"Krentcil will now have one thing even “Snooki” does not have, her own action figure. Connecticut-based doll maker HeroBuilders.com has announced it is releasing a “Tanorexic doll” featuring Krentcil’s signature burnt face and golden hair. The $29.95 doll reportedly uses the same body from the Sarah Palin action figure the company also sells."
Something doesn't seem right about this story. Watch the video and see the mug shot at about :45. The woman in the mug shot looks pretty ordinary to me; her tan looks nothing like the exaggerated tan shown in the interview. Also in the interview, her legs look tan but not overly so. I have to wonder if someone is playing with us on this story.
Support the Althouse blog by doing your Amazon shopping going in through the Althouse Amazon link.
Amazon
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for me to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Support this blog with PayPal
Make a 1-time donation or set up a monthly donation of any amount you choose:
16 comments:
"Krentcil will now have one thing even “Snooki” does not have, her own action figure. Connecticut-based doll maker HeroBuilders.com has announced it is releasing a “Tanorexic doll” featuring Krentcil’s signature burnt face and golden hair.
The $29.95 doll reportedly uses the same body from the Sarah Palin action figure the company also sells."
Whodathunk Alinsky would have a doll company?
It isn't that often that one can tell a person is insane just by looking at her, but it is true in this woman's case.
It's totally okay to ban a person based on the color of their skin, as long as that person is white.
Banned on the basis of her skin's color, or its crispiness?
You could have the same headline if you banned someone in blackface from entering.
You could have the same headline if you banned someone in blackface from entering.
I don't think that analogy works.
They see hear and the word, "lawsuit", is all they can think of.
And the war on women continues.
s/b her, not hear.
Sign on the tanning salon door:
No Shirt, No Shoes, No Problem, but We Do Not Serve the Mentally Ill
I live near Nutley.. and word is she is the toast of the town.
Put her face on the cover of Life magazine and I will be haunted for life. Or at least that's what my autobiography will say.
Nutley is a strangely appropriate place for this story to take place.
To me, it's just amazing that this didn't happen before all this national attention.
I walk into a bar slurring my speech, stinking of alcohol, and staggering all over the place...the bar will not serve me.
I walk into a tanning salon looking like Fonzie's jacket and they'll let me continue tanning.
Something doesn't seem right about this story. Watch the video and see the mug shot at about :45. The woman in the mug shot looks pretty ordinary to me; her tan looks nothing like the exaggerated tan shown in the interview. Also in the interview, her legs look tan but not overly so. I have to wonder if someone is playing with us on this story.
I'd rather ban her for the content of her character.
Post a Comment