... one who once supported a state bill to keep the Confederate battle emblem a part of Georgia’s flag, and another who led the defense of the state’s photo ID law, which Scott claims is a statute designed “to keep black folks, as much as possible, from voting.”
“I asked her specifically that they should be [withdrawn]. She just didn’t say anything.... The president should have said, ‘There’s absolutely no way I want to go down in history as putting these kinds of people into federal court nominations against my own African-American [people]’ ... It’s a tragedy.... This is a terrible mistake, history will record it as such.... And it breaks my heart that it’s a black president.”
৭ ফেব্রুয়ারী, ২০১৪
"Do you think George Bush would have been able to do this, or any white president would have been able to do this? No."
Said Georgia Rep. David Scott, a member of the Congressional Black Caucus, complaining to Valerie Jarrett about 2 of Obama's judicial nominees...
এতে সদস্যতা:
মন্তব্যগুলি পোস্ট করুন (Atom)
পোস্টগুলি
২৮৮টি মন্তব্য:
«সবচেয়ে পুরাতন ‹পুরাতন 288 এর 201 – থেকে 288Inga: "He killed a young man walking home with skittles for the crime of walking while being black."
Inga pretends the trial never took place.
Zimmerman shot a young man who was beating Zimmermans head against a sidewalk for the crime of Zimmerman watching the young man walk home.
FIFY
Inga: "He killed a young man walking home with skittles for the crime of walking while being black."
Inga pretends the trial never took place.
Zimmerman shot a young man who was beating Zimmermans head against a sidewalk for the crime of Zimmerman watching the young man walk home.
FIFY
Keep up Gerry, I said American leftists are not Communists, you are thoroughly brainwashed, but you're in good company along with the rest of the rightist extremists that have taken over the conservative movement.
I actually wept during Travon!
I feared that the race pimps (Sharpton, Jackson, Foxx, etc.) could hi-jack a tragedy and convict Zimmerman of murder. I thought that manslaughter was certainly a possibility, but murder?
Crack was a slave?
Somebody get ahold of Holder.
It is embarrassing that they allow you to teach law. These are some of the most retarded comments you have ever written.
I expect race baiting from Crack, and supreme ignorance from the stupid old woman, but this is a new low even for you.
Ugly.
Inga, the rightist extremists have nothing to do with the conservative movement.
But many many leftists are in fact communists in deeds and policy preferences.
There.
I hope that helps.
Now please return to telling us all about how no one on the left was concerned about Zimmermans race!
LOL
Seriously, I can't believe you put that out there.
Yet you did.
Hilarious.
Illuninati said...
Crack Emcee said:
"Conservative support for Zimmerman doesn't really fit your racist agenda"
I was talking to Inga but hey as they say if the shoe fits wear it.
I am, nice fit, too.
See, unlike the other side, I DON'T play cagey, bouncing from topic-to-topic, frolicking in the unsubstantiated ramblings of mad men, but clearly state the obvious:
Proudly.
jacksonjay: " I thought that manslaughter was certainly a possibility, but murder?"
Exactly.
Some variant of manslaughter was certainly more applicable and likely obtainable.
But, nope.
All of Inga's pals who apparently were completely and blissfully unconcerned with Zimmermans race (LOL) wouldn't let it go at that.
They wanted something so unrealistic they got nothing.
White hispanic.
Which conservative group came up with that again Inga?
Help us out here.
LOL
The Crack Emcee:
You tell me. That was your line.
jacksonjay,
race pimps
No, you guys aren't racist.
Any everyone knows that the Democrats were the Dixiecrats and the Dixiecrats became Republicans. It's pathetic for today's Republicans to rest lazily on the reputation of Republicans from a period so far in the past.
I would assume that Professor Althouse would be of the opinion that Dixecrats did not become Republicans until after the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Therefore, those Southerners who voted for Eisenhower were never Dixiecrats.
