David Crowley says beer gardens contribute to “racial inequity” because they are “predominately supported by white users.”
— Tom Tiffany (@TomTiffanyWI) September 23, 2026
Since when did enjoying a cold one become about race? pic.twitter.com/Qa4QVsoCxn
23 సెప్టెంబర్, 2026
The racial inequity of beer gardens.
Tags:
beer,
David Crowley,
racial politics,
Tom Tiffany

66 కామెంట్లు:
Ah yes, coming out against beer in Wisconsin. The political instincts of the modern Democrat party. "What's the least popular position we can take? And then blame racism for people not voting for us!"
Seriously, it's not even a good reason. Like, say, "I oppose drinking because drunken people and the fact it's unhealthy." That's at least defensible. Nope, it's "Don't drink beer because you are white and drinking beer is racist!"
Does that mean any time we see a black person drinking mead (no relation to our hostess!) that's racist too?
Meanwhile, the ladies of the View, i.e. the moral arbiters for AWFL's everwhere, are now claiming multiple horrific things. Like, Sonny Hostin is bragging about how she was the lone vote to get a literal cannibal murderer off a decade or so ago. The guy killed and ate his female roommate and Hostin is proud she voted against his conviction. And then blamed the husband of Lindsey Clancy for not staying in that marriage... what's a little infanticide and murdering your kids, right? Only women should get divorced on a whim, just because they saw a better set of abs on a guy in Vegas! That's a good reason to get divorced, but a man has to stick by his wife even when she's murdering his kids!
Then they wonder why men aren't so eager to marry a leftist woman anymore in the first place.
…are the pretzels racist? I really like the pretzels…
It can't be said often enough that democrats obsession with race is weird and stupid.
Our Better Angels are standing by with their 'Racial Equity Budget Tool', to get us through this difficult period of adjustment. I previously thought this was known as flash mobs hitting up the higher-priced luxury goods stores, ripping stuff off the hangers and shelves and dashing out the door - but apparently I was misinformed. That is NOT the Racial Equity Budget Tool in action, it's a completely different kind of equity.
Systemic racism is a Marxist concept. Look for Crowley to come out as a member of DSA.
Wisconsin’s next Governor.
You guys sure can pick ‘em.
…all I can hear is Bill Hader doing his Schwarzenegger- “Carl Weathers, he ate the schnitzel…” Carl Weathers ate the schnitzel!!!
A measure of Diversity? DEIsm or affirmative discrimination in policy? Maybe, baby. #HateLovesAbortion
We need affirmative action at the beer garden door. Deny white people entrance when the number already admitted exceeds quotas. That will force a group of 9 white people to go recruit a black person if they want a drink. Or, if we're not counting Hispanics as white, I guess that number could be reduced to 5 or 6. Clearly, we need the courts to give us a number.
Back... black hole... whore h/t NAACP at the intersection of racism and sexism politics? With benefits.
Grievance and stupidity, a bad combination.
"predominantly supported by white users with discretionary income."
So, it's not just white people. It's white people *with discretionary income*. What's the ratio of white people with discretionary income to black people with discretionary income? The courts have their work cut out for them.
White as in albino? Black as in exclusion from Rainbow parades? Albinophobia, perhaps, incorporated under the Diversity umbrella.
Fifteen is MY limit on schnitzengruben.
I beg your pardon, I never promised you a beer garden...
They need to add Colt 45 and Night Train to the menu, that will balance the market.
There will always be a debate about how race and wealth interact, but they are still two different variables. (And the relationship is very complicated.)
The left is really shooting themselves in the foot by letting the right control the debate about race when they keep making blanket, quotable, statements like: X, Y or Z is racist.
Now do Crack Dens & Street Takeovers.
The GOP should focus on DEMOCRATS giving ILLEGALS DRIVERS LICNESES.
To enable fraud and death. Dangerous unqualified drivers and voting. Death and vote cheating - right up the vile left's alley.
ILLEGALS VOTING. Ah yes - just today - another 30,000 illegals given drivers licenses - able to vote.
The GOP should focus on the fact that Illegals are getting our benefits.
Defund the Police and Defund ICE are the same thing.
baghdadbob said...
"Now do Crack Dens..."
In another obvious example of racial disparity, the parks district doesn't provide crack houses.
"Since when did enjoying a cold one become about race?"
1933 Germany?
"Since when did enjoying a cold one become about race?"
In the future, everything will be racist for 15 minutes. -- Andy Warhol
I am not a supporter of Dem racist policies by any means, but the point that Crowley was trying to make was not that beer gardens are racist, but that allocating taxpayer money to things that are very disproportionally supported/used by rich white folks, if not racist, at least has a racial component. I am not at all certain that there is a racist component to it, but I am also not sure why you are okay with the government forceably taking your hard-earned dollars to promote alcohol consumption by the rich. Let the beer garden pay its full freight, for f**ks sake.
