"... most notably from neo-Nazi and self-styled incel Nick Fuentes. In 2022, Fuentes went on a rant on his show, in which he argued that his lack of sexual experience with women 'actually makes me really more heterosexual than anyone' As Fuentes explained: 'If we're really being honest, never having a girlfriend, never having sex with a woman really makes you more heterosexual, because honestly, dating women is gay, having sex with women is gay. And having sex with men is gay. Really it's all gay. And if you want to know the truth, the only really straight heterosexual position is to be an asexual incel. That's it. That's all there is…Having sex in itself is gay, I think. I think that it's really a gay act to begin with. Think about it this way: What's gayer than being like "I need cuddles. I need kisses…I need to spend time with a woman."'"
Writes Alan Elrod, in "Sex Is Gay, Rape Is Epic, No Fatties: Young Right-Wing Men Are Obsessed With Male Power and Male Bodies/The group chat leak reveals what over a decade of incel messaging and Bronze Age Pervert have done to Young Republicans" (Liberal Currents).

१७८ टिप्पण्या:
If the quotes are accurate representations of the thoughts of Mr. Fuentes, he is nutso. So what?
Sex is functional.
Gay is a cheerful state of mind.
Homosexuality is transgender.
Celibacy is a dysfunctional choice.
#HateLovesAbortion
He's the gopher, right?
The only time I ever read about Nick Fuentes is here or at Instapundit. Never shows up on my X or Facebook account. Never has he come up in any political discussion with anyone I know in person.
So, a complete non-entity outside the blogosphere.
We are all gay now.
I see we are at the shaming stage of discourse. It's so weird to me how current the topics are but the rhetoric styles stay the same as 16th century witchhunts and mid 20th century findamentalists. Use guilt. Use shame. Assert violence. Throw it all into a stew and feed those starving for meaning amd wanting a sense of moral superiority while indulging moral bankruptcy in their own lives.
Blame and shame is always easier but results in killing a movement as people see the blame and shame as increasingly untethered.
Charlie Kirk is a bigger influence even still but he's hard to argue with. Easier to find a neo-Münster to tar all who share basic political opinions
If you take the word “gay” to mean unmanly it makes weird sense.
Fact check: False.
My experience was just the opposite. Having sex with a woman, and the, esp, when having a steady sexual relationship with one, was when I fully realized that I was very happily heterosexual. Yin and Yang. Complimentary.
This is SO niche.
I mean, I'm a woman, so what do I know about what sex means to a man, gay or straight? But their behavior would, I think, be a clue.
Nick Fuentes wants to be St. Paul. Alan Elrod wants to be Elmer Fudd.
One of them has succeeded.
I suspected as much when young, right-wing American men started dressing and shaving like Tom of Finland fans and calling themselves “Proud Boys.”
Some people need to look up "sarcasm" and "absurdist humor." Some people should not take 4Chan seriously.
Jon Waters and Borat were just humor.
What happened to "Not that there's anything wrong with that"?
Are we supposed to care what this Nick Fuentes guy thinks? Or will a pro forma denunciation suffice?
It's all the same, I'd rather think about Tito "King of the Timbales" Puente, assuming the "No Kings" demands of last weekend don't apply to a deceased percussionist.
Not great for society, but hey, more girls for me!
Guys are attracted to the frontal vertical cleavage, at the back of which they then discover an enticing hole, if they get that far.
A hole itself wouldn't do it. The given sequence has to match the brain wiring.
If that doesn't work, you're gay. Different wiring.
“ Your frontal vertical cleavage is gay.”
“Trump, Biden, Obama are the three of the absolute gayest presidents we have ever had.”
And Trump is the gayest of all.
These people need help. Humanity needs help.
“We love the gays.”
Earnest Prole/Ronald J Ward account- your boyfriend says he's waitimg for you to come to his daily congual prison visit:
https://tennesseestar.com/justice/accused-wisconsin-pedophile-allegedly-recorded-and-shared-sexually-explicit-videos-of-his-own-adopted-son/admin/2024/02/24/
Another attempt to denigrate young right wing men, As opposed to left winger cross dressers and crybabies.
Commenter here formerly known as "Rich" actually boasted of always crying during particular scenes of "An Affair to Remember".
Hafta admit, as a youngster I did get sad when that beautiful ship sank.
Oh, wait, wrong ship movie. 1953 Titanic was the good one.
Since the recent post and comments regarding autism, I find RH comments even more interesting
"If you take the word “gay” to mean unmanly it makes weird sense."
It does and it in some ways echoes monastic discussions about sexuality (especially the early monastics) and spiritual fortitude. “Be strong, Polycarp. Play the man," the voice from heaven said as he approached his martyrdom.
The underlying sentiment is that a real man has complete control over self, and rather than sexuality being an expression of manliness, as it is considered in our era, it can be seen as a way we are pulled away and controlled. Others control our emotions and drives rather than us having power over our whole self, so we are thus subject to them, passive recipients of the temptations and the tempters. The manly thing is not to give into temptation but to overcome temptation with a consistent vision of self and mission.
Having complete control over our passions and emotions is the ultimate in expressive manliness.
"neo-Nazi and self-styled incel Nick Fuentes."
Yeah, everyone who doesn't agree with the Left is a Nazi. Since trump is a "Nazi" - fuentes should be labeled a "super-nazi".
Fuentes is simply repeating the philosophy of General "Buck" Ripper. Or as Archie Bunker said "Real men have their hormones on a leash".
The trouble with Fuentes is it is seems it is trying for the same ideal but without the orienting transformative vision of the Kingdom of Christ to provide re-orienting meaning and purpose. It isn't letting go for the sake of letting go or just because one isn't able--starving isn't fasting--but a embrace of a more valuable mission for which the committed focus their energy and values, and passions, accordingly.
Giving into lust is a weakness. Look at all these "Great men" who got blackmailed by Epstein cause the little babies wanted some young pussy. Its impossible to respect a man who's number one goal in life is to have sex.
The other trouble is he serves more as a convenient foil for progressive dismissiveness than actually influencing the great majority of those on the right, most of whom have never heard of him.
RCOCEAN at 3:05, exactly! It's a giving over of self and power, a loss of control and weakness indulged.
I miss the days when political psych-ops were smooth and sophisticated and sartorially impeccable, like Roger Stone.
I don't follow this guy, but I am interested in the evidence that Nick Fuentes is a "neo-nazi." Does anybody have any?
"If you take the word “gay” to mean unmanly it makes weird sense."
Oops! Sorry to be confusing. I was doing voice to text.
I meant: If you take the word “gay” to mean manly it makes weird sense.
It's manly because there's more man. None of this fooling around with woman. You know who was unmanly? Hugh Hefner. In his pajamas.
Very funny, Jamie. For some reason, I assumed you were a man. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
If you're not having a gay old time, you're doing it wrong. Okay!
After the Fall, every man would be born through his mother’s frontal vertical cleavage. 9 months after his parents had gay sex
A queer conundrum, but is it weird? Yes, it is a function of evolutionary fitness. Our Posterity in blood and jeans... genes.
Ideally, sex is hot, heavy, and a gay old time... with forward-looking beneficiaries.
Apparently, according to AI, a person is a neonazi if the SPLC says that he is. If you use terms like "globalism" that's a "dog whistle" for "white supremacism," for example. Which is very convenient for the globalists, if criticism of their agenda is beyond the pale in polite society.
Nick Fuentes with his cat boy furry date. Groypers seem to prefer male furries, just like Tyler Robinson.
“He's the gopher, right?”
Yes
"If you take the word “gay” to mean manly"
Your contrasts show the difference between Christian (the original comment) and Greek (the correction) views of manliness. And the difference in the respective gods.
Incelibacy is gay. Celibacy is gah.
LOL! Because, of course, Nick Fuentes is just like every other male Republican. I think it pretty obvious that most incels are progressives, not conservatives.
Fuentes denying the Holocaust happened by comparing the incineration of Jewish bodies to baking cookies
Conservatives are pro-Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of a gay old time. Hurray!
Only a matter of time before Fuentes goes full Mishima.
To cut and peel a hazel wand, hook a berry to a thread; drop the berry in a stream, and catch a little silver trout is as gay and manly as a man can be.