In the 1952 Presidential election, Eisenhower won 4 of the 11 former Confederate states. In 1952 Eisenhower won 48.1% of the vote in the 11 states that formerly comprised the Confederacy.
This data shows that well before the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Republicans had made solid inroads on the Solid South. As The Myth of the Racist Republicans points out, those Southerners voting for Eisenhower tended to be better educated, more suburban,and more likely to have migrated from the North than the typical Southern voter at the time. Dixiecrats from the North. Tell me another one, Professor Althouse.
In 2012, Romney won 53.6% of the vote in the 11 states that formerly comprised the Confederacy.That is not a lot different from the percentage that Eisenhower won in 1952.
So where are all the Dixiecrats turned Republcan? Especially since there is a gap of 60 years? Inquiring minds want to know.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1952
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2012
Illuninati, how dare you challenge Crack when you are personally responsible for the stylized reenactments of the actions of 1950's and 60's Madison Avenue Ad executives in disrepecting and treating as non-people black waiters at upscale Manhattan restaurants.
I mean, who do you think you are?
American leftists are not Communists
Inga, Are you blind or ignorant?
Inga:
Martin was murdered when he mounted an unprovoked attack against Zimmerman. Fortunately, Martin failed to murder Zimmerman while bashing the other man's head against the ground.
If Zimmerman would have died, then Martin would have been charged with second degree murder. If Zimmerman survived, then Martin would be guilty of attempted murder.
Richard: " Inquiring minds want to know."
Yes Richard, inquiring minds do want to know.
But that necessarily excludes Inga and, sadly, Ann Althouse.
They prefer to rely solely on those "truths" that, by golly, everybody just "knows".
I mean, how is it that you don't "just know" these things.
Aren't you open to received wisdom?
Facts are for suckers.
Hey Crack,
"code word" right?
Crack: "No, you guys aren't racist"
More of that "you guys" stuff.
Must be nice.
Wholesale categorization of others based on their skin color and "institutional guilt"?
Nope, not racist at all.
Logic.
Inga said...
"Keep up Gerry, I said American leftists are not Communists, you are thoroughly brainwashed, but you're in good company along with the rest of the rightist extremists that have taken over the conservative movement."
I think David Horowitz who grew up in an Communist home has the best definition of the American left.
http://discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1217
the actions of 1950's and 60's Madison Avenue Ad executives in disrepecting and treating as non-people black waiters at upscale Manhattan restaurants.
You prefer law-abiding citizens today?
It's your - well, no, "our" - funeral,...
The Crack Emcee said...
"Illuninati said...
Crack Emcee said:
"Conservative support for Zimmerman doesn't really fit your racist agenda"
I was talking to Inga but hey as they say if the shoe fits wear it.
I am, nice fit, too."
Crack, that is the most honest thing anyone on your side said all day. I don't mean that as a criticism. I like honesty.
Crack, if you don't like me commenting on stylized reenactments from the 50's and 60's, why did you link to them?
Back on point, at what police station should I turn myself into for my "institutionalized" responsibility for your latest linked event?
The American Left is communist in that they favor consolidation of capital and power to control the population. However, where they differ from their predecessors, is that they favor a population control protocol which normalizes murder. They are second only to the Chinese Communists in the number of human lives they have terminated. The voluntary nature of their protocol does not morally distinguish them from the involuntary protocol of their nearest competitor. The result is equivalent: a reduced or manageable problem set.
Illuninati,
Crack, that is the most honest thing anyone on your side said all day. I don't mean that as a criticism. I like honesty.
Thanks.
I told you that's what I do - state the obvious.
So crack, lets just cut to the chase.
You oppose Voter ID laws.
Ok.
Now what?
Say those all go away.
What other policy prescriptions do you advocate for, if any?
What's next?
What does the pathway to a more perfect union look like?
Years ago, I wrote letters to the editor in several newspapers across the South, that Confederate flag supporters should stop supporting the battle flag and the Confederate naval ensign and support the original Confederate flag, if they were serious about their historical heritage motives. I did this because many people thought the traditional flag represented racism. I and others were partially successful. The current State of Georgia flag is almost identical to the original Stars and Bars, a circle of stars with three red and white bars—a Confederate flag.
The Stars and Bars is not the traditional Cross of St. Andrews, and Saltire of St. Patrick flag which most people think of as a Confederate flag. That flag was designed to appeal to the British because their flag had a cross like that. They still like it today.
Illuninati, why won't you let blacks sit at lunch counters in the south?
Why?
Ok guys, I have to get something accomplished. I've enjoyed the talk.
Drago,
Crack, if you don't like me commenting on stylized reenactments from the 50's and 60's, why did you link to them?
You act on your own assumptions - like I "don't like" you commenting on stylized reenactments from the 50's and 60's. Where did I say that? You just made it up. You convinced yourself of it - and then acted on your assumption by projecting it onto me. Wild.
I linked to mad men because it's science fiction, looking backwards, so those white guys are displaying the same cultural blind spots you guys are, but you don't see it because you don't understand the program or something.
Drago said...
"Illuninati, why won't you let blacks sit at lunch counters in the south?
Why?"
Before I go, I do want complement Drago on his interesting posts. Now I really am gone.
Hey Crack,
"golf"
Crack: "I linked to mad men because it's science fiction, looking backwards, so those white guys are displaying the same cultural blind spots you guys are, but you don't see it because you don't understand the program or something"
My cultural blind spots are the same as 1950's Madison Ave Ad execs.
Sure Crack.
Sure.
And this is demonstrated precisely how?
Talk about projection.
If I may quote an individual whom I hold in the highest regard (lest I be accused of crimes against humanity): "You just made it up. You convinced yourself of it - and then acted on your assumption by projecting it onto me."
Totally wild.
Stars and bars was assuredly racist. It was all about slavery.
at the time the insurrection of the slave states started in 1860 the tarrif was at historically low levels. The tarrif was raised in 1861, and signed into law by Buchanan after the insurrection started. The tarrif could be raised only because of the withdrawal from Congress and Senate of the Senators of the states in insurrection.
It wasn't all about slavery, it was all about states rights. One of those rights, arguably the most significant, was slavery. But hardly the only one.
"Well… one answer is they really ARE trying to minimize the black vote."
They really ARE trying to minimize the ILLEGAL black vote.
This is all about wiping out the cottage industry that dems have run in big cities, using "walking around money" on election day to pay cheaters to move from precinct to precinct casting votes for those in jail, prison, dead or too whacked out on drugs to vote.
jacksonjay said...
Hey Crack,
"golf"
That's funny - really - but can you sustain that intensity?
I bet you can't.
I'm watching now - go!
Surprised by all the comments. I don't find the debate about how the South became republican all that interesting. Some of it has to do with civil rights, but not all. It is very intersting that Romney received approximately the same vote percentage as Eisenhower in the south -- although I'm not sure what it means.
As to vote fraud, one of the things that frustrates me is when liberals smugly claim it does not exist, citing how many times it is caught. Since it is easy to do and no one is policing it, the stats on how often it is caught and convicted are meaningless. I honestly don't know how often it happens, but policing the identity of voters seems like common sense. We do know that vote fraud got Johnson elected senator, which led to him becoming president. We also are pretty sure that vote fraud was very helpful to Kennedy in 1960. And who knows what tpe of vote fraud propelled Truman to his wins in Missouri. To some extent, those were differnt types of vote fraud, but the method would change with the times - the intent/motive remains the same.
Drago,
My cultural blind spots are the same as 1950's Madison Ave Ad execs.
Sure Crack.
Sure.
And this is demonstrated precisely how?
Well, your avatar certainly harkens back to a different era,...
Kansas City,
It is very intersting that Romney received approximately the same vote percentage as Eisenhower in the south -- although I'm not sure what it means.
I don't either, which is why I didn't answer it. Distractions.
As to vote fraud, one of the things that frustrates me is when liberals smugly claim it does not exist, citing how many times it is caught. Since it is easy to do and no one is policing it, the stats on how often it is caught and convicted are meaningless.
So we're back to Ann's point - history as blacks interpret it.
I'd say there's ample evidence to back us up on it,...
Keep up Gerry, I said American leftists are not Communists, you are thoroughly brainwashed, but you're in good company along with the rest of the rightist extremists that have taken over the conservative movement.
Inga, Republicans are not racists. You are thoroughly brainwashed, but you are in good company with the rest of the ultraleftist, Progressive extremists that have taken over the Democratic Party.
Also, was Pete Seeger an American leftist?
Hey Crack,
"thug"
Crack: "Well, your avatar certainly harkens back to a different era,..."
LOL
Guilt by avatar!!
I happen to think very highly of Rod Steiger the actor.
I happen to think that his role as the sheriff in "In the Heat of the Night" is his greatest performance ever.
It's one of my favorite movies.
It's gritty, "real" and doesn't sugar coat anything.
It also plugs in a number of "we are all alike" moments.
But hey, that's my avatar so "Guilty!".
Given your now apparently habitual inability to rise above guilt by superficial categorization, why not add "avatars" to the list of incriminating evidence?
Inga: What do female hormones have to do with Althouse's comment about voter ID? How are they related in any way at all?
Something like menopause would account for wild emotional swings and lack of judgement. Same thing with getting your period. Its likely one of the reasons men decided to keep women oppressed since the dawn of time - we simply don't trust humans who go randomly insane on us.
Crack said...
And you beautifully illustrate how the stealing of one group's wealth - putting them into an almost perpetual poverty as society advances ahead of them based on that wealth - is hidden by racists under the pejorative "Black's perpetual sense of victimhood" instead of the Republicans (who - don't forget - freed the slaves) fighting for justice in America.
It's really sick in the head.
And not the way to win blacks to your side,...
I think this gets to the heart of what Crack is saying -- namely, the tendency lately of conservatives to harp on "Black's perpetual sense of victimhood," which is not only racist (even if many doing the harping are not themselves racist) but foolish because it only serves to drive blacks even further away from the Republican party.
He's saying we've got to take the high road instead and be out in front fighting for justice. Sounds like a plan to me. And many Republican initiatives do just that, but are hidden from view because it's so easy for Democrats to forefront the racist-sounding ones.
Crack: "So we're back to Ann's point - history as blacks interpret it"
I cannot change history.
Any attempt on my part to dissuade blacks about any piece of history is proof of racism.
Failing to attempt to dissuade blacks about any piece of history is also proof of my racism.
Game. Set. Match.
This is why you see so many whites giving up.
We are guilty.
To argue we are not guilty is to admit guilt.
To not argue we are not guilty is to admit guilt.
Do you really blame anyone for simply deciding it's not worth it anymore?
There are a lot of folks who assume every whitey is a racist. And they further push out the idea that no blacks are.
That, to paraphrase a character from Killer Angels, makes them peewits.
Ann facilitates that by suggesting anyone who is a Republican is probably a former Dixiecrat or at least pines for the days of Jim Crow.
Shame on you all.
And shame on you for suggesting that voting should be taken less seriously than gun ownership. Or a trip to any Federal Building. Which both require a valid government-issued ID.
Inga: He killed a young man walking home with skittles for the crime of walking while being black.
Having actually watched the trial live, and been provided with expert legal analysis of at Legal Insurrection (banner event for them btw), I can only weep at Inga's ignorance and stupidity.
Careful children,
Althouse may have to put you back into the moderation playpen.....
Lydia: "He's saying we've got to take the high road instead and be out in front fighting for justice."
We are already at a "Full Stop" since we cannot agree about what "Justice" is, should like, or who gets to determine it and to what extent.
Lydia: "Sounds like a plan to me."
See Above
Lydia: "And many Republican initiatives do just that, but are hidden from view because it's so easy for Democrats to forefront the racist-sounding ones."
The "racist-sounding ones".
Well, that's just it isn't it?
Everything attempted is labeled as racist.
Every single time.
It's irrelevant what you do.
The lefts prized cudgel is "Racism!" and there's nothing you can do about.
Nothing.
To even think you can attempt to address such an emotional and deep set emotion is foolhardy and destined to fail.
"oh, but we can't give up".
Oh but we can.
And many of us have.
There is literally nothing, and I mean nothing any republican or conservative could do that would keep the left from labeling us as racist.
Nothing.
And the Ann Althouses of the world, who should know better, simply play along.
After all, "everyone knows all those dixiecrats became republican".
This is why we are lost.
How do you get an EBT card without valid ID?
Fen: "How do you get an EBT card without valid ID?"
It's as easy as a foreigner making a political contribution to obama via credit card from overseas.
Easy easy easy.
Of course, to note that these things are easy is to admit my institutional racism and guilt in any and all historical crimes against blacks in north america as well as everywhere else in the world.
As a non-former dixiecrat, my clearly guilt-ridden failure to become a dixiecrat due to my relative youth and then later vote republican only provides that much more proof of my intrinsic racist intent.
To argue otherwise is tantamount to an admission of guilt.
Such is the kafkaesque circumstance that Althouse and pals have cast us into.
As another hero of the left, Beria, asserted: "Show me the man and I'll find you the crime."
Of course, Beria was a good guy.
How do we know this.
Because Walter Duranty of the NYTimes won a pulitzer telling us so.
And all the good little lefties bought in.
The Crack Emcee @2/7/14, 2:23
Kansas City,
It is very intersting that Romney received approximately the same vote percentage as Eisenhower in the south -- although I'm not sure what it means.
I don't either, which is why I didn't answer it. Distractions.
What does it mean? It means that the narrative that Professor Althouse put forth- "Any everyone knows that the Democrats were the Dixiecrats and the Dixiecrats became Republicans"- doesn't stand up to the facts.
Is it a "distraction" to point that out?
to harp on "Black's perpetual sense of victimhood," which is not only racist
How is that racist?
The Dems are the plantation owners keeping blacks ignorant and fearful. I feel like the Yank breaking the slave's chains and yelling "run! run North! We'll save you!" And the slave responds, "nah I get free room and board here, and a cell phone, I'm good" as he walks back to his urban getto prison.
Inga and Crack driving the ranting threads. Perfect!!
Voter ID makes it much much easier to prove certain kinds of voter fraud actually occurred and to have tangible evidence of same, because the person who checks IDs and matches them signs off on having done so.
One common form of voter fraud is for, after the polls supposedly close, have the poll workers go through the list for people who haven't voted, sign falsely to their names, and vote for them. (You can assume this is taking place everywhere that polls are held open past closing time.)
In the case of Voter Id, you now have proof that the person who signed off on having checked a dead person's ID is at fault and you can arrest and pressure them. One might be an accident, but if multiple dead voters are found, complicity is assured.
Ann even had to school you in it because, as racists, civil rights history ain't your strong suit.
Ann was wrong about history, as has been pointed out several times already.
Inga said, American leftists are not Communists, that is your brainwashing speaking again. Voices in your heads that aren't really there. Sad and funny.
Actually, I used to be brainwashed that liberals (and even American Communists) were fluffy bunnies that just wanted the best for everyone. Thanks to the Internet, where I can see what they themselves write and do, as well as criticisms from others, I now know that whatever they may have been in the past, they certainly are not that now.
jacksonjay said...
Hey Crack,
"thug"
Atta Boy!
Quite impressive. Quite impressive, indeed.
You got Cracka-Assed Cracka written all over you:
I like that,...
Drago,
Do you really blame anyone for simply deciding it's not worth it anymore?
Yep - I've already been there, done that - it's racism.
See - that's how I know.