So if a black man drinks beer does that make him an Uncle Tom?
Little known fact: Black Men invented beer gardens when they were in ancient Egypt.
"but the point that Crowley was trying to make was not that beer gardens are racist, but that allocating taxpayer money to things that are very disproportionally supported/used by rich white folks, if not racist, at least has a racial component."
A Democrat, insisting that the government not support things that disproportionally benefit people based on their race?
A Democrat, insisting that the government not support things that disproportionally benefit people based on their race?
Fair point.
It is common sense to understand the point that Crawley was trying to make but Tom Tiffany doesn't have any meaningful plans/policies or a favorable voting record, so he posts ridiculous things like this.
If everything is racist, nothing is.
Hmmm, I remember the racist Obama and the racist Skip Gates having beers in the White House garden with a couple of white guys,
https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/resize/630/quality/90/format/webp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fs3-origin-images.politico.com%2Fnews%2F090730_beer_summit_3_ap_297.jpg
"Fair point."
I'm guessing his point was that it's bad when the benefits accrue to whites. I suspect he'd have a different opinion if it was blacks who were disproportionally benefitted.
"the point that Crowley was trying to make was not that beer gardens are racist, but that allocating taxpayer money to things that are very disproportionally supported/used by rich white folks, if not racist, at least has a racial component. I am not at all certain that there is a racist component to it, but I am also not sure why you are okay with the government forceably taking your hard-earned dollars to promote alcohol consumption by the rich. Let the beer garden pay its full freight, for f**ks sake."
This is why we can't have nice things. What the hell is wrong with marinas, golf courses and beer gardens? They make people happy. Even black people who like to go to the waterfront, drink beer and look at the rich people's boats. And black people who like to play golf (there are lots of them). Marinas, golf courses and beer gardens raise the aesthetic value of the community, and thus raise the financial value of the community, for everyone who belongs to the community, including the black people.
Instead, the nice municipal property gets paved over for public housing, and tennis and basketball courts. the basketball courts get used, the tennis courts don't, the place becomes an eyesore and open air drug market, property values go down and politicians like Crowley complain about "white flight." After a couple of decades of driving down the property values this way, young white people start to buy distressed properties and fix them up, because they are cheap. This is called "gentrification."
I want the taxes which are forcibly taken from me to be used for good stewardship of public resources, not to foolishly try to change the laws of economics.
"It is common sense to understand the point that Crawley was trying to make but Tom Tiffany doesn't have any meaningful plans/policies or a favorable voting record, so he posts ridiculous things like this."
Yeah it's totally ridiculous for a politician to take advantage of his opponent saying he's against BEER GARDENS IN WISCONSIN! Dirty politics! There ought to be a law!
Gork says "beer gardens generate millions in revenue for county parks". A plain reading of this would be that the revenue generated by all those white beer drinkers with discretionary income is supporting all the other country parks, including those used more by non-whites and poorer people. How is that not supporting "equity" under the definition used by Crowley?
The point is that nobody should have "discretionary income." Not even black people who don't actually work in government or education. And also that government property should not be used to benefit the taxpayers who pay most of the taxes; it's purpose is solely to promote "social justice." All excess money held by anybody is "obscene" and should be devoted to "the common good", as decreed by those who are better and more enlightened than all of you grubby people clamoring after money at the expense of the perfect state.
Does it ever occur to the promoters of "equity" that the reason that the nice white suburbs are so nice (so nice that black people want to move to them, even though they are populated by "racists) is because the governments of those suburbs have used the tax dollars paid by their residents to develop nice public things, like marinas and parks and golf courses and food plazas and beer gardens?
"Tom Tiffany doesn't have any meaningful plans/policies or a favorable voting record"
Please tell us more.
When did the Democrats go totally Bat Sh crazy?
A tale of Kenyan elite vs deplorables? Diversity. Maybe, baby.
He wants you to keep more of your money whats wrong with that
Slowly then all at once
*When did the Democrats go totally Bat Sh crazy?*
I can trace it back to 1994 when Republicans took control of the House of Representatives for the first time in 40 years.
Sprinkle in the 2000 election - and add some Donald J. Trump - and this is where we are.
What the hell is wrong with marinas, golf courses and beer gardens? They make people happy.
I have nothing against any of these, and I also have nothing (from a racism perspective) of government money being spent to promote things white people like - certainly enough is spent on blacks to justify spending the other way.
I want the taxes which are forcibly taken from me to be used for good stewardship of public resources, not to foolishly try to change the laws of economics.
