Hulyo 6, 2005

Covering the unknown Supreme Court nominee.

Hmmm... just checking the Site Meter referrals and seeing that I'm getting traffic from the Washington Post. It's this article (on page 2) -- Howard Kurtz, writing about the Supreme Court appointment -- or, really, the strangeness of all the media coverage of the appointment in this period before anyone's been selected. Kurtz quotes this post of mine. And he collects lots of other commentary -- quite interesting -- about the unknown nominee and the Senate response to him/her.

I notice Kurtz refers to me only as "Ann Althouse," not "blogger Ann Althouse" or "law professor Ann Althouse" or "blogging law professor Ann Althouse" or "law professing blogger Ann Althouse." Not sure whether that makes me feel famous or obscure.

6 (na) komento:

Ron ayon kay ...

Ann: I'd say you should feel famous, because Kurtz has now made you a brand name! Like Xerox or Kleenex! Doesn't it sound like that in his article?

"Ann Althouse -- for creamy, bloggy goodness. Good til the last post."

Ron ayon kay ...

Mark: hmmm...you wonder if there's an Ann Applebaumhouse out there somewhere...who needs to blog!

Ann Althouse ayon kay ...

"Cooking enthusiast"? Where the hell did that come from?

vnjagvet ayon kay ...

When Althouse blogs, people listen.

Ann Althouse ayon kay ...

Beldar: Thanks. The three things are kind of the same.

Ann Althouse ayon kay ...

Matt: That's better.

Mag-post ng isang Komento

Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.