October 25, 2005

Hottest "law porn."

The award goes to ... NYU! Congratulations, NYU! How do you do it? "Dworkin on Dworkin" -- that's so ... exciting!

Could Dworkin possibly have a more satisfied look on his face?
Posted by Ann Althouse at 8:19 AM
Tags:

5 comments:

Troy said...

Dworkin on Dworkin sounds like a porn title, though not a pretty picture Martha's Vineyard notwithstanding.

10/25/05, 9:55 AM
Ann Althouse said...

Troy: Yeah, I think everyone is observing that. You'd think, considering that these brochures are already called law porn, that NYU would have been a little bit more savvy about titling! But the love for Dworkin at my alma mater is blinding.

10/25/05, 10:16 AM
knox said...

I think they put the "Barbara Walters" vaseline filter on him

10/25/05, 11:09 AM
P_J said...

Man, when I clicked on that link, I can't tell you how grateful I was not to find grainy cell phone pics of NYU law prof and radical feminist in sweaty canral bliss.

I've never been so relieved to see a smug New Yorker in my life.

10/25/05, 11:12 AM
XWL said...

I take the opposite view of Pastor Jeff, I think graphic porn would be less obscene than that cover (could that cover be banned if it failed the 'community standards' test?).

The thought of a Dworkin on Dworkin 'law porn' sextape (in this I guess Andrea does unspeakable yet philosophically stimulating acts upon Ronald, in a visual reversal of male hegemony) is almost as wretched as the sight of that picture, his smugness, and the thought of him speaking about himself and his philosophy in tones and phrases that scream of his self-evident importance in the area of the philosophy of jurisprudence.

10/25/05, 8:03 PM

Post a Comment

Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.