Isn't an 8 on the discomfort scale ( the level of intensity the article says you should work for) a deterrent to people who aren't inclined to exercise otherwise?
I'm also concerned that the focus on interval training will turn out to be a bit dangerous in its own right due to the stress it places on the heart over time.
Finally, like so much around fitness, the key question remains fit to do what? 7 minutes a day might make it less likely you'll have a heart attack running to catch a bus, but it isn't going to prepare you to hike the Grand Canyon or spend all day chasing your grandkids. ;)
That sounds a lot like the stuff recommended by some of paleo/primal bloggers. We're doing some of this with my running group too, but we haven't worked up to side planks.
I have been lifting for >30 years now (you'd think I'd look better, but that's another topic) and I can't tell you the number of fads that have come and gone. This is not new, either, I just can't remember what it was called last time.
Frankly, the best shape i was ever in when I alternated jazzercize (no, really) with heavy lifting. Of course I was 24 at the time....
This looks interesting. I've mentioned before that I started doing push ups last year, and that I've been doing 100 per day (I've added sit ups too). Depending upon what you are trying to accomplish with the work out, I think the main thing is to do something nearly every day.
Over 10,000 push ups this year. I'm pretty sure that I hadn't done 10,000 push ups in my life before this.
They aren't knocking using weights, they're saying body weight exercises are just as effective, especially for the major muscle groups. My strength workouts are a mix of free weights and body weight stuff and will vouch for the effectiveness of both.
Though with the body weight stuff, you also have to overcome the hit to the ego when you can't lift yourself off the floor.
Those of us old enough to remember Charles Atlas will recognize this "new" theory, which has been around since 1929. A lot of 90 pound weaklings bulked up after paying for Atlas's 50 page book touting "dynamic tension" aka isometrics.
The chair was his most utilized piece of equipment, btw. Charles is dead but his program lives on at charlesatlas.com. Check it out.
Methadras said... The illustration doesn't show how many of each of those exercises you need to do in the 7 minutes required.
The article indicates that you do the exercize at an intensity of 8 for 30 seconds and then move on to the next one.
On the pro-side: No matter how out of shape you are, it will still take only 7 minutes to get through the workout. On the con side: It still takes 7 minutes no matter how fit you get.
Support the Althouse blog by doing your Amazon shopping going in through the Althouse Amazon link.
Amazon
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for me to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Support this blog with PayPal
Make a 1-time donation or set up a monthly donation of any amount you choose:
20 comments:
Squats kill your knees.
Those years that I'm not slacking I do push-ups and planks.
Squats don't kill the knees if you do them properly. But standing up from a chair could be substituted if you already have bad knees.
I noticed this latest trend at the gym. I'll stick to my six-days-a-week, one hour a day routine with weights, dips, and chin-ups, thanks.
And let's see what the science says a year from now.
Sweet! I'll be happy to experiment with this. I enjoy walking, but I prefer strength training to be as short as possible.
Sounds like a trip to the bathroom.
Isn't an 8 on the discomfort scale ( the level of intensity the article says you should work for) a deterrent to people who aren't inclined to exercise otherwise?
I'm also concerned that the focus on interval training will turn out to be a bit dangerous in its own right due to the stress it places on the heart over time.
Finally, like so much around fitness, the key question remains fit to do what? 7 minutes a day might make it less likely you'll have a heart attack running to catch a bus, but it isn't going to prepare you to hike the Grand Canyon or spend all day chasing your grandkids. ;)
That sounds a lot like the stuff recommended by some of paleo/primal bloggers. We're doing some of this with my running group too, but we haven't worked up to side planks.
Sounds like a trip to the bathroom.
Not sure what you're doing in there, but I'm positive I don't want to know!
I have been lifting for >30 years now (you'd think I'd look better, but that's another topic) and I can't tell you the number of fads that have come and gone. This is not new, either, I just can't remember what it was called last time.
Frankly, the best shape i was ever in when I alternated jazzercize (no, really) with heavy lifting. Of course I was 24 at the time....
-XC
This looks interesting. I've mentioned before that I started doing push ups last year, and that I've been doing 100 per day (I've added sit ups too). Depending upon what you are trying to accomplish with the work out, I think the main thing is to do something nearly every day.
Over 10,000 push ups this year. I'm pretty sure that I hadn't done 10,000 push ups in my life before this.
It seems the American College of Sports Medicine’s Health & Fitness Journal isn't into sparking a dialogue.
Squats don't kill the knees if you do them properly.
That's what someone says about every exercise that kills your knees.
I just can't remember what it was called last time.
Isometrics.
As a former Marine, I'm very committed to my morning exercises.
Up down. Up down. Up down. Up down. Uuuuup down
Then I do the other eyelid
Up down.....
Oh, that one is sooo old. Bob Hope vintage.
They aren't knocking using weights, they're saying body weight exercises are just as effective, especially for the major muscle groups. My strength workouts are a mix of free weights and body weight stuff and will vouch for the effectiveness of both.
Though with the body weight stuff, you also have to overcome the hit to the ego when you can't lift yourself off the floor.
It only takes eight minutes but you probably go the whole day, every day dreading it.
A lot of people are down on machines, because free weights and body weight exercises use stabilizer muscles while machines just isolate.
Those of us old enough to remember Charles Atlas will recognize this "new" theory, which has been around since 1929. A lot of 90 pound weaklings bulked up after paying for Atlas's 50 page book touting "dynamic tension" aka isometrics.
The chair was his most utilized piece of equipment, btw. Charles is dead but his program lives on at charlesatlas.com. Check it out.
The illustration doesn't show how many of each of those exercises you need to do in the 7 minutes required.
Methadras said...
The illustration doesn't show how many of each of those exercises you need to do in the 7 minutes required.
The article indicates that you do the exercize at an intensity of 8 for 30 seconds and then move on to the next one.
On the pro-side: No matter how out of shape you are, it will still take only 7 minutes to get through the workout. On the con side: It still takes 7 minutes no matter how fit you get.
Post a Comment