1. "Tarantula."...Surely, this list could be lengthened.
2. "Dylan."...
3. "Renaldo and Clara."...
4. "At Budokan."...
5. "Masked and Anonymous."...
१२ नोव्हेंबर, २००६
Other Bob Dylan fiascos.
The awful failure of the Bob Dylan musical prompts Mark Caro to list other Dylan-related disasters:
याची सदस्यत्व घ्या:
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा (Atom)
पोस्ट्स
११ टिप्पण्या:
Any list would have to include the "Self Portrait" album.
Given Dylan's lengthy tenure and voluminous output, this list of rejects is mighty thin.
I just gained more respect for the man.
The baby blue not to be thrown out with the Masked & Anonymous bath water would be the soundtrack - a superb collection of little-known covers including a Japanese 'My Back Pages,' an Italian hip-hop 'Like a Rolling Stone,' and Bob himself with his boys doing the best damn version of 'Dixie' you will ever hear this side of the post 19th century Mason-Dixon line.
The movie itself is worth wasting time watching for one scene and one scene only: an a cappella audition of 'The Times They Are A-Changin' performed for the old man by young Tinashe Kachingwe.
A couple of thoughts about the list:
1. The live album at Budokan is not terrible; it just isn't what most people expect and want from Dylan. To my mind, the album helps reveal that Dylan's music isn't just an occasion for his lyrics. Pop-Dylan sounds just fine. (And saying that it sounds like Vegas as a way of insulting it overlooks that Vegas does preserve some art forms that are hard to find elsewhere.)
2. "Masked and Anonymous" is a terrible movie, but the soundtrack has its moments: some Jerry Garcia versions that are excellent, Dylan singing "Dixie" and "Diamond Joe", and a group by the name of The Dixie Hummingbirds singing "City of Gold" so well that you might want to get it for that song alone.
The linked-to article notes that this musical is a fiasco not of Bob's making but one that he is merely associated with.
Two more fiascos the artist associated himself with:
1. Carter
2. Carter
The more one tries, the more one fails. Well, yes, but by his own admission he's been coasting for quite a while now! While I fully appreciate his towering achievement, his artistic judgement and ability to edit himself is often shockingly poor. Except perhaps for a bit part in Pat Garrett, his cinematic forays have been uniformly awful.
The song "Three Angels" from New Morning. Then let's not leave out "If Dogs Run Free." Also from an otherwise excellent album: "Lily, Rosemary and the Jack of Hearts," especially the part where he uses a harmonica that's in the wrong key.
Something I regard as a continuing fiasco, based on the last three live shows I attended, were his guitar solos, which typically consisted of three notes played over and over again. (He has since gone keyboard-only.) Perhaps there is purpose to this, since he has done much the same with his singing, often converting otherwise interesting tunes into tonic-dominant-octave, one after the other.
Well, yes, but by his own admission he's been coasting for quite a while now!
I haven't read where he's said that, but nothing could be further from the truth (and generally Dylan interviews are far from the truth). I put Modern Times and Love and Theft as among his greatest work, just a hair behind Highway 61, Blonde on Blonde and Blood on the Tracks. Plus, his touring schedule is strenuous. Because of the enduring popularity of his older songs and albums, Dylan is extremely wealthy, and doesn't need to go to the trouble of making new music or performing in public on such a regular basis. "Coasting" is the most inapt word you could possibly apply to Dylan.
Any list would have to include the "Self Portrait" album. But that album was a conscious attempt to get the various hippie hangers-on, New Left lunatics and so-called "Dylanologists" off his back. He figured, rightly, that his insistence that he spoke for no one but himself would only finally be heard if he made an album of meaningless music. (Sadly, "Self Portrait" was the first Dylan album I bought with my own money. A pricey double-LP! Listening to it was a very weird experience. I thought the whole thing was in code, and I just wasn't cool enough at 14 to figure it out.)
I think Dylan's biggest fiasco was allowing himself to be associated with the folkie/protest movement. It might have been politically significant for a few months, but it gave him an image that he is still unable to shake of someone whose songs are meant to criticize society and make this a better world. It goes on today -- dumb rock critics assuming that "When the Levee Breaks" off his new CD just has to be a protest song about how the Bush Administration mishandled Katrina, when not one word of it supports that interpretation.
If he's so great, why does he invariably sound as though he has a corncob stuck in his nose?
No, "Modern Times" is not great. It sounds OK, because the ensemble playing is good, but the words and music are lazy and derivative.
Sorry LarryK, but his only 'great' works were produced from 1964 to 1969 -- original, courageous, imaginative.
So you're right about 'Bringin' It All Back Home.'
But 'Modern Times' and 'Love & Theft?' nah.
'Time Out of Mind' was a good album thanks to its producer. Every album that he has self produced has pretty much sucked.
Every album that he has self produced has pretty much sucked.
I'd venture to say that every album that has been produced has sucked. Actually I wouldn't because I don't believe that but I don't think it has much to do with him being the producer. For example the overly slick and polished sound that many believe take away from the songs on Street Legal can be credited to Don DeVito.
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा