The transcriber actually missed two words from the first line. A glance at the manuscript shows that Wallace wrote "so hard" twice. So his first line was really...
My mother works so hard, so hard,
...which is a much better line, fits the meter of the poem and repeats the phrase to evoke the repetitive nature of her hard work.
I enjoyed seeing his little ditties in his original schoolboy scrawl. I really like that a teacher of that generation did NOT get out her red pencil to change "threw" to "through", or "there" to "their". I also like his sense of humor in using "dayd" for dead, and that the teacher let it be.
That is fundamentally good practice to teach in edu101 - when to correct and when not to. Fortunately I had such a professor, long ago.
I really like that a teacher of that generation did NOT get out her red pencil to change "threw" to "through", or "there" to "their". I also like his sense of humor in using "dayd" for dead, and that the teacher let it be.
Today those errors would go uncorrected because the teacher wouldn't spot them.
It's a lovely romantic idea in play here, the celebrated writer who was already a budding literary genius in kindergarten. Behind that idea is the reality of an academic treadmill, with newly (and not so newly) minted PhDs desperate to find some author about whom to make their career. UT Austin seems to have a leg up in the DFWallace sweepstakes.
AS I read this article, I started thinking back to WJBate's bio of Keats, and the (to me) harsh judgments about his early poetry -- really, almost everything before the great Odes in his last year. When DFWallace finally meets his WJBate, I suspect the judgments will be harsher still. But that will come later. It seems we're still in the adulatory phase.
Support the Althouse blog by doing your Amazon shopping going in through the Althouse Amazon link.
Amazon
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for me to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Support this blog with PayPal
Make a 1-time donation or set up a monthly donation of any amount you choose:
9 comments:
We murder to dissect.
Analyzing "so hard and for bread" as a single phrase is very peculiar.
The transcriber actually missed two words from the first line. A glance at the manuscript shows that Wallace wrote "so hard" twice. So his first line was really...
My mother works so hard, so hard,
...which is a much better line, fits the meter of the poem and repeats the phrase to evoke the repetitive nature of her hard work.
Well lardy-dardy. . .
I enjoyed seeing his little ditties in his original schoolboy scrawl.
I really like that a teacher of that generation did NOT get out her red pencil to change "threw" to "through", or "there" to "their". I also like his sense of humor in using "dayd" for dead, and that the teacher let it be.
That is fundamentally good practice to teach in edu101 - when to correct and when not to. Fortunately I had such a professor, long ago.
Agree with Paul. These are separate phrases and there is no particular justification for reading them as a single thought like that.
I really like that a teacher of that generation did NOT get out her red pencil to change "threw" to "through", or "there" to "their". I also like his sense of humor in using "dayd" for dead, and that the teacher let it be.
Today those errors would go uncorrected because the teacher wouldn't spot them.
It's a lovely romantic idea in play here, the celebrated writer who was already a budding literary genius in kindergarten. Behind that idea is the reality of an academic treadmill, with newly (and not so newly) minted PhDs desperate to find some author about whom to make their career. UT Austin seems to have a leg up in the DFWallace sweepstakes.
AS I read this article, I started thinking back to WJBate's bio of Keats, and the (to me) harsh judgments about his early poetry -- really, almost everything before the great Odes in his last year. When DFWallace finally meets his WJBate, I suspect the judgments will be harsher still. But that will come later. It seems we're still in the adulatory phase.
This web site Is Truly wonderful and amazing information maybe there is and looking so captivating..
immigration attorney las vegas nv
Post a Comment