You'll step into every requirement, willingly, of your own volition. Nobody has to coach you on what to say. It's all you know. All you've practiced. Your defenses are boilerplate.
Sorry.
Richard Johnson,
It means that the narrative that Professor Althouse put forth- "Any everyone knows that the Democrats were the Dixiecrats and the Dixiecrats became Republicans"- doesn't stand up to the facts.
Is it a "distraction" to point that out?
As has already been said, by myself and someone else, it doesn't mean what you think it means.
Inga: "What do female hormones have to do with Althouse's comment about voter ID? How are they related in any way at all?"
-------------------------
Fenny :
"Something like menopause would account for wild emotional swings and lack of judgement. Same thing with getting your period. Its likely one of the reasons men decided to keep women oppressed since the dawn of time - we simply don't trust humans who go randomly insane on us."
2/7/14, 2:47 PM
Dear innocent ignorant Fen. POST menopausal women have no hormonal fluctuations. Althouse is 62, I am 61, there are no more hormonal ups and downs, dummy. Menopause is long over with at Althouse's and my age.
It's The Crack and Inga Show!
I bet somebody's gonna find that racist.
This is how Ann gets her numbers up. Several racists and bigots arguing with each other, throw in two stupid bitches and a law prof who votes with her female bits and you have a very lively blog.
Inga: Dear innocent ignorant Fen. POST menopausal women have no hormonal fluctuations. Althouse is 62, I am 61
My bad. I didn't realize you were so fucking old. Maybe its the osteoporosis:
"Many people said that osteoporosis had not affected them too much emotionally."
http://healthtalkonline.org/peoples-experiences/bones-joints/osteoporosis/feelings-and-thoughts-about-osteoporosis
The Crack Emcee @2/7/14, 4:24 PM
As has already been said, by myself and someone else, it doesn't mean what you think it means.
What you previously stated was about not knowing what it meant:
The Crack Emcee @2/7/14, 2:23
First quoting Kansas City:
It is very intersting that Romney received approximately the same vote percentage as Eisenhower in the south -- although I'm not sure what it means.
Then concurring with Kansas City: I don't either, which is why I didn't answer it. Distractions.
So I'm wrong about what I think it means, but you don't know what it means- and consider trying to figure out what it means to be a "distraction."
Brilliant.
Ciao.
Rusty said...
It's The Crack and Inga Show!
I bet somebody's gonna find that racist.
2/7/14, 4:34 PM
No. It's sexist. You listed the woman second. Now, if you reversed the order, then it would be racist!
Fen, while your prostate is enlarging, your brain is shrinking.
Ah, yes, the old "racist Democrats were really Republicans" canard. No offense, Ann, but you're above this. I read your blog quite often.
Michael Chaney said...
Ah, yes, the old "racist Democrats were really Republicans" canard. No offense, Ann, but you're above this. I read your blog quite often.
Did you follow the MLK link I provided?
If so, why blame Ann?
"Who supports the Stand Your Ground law?"
Who knows that Stand Your Ground play no (that's zero, nullus, nada) role in Zimmerman's trial?
Not Inga, that's for sure.
Richard Johnson,
So I'm wrong about what I think it means, but you don't know what it means- and consider trying to figure out what it means to be a "distraction."
Yes. Very nicely put. Clear. Concise.
By Jove, I think you've got it!
I am relatively sure "absolute moral authority" applies to no person (save Jesus if you're religious) but let's keep pretending...
You're up, Mr. Emcee.
It's funny hearing a woman from Madison who doesn't travel unless she goes to Austin (the Madison of Texas) opine on racial matters.
Really.
Birkel said...
I am relatively sure "absolute moral authority" applies to no person (save Jesus if you're religious) but let's keep pretending...
You're up, Mr. Emcee.
Ahhh, see? I see what you did there - it was unethical.
Crack: "Drago,Do you really blame anyone for simply deciding it's not worth it anymore?"
Coherence. Look into it.
Crack: "Yep - I've already been there, done that - it's racism."
