From "She helped lead a far-right internet movement. Then it turned on her. Inspired by female conservative influencers, Amy Dangerfield worked to become one of Nick Fuentes’s model 'groypettes.' A vicious fight left her grappling with the dark side of far-right fame" (WaPo)(gift link).
Influencer in-fighting.
પોસ્ટ્સ
65 ટિપ્પણીઓ:
No respect, I tell yas...
Ladies just can't get no respect for standing up lesser men today. Hug your commoner, ann, and thank goodn3ss you are not waking up alone, eh? Lol
**"She’d done everything she thought men expected of women on the far right…”**
And there’s the problem. There really is no “far right” here or anywhere. If one believes in a right-left spectrum then a definition of terms is necessary based on that binary choice. Traditionally the terms left and right stood in for liberal and conservative with the common understanding that the USA is a Constitutional Republic built on Natural Law and classical liberal ideals of Free Speech and strong property rights. Democrats seized on Liberal as their preferred label until they had to abandon it for Progressive, which is closer to a true description because the Progressive movement is at its core a rejection of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution in favor of technocratic solutions to ordering society.
Given this factual history the nicknames Right and Left stand in for Conservative and Progressive, one wishing to preserve the Constitutional Republic and one that works to replace the Constitutional Republic with something else. Keeping our system or changing it into something else with”hope and change.” Strengthening the Constitution as written or subverting and weakening the autonomy of the individual.
So, being Far Left is not only possible, for one can be way out there in “change” world, but necessary now to attract Democrat voters. Candidates now on the Far Left are calling to end the electoral college, the Senate and the Executive Branch and pack the Supreme Court. Far Left is now mainstream Democrat.
Therefore a Far Right candidate would be for really hewing to the Constitution not abandoning it for Fascism the way the Left has. So perhaps all the 2nd Amendment wins of late are Far Right, but not kooks like Tucker or Candace who entered crazytown and found common ground with the Marxist Jew haters. There’s nothing conservative about that shit.
I question the applet that provides the comment count.
The other problem is having anything to do with Nick Fuentes.
I never heard of this woman and i wasnt missing much
Amy Dangerfield don’t get no respect.
"Influencer in-fighting."
Wait till she gets a load of radical leftist opprobrium.
What would make any woman attach herself to Nick Fuentes?
She gets respect from WaPo, who will spin a story of the far-right using her as a pawn all the while it is the lefty paper using her. The respect is a fascade.
You mean the guy who is so "far-right" he said he'd vote for the Democrats in 2028 if the nominees are Vance and Rubio?
Seems to be more a case of clique power and jealousy. Same situations happen in all types of groups of people. Just a case of the Fuentes crowd meeting human nature.
Yeah shes a hamas hugger, like fuentes
These "far-right" grifter/agitators are catnip for the lefty press. Nobody else cares. Astroturfing.
https://observer.co.uk/news/columnists/article/how-the-media-made-nick-fuentes
https://blog.openmeasures.io/p/flash-report-claims-of-nick-fuentes
“Lauren Southern, a former far-right influencer who was similarly attacked and has since disavowed her past views, writing a book about her experience called “This Is Not Real Life,” said in an interview that she understands why women like Amy join anti-feminist movements. Their rarity lends them status and a rush of adoration; for some, it’s a feeling of attention and economic promise they’ve never experienced before.
But it’s a “deal with the devil,” Southern said, because most women are held to impossible standards and eventually ripped apart. “I always tell these women,” she said, “you’ve got a shelf life of [maximum] three years in this movement before it eats you.””
From Athouse’s free article at WaPo.
I kind of half expected to get to the end of the article and read that Ms. Dangerfield has given it all up and is taking an online course to become a paralegal but that didn't happen.
It sounds to me like Amy got too big for her britches in the eyes of the radical manosphere. How dare she, a mere woman become so independent?
“Over the next few months, Amy’s YouTube following soared as the couple focused on frequent social media posts and video essays in which she decried ideas such as the “war on gender roles.” “Femininity is not weakness. Submission is not slavery,” she said into the camera, as a clip played from a 1950s TV commercial showing a doting housewife. “Needing a man is not shameful, it’s human.”
Some of Amy’s viewers called out the contradictions in building a public business urging women to disappear into domestic life. The tension is a common one for far-right women online, who often frame themselves as different from other women who haven’t seen through feminism’s lies, said Alex DiBranco, a researcher who studies modern misogynist movements.
“It gives them status and elevates them over the oppression they would otherwise face,” DiBranco said. “But one of the hypocrisies is that these women who are influencers, promoting these traditional ideologies, are essentially businesspeople. They have careers.”“
Phyllis Shlafly (sp)
Too bad we dont educate students in America anymore... it's all DEI drivel for the tenured unions to protect. This is your life work,annie. Proud? 😆
I finished ahead of you, Mike wolf.
