A highly rated contribution to the comments section for "Afghan Women Erased From Public Life in Five Years of Taliban Rule/Decrees restricting the rights of women and girls to study, work, travel and act independently now threaten to damage Afghanistan permanently, experts say" (NYT gift link).
14 ఆగస్టు, 2026
"This is no different from what the Heritage Foundation wants for women in the US. Except maybe instead of burqas..."
"... they want us in milk maid dresses, heavy hideous makeup, plastic surgery and naked. And it's actually worse when I think about their plans for society as a whole with illiteracy, poisoned food, toxic 'health' care, etc. Separation of religion and state must happen to even attempt a free society. This is why this concept exists."
పోస్ట్లు
215 కామెంట్లు:
«అన్నిటి కంటే పాతది ‹పాతవి 215లో 201 – 215Kermit Gosnell and the super coil
Gosnell, of course, continued to work for decades. And another pro-choice man, Tom Ridge, decided that Philadelphia ought to stop doing health inspections in abortion clinics.
Because what could go wrong with an unregulated "doctor" who's operating a clinic with the express intent of causing miscarriages in late-term pregnancies? No health inspections. An abortion "free of interference from the state." Tom Ridge is a man. Kermit Gosnell is a man. All these women were impregnated by men, and many of them have been abandoned by men. Again, is this feminism, or what happens to women when men are anti-fatherhood?
So spare me this shit about how wonderful it is when only men make decisions.
Titania McGrath be working overtime in the NYT comments section.
Achilles says:
“Men who don't defend society and women who don't have children are selfish and should not be voting until they do.”
You’re explaining a personal moral code, not a workable voting standard. So it really doesn’t have anything to do with the rights of citizens.
But let’s say it’s a genuine proposal. On a practical level, “men who don’t defend society” gives the government enormous power to decide which men are worthy of full citizenship. Is being a politician considered defending society? (Of course it will be) Is refusing to support a particular war disqualifying?
Do you really want the Democrats - or the Republicans you dislike to use your rule to decide how you and future generations of men must “defend society” in order to keep their vote? You’re turning voting into a reward government hands out for compliance.
The thing is, that’s an obvious point. You’re a smart guy so I know it’s obvious to you. I guess it’s a rhetorical device on your part? Just not a very effective one.
Or maybe you think it is effective, who knows?
"The Taliban regained control of Afghanistan five years ago this week, returning to power after two decades and restoring an Islamic government that had severely restricted women’s rights."
What else would you expect from any Muslim nation? As for dress, men as well as women must adhere to traditional costumes, and It is not news that women are subordinate to men.
And the reaction to that in this comment section was to argue for the repeal of the 19th amendment. Unbelievable.
Boatbuilder and John Mosby are right.
Eva Marie said...
Achilles says:
“Men who don't defend society and women who don't have children are selfish and should not be voting until they do.”
You’re explaining a personal moral code, not a workable voting standard. So it really doesn’t have anything to do with the rights of citizens.
But let’s say it’s a genuine proposal. On a practical level, “men who don’t defend society” gives the government enormous power to decide which men are worthy of full citizenship. Is being a politician considered defending society? (Of course it will be) Is refusing to support a particular war disqualifying?
Do you really want the Democrats - or the Republicans you dislike to use your rule to decide how you and future generations of men must “defend society” in order to keep their vote? You’re turning voting into a reward government hands out for compliance.
Women just do not like responsibility.
I should amend that many women do accept responsibility for the continuation of the human race and a functioning society. We are still here after all.
Most men don't volunteer for the military or create livelihoods for other people.
But it is unfortunate that a majority of people do not really contribute to the future anymore.
Allowing selfish people to decide who runs the country leads to things like Social Security, Abortion, wars most men and women don't fight in, and all manner of me me me me bullshit.
I find that milkmaid outfit idea intriguing.
I'm accepting volunteers.
And people wonder why our newest SCOTUS Justice was promoted. Or Cambridge....
Just the one example of a single sentence being self-contradictory is so obvious.... My Lord, the stupid, it burns, BURNS!
Happily I was deprived of learning this brilliant way of thinking by studying engineering.
These women didn't get the memo.
It's *schoolgirl uniforms*!
That's some oppression I can get behind...
If only these budding handmaidens had latched onto the Ellen James society we wouldn't have to listen to their shit.
When I, in all despair, consider the danger posed by these fellow citizens whose thought process has been ravaged by far-Left mind-parasites, I draw some comfort from knowing that they are trapped in a miserable hell of their own making.
కామెంట్ను పోస్ట్ చేయండి
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 4 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith. Also: No italics, even briefly. Use asterisks for emphasis. And don't play with the format by changing fonts or using boldface or all caps. Never include more than one extra line break between paragraphs.