tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post1026225321228200459..comments2024-03-28T03:36:23.587-05:00Comments on Althouse: They all play the gender card... and Hillary's playing it well.Ann Althousehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01630636239933008807noreply@blogger.comBlogger63125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post-23388815149985600532007-11-10T23:20:00.000-06:002007-11-10T23:20:00.000-06:00Mud, yes, mud!Mud, yes, mud!Bob's Bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11971565970366294930noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post-50627146819192793352007-11-10T15:50:00.000-06:002007-11-10T15:50:00.000-06:00Bonnie,Who the hell are you?Bonnie,<BR/>Who the hell are you?Luckyoldsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11489310035114843752noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post-31061962518121733522007-11-10T00:16:00.000-06:002007-11-10T00:16:00.000-06:00This comment has been removed by the author.Carolinehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11577584676839171856noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post-3688213207237848312007-11-09T20:54:00.000-06:002007-11-09T20:54:00.000-06:00One thing worth responding to in tc's murky word s...One thing worth responding to in tc's murky word stew: The much maligned baby boomers gave "America's Greatest Generation" a far better retirement than they deserved. Couples living on one income, taxed at 2%, were living off the income of two income couples taxed at 15%, yet they were bleating about being cheated of their rightful due for being "notch babies" or some bullshit. The confiscatory FICA rates were excused as being necessary to amass a "trust fund" so that Gens X, Y, and Z would not have to spend half their income supporting their elders. But the idiot in the White House, with his trillion dollar war on Saddam, is spending his fellow boomers' trust fund.<BR/><BR/>Too bad we didn't make it a spendthrift trust. <BR/><BR/>And too bad I didn't turn all my savings into Euro-denominated funds. Since Bush took office, the Euro has gone up 50% -- a better investment than anything I could have made.former law studenthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15196697206046544350noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post-38857090801925667542007-11-09T20:15:00.000-06:002007-11-09T20:15:00.000-06:00Ann:I know this is your blog, but couldn't you sta...Ann:<BR/><BR/>I know this is your blog, but couldn't you start moderating comments and delete some of the above idiots?<BR/><BR/>Truly, they are a waste of type.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15058219643912780497noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post-15209684743401197532007-11-09T19:29:00.000-06:002007-11-09T19:29:00.000-06:00They might fight wolves, but they pee in thier cha...They might fight wolves, but they pee in thier chaps when they face Giant's!!!!!!!<BR/>LET'S GO GIANTS! <BR/><BR/>New York Giants Fight Song <BR/><BR/>"Fight, You Fightin' Giants!" <BR/><BR/>Come on and fight you fightin' Giants, <BR/>Roll along, to a score; <BR/>Come on and fight you fightin' Giants, <BR/>Roll it up, more and more. <BR/>Go on and show your might, you Giants, <BR/>As you go, t'ward the foe; <BR/>Come on and go, go, go, go, go fightin' Giants, <BR/>Giants Go! <BR/><BR/>Marching along the road to victory, <BR/>Fight Giants fight, you're on the way. <BR/>Singing a song, another victory, <BR/>You're gonna win again today. <BR/>So rack 'em up, and stack 'em up, <BR/>And go, go, go, go, go, go, go! <BR/><BR/>Come on and fight you fightin' Giants, <BR/>Roll along, to a score; <BR/>Come on and fight you fightin' Giants, <BR/>Roll it up, more and more. <BR/>Go on and show your might, you Giants, <BR/>As you go, t'ward the foe; <BR/>Come on and go, go, go, go, go fightin' Giants, <BR/>Giants Go! <BR/>- - - by Herb Steiner, Cy Gillis, Kyle Rote, 1960Trooper Yorkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01978703998566102194noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post-88947957494253814622007-11-09T18:51:00.000-06:002007-11-09T18:51:00.000-06:00"There isn't even an association between cowboys a..."There isn't even an association between cowboys and wolves. Cowboys don't fight wolves."<BR/><BR/>Actually, cowboys do fight wolves. At least they did when there <I>were</I> wolves roaming the land in packs preying on cattle - cowboys' livelihood. Cow<I>girls</I> fought wolves too. At least <A HREF="http://www.nrapublications.org/woman's%20outlook/Cowgirl.asp" REL="nofollow">real cowgirls did.</A>"Meadehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03316388500723034455noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post-3755281462247630362007-11-09T18:15:00.000-06:002007-11-09T18:15:00.000-06:00rhhardin,Ima Swede.rhhardin,<BR/>Ima Swede.Luckyoldsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11489310035114843752noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post-66440232498142580632007-11-09T18:11:00.000-06:002007-11-09T18:11:00.000-06:00luckyoldson writesrhhardin,Hear any new really fun...luckyoldson writes<BR/><I>rhhardin,<BR/>Hear any new really funny tapes making fun of "people" lately?</I><BR/><BR/>Well, let's see. How about <A HREF="http://rhhardin.home.mindspring.com/imuscut.curling.ram" REL="nofollow">Norwegians</A>?rhhardinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06901742898653890646noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post-14019766037394046982007-11-09T18:08:00.000-06:002007-11-09T18:08:00.000-06:00Uh-huh. Right.You all can call LuckyOldSon "Lucy."...Uh-huh. Right.<BR/><BR/>You all can call LuckyOldSon "Lucy." Me, I'm going to call him "Will."reader_iamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17352836883752091339noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post-83883522580077291812007-11-09T17:33:00.000-06:002007-11-09T17:33:00.000-06:00BLOW ME.-- SuckyOldson, elucidating the feminist r...<I>BLOW ME.</I><BR/><BR/>-- SuckyOldson, elucidating the feminist rationale for the Hillary Clinton campaignMortimer Breznyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16964027337144379262noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post-19531144622631364762007-11-09T17:30:00.000-06:002007-11-09T17:30:00.000-06:00Mort,Give it a break, Dude...you know exactly what...Mort,<BR/>Give it a break, Dude...you know exactly what I as saying , implying, inferring, etc.<BR/><BR/>See if you can understand this...and I want to make sure I'm being perfectly clear:<BR/><BR/>BLOW ME.<BR/><BR/>P.S. Sorry, Reader, I overreacted...because I sense you may be a powerful woman...and you scared me...seriously.Luckyoldsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11489310035114843752noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post-28393491293042432372007-11-09T17:27:00.000-06:002007-11-09T17:27:00.000-06:00I thought the scope was a gratuitous overgeneraliz...<I>I thought the scope was a gratuitous overgeneralization</I> <BR/><BR/>I thought he meant what he said.Mortimer Breznyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16964027337144379262noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post-7176950446818654912007-11-09T17:07:00.000-06:002007-11-09T17:07:00.000-06:00LOS: I was referring to your 4:01 comment, not the...LOS: I was referring to your 4:01 comment, not the other conversations in which you're engaged.<BR/><BR/>I don't disagree with your point that some number or proportion of men--mostly likely fewer or smaller than some people would like to believe, and most likely greater or larger than others would like to believe--are intimidated by strong women, and a chunk of those always have been and always will be.<BR/><BR/>Shorter: It's the scope, not the content, of your remark I was questioning--and only then because I thought the scope was a gratuitous overgeneralization <I>that would make it easy for people to look past the point</I>, which is a good one. And germane.<BR/><BR/>Jeez, why do you have to make it so hard even to AGREE with you?reader_iamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17352836883752091339noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post-21256101941912170712007-11-09T16:43:00.000-06:002007-11-09T16:43:00.000-06:00And, with some help..., I will use the "gender car...And, with some help..., I will use the "gender card" (11-9-07) to destroy not only Hillary, but feminism as well. See below:<BR/>tom said... Below you'll find what I posted above at about #40. The reason I post it again (about #60) is to illustrate how bad off we as a country -a world- are. Feminism has destroyed any backbone in men whatsoever. No one has commented on the fact that I have posited the near complete revision of civil rights in the USA -and the world. Because feminism has made pansies, wimps, faggots and worse out of all men in our once great country. Yesterday I met a Sunni iman from Lahore,Pakistan in Yonkers who could probably beat any one of you supposed American men either intellectually or physically because of his determination. As I see it -because of feminism- no man in America today has any idea what being a man means. And I call all you "men" perverts, faggots, queers, ass- wipers and worse. America's men today are worse than cursed women/ feminists because they are to lazy even to wipe their own asses. POSTED EARLIER:<BR/>More to the point, do we (including women) want women anywhere other than at home with -and raising- their own children whom they have borne in their own wombs ? Who is going to pay for the retire- ment pensions of all the baby- boomers ? Young workers -far less numerous than in 1960s- are already highly taxed. Our politicians are afraid to touch Social Security because they'll not be re-elected. Public pension plans nation-wide are near bankrupt -and private pensions may be worse off. The die has been cast and the fight is upon us : Inter-generational warfare between all the aging baby-boomers who supported feminist nonsense and young -already excessively taxed- workers. Who do you think will win ? I very much doubt we old-timers will. And why has this occured/is this occuring ? It is one of the innumerable horrors wrought by feminism, a feminism which said that men and women are equal (such a dastardly lie), that women should work instead of having children, that abortion was a woman's "right" and so much other contemptible nonsense that I couldn't even list here; because life itself has been attacked by a feminism that only embraces death. And that is what Hillary Clinton and her equally foolish husband (whose cockmanship I highly esteem; as Hillary couldn't satisfy him, he found it necessary to get tit elsewhere -so even Hillary has been victimised by feminism) will bring to America and the world if she gets elected. As to Maxine Weiss, thank-you. And I note that the female genius, once a woman agrees with a man, is to do him better.Tom<BR/>a) Maxine Weiss said... http://www.last.fm/listen/user/YuleMaxine/playlist (I like your playlist, Maxine. And I hope to be singing in my church choir (tenor/ baritone) for midnight mass on Christmas Eve.