November 11, 2026

"Former Wisconsin Lt. Gov. and gubernatorial candidate Mandela Barnes sued the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel on Tuesday..."

"... alleging the newspaper published a defamatory story about his consensual sex life at a key moment during the Democratic primary for governor that caused great harm to his reputation. The legal complaint includes an explosive charge: that a female political reporter at the newspaper had a past sexual relationship with Barnes and then was involved in the flawed reporting process on his consensual sex life, and that the newspaper learned about the alleged conflict but did not tell readers, instead rushing the story into print."

From "Barnes Charges JS Reporter Who Slept With Him Worked on ‘Defamatory’ Story/Explosive complaint charges conflict of interest in newspaper's story about former Lt. Governor" (Urban Milwaukee).

Here's the Journal's response— "Former Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes sues Journal Sentinel alleging defamation" — "The story went through our standard editing and legal review, and Mr. Barnes was given the opportunity to respond before publication."

22 comments:

Christopher B said...

#BeliveAllWomen

Big Mike said...

“… and Mr. Barnes was given the opportunity to respond before publication."

I’m familiar with the gambit. They call their victim in the early morning hours about ten minutes before the article goes to press and demand a response while said victim is still groggy.

Howard said...

Apparently her false memory of having sex with this man was actually the Mandela effect.

Leland said...

So if this succeeds, can the Cornell 7 do the same?

Eric the Fruit Bat said...

Sounds like one of those lawsuits where both sides should lose.

Dave Begley said...

“ The Conflicted Reporter had previously maintained an intermittent sexual relationship with Barnes beginning in approximately 2018 and lasting several years,” the complaint notes.”

Intermittent? She serviced him as part of a booty call?

So Mandela had sex with a number of women. That damaged his reputation? Don’t think so.

He loses this case. Public figure. He’s subject to criticism unless, of course, he’s the Sheriff of Knox County, Nebraska.

narciso said...

Yeah tell me another one

Aggie said...

All she has to do is say 'I forgot'. Wouldn't that be more damaging than any other allegedly defamatory information?

Roger Sweeny said...

A Democratic politician and a political reporter in an intimate relationship. There's a shock. Now, if it had been a Republican ...

Lazarus said...

It was all very zipless. That should count for something.

RCOCEAN II said...

What a name "mandela barnes". It was kooky I looked it up. And yep, that's his middle name, his first name is really "Jesse". Looking at his election history is amusing. He won his general elections to the Winsconsin Assembly by 98% - LOL.

RCOCEAN II said...

BTW, when you look at his history as a Democrat running for state wide office, its amazing how many outsiders he had to beat to get the nomination. He beat Alex Lasry from NYC in 2022 to get the US Senate nod. And beat Kurt Kober from California to get the Lt. Gov nod.

Mr. D said...

Thin line between defamatory and defining. I'm sure he's pissed because the machine pushed Urkel over the line and not him.

Iman said...

Teh bitch set him up?

Hombre said...

If his claim is true, why would anyone be surprised? Journalistic ethics? Oh please!

Hombre said...

NYT v. Sullivan is an abomination.

Earnest Prole said...

So you’re saying she got the inside story?

mccullough said...

Left on Left

mikee said...

Those oppoortunities to respond, before publication, often come in by email at one hour before the edition is made public, with the refusal to respond already written in the article. And what is the pol gonna say? "Yes, I boinked the reporter who wrote this?" Doesn't help much, does it?

Zavier Onasses said...

First thought: If he cant keep his pecker in his pants, he should at least know not to stir up a scandal about himself.

Michael The Magnificent said...

Mandela Effect, meet Streisand Effect.

Deep State Reformer said...

Lol. If you FA then we'll FO from the media. Bet on it you horndog politicos. Always remember: Keep it tight for [fill in the blank].

Post a Comment

Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 4 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith. Also: No italics, even briefly. Use asterisks for emphasis. And don't play with the format by changing fonts or using boldface or all caps. Never include more than one extra line break between paragraphs.