enlightenment.
The Supreme Court sure does make a lot of political decisions. I say we eliminate that pesky Congress and start electing 50 Supremes every 4 years, since they seem to be doing the job of the Legislature already.
tim maguire said...
huh, I thought I was reading a list of the ways in which our country has departed from basic principles of limited government and the ideals of the Enlightenment.
One more Supreme Court confirmation would ensure that for a generation.
"prohibiting possession of firearms by individuals convicted of domestic violence, abortion, Bob McDonnell, immigration...."
How is one convicted of Bob McDonnell?
I am Laslo.
Laslo Spatula said...How is one convicted of Bob McDonnell?
You'll have to ask his parents.
King Kennedy strikes again. The cure for past racial discrimination is more racial discrimation unless, of course, you are good at sports.
"A fella could have a pretty good weekend in Vegas with all this stuff!"
JSM
Is an E-warrant suppose to be EXACTLY what happened?
Bulletin
ટિપ્પણી પોસ્ટ કરો
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.