So now you reference me and provide a link to "white indifference" about crimes committed against blacks.
At no point in this thread did I post anything that could remotely be presented as indifference to crimes committed against blacks.
But you NEED that to be true don't you?
This entire thread "back and forth" has been about labeling whites as racist "just because".
I can understand your Inga-like need to move the goal posts, change the subject etc.
You have no idea what my position/feelings/policy preferences are as relates to crimes against blacks.
But again, you NEED to assign your projected beliefs onto me.
Why?
You're probably a bit touched.
Do carry on.
EMD said...
It's funny hearing a woman from Madison who doesn't travel unless she goes to Austin (the Madison of Texas) opine on racial matters.
Really.
Do tell, why, EMD. Is there something that should prevent "a woman from Madison" who "goes to Austin" from speaking? Did you "opine on racial matters" today and, if so, what did YOU say?
Come on, out with it, man,...
Ann Althouse said...
And everyone knows that the Democrats were the Dixiecrats and the Dixiecrats became Republicans.
In fact Dixiecrats overwhelmingly remained Democrats until they became extinct. Democrats had previously won them into their coalition despite their cultural unsuitability by perverting government to support their racism.
When Democrats made the decision to stop that practice the South naturally became more Rebublican as their natural values of individuality and patriotism were no longer outweighed by Democratic enforcement of Jim Crow.
Believing in mythology is no way to go through life.
Drago,
At no point in this thread did I post anything that could remotely be presented as indifference to crimes committed against blacks.
But you NEED that to be true don't you?
God, you were doing so well before "you NEED that to be true" because that's another assumption and it makes you a jackass every time.
Challenged, I put a link, earlier, to the unwarranted death of a black man. That link is the only time it's been mentioned since. Because, just like the night he died, whites don't care.
Like my MLK quote, which most of you ignore as you attack "Ann's" narrative AKA the Republican / Dixiecrat switch is a myth, you guys will discuss anything but the undeniable evidence before you.
MY evidence isn't Richard Johnson's you-can-look-at-it-this-way bullshit, it's undeniable.
So you debate anything - but being wrong.
Matt said...
Rusty said...
It's The Crack and Inga Show!
I bet somebody's gonna find that racist.
2/7/14, 4:34 PM
" No. It's sexist. You listed the woman second. Now, if you reversed the order, then it would be racist! "
It didn't scan the other way.
Posts like this make me glad I can't afford the luxury of being outraged at this shit.
Crack: "Because, just like the night he died, whites don't care."
"..whites don't care."
That about sums up Crack's entire thesis.
Whites can be treated as one homogeneous group.
That makes it easy to assign institutional blame to them all, even hundreds of years after the fact.
Adios Crack.
Althouse doesn't call out Crack for his style of not using quotes or clearly attributing previous comments to others.
Pure cowardice on her part. She complains about it in others. But she would never criticize The Crack EmCee
Hypocrisy
Also, a clear sign of collusion if you ask me.
What is it, Althouse? Collusion or hypocrisy?
Flabby reasoning, boomer pablum, historical ignorance, liberal foot-stamping, and name-calling as argument.
Then Inga and Crack batted clean-up.
Pathetic.
Rusty, in case it wasn't clear, I was playing along with your joke. The post was not meant literally.
Also, Drago's posts were great and put a smile on my face.
Matt said...
"Rusty, in case it wasn't clear, I was playing along with your joke. The post was not meant literally."
I know. I just wanted attention. Inga and Crack are hogging all the love.
"Also, Drago's posts were great and put a smile on my face."
Like using a laser on a couple of cats.
chickenlittle said...
"Althouse doesn't call out Crack for his style of not using quotes or clearly attributing previous comments to others.
Pure cowardice on her part. She complains about it in others. But she would never criticize The Crack EmCee
Hypocrisy"
And here I thought is was because she liked me more. For the briefest moment I felt respected, wanted. And now...............
RACIST!
একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন