July 3, 2006

Radio.

I'll be on the "Midday" show at 11 Central Time this morning, talking about the Supreme Court. You'll be able to stream it here later.

UPDATE: Stream it here. It's a call-in show, but almost everyone opted to email. I comment on that at one point.

4 comments:

Simon said...

I loved the comment you made in reply to Kate. That was a very subtle way of making her look like a terrible human being.

I also appreciated your fair treatment of Thomas. He gets a monstrously bad rap, and in particular, people who don't like his jurisprudence tend to seize on the lack of questioning. I thought it was very nice to hear someone who doesn't have much in common with him in terms of constitutional views offering a fair defense.

I think it's a little unfair on women to call Kennedy a woman.

Simon said...

By the way, didn't you get the wrong case name? The knock and announce rule case was Hudson v. Michigan, not Davis v Washington. Also, the Court's online docket makes it easy to resolve the question of when cert was granted. It was granted before Rehnquist died.

Ann Althouse said...

Simon: Yes, you're right about the case name. Davis is the confrontation clause case.

Kate, was she the one who seemed to think Roberts changed because at the hearings he talked like a decent, reasonable man but on the Court he turned out to be a conservative?

Simon said...

That's the one, yes.

Post a Comment

Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.