Annie just censors to let you jewish fellas win... after what her people did to yours, she has some guilt to atone for and letting lessers win is how she tilts the game.
Girl!
Is it silly cunts newsday on the althouse blog?
Lol... work that theme, grrl.
Nick Fuentes Is “far right,” but opposes Vance and Rubio, who are just two years from being the new Hitler. It’s so confusing reading the left’s definition of far right.
I mean, it’s not like there are any far left female influencers who’ve shunned men vociferously have ever regretted their choice now that they’re lonely and beyond child rearing age. The further left or right you go as men or women can bring on the same boomerang as what is described here. We’re only human.
Yes, the mid-term elections are approaching, so the themes of phonies are emerging: Look at all these formerly MAGA submissive type Substacker and Blogger ladies, they're re-discovering their agency and throwing off the chains of Far Right & White Nationalist subjugation ! It's the new suffrage, and you can do it too! !! And to supplement this theme, we'll trot out our election Special Team of commenters to providing supporting context for all you readers ! !
Astroturfing on a budget, hey, let's talk about what happened to your ActBlue cash flow and NGO funding, shall we? What's up with that?
Thank you, Inga, for immediately confirming my point. (6:59)
"She joined Nick Fuentes" is all you need to know about her lack of intelligence.
Inga has always had a fondness for "far right" scare stories. Remember her histrionics about the Bugaloo Boys several years ago?
Note that the far left operations like NYT and WaPoo - never discuss the FAR LEFT or the radical neo-nazi left.
The tension you leftists create - is all based on the reaction to the corrupt left's massive plan to destroy family, relationships and men and women.
Inga only cares that her corrupt party is in power.
She helped lead a "far right movement!"
How scary. I hope you Soviet leftists can lock her up and re-program her.
Leftist Nazi Antifa thugs caused how much damage? But all we get from Radical leftist Soviet rags like NYT and WaPo is this.
The entire culture of 'influencers' continues to dumb down their audience, but at the same time obliterating the brains of those playing the influencer. They won't recover from it and will always be known for being a twat.
The most embarrassing is when you see grown adults- really middle aged and up, aspiring to become influencers. I know a person, well into the last third of her life, fully accomplished in her career, yet longing to walk away from it all and become an influencer. She even paid people to teach her how to do it. How to use your opinion to play the expert to those willing to follow your every thought.
I dunno. I live by the old axiom that opinions are as common as assholes.
An influencer tries to make money by getting people's attention and then getting their cash - over and over. It's like being a pickpocket. And I guess a subset of The Attention Games is Pile On This Influencer - and write about that.
Inag quotes:
" “But one of the hypocrisies is that these women who are influencers, promoting these traditional ideologies, are essentially businesspeople. They have careers.”“"
Oh noooo! Careers! WE have been lectured to by the left that women can do it all! kids AND careers! Election time - Flip a switch and boom - the same Soviet left lecture and scold us. Kids and careers (making money) that is all hypocrisy.
(of course the left prefer we all be wards of the state)
Good thing we have the Soviet Hypocrisy Police!
"What would make any woman attach herself to Nick Fuentes?"
I think your first guess might be what you always guess when a woman attaches herself to an unappealing man.
I consider Nick Fuentes, Canned Owens and Tuq'r the same toxic soup of revisionist history/ strange bedfellows of blame-Israel first incest/ and neo-socialist apologists.
Prof: "I think your first guess might be what you always guess when a woman attaches herself to an unappealing man."
Gigantic wiener? CC, JSM
also important in the boogaloo Fuentes groyoper/ Israel hate/Tuq'r clown show - anti strip-mall.
Aggie @ 8:08
That is exactly it.
Fuentes is for the lost bois with no brains.
John mosby, if by "weiner" you mean "wallet," then yes.
My influencer career was cut short when I recorded a video in my car while it was running inside my garage.
One of these days I'm going to look into who this Nick Fuentes feller is.
"if by "weiner" you mean "wallet," then yes."
That bulge in your pants can be at the front or in the back or both. If your bulge is in the back, it had better be to one side, not in the middle.
The Democrat party platform:
DEFUND ICE
OPEN THE BORDERS
DEFUND POLICE
OPEN THE PRISONS
DESTROY THE US CONSTITUION
LAWFARE TRUMP TO DEATH
ASSASINATE OR JAIL TRUMP
GOVERNMENT RUN HEALTHCARE
PUNTIVE TAXATION/ MASSIVE TAX HIKES
OPPRESSIVE REGULATIONS/ SOVIET STYLE
NEW GREEN DEAL - (fraud)
NO ID TO VOTE
but eeeek "far right influencers!"
She chose... poorly. (Nick f'in' Fuentes?!)