<BR/>b) Ann Althouse said... Oh good lord.<BR/>c) Trooper York said... When Federico Fellini was directing... in the bizarre world of freaks and demons ( to my dear NYC tax attorney in NYC (a gayboy ? who know), you really should re-assess your "freaks and demons" for you may be missing the ones who work with you...or the fellow you see in the mirror every morning -for such a status can come about without one being aware of it).<BR/>d) tc said... Oh yes, dear Ann, I am a Roman Catholic and I go to mass every Sunday/Saturday night. But I was also trained by the Jesuits, the Jews, U.S. Intelligence agencies... And I revere all of the above.<BR/> You, Ann and your fellow feminists are going down, all the way down. TomAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post-68192147655569253142007-11-09T16:32:00.000-06:002007-11-09T16:32:00.000-06:00It's interesting to me that the dose-response curv...It's interesting to me that the dose-response curve on cigarettes fails to evince a risk for less than 5 cigarettes per day, though you won't find that little tidbit written about. I do not know what the no-risk use of cigars is, but I cannot believe that once per week is an inherent danger.<BR/><BR/>OTOH if it is, then I'll be doing the government a favor by dying early and using fewer SSI and Medicare benefits.<BR/><BR/>That's just me, though, the altruist.KCFleminghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00124201866124646626noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post-1529480670653194092007-11-09T16:18:00.000-06:002007-11-09T16:18:00.000-06:00reader: "over-generalizations"reader: "over-generalizations"Luckyoldsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11489310035114843752noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post-36162255300275613642007-11-09T16:11:00.000-06:002007-11-09T16:11:00.000-06:00Context, LuckyOldSon, context. I know you're smart...Context, LuckyOldSon, context. <BR/><BR/>I know you're smarter than that, even if you don't (want to acknowledge it).reader_iamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17352836883752091339noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post-13183159250637549772007-11-09T16:08:00.000-06:002007-11-09T16:08:00.000-06:00Pogo said..."For example, many LOS posts lack suff...Pogo said..."For example, many LOS posts lack sufficient modifiers, resulting in over-generalizations."<BR/><BR/>This from a guy who doesn't think smoking kills 400,000 Americans every year...and if we institute no-smoking laws...WHAT'S NEXT??<BR/><BR/>No more roller-blading, driving, motorcycles...<BR/><BR/>Why?<BR/><BR/>Because the whole smoking kills campaign is an "over-generalization."Luckyoldsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11489310035114843752noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post-32536328615002918482007-11-09T16:07:00.000-06:002007-11-09T16:07:00.000-06:00Soon enough. Since taxes on tobacco are earmarked ...Soon enough. <BR/><BR/>Since taxes on tobacco are earmarked to fund health care in Minnesota, I gotta do my part.<BR/><BR/>It's for the children.KCFleminghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00124201866124646626noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post-30357397766511895242007-11-09T16:05:00.001-06:002007-11-09T16:05:00.001-06:00Mort,I can't.Mort,<BR/>I can't.Luckyoldsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11489310035114843752noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post-28980962315531256272007-11-09T16:05:00.000-06:002007-11-09T16:05:00.000-06:00Pogo,Why aren't you at a cigar club?*And thanks fo...Pogo,<BR/>Why aren't you at a cigar club?<BR/><BR/>*And thanks for joining in. I appreciate the attention.Luckyoldsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11489310035114843752noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post-38620633133140644752007-11-09T16:04:00.000-06:002007-11-09T16:04:00.000-06:00Can anyone here dispute that part of the rationale...Can anyone here dispute that part of the rationale of Hillary Clinton's campaign is <I>sexism</I>?Mortimer Breznyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16964027337144379262noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post-36044043103684679142007-11-09T16:01:00.001-06:002007-11-09T16:01:00.001-06:00For example, many LOS posts lack sufficient modifi...For example, many LOS posts lack sufficient modifiers, resulting in over-generalizations.KCFleminghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00124201866124646626noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6329595.post-23243877366892184792007-11-09T16:01:00.000-06:002007-11-09T16:01:00.000-06:00Reader,Great suggestion.Kind of like; Americans ha...Reader,<BR/>Great suggestion.<BR/><BR/>Kind of like; Americans hate terrorists.<BR/><BR/>Oooop, sorry.<BR/><BR/>Most, many, some...Americans hate terrorists.<BR/><BR/>Better?<BR/><BR/>Duh.Luckyoldsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11489310035114843752noreply@blogger.com