Again, I totally agree with this in principle. I just don't know how beer gardens became a "public resource." If everyone doesn't like what the government is doing (albeit for vastly different reasons), the logical answer is LESS GOVERNMENT.
"If everyone doesn't like what the government is doing (albeit for vastly different reasons), the logical answer is LESS GOVERNMENT."
Well, sure. Conservatives have been saying that forever. Unfortunately, that option never seems to be on the table. Eventually, the people in favor of less government come to the realization that the only choices available are A) spending for things they support or B) things they don't support.
Guess which option they're likely to choose.
Beyond what he did or did not mean about, specifically, beer gardens, he strikes me as very clearly signaling that, if elected, he will focus on specifically, the needs of Wisconsin’s non-white citizens,and you whiteys can just go to Hell for all he cares.
Everybody wants to live in a "nice" city or town. Every "nice" city or town I've ever encountered, except in some rural areas, has public resources devoted to recreational and entertainment spaces which the people who live there enjoy, consider an enhancement and a public benefit, and pay taxes to support. If the residents don't want those things, they vote for local politicians who oppose such things. What Crowley said is that if white people behave this way they are racist.
Crowley is a black Democrat. He sees race and its affects on society. And he sees blacks in Winsconsin (and probably Asians) not going to "beer gardens" so its bad. And he probably imagines Trump voters to to beer gardens.
Of course all Republicans are doing by bringing this up is dog-whistling to white voters during election time. In reality, the Republican elite wouldn't be caught dead in a "Beer Garden" and wont do a damn thing to help the people there.
To them the only thing that matters is (1) low taxes and (2) helping Business.
I doubt Crowley will be anymore "anti-white" than the Republican Governor. With the R's any talk of being Pro-white or Anti-white is campaign rhetoric.
I don't understand; are these places selling beer at below cost? If not, then what's the objection?
"If not, then what's the objection?"
Things white people like are racist.
tommyesq said...
I am not a supporter of Dem racist policies by any means, but the point that Crowley was trying to make was not that beer gardens are racist, but that allocating taxpayer money to things that are very disproportionally supported/used by rich white folks
If you think that "beer gardens" are patronized by "the rich", you've clearly never been to one.
Which is why this kind of thing is electoral poison: they're patronized by the kind of people Crowly needs to have vote for him
Rank cheese for a brain…
IRC, "Beer Gardens" were imported by the Krauts. On Saturday, and on Sunday after church, everyone went there had some food, some beer, and a good time. Of course, the the 19th century Anglos hated that.
To the anglos - one spent sunday like puritan, reading the bible and thinking about God, or you got drunk on whiskey. And had sex or got into a fight. The idea of going someplace with their family, and just having a good time and drinking in moderation was beyond them.
“In reality, the Republican elite wouldn't be caught dead in a "Beer Garden" . “
Glad to know I’m not an elitist.
The blacks just inherited the Southern - anglo - tradition. Can you imagine a bunch of blacks having a couple beers after church and singing a couple songs. LOL. Too boring. Too whitebread.
tommyesq said...
Let the beer garden pay its full freight, for f**ks sake
The beer garden is a profit center and funds many of other park services. According to Wisconsin Public Radio, “the beer gardens result in about $3 million in revenue for the parks department each year.”
"If you think that "beer gardens" are patronized by "the rich", you've clearly never been to one."
Yeah, lumping beer gardens in with golf courses and, especially, marinas tells me David Crowley has never been to one.
Yes, but what about the racist fish fry?
Has this guy heard of the Milwaukee Brewers?
Beer gardens used to be the target of prejudice. Specifically anti-German prejudice.
The Anglo elite were very suspicious of the places, where German immigrants (half of them gasp! Catholic) spent their Sundays, with omg their children tagging along. And probably continuing the anarchist and commie plots that got them kicked out of the old countries.
Especially after the Haymarket incident in Chicago, right thinking people feared any Kraut gathering.
Beergardenphobia was one of the drivers of the prohibition moevement.
Crowley apparently does not subscribe to the “first they came for the…” theory. CC, JSM
Just call it a sports stadium. Problem solved.
Is there anything that isn't systemically racist?
And black people who like to play golf (there are lots of them).
Sorry, but only one Black person in history played golf, and he turned out to be a pervert who chased around pancake waitresses.
Up next:
Among the many woke winners of this year's prestigious National Book Awards is a black Columbia University professor whose screed attacks "white paint" as racist.
Professor Wendy Walters' new book, "A Dead White: An Argument Against White Paint," claims that white paint is not the "neutral" architectural design element that it initially appears to be.
కామెంట్ను పోస్ట్ చేయండి
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 4 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith. Also: No italics, even briefly. Use asterisks for emphasis. And don't play with the format by changing fonts or using boldface or all caps. Never include more than one extra line break between paragraphs.