And she chose on the basis of what she thought men wanted her to do, rather than looking into her own mind and soul and deciding what she believes and why. When you build your career (or, God forbid, your life) on lying to yourself *about* yourself, how can you expect success and happiness?
Everything they label “far right” eventually exposes their actual leftist bonafides. The chick in the article and everyone they claim is right wing are actually promoting leftist candidates.
Just like we’ve always told the low information crowd here like Inga who just eat up this soap opera slop masquerading as politics. It’s catnip for AWFLs and looking here: like shaking a treat bag the catty Kay shows up!
Peachy (you're Jewish right? You forgot...)
NO NEW WARS FOR ISRAEL
Why do you insist on selling out our count ry and your fellow cou try men to support the evil Bibi ? He will bring down Israel id not stopped soon... Americans now know that...
Another person influenced to become an influencer. She married a man she knew only a few months, within a year had a (presumed) first child, and started a solo video production career. Three major life changes at age 30. No problem?
She was influenced to believe that in building satisfying human relationships group assignment (male/female, political alignment, etc.) is more important than the individual.
Who can step up for the Social Media addicts like Bill did for the drunks?
Nothing says "Far Right" like endorsing Kamala Harris.
At least nick Fuentes was not dumb enough to marry an Erika and get himself Charlie kirked...who is a more attractive mate now?
Once again, anecdotal experiences Trumps statistical predictions. Renember, kids: climate is what you expect, weather is what you get.
LOL!
"Far Right"
Anyone who reads the WAPO and thinks they are learning anything is just a fucking retard.
From "She helped lead a far-right internet movement. Then it turned on her. Inspired by female conservative influencers, Amy Dangerfield worked to become one of Nick Fuentes’s model 'groypettes.' A vicious fight left her grappling with the dark side of far-right fame" (WaPo)(gift link).
A "vicious fight" amongst "influencers."
Also known as a discussion.
They "turned on her."
This is fucking stupid bullshit aimed at Democrat Voters who live by consensus and can't think for themselves or deal with people who disagree with them rationally.
Democrats are stupid people who read the WAPO.
Of course we have a bunch of Fox News Republicans on here who have very similar thought patterns so what are you going to do.
Temujin said...
The entire culture of 'influencers' continues to dumb down their audience, but at the same time obliterating the brains of those playing the influencer. They won't recover from it and will always be known for being a twat.
Actually it is the opposite.
If you actually go watch the influencers talk for themselves they are much more grounded than the WAPO or Ann lets on. You are reading through 2 filters here and just confirming your own biases.
Notice how Ann very rarely goes to the actual influencers being shit on by the WAPO and the NYTs.
If you are going to post some stupid bullshit hit piece like this Ann the least you can do is provide an actual sample from the person being trashed.
I don't know who Amy Dangerfield is but my guess is she is just as smart as most of the people posting here. People think they are smarter than they actually are and this is how they act.
Inga said...
It sounds to me like Amy got too big for her britches in the eyes of the radical manosphere. How dare she, a mere woman become so independent?
Perfect example of an ignorant retard making things up about things they don't know and pretending they are smarter than the person they don't know about.
Inga is an 85 IQ dimwhit that can only argue with a made up version of whoever this person is.
I put a 99.99999% confidence interval on Amy Dangerfield completely destroying Inga in any discussion about anything.
The influencers don't dumb down their audience. Instead, just like Trump, they tell the audience exactly what they want to hear.
Fake people getting paid in real money to promote fake politics.
JSM: either that or $$$$$
The governing spectrum from right is libertarian, left is authoritarian, center is conservative, far-right is anarchist, far-left is totalitarian, and the left-right nexus is leftist.
(sigh) I somehow remain uninfluenced.
To me, more than anything else, this article encouraged me to get the Lauren Southern audio book. The article references her book.
Indefinitely Extended Excursion™️ said...
Fake people getting paid in real money to promote fake politics.
This belongs on the Wall Street Journal Thread.
The average Youtube Influencer has infinitely more legitimate information and personal insight than anyone working at the WAPO, NYT, FOX, CNN, NBC or WSJ
Rustygrommet said...
(sigh) I somehow remain uninfluenced.
No. You were influenced.
You are doing exactly what the WAPO wants you to do.
Good job. You are very smart. Way smarter than that "influencer."
Don't actually go see what they say themselves. Ann and the WAPO gave you all the information you need to feel smart about yourself.
*What would make any woman attach herself to Nick Fuentes?*
I don't know. Maybe the same type of woman who told us not too long ago we should be listening to Candace Owens?
ટિપ્પણી પોસ્ટ કરો
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 4 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith. Also: No italics, even briefly. Use asterisks for emphasis. And don't play with the format by changing fonts or using boldface or all caps. Never include more than one extra line break between paragraphs.