Life in 1984.
Frank Zappa - He's So Gay + Bobby Brown
’You know who was unmanly? Hugh Hefner. In his pajamas.’
Hugh Hefner, period. What a dweeb…
Inga, I didn't even know who this guy is. A few minutes on, I knew precisely who he is: not one of us.
We tolerated Milo because he was actually intelligent. Poor guy, apparently addled and ill.
Now why don't you tell us what you did when Ted Kennedy killed that poor girl?
Inga? Inga?
Too bad you called me aNazi one too many times. I felt compassion for you for a long time.
"It’s important to note that 'sex is gay'"
Funny, that could have been the first 'award winning' article published in Out magazine in 1992.
“Too bad you called me aNazi one too many times. I felt compassion for you for a long time.”
Tina, I really don’t know what is wrong with you, but I’ve never called you a Nazi. You come up with some strange stuff directed at me and even fellow conservatives here.
So what does this guy Elrod snort?
Having sex with a woman, and the, esp, when having a steady sexual relationship with one, was when I fully realized that I was very happily heterosexual. Yin and Yang.
--------
You needed to have sex with a woman to realize you were a man... lolol.
“Now why don't you tell us what you did when Ted Kennedy killed that poor girl?”
Huh? I was 17 years old and getting ready for my senior year of high school.
A fruitful topic for discussion, if one is not sissified or fagged out by the queerness of it.
Ann Althouse said...
"If you take the word “gay” to mean unmanly it makes weird sense."
Oops! Sorry to be confusing. I was doing voice to text.
I meant: If you take the word “gay” to mean manly it makes weird sense.
-----------
Made more sense the first way, the way kids use the word "gay" nowadays.
And no, your argument would assume the two men having sex are equals. How privvy are you to most gay relationships between men? THere is most always a top and a bottom. Meaning they are not both manly... one is more passive and submissive. hth.
every man would be born through his mother’s frontal vertical cleavage.
---------
Are you trying to be funny? Your comments make no sense? Are you talking boobs or pussy or what? Front vertical cleavage seemed to be boobs... stick to the lawn work. Comedy is not your forte, nor biology, it seems...
The only time I ever read about Nick Fuentes is here or at Instapundit. Never shows up on my X or Facebook account. Never has he come up in any political discussion with anyone I know in person.
Yep. And yet somehow, the left accuses us of being acolytes to him and the other fringe movements.
Whatever.
The 'Brave New World' is here and I missed the parade.
It appears Inga spends more time following this Fuentes guy than we do. Maybe we should read something into that.
Maybe if you're worrying about gay sex, ann and meade, you're not getting enough at home? How's that separate bedrooms thing working out for ya now? lol. Just do it. STop typing with your little fingers and get busy...
Jim at said...
It appears Inga spends more time following this Fuentes guy than we do. Maybe we should read something into that.
--------------
INga's gone gay?
This guy Fuentes --I only heard about as a fringe personality-- recently started showing up in my YouTube offers. It's good to see that it wasn't something somebody pushed up and everybody just went along with.
She wants to date him i guess
“It appears Inga spends more time following this Fuentes guy than we do. Maybe we should read something into that.”
It’s cute the way rightists here pretend they never heard of Fuentes. No memory of the dinner Fuentes had at Mar a Lago with Trump and Kanye West?
Or maybe they are uninformed and incurious.
“Representative Paul Gosar of Arizona gave the keynote speech at Mr. Fuentes’s America First Political Action Conference in 2021. A year later, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia did the same, though she later expressed regret, claiming that she had been unaware of Mr. Fuentes’s racist beliefs.
Later in 2022, Mr. Fuentes accompanied the rapper and presidential aspirant Kanye West to Mar-a-Lago to have dinner with Mr. Trump. In the interview, Mr. Fuentes said that he had been working on policy papers for Mr. West, “who wanted us to rewrite the U.S. Constitution and to include in it Hitler’s most severe policies and also his most moderate policies.”
He was surprised to have been let into Mar-a-Lago “because of who I am” and recalled spending most of the evening “glazing” the former president with flattery and encouraging him to give only unscripted speeches. Still, the fact that Mr. Trump had dined with a notorious bigot created a firestorm. His former ambassador to Israel, David Friedman, condemned the meeting as “unacceptable.”
Mr. Trump, Mr. West later said, “is really impressed with Nick Fuentes.”
NYT
"And yet somehow, the left accuses us of being acolytes to him and the other fringe movements."
You guys should look in the mirror, as the people you hold up as representing the left are much the same.
In fact, before I saw what Nick Fuentes looked like, I thought he was a media personality, who happened to be an ilegal alien during the first years of Obama. I wonder what happened to that guy. I don't remember his name. It might've been Fuentes.
Is weird sense actually a thing? There’s sense, nonsense, and weird sense? Weird.
You guys should look in the mirror, as the people you hold up as representing the left are much the same.
You mean the millions of clowns at the No Kings rallies don't represent you?
You mean the tens of thousands of leftists who celebrated Charlie Kirk's murder don't represent you? Or those who wish Thomas Crooks was a better shot?
You mean AOC, Cory Booker, Bernie Sanders, Kamala Harris, Katie Porter and the rest of the TDS Brigade don't represent you?
These are your people. These are the people who share your philosophy. If you don't want to be represented by those types of people, maybe you should change.
It's very easy for me to distance myself from people like Fuentes. He's an extreme fringe. I share nothing in common with him.
Not so much with the people I listed on your side of the aisle.
Inga, you can be really impressed with how awful someone is. You really impress me all the time.
Did I trigger you Stan? Stan the Snowflake.
Wait. This is big. Now that I am suddenly gay, they cannot fire me without a huge lawsuit. WIN.
They're doing it wrong. Or rather, they're not-doing it wrong.
It’s cute the way rightists here pretend they never heard of Fuentes. No memory of the dinner Fuentes had at Mar a Lago with Trump and Kanye West?
I vaguely remember it. Am I supposed to remember every person who had dinner with Trump?
Again, you latch onto the stupidest, most trivial things and then claim it's some sort of gotcha. It isn't.
You want to know how to identify a nobody of importance in Republican politics? You see who Inga spends the most time writing about. It also works for the Democrats she writes about.
’It’s cute the way rightists here pretend they never heard of Fuentes.’
I’ve heard more about him from you, on this single thread, than anywhere else.
Jim, you have much more in common with Fuentes than you might realize. Your retorts to liberal commenters remind me of an angry incel persona.
Well, that explains it - why young men might be conservative. I mean it could not be the appeal of the ideas themselves; it has to be something weird attracting them away from the Democrats.
“I’ve heard more about him from you, on this single thread, than anywhere else.”
I’m glad I could educate you, but you really should've known about this guy. He has many thousands of right wing male followers, who voted for and supported Trump. He influences young men on the right. Young Republicans ring a bell?
So, Inga, are your Jewish relatives still celebrating Trumps help in freeing hostages (HT Eva)
Jim says:
(Inga)Again, you latch onto the stupidest, most trivial things and then claim it's some sort of gotcha. It isn't.
10/20/25, 5:10 PM
It's not a bug, it's a feature.
"It’s cute the way rightists here pretend they never heard of Fuentes."
I've heard of him. I know he's one of the people that "the good people" are supposed to hate, and that he's been accused of the usual litany of stuff by the SPLC, but their credibility is zero. I've never listened to him, so I don't know what he's actually said or what he actually believes. Frankly I can't get past the poor production quality of his videos and has bad haircuts and bad suits.
“As of October 2025, Nick Fuentes has over 750,000 followers on X, and his content is also followed by large audiences on other platforms. Exact numbers fluctuate, but recent reports highlight the following:
X (formerly Twitter): In a September 2025 report, The New York Times stated that Fuentes had over 750,000 followers on the platform. His follower count has grown significantly since his account was reinstated in May 2024.
Rumble: His streaming show on the video platform Rumble draws an audience of around 500,000 viewers.
Telegram: According to a report in mid-October 2025, his combined following across social platforms like X, Telegram, and TikTok is nearing one million. In March 2023, his official Telegram channel had over 84,000 subscribers.
Instagram: In addition to these large platforms, Fuentes has smaller followings on other social networks. An Instagram profile, for instance, shows a follower count of over 2,000.”
Gemini
Jim, you can swear him off as much as you like, but he is a more important part of your 'political team' than you ever will be.
In fact, your desire to equate me with a whole range of figures on the left is very thing you pretend to decry here. Save your hypocrisy
Our blog host seems to find him newsworthy and here you are desperately trying to tell us both his irrelevance and how he isn't you. Your angry response tells me that this hits close to home for you. If you really didn't care you wouldn't be so invested in this discussion.
Doubt! Even Nick Fuentes has loser groupies.
"He has many thousands of right wing male followers"
Trump has many millions of right wing male followers, Inga- tens of millions actually. All you are doing here is demonstrating your inability to comprehend scale.
"FormerLawClerk said...
"I need cuddles. I need kisses…I need to spend time with a woman."'
Fuentes has obviously never spent time with any woman. Women don't want that. They want to be fucked. Hard."
Some kinky woman left wing commenters come here for abuse. NTTIAWWI
Aggressively closeted.
’…but you really should've known about this guy.’
I have zero interest in this weirdo, other than laughing at his absurd assessments, re: sex.
If you went out on the street and found 100 random Trump voters, I bet fewer than 2 of them would have ever heard of Nick Fuentes (and I write that as someone who has heard of him). And I doubt any of them would have a single clue what a Groyper is.
“ Oops! Sorry to be confusing…. I meant: If you take the word “gay” to mean manly it makes weird sense.”
Actually I think I had it right the first time. If you take the word gay to mean unmanly it makes weird sense.
I think I’m just going to have to take the position that you can understand it either way and see if it makes sense for yourself.
“ Your contrasts show the difference between Christian (the original comment) and Greek (the correction) views of manliness. And the difference in the respective gods.”
Yes! That explains it well. I can see how I was able to believe either idea.
I don’t really follow the incels but it seems to me that if they emphasize that they’re just stuck being celibate and then trying to make the best of it, it’s worse than if they took the strong position that celibacy is good and did not concede that they were incapable of getting sex it would be more impressive.
And I don’t even know why any of this has anything to do with being right wing. I’m not interested enough in these people to try to figure it out. I just thought the idea that sex is gay and that a man being with women is gay was interesting
“I have zero interest in this weirdo, other than laughing at his absurd assessments, re: sex.”
That’s a mistake. Forewarned is forearmed. He’s INFLUENCING right wing young men in larger numbers than you can imagine, or are afraid to imagine. If your complacency serves you well, so be it.
It appears this Fuentes d-bag is influencing Igna more than any “rightwing” young men.
’If your complacency serves you well, so be it.’
Since you put it that way, I’ll cancel all my plans for the week and get to work!! Erudition awaits!
In fact, your desire to equate me with a whole range of figures on the left is very thing you pretend to decry here. Save your hypocrisy.
You're picking one person and trying to link him to the right.
I selected your whole, entire, political movement.
If you can't see the difference, that's on you. Not me.
FLC last had sex with a woman in January ‘25.
Or was it January ‘24…
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/09/us/politics/nick-fuentes-trump.html
Until a month or two ago, Nicholas J. Fuentes was regarded by right-wing influencers as a mosquito-like interloper whose lifeblood was attention. Ignore his openly racist and sexist rants, their thinking went, and Mr. Fuentes would eventually flitter off into oblivion.
But today an entirely different consensus has emerged on the right. The footprint of the oratorically proficient late-night streaming show host has not dwindled in the least, with his tens if not hundreds of thousands of alienated young male conservatives followers known as Groypers, a nickname derived from an alt-right meme. If anything, his anti-Israel, anti-immigrant, anti-transgender and anti-civil-rights views seem to have gained new currency during the second Trump administration.
There is now growing alarm among leading conservatives about Mr. Fuentes, who routinely tests the cultlike devotion of his young male fans by savaging their patriarchal figure, President Trump, for not being right-wing enough. In the process, he has emerged as one of the loudest voices on the right to turn on the president.
“When I was a teenager, I thought he was a Caesar-like figure who was going to save Western civilization,” Mr. Fuentes, 27, said in an interview. “Now I view him as incompetent, corrupt and compromised.”
Is this the horseshoe theory that once the left and right push out far enough, they come around and meet in a gay embrace?
NTTIAWWT!
“Specifically, he has criticized the president for showing solidarity with Israel over the war in Gaza, for refusing to release the Epstein files and for considering extending student visas to Chinese nationals. On Labor Day, Mr. Fuentes posted on social media, “Trump 2.0 has been a disappointment in literally every way but nobody wants to admit it.”
Asked to comment on Mr. Fuentes’s remarks, White House officials declined. Current and former members of the Trump administration as well as outside advisers would not be quoted for the record about Mr. Fuentes out of fear, they said, of inviting online attacks from him and his zealous followers. Three of them mentioned the sudden ubiquity of Fuentes-related clips circulating in their social media feeds.”
NYT
Your angry response tells me that this hits close to home for you. If you really didn't care you wouldn't be so invested in this discussion.
Good lord.
A dude I've barely heard of. A dude I pay no attention to. A dude I would've never known about except for blogs posts here.
Is somehow hitting too close to home.
The only reason I'm 'invested' in this conversation is because I'm trying to refute your moronic comparisons.
I'll never make that mistake again.
Living lies about sex is not healthy.
So he hates israel just like you
WoAH… NYT… gotta be bunk.
”Your body, my choice.” Nick Fuentes sickening angry incel rant about women.
It’s pretty obvious he hates women like a true blue incel.
Im sure the Times would never misrepresent such things right
Oh liberal currents just as legit
Seeing as society had overremphasized non binary predilctions (all 57? Of them, some might conclude that
Good grief, if we didn't have Inga around to promote anti-semitic rightwingers like herself, we would have to make a sockpuppet account.
Inga 6:09
Just what do you think any of this says about Trump and/or what this Fuentes clown is trying to accomplish?
Think about it for a while.
Based just on the stuff Inga has posted in this thread, I will bet half of Fuentes' followers are leftwingers just because of his anti-Israel stance.
“…anti-semitic rightwingers like herself…”
Don’t you mean like YOURSELF?
Asking Inga to think deeply about, well anything, is like asking a cat to do algebra.
Like titanis mcgrath it would be too on the noze
She prefers he men like harry sisson
Like it or not, most MAGA members are INCEL and misogynists, as evidenced every day on many MAGA blogs and here on Althouse Blog. Sad but true.
“Asking Inga to think deeply about, well anything, is like asking a cat to do algebra.”
Yancey Boy, who still lives at home with Mommy, a good example of a right wing incel.
I just want to clarify that my criticism of Fuentes' hairstyle and suits is in no way gay.
No there are plenty of smart attractive women we admire nog only in this country
And she steps forward to prove Yancey right.
Squirrel because of the armies of wannabe murderers we uncovered this weekend hiding in plain sight
Maybe Fuentes is just not pretending to notice the little dishes of poison that married people offer you all the time.
“No there are plenty of smart attractive women we admire nog only in this country”
If only you could write love letters to them without every other word being misspelled…
’Think about it for a while.’
That was very dry, bb. ;)
There is no place I look to discover the "consensus on the right" that caries more authenticity with me than the New York Times.
“And she steps forward to prove Yancey right.”
Another right wing incel at heart…
Maybe fuentes and aoc should get together between them their iq is about 50 (and embarassing to us latinos)
"And I don’t even know why any of this has anything to do with being right wing."
Because it's just too juicy of a smear to pass up.
“Like it or not, most MAGA members are INCEL and misogynists, as evidenced every day on many MAGA blogs and here on Althouse Blog. Sad but true.”
Gosh, it’s actually scary how many of the rightist men here do sound like incels. 😬
You know right, same for politico, now that usaid has paired down their subscription base
“Overview
Incels (short for “involuntary celibates”) are not a monolithic group with a single political ideology. They span the political spectrum, but data and analysis from academic studies, online community monitoring, and surveys show a strong skew toward the far-right and right-wing extremes. This is driven by overlapping themes of misogyny, racial hierarchies, and anti-feminist rhetoric that align with alt-right and white nationalist ideologies.”
Grok
Inga said...
“As of October 2025, Nick Fuentes has over 750,000 followers on X, and his content is also followed by large audiences on other platforms....
How many are bots? I have over 100, 90%, at least, are bots.
These vile leftwing “No Kings” protesters/corksoakers are on videos uttering the most disgusting shit, laughing about killing children and spouses of the people they hate. There is something so wrong with their brains. Not only do they look as crazy as one would imagine a cretin having this mental illness would look. Lots of videos out there of this human excrement.
Eff a bunch of Nick Fuentes and this squirrely distraction from these parasitic Queens.
Libs of TikTok on X: "🚨MASSIVE SCANDAL UNFOLDING IN CALIFORNIA SCHOOL🚨 A 4-year-old girl was allegedly r*ped by a male teaching assistant who was left alone with her during nap time The school reportedly covered it up for MONTHS When superintendent Gina Potter finally addressed it, she simply https://t.co/MVK6Q3pmhc" / X https://share.google/TlUJ7UZKM5ua5kVgb
Thats just one of many examples liberals in good standing no doubt
I wonder if Nick is related to Daisy. She was pretty hot.
Not in a million years
Iman said...
Eff a bunch of Nick Fuentes and this squirrely distraction from these parasitic Queens.
NO QUEENS!
It's said that in classical antiquity a man who was too attached or deferential or subservient to his wife was considered effeminate. A man who bggrd other men was not. If you were the one who got bggrd, you were. It was the passivity and the penetration that were frowned upon. If you weren't 'master of your own domain,' as Seinfeld put it (in reference to another form of sex) that wasn't good.
As Jonathan V. Last put it at The Bulwark,
These Young Republicans have never known any other type of Republicanism. I assume Trumpism will persist as the dominant feature of Republican politics at least to 2028 and almost certainly to 2032. By that point we're talking about a full generation of Republicans who only understand politics in the context of an authoritarian project.
Jonathan V. Last is an idiot. Young Republicans have always said and done stupid things. It goes with being young.
I don't know anything about Fuentes. Is he really a "neo-nazi" or is that just the usual hyperbole?
That's not how it works, son...
Inga said...
[“You know who was unmanly?”]
My take: Bill Clinton in a blue dress. That may have been Hillary's idea.
NO QUEENS!!!
You know, if this Fuentes guy is as important and influential as you're making him out to be, why haven't you tried killing him yet?
the left must manufacture outrage...
"Not in a million years"
I was going to say "maybe in 'billions and billions' of years", but after checking with AI.
The popular "billions and billions" quote is widely misattributed to Carl Sagan; he never actually said it. It was created by comedian Johnny Carson on The Tonight Show during a parody of Sagan.
#TIL #googling is dead
What Jim at said... @8:01
I didn't expect the punchline. I'm stealing that.
Gosh, it’s actually scary how many of the rightist men here do sound like incels.
So. How does Inga know how Incels sound like?
"It's said that in classical antiquity a man who was too attached or deferential or subservient to his wife was considered effeminate. "
Uxorious. This is a good word to know, BTW, if you play word games.
Is there statistical evidence that followers of Fuentes are committing rapes in unusual numbers? Or is this more proof by reference to the narrative, you know, is it that there is a "growing sense" that this is so.
Are we sure Inga is a woman and not a Gay man? She seems pretty obsessed with Fuentes.
If you want sexual weirdness Inga is in the right place. Or rather the Left place. Sometimes I think every sexual weirdo in the USA votes Left. Every Transexual seems to belong to Antifa, or is an ex-member of the Biden Administration. So her "Fuentes obsession" is probably sexual.
Its funny how everyone attacks incels. Men and women. They're supposed to "man Up" and go out and get a chick. However if they were women, we'd be told to cheer their "High standards" and approve of their complaint that "Men just arent good enough".
Its funny how the christian virtue of "chastity" has gone completely away, and been replaced by the Protestant love of Israel and abortion.
Its funny how the christian virtue of "chastity" has gone completely away, and been replaced by the Protestant love of Israel and abortion.
------------
Babies, babies, babies!
Some demographics draw a premium, they say. The women will not do their jobs, and are demanding we start paying them to reproduce as well as care for their offspring via the State. They won't pair up and do it voluntarily anymore, and the old men and women like meade who will pair up and do it voluntarily just are not producing any benefit. We've got to cut them off and reinvest in the products that work and still have a lifetime of utility ahead. The "take all you can and don't give back just keep asking for more" method is killing us, man. We gotta stop artificially propping up these women and men who don't contribute essential work.
Meade said...
Iman said...
Eff a bunch of Nick Fuentes and this squirrely distraction from these parasitic Queens.
NO QUEENS!
------
Isn't your stepson Chrissy a queen? I'm so confused at the althouse family formation changes... Nothing is ever stable once you start divorcing, remarrying, being gay when it's a "thing" (I love my gay son!) then opting out when it's too gay...
If he's still gay and you're slamming him in the comments section while living in his childhood home, look up chupzpah? The Cohens have been berry berry good to you, meade. Taking you into the Madison big house after your own wife kicked you to the curb and hired hispanic help with the lawn (they don't scythe and get the job done timely!)... and you call the boy a queen. Sad.
Actually I think I had it right the first time. If you take the word gay to mean unmanly it makes weird sense.
----------
Can we tell ann a secret?
Most people don't spend time thinking about gay people's sex lives... Honestly! If you're not into that (remember how people called you faghag before meade came along? Do you know what that means? Someone with an outsized fascination with gay men, particularly their sex. That's YOU to a "t". It had/has never been about a legal strategy for gay marriage or winning civil rights... you just have a fascination w/gay sex, it seems. A lot of women your age want to be "supportive". Some might say your son -- named after Christopher street -- is your gay project, and after the divorce when he was just living w/you... you "gayed" him.)
Try to redirect? Everytime you think of gay sex, read a book or watch a movie to think about your own sexual performance. Maybe you could to something "gay" to keep you focused on your own bed and the sex taking place -- or not --there? Women can steal practices from gay men. You've told us you enjoy performing oral sex. Meade could likely work with that, although if you are questioning what "man sex" is most manly, you might be down deep not confident he can give you what a more well-endowed gay man could?
Have you tried therapy? I'm sure Madison benefits would cover a visit. Maybe worth investigating your fascination with gay sex at your age... "Is it manly? Is it the opposite?"... or better yet going in and seeking a private meeting with clergy. It's never too late to develop some values. I've never heard of a more mixed-up boomer in the bedroom, questioning everything she's been taught since she cracked her first Playbook at what? Four years old on yer daddy's lap? Talk to a therapist about that? Please... in case one of the boys drags home an offspring or a step-grandbaby? You need to know how sex and families... and men work, I think.
I don't know all that much about Fuentes but, I genuinely thought he was a homosexual. Maybe this bit about heterosexual intercourse being "gay" and abstinence making you more "heterosexual" filtered through the internet and turned into Fuentes being homosexual.
You're just bi-curious.
"I just thought the idea that sex is gay and that a man being with women is gay was interesting"
There's an article by John Tierney in the 1998 NYT on testerone and the DOW average and strip clubs, based on a study of monkeys as an excuse for talking about men needing a boost from watching naked women.
NYT link
repeatedly reload and X-stop out of the reload to get past most paywalls. Cause race conditions that html does't protect against.
Sex with girls is like playing house, with orgasms.
G.I. Joe is involuntarily celibate.
"I don't even have the equipment for it. When I shipped out of Vietnam, it was all gone."
Just because people are followed on X does not mean they are subscribing to their ideas. Many are monitoring them, researching them, keeping an eye on a zeitgeist in order to dispel lies about its influence and size, hate-watching, or just have him on a list of public figures, as most political staffers and reporters do.
Heard of him, and now this is 100% of what I know about him. So, not interested in knowing more.
If getting to play with women naked is gay, then I'm gay AF.
Now who can argue with that?
Well, this explains a lot about Fuentes.
When out of ideas, question masculinity.
What does “asexual incel” mean? I don’t actually want to have sex with women who don’t want to have sex with me?
Men can give birth, but only through gay sex...
What a world, what a world."
- Wicked Witch of the West
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.