Biden spoke of unity, of national reconciliation, and also—and perhaps most important of all—of the need for leaders “to defend the truth and defeat the lies.”...
[I]t was his love letter to the role of truth in a free society that rang loudest to me during his twenty-minute speech, which took place under a sunny Washington sky....
Ha ha. That reminds me of the lesson in spotting propaganda that I received in my high school class — a class where we were required to subscribe to and read The New York Times. The object of study was a news report on Nixon's inauguration. There was a description of the "gloomy drizzle" of the day....
... and here's how the NYT covered the weather on John F. Kennedy's inaugural day, which the teacher must have reported on from memory:
Isn't that hilarious?! I never forgot that lesson, the seed, perhaps, of 80% of my blogging.
Must I go back to Susan Glasser, or can I simply end with that light-hearted lesson, which I will now place in the #1 position on my ranking of Things I Learned in School?
I'll just quote Glasser's last line:
Never have the old patriotic clichés about America sounded so good. May their words matter and their aspirations turn into reality. Is this what optimism feels like?
But old patriotic clichés, aspirations, and optimism are not truth — "the property of being in accord with fact or reality." Glasser loathes Trump, but Trump was full of old patriotic clichés, aspirations, and optimism are not truth. They just sounded bad to her when they came from Trump. It sounds good coming from Biden because she's rid of Trump and is in the mood to feel optimistic.
The snow glistens for the President of your heart.
73 comments:
"Joe Biden’s Love Letter to the Truth"
C'mon man, salute the Marines!
Let the gushing begin. These people truly have no self-awareness, none at all. This would be a bit less embarrassing if it came from a teenager.
"Did you say, 'I know my truth'?"
In truth (as it were), we live in the Age of Falsehood. I no longer believe anything that comes from the media, big tech, or the government I once respected (FBI/CIA/NSA/DOJ or anybody else for that matter). It's lies all the way down now, and how a modicum of truth will be restored to our national life, I have no idea.
If Slow Joe "loves" Truth, it's from afar.
I can remember one teacher in high school teaching about the difference between truth and fact, which really turned my brain upside down at the time, but today I think I understand it a lot better.
Plagiarists don’t love the truth.
Glasser russia truther extraordinaire.
This is such a beautifully-curated blog post.
Brava Althouse.
It's not a lie if you believe it.
"We choose truth over facts."
This Biden quote goes perfectly with this post.
You want the truth.
Journalism resplendent
https://mobile.twitter.com/Cernovich/status/135248071616925286
You can't handle the whatever.
"We choose truth over facts."
Yes. As is being stated, the truth Team Biden likes is Oprah's 'their truth'. Problem is there is no 'my truth' or 'her truth' or 'our truth'. These are weasel words for lies...
There is only the truth.
We live in the age of lies, the long dark winter of dying democracy (to paraphrase Biden and WaPo). Speaking of the "truth" in a shameless puff piece about the most powerful man in the world with a long, well documented history of lying seems more than a little ridiculous. But these are the times we live in.
If your heart is for China Joe...your heart is in China. Calling half of America White Supremacists is really presidential, and unifying...if you are a communist.
Progressives wrote a Dear John letter to the truth a long time ago.
"Dear Truth,
It's not you. It's me...
You have so many wonderful qualities and I'll always think fondly of you, but in my heart, I feel like I'm still looking."
...which I will now place in the #1 position on my ranking of Things I Learned in School
So you have a list? and the rankings are fluid? What else is on there?
I've never had a list personally but off the top I'd say knowledge of girls and the value of compound interest would be right up there...
Unrequited love?
Truth is flexible
https://mobile.twitter.com/GLNoronha/status/135246776420475289
They always speak of "love" and "truth" just before they stick the knife in you.
Ann, I'm about your age and I, too, got a wonderful high school education. Public school in California! Now, of course, the students can't read or do arithmetic, let alone think.
...eighth grade ditto handout on scientific method. Fifth grade flow chart on identifying indigenous plant species...
...and though it wasn't taught, the discovery that liberals are destructive assholes.
I am not saying that *any* given politician is a complete stranger to the truth.
But I am saying they could both be at the same party for quite some time before recognizing each other.
Propaganda is the highest form of patriotism now. Dissent is dangerous. Elections are safe and secure from fraud. Update your style books accordingly.
(Spelling corrected)
"Propaganda is the highest form of patriotism now. Dissent is dangerous."
'twas always thus. What most people consider "patriotism" has always been unthinking regurgitation of the prevailing lies a nation tells itself about itself.
I guess that's where the phrase "naked truth" came from.
