"Police said a helicopter was called to chase the culprit, who jumped into the Serpentine lake in London. The 27-year-old has since been released with no further action being taken and the glasses have been recovered."
A helicopter? I mean, I know Franzen's book — "Freedom" — is considered tremendously important, but... it was a pair of glasses. Why chase the guy with a helicopter?
Is it because those glasses are part of his signature look? Quick! Which one is Franzen?
Without the glasses... he could be... just anybody.
Some book journal editor who was at the scene of the crime, said: "It was frankly quite bizarre. Considering the seriousness of Franzen's work, this is the last thing anyone expected at his book launch."
Considering the seriousness of Franzen's work! I don't understand literary-journalist logic. It's exactly seriousness that inspires absurd prankish tweaking. (If you don't understand my logic, you need to watch a few Marx Brothers movies.)
याची सदस्यत्व घ्या:
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा (Atom)
३० टिप्पण्या:
What's "terribly important" about his book? I heard it was good, but not one word sounds unmissable.
Or am I missing something?
Any thread with a Simpsons reference is automatically considered serious work.
Chabon, Franzen, Wolfe...ummmm...McGuane? Mailer? Conroy?
And what kind of experienced traveler goes abroad without a backup pair? I mean, things happen!
Unless the glasses are Franzen's binky?
Wouldn't surprise me.
His eyeglasses aren't worth as much as J.D. Salinger’s toilet.
I'm waiting for Sylvia Plath's gas range to come up for sale, myself.
Crack, in a showdown between Oprah and Franzen, I have to root for Oprah. He had a hissy fit when she chose his previous book for her book club. He writes in the High Art Tradition! Daytime TV-watching ladies can't POSSIBLY comprehend his art!
And now, now, this thief has failed to acknowledge the seriousness of his work. What's a guy have to do to get some respect?
Consider stealing Hemingway's shotgun.
"What's "terribly important" about his book?"
Don't look at me. I said "considered tremendously important." I just keep seeing his bespectacled face on the cover of magazines.
"His eyeglasses aren't worth as much as J.D. Salinger’s toilet."
Yeah, that's why you don't have to chase the thief with a helicopter. The glasses are only valuable if he tries to sell them as Franzen's. Wait until that happens, then go nab him.
Franzen makes a career of being borne along by events and writing about how powerless we actually are...so this event is a Franzenian Moment if ever there was one. Therefore his work seems terribly important only to self important people.
OK, I recognize Tom Wolfe (white suit) and I guess Franzen is the one with the glasses, but who are the other two?
Just try running from a helicopter while carrying a toilet.
Nearly threw my back out.
Serpentine!...serpentine!!
So it's strange that a serious writer was robbed but the whole helicopter thing for a petty thief--that's not strange?
The glasses are only valuable if he tries to sell them as Franzen's. Wait until that happens, then go nab him.
I'm not convinced this is a viable strategy in a country that allows a clearly illegal alien to be trotted out as a political spoiler without being nabbed on the spot.
Maybe he got those glasses in Malaysia.
Who hired the guy to steal the glasses so Franzen could get publicity?
Doesn't want to make me read his you-can't-miss-this book, however.
...er Doesn't Make me Want to read the book.
Just read the book, which is quite good, if you like that kind of thing; I do.
Would not say he is more serious or important than lots of other writers around now.
A helicopter?
That's serious.
Reminds me of that Seinfeld where Elaine purposefully angered her ex-boyfriend, a writer, by buying a pair of eyeglasses that were identical to his very rare Malaysian eyeglasses. He, of course, bought them so that he had a distinct look.
Great minds Sofa King.
Beth,
Crack, in a showdown between Oprah and Franzen, I have to root for Oprah.
And that's why I regularly confuse your comments with those of Rick Sanchez.
Oh Crack, it's too bad you lack a sense of humor; you get credit for trying, though. The whole fun in a Franzen-Oprah showdown is how it encapsulates American pop culture. Tortured intellectual Franzen loses because he's so appalled that touchy-feely lowbrow Oprah has read his book. He's doing serious work! How can you not laugh at that?
Beth,
Tortured intellectual Franzen loses because he's so appalled that touchy-feely lowbrow Oprah has read his book. He's doing serious work! How can you not laugh at that?
Her previous pick was The Secret. She said it was the most important book in the world. That's not lowbrow but nobrow. Or a brow so Neanderthalishly elongated, you can no longer find her eyes.
And, in case you missed it, I'm not lightening up from my murder/divorce and what set it in motion:
After The Secret, anyone, in almost any capacity - including the guys from Jackass - has more-than-a-right to look at Oprah Winfrey's body of work, such as it is, and say it's below them.
Beth,
And just so we're clear, in the future, on how this Crack/NewAge thing works:
I know people who couldn't honestly write anything on a job application, but "drug addict" and "thief", who I look forward to seeing in my home more than an episode of Oprah.
It's Chabon, Franzen, Wolfe, and Vidal - a perfect quartet of overrated writers. (Although I did like Kavalier & Clay.)
Thanks. I was wondering who they were as well.
Crack, Oprah's opinion means nothing to me. What's funny is how publicly horrified Franzen was. It's always funny to see someone who takes themselves so seriously lose their cool, even if it's justified.
The thing is, life exists outside your solipsistic world, and there's humor out there.
Any chance that Tom Wolfe imagined himself Mark Twain? *cough, cough*
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा