Although the historians [Hans Kaufmann and Rita Wildegans] provide no "smoking gun" to back up their claims, they argue theirs is the most logical interpretation, and explains why in his final recorded words to Gauguin, Van Gogh writes: "You are quiet, I will be, too".Yeah, well, Gauguin was such a jerk to Van Gogh. Just look:
They cite correspondence between Vincent and his brother, Theo, in which the painter hints at what happened without directly breaking the "pact of silence" made with his estranged friend.
He mentions Gauguin's request to recover his fencing mask and gloves from Arles, but not the épée....
He also pointed to one of Van Gogh's sketches of an ear, with the word "ictus" – the Latin term used in fencing to mean a hit. The authors believe that curious zigzags above the ear represent Gauguin's Zoro-like sword-stroke.
४ मे, २००९
"Van Gogh's ear was cut off by friend Gauguin with a sword."
Hot news.
याची सदस्यत्व घ्या:
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा (Atom)
पोस्ट्स
२६ टिप्पण्या:
I don't think you could easily cut off someone's ear with a fencing épée, they typically have no sharpened edge. They're intended for sport, after all, not serious work.
You want a sabre for ears.
I don't think you could easily cut off someone's ear with a fencing épée, they typically have no sharpened edge. They're intended for sport, after all, not serious work.
Those are modern versions, maybe the ones in the 19th century were a little less domesticated?
We always thought this to be a sordid affair, but how little did we know...
An épée has a sharp point but no cutting edge; it's for thrusting and stabbing, not slicing.
I guess complete and total ignorance about weapons doesn't end with guns.
The funniest part was the phrase "Gauguin's Zoro-like sword-stroke." Were Gauguin an expert fencer, he wouldn't be using a "Zoro-like" move.
At best (worse?), any of the three fencing weapons could have torn the ear lobe off with a freak hit.
Jason, the épée of the early 19th century was deliberately designed to have only a pointed tip--the notion was that you would duel to first blood, not actually kill each other. By the Van Gogh's time, the épée, sabre and foil were all designed for the sport of fencing, not drawing blood.
Monet made a bigger impression on his friend than he made on the art critics of his day.
(1) The authors believe that curious zigzags above the ear represent Gauguin's Zoro-like sword-stroke.
That is pathetic and unsupported speculation.
Seriously.
THIS was the weapon!
(2) Anthony Quinn. That’s too weird. We saw “Zorba the Greek” last Saturday for the first time.
Alan Bates was astonishing.
And then there was the Mighty Quinn.
The movie was not exactly what Mrs. Bissage and I were expecting.
Especially me, but it was a great movie.
I laughed. I cried. I felt politically-incorrect, culturally-bigoted, imperious repugnance.
And then . . .
I . . .
D . A . N . C . E . D.
(3) No offense intended, but that clip with Kirk Douglas in it struck me as pretty crappy.
Way over the top.
IMHO, a much better movie about the passion of painting – and the passions of a great painter – was “Pollock”.
It has but one flaw.
When he insults his loving and supportive wife by dealing her the ultimate insult . . . the script chickens out.
I suspect the error was intentional . . . so as not to cause offense.
(4) Monet?
God, I absolutely LOVED his work!!1!!!!!
LINK.
So good!
P.S. Sorry about the deletions everybody. My batting average is in the basement. Ha!
Bissage, Zorba can be watched on Saturdays, but Never on Sunday
Although the historians provide no "smoking gun" to back up their claims, they argue theirs is the most logical interpretation....
Little did they know that the FBI did have the hotel room bugged for video.
A video of Mayor Marion Barry "smoking crack".
There's an interesting exchange about 5:40. Maybe Quinn and Douglass switched roles in that movie.
So it was Gauguin with a sword in the drawing room?
Oh, that Van Gogh. He was so reticent about expressing himself that we had to wait for Don McLean to tell us what he was really thinking.
It's just that sometimes you don't really know about what somebody's real thoughts are.
For example, I'm guessing that a man from Montana didn't want to do jury duty. Just a hunch:
Apparently you morons didn't understand the first time. I CANNOT take time off from work. I'm not putting my families well-being at stake to participate in this crap. I don't believe in our "justice" system and I don't want to have a g****** thing to do with it. Jury duty is a complete waste of time. I would rather count the wrinkles on my dogs balls than sit on a jury. Get it through your thick skulls. Leave me the f*** alone.
(signed and notarized).
Ear today.
Gone tomorrow.
This sounds like made-up BS to me. Someone might as well say there's evidence Frank Booth did it.
Although the historians provide no "smoking gun" to back up their claims, they argue theirs is the most logical interpretation, and explains why in his final recorded words to Gauguin, Van Gogh writes: "You are quiet, I will be, too".
Yeah. Couldn't possibly mean "You won't talk to me? Well screw you, I won't talk to you either."
Even a blunt, sport épée will poke a hole in an ear rather easily with a lunge. It would take a very forceful and deliberate slash to remove one.
Indeed, Ollie.
So NOW WTF we gonna do with VG?
The man is BENT, don't you know.
Gauguin: So, Vincent, how d'ya like me now, chump, you jus' been pwned dude!
Van Gogh: What?
Goghpwnd. A new phrase for the WoW world.
Also, you may be interested in this.
Van Gogh (sotto voce): Oh man, Gaugin just cut off my ear. What do I do? If I tell people the truth, it will make Gaugin look bad. If I don't, people will think I'm crazy. And what about this piece of ear? I know! I'll give it to a prostitute.
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा