Note: All NYT links are gift links now. I'm not going to write "gift link" next to every NYT link anymore. Just know they are gift links. I'm not going to keep repeating myself, and there's also no need for you to repeat the complaint that the NYT requires you to register with them to get the access they're offering free. You can't have everything you want. What in this world is completely free?
September 26, 2026
"In an unsigned decision with no noted dissents, the justices warned of 'electoral chaos' if the state were to change course so close to the election and use the 2025 map."
"The election is not merely upcoming; it has already started. Ballots using the 2022 map have been printed and mailed. Absentee voting has already begun, as has military and overseas voting,” according to the five-page decision."
Posts
39 comments:
OTOH, CNBC says:
Supreme Court restores Trump’s mass voter verification system
"The U.S. Supreme Court revived on Friday an expanded immigration database that President Donald Trump’s administration said aims to combat voting by noncitizens but critics contend could disenfranchise eligible voters.
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/25/supreme-court-restores-trumps-mass-voter-verification-system.html
The justices granted the Justice Department’s request to block a judge’s order that had stopped state officials from using Social Security numbers and other information to conduct sweeping checks of the citizenship status of registered voters against federal records.
The court has a 6-3 conservative majority. Its three liberal justices dissented from Friday’s order."
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/25/supreme-court-restores-trumps-mass-voter-verification-system.html
.…remember when we called maps like this unconstitutional? Well we were waaaay off!
…so now primaries are deemed moot and just like the Democrat party voters will only get to vote for candidates someone else chose..
Democrats are good at interference and running out the clock.
It bothered me that an internet search for "completely free" failed to turn up anything about Frank Zappa until I realized I was misremembering "absolutely free" which also bothered me but in a different way.
…and with this ruling the Supremes return to being fair arbiters of the law handing down inevitable truths. Tomorrow they return to their regularly scheduled illegitimacy tossing down partisan lies requiring court packing as remedy…
“What in this world is completely free?”
I can tell you fancy, I can tell you plain
You give something up for every thing you gain
Since every pleasure's got an edge of pain
Pay for your ticket and don't complain
yes, TINSTAAFL…
…and truth be told NYT gift links were never gifts…
Voting is free. And apparently, voting multiple times doesn't cost any more.
Primaries used 2026? Maps; ballots printed using 2022 maps?
Don't compute at all!
"only get to vote for candidates someone else chose"
Super delegates! #NoQueens #MaybeBabyNot
“What in this world is completely free?”
Love between parent and child.
Except in Plymouth County, Massachusetts.
Why in the world would the Commies want to pack the court?
All this map stuff in the year before election was always going to be messy. But sorting it the process now will put these maps in place in 2028.
It’s sort of the way the Republic is supposed to work….slowly and noisily.
Is the new map a violation of the Federal Constitution? That is the sole reason any federal court can legitimately deny the state's right to use it. Last I looked, the risk of "chaos" is not a Constitutionally valid ground. The state has the unfettered right to cause this chaos if it sees fit.
The links aren't free for anybody who has ever had an account before on that email. They're free for people who have never subscribed as a marketing ploy.
You are not feeding people with your free links.
People who are not subscribing are doing so for a reason...
You will have to learn to read and summarize, pull out the most relevant quotes to the post you're making, and write for those who haven't read your material.
Most people shouldn't be voting anyways.
I'm a little surprised at this, '... the justices warned of 'electoral chaos''...'
What do they think they've guaranteed, with their decision? The primaries were run and candidates were decided on the 2025 map. They've disenfranchised a substantial number of voters, but that isn't 'chaos'? Who would have been disenfranchised if the 2025 map would have been upheld?
An ideal system would have independent, nonpartisan citizen commissions draw districts using transparent, legally defined criteria--equal population, compactness, contiguity, communities of interest, and compliance with the Voting Rights Act while excluding partisan election data from the map-drawing process. Computer modeling could then test thousands of alternatives for partisan bias, with public review and judicial enforcement to prevent either party from manipulating the process.
The chaos is caused by the new maps. And, early voting. It's September 26, Election Day is November 10 this year. More than a month from now In 5 states early voting has already started.
Missouri isn't one of them. They held a primary- and selected candidates in election districts that no longer exist. Early voting there starts the second Tuesday before election day- .October 27. A month away. The court could have easily ordered the Missouri elections be delayed a month so people could vote for candidates selected- there is no requirement under the Constitution that election day be November 10 this year. That's law passed by Congress.
In fact, Congress has established, by it's authority under The Constitution, that election day BE the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November. Early voting violates that law. That's voting before election day. But hey, why should anyone actually follow the law?
Election Day should be uniform throughout the country.
The only Constitutional residency requirement is that legislators reside in the state they represent.
I hope you’re enjoying Trump’s wars, because he has flushed MAGA down the toilet and Democrats are taking control, which is fine with me because Republicans can’t be trusted. Probably the Democrats will be as bad, but if the voters don’t punish absolutely abhorrent behavior, we may as well give up.
Democracy is a joke anyway, Venezuela’s unelected leader, installed by us under the laughable pretext of fighting the drug trade, just signed away the wealth of her country in return for what is no doubt a big payday. Trump controls Iraqi elections by vetoing the people’s choice there, for democracy. Romanian election was reversed by means of a clause in their constitution that allows a judge to “vote his conscience.” Two of them did because they could find no reason in law to overrule the voters.
This is the world now.
"An ideal system would have independent, nonpartisan citizen commissions, working in a weightless vacuum, draw districts using transparent, legally defined criteria..."
FIFY
As Gospace noted: There’s a legitimate problem here: Missouri held its primary under one congressional map and is now heading into the general election under another. But early voting does not violate federal law; November 3 is Election Day, while states may allow ballots to be cast beforehand.
One basic correction: Election Day this year is November 3, not November 10. The Supreme Court kept the 2022 map because changing districts after the primary and as the general election process was already underway would create even greater disruption.
The most popular political party in Germany is kept out of power in order to keep the grift going, it never ends. France’s populist candidate for president, likely to win, just sold out her cause to the globalists, same as Trump has. We are living under Sorosism, Scot Bessent was Soros’s right hand man. Bust out your Marcus Aurelias, because Soros has won. He used Trump for his ability to fool the rubes, and it was a good investment.
Voters are entitled to hold the governing party accountable for its policies and consequences--including choosing the Iran war, imposing tariffs that raise costs, and adding substantially to federal deficits while affordability remains a problem. Republicans in Congress have largely enabled Trump’s Iran policy and his economic agenda, so they can reasonably be judged on that record
"What in this world is completely free?"
"Whoa. I have to sit with that for just a second."
Elections are so passé. Gain the courts, gain the country.
When our child was young, my wife was driving around running errands while he was strapped into the car seat in back. The car radio was tuned to the classic rock station. Between songs, he asked, “Mommy, why can’t you always get what you want?”
"What in this world is completely free?"
Free as in speech, or free as in beer?
Delay. Delay. Delay. TOO LATE!
It's actually been kind of funny watching news video commenters proclaim ultimate victory every time a new decision came out, only to have another court reverse the decision a short time later. Then the other side proclaims ultimate victory....until the decision is reversed again by another court. And this happened again and again and again.
Ignoring the map drawn by the state legislature, of course, doesn’t result in “election chaos”, just an advantage for Democrats.
??? Election Day is November 10 this year ....
You Will be a week late if you show up then!!!
If the maps are different how were candidate names decided to go on ballot?
The next shoe to drop could be whether Missouri voters choose to keep the new map. Polling shows them pretty evenly divided—35% Yes, 32% No, and 33% Undecided.
𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘋𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘵 𝘊𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘊𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘈𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘴 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘦𝘯𝘫𝘰𝘪𝘯 𝘰𝘳 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘸𝘪𝘴𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘩𝘪𝘣𝘪𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 2022 𝘮𝘢𝘱 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 2026 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘔𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘪. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘋𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘵 𝘊𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘊𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘈𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘴 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘰𝘳 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘸𝘪𝘴𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘔𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘪 𝘵𝘰 𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 2025 𝘮𝘢𝘱 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 2026 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘔𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘪.
𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘌𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘩 𝘊𝘪𝘳𝘤𝘶𝘪𝘵’𝘴 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘗𝘶𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘭𝘭 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘵. 𝘌𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩 𝘧𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘵𝘴 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘴 𝘤𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘯 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘧𝘳𝘦𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘭𝘢𝘴𝘵-𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘵𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘯 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘣𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘴—𝘴𝘶𝘣𝘫𝘦𝘤𝘵, 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘴𝘦, 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯 𝘭𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘧𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘭𝘢𝘸. 𝘔𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳, 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘦, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘔𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘪 𝘚𝘶𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘦 𝘊𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘵 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘦-𝘣𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘴. 𝘖𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘳𝘺, 𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘯 𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘣𝘢𝘤𝘬 𝘪𝘯 𝘔𝘢𝘺 2026, 𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘭 𝘣𝘦𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘔𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘪 𝘚𝘶𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘦 𝘊𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘵 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 2025 𝘮𝘢𝘱 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘤𝘵 𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘭 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘷𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘶𝘮, 𝘢𝘵 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘵 𝘪𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘶𝘮 𝘱𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘴𝘶𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵. 𝘚𝘰 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭-𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘩 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘥 𝘣𝘦𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘈𝘶𝘨𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘔𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘪 𝘚𝘦𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘭 𝘢𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘈𝘶𝘨𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 2025 𝘮𝘢𝘱 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘥 𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘬𝘴. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘦𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘯𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘤𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 2025 𝘮𝘢𝘱 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘺.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/26a388_q86b.pdf
Sounds like Trump needs to pack the Supreme Court. Democrats are campaigning on adding what, 5 justices, so Trump better get to it! Surely the left cannot complain....
Post a Comment
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 4 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith. Also: No italics, even briefly. Use asterisks for emphasis. And don't play with the format by changing fonts or using boldface or all caps. Never include more than one extra line break between paragraphs.