A lie often enough repeated becomes the truth, and for some people, the truth is but a lie undiscovered.
I believe that politicians position themselves somewhere in relationship to the truth, but not that they do it out of love.
At any given time truth is only useful to a politician if it benefits them at the moment. A consistently honest politician is highly unlikely to make it past the municipal/county level. I don't doubt that there's a fair number of generally honest small town mayors for example. But the farther you go up the ladder, the less honest our elected representatives become.
Of course at this point none of this is necessarily shocking or revelatory to many voters. But I think people choose to believe certain lies told by certain politicians because they like the lies and the person telling them. It's a weird failing of human nature that we're more willing to believe things we hope are true. And we're generally not very inclined to go out of our way to research if something that some politician says is actually true if it conforms to our view of reality.
"I don't know anything about Hunter's business dealings" - President Joe "Lying Dog Faced Pony Soldier" Biden.
"Less wrong" is a often better concept than "true".
“Joe Biden’s Love Letter to the Truth
The new President tried something different: levelling with the American people.”
There is truly something pathetic about this. Joe Biden has a documented history of lying, most recently about his family’s grifting. If the essence of QuidProJoe’s speech was “unity” as the leftmediaswine claims, Glasser and her ilk need to take a look at his day one executive orders. Count illegals for reapportionment? Check. Appease the trannies and kill womens’ sports? Check. Kill the Keystone, fracking, energy independence and 8,000 jobs? Check. Kill the 1776 Project and authentic American history? Check. And so on.
For the Democrat elite and their nomenklatura, the “unity” blather is pap for their apparatchiks and other dupes like the Glassers of the world. For non-Democrats Biden’s executive orders are the reality. They exemplify Democrat political corruption: pandering to special interest groups and causes at the expense of the nation’s well being to solidify political power.
“Love letter to the truth?” Journolistas, particularly NY journolistas, and the editors who publish them are shamelessly fatuous in their aggrandizement of Democrat swamprats.
https://www.rebelnews.com/bill_barr_says_suppression_of_speech_loss_of_faith_in_media_contributed_to_capitol_mob
When I was younger (I'm 70) I thought it was a natural tendency for young people to resist authority, to defy the establishment and to sniff out propaganda. It seems that now American youth is doing all they can to advance the establishment and thereby embrace (perhaps unknowingly) big government, big business and big tech. Whatever happened to speaking truth to power? And when did speaking truth to power become domestic terrorism?
Where’s the truth in men pretending to be women beating real women in sporting events?
---Must I go back to Susan Glasser
Not at all. Skip her. Wiki tells us she's married to NYT White House chief correspondent. {Correspondent, LOL! Aw, quaint.)
And she worked for Wapoo and now the New Yorker. So we know exactly where it's all coming from.
Daughter of a pair of legal publishers. Harvard cum laude, notes the Wiki article. (Did she put that in? Half the graduating class is cum laude, Wiki.) A perfect American mandarin. She is happy with her ruling class victory. The Trumpists can eat cake.
We need a modern-day Lemoyne to paint "Biden Getting Handsy With Truth".
On Truth, don't forget Nietzsche
Supposing truth to be a woman - what? is the suspicion not well-founded that all philosophers, when they have been dogmatists, have had little understanding of women, that the gruesome earnestness, the clumsy importunity with which they have been in the habit of approaching truth have been inept and improper means for winning a woman?
Certainly she has not let herself be won -- and today every kind of dogmatism stands sad and discouraged, if it continues to stand at all!
(Beyond Good and Evil, preface)
I thought it was a natural tendency for young people to resist authority, to defy the establishment and to sniff out propaganda
Historical young people are perhaps the most susceptible to authority. Look at the Hitler Youth or Mao Zedong's Red Guards during the Cultural Revolution. For young people, it's not specifically authority that they feel the need to rebel against, it's really against the old ways, the ways of their parents whatever those may be. And if their parents were anti-authoritarian, obviously they'll be attracted to authoritarian ideas.
'Truth' needs to go to the gym and eat a salad once in a while.
It's a good thing 'Time' does go to the gym and is pretty ripped.
And Wikipedia?
Sorry AA, a good place to go for a quick check on a date or a name, but the entries are heavily edited by almost all left-wing activists.
Don't expect to find any 'truth' there.
What most people consider "patriotism" has always been unthinking regurgitation of the prevailing lies a nation tells itself about itself.
Says you. This is what progressives really think: America has always been fatally flawed and this is nautical Mike’s from how “most people” would define patriotism. If you can’t appreciate incredible achievement enshrined in our Declaration & Constitution then you’re hopelessly ignorant. You don’t have to love and respect your country or be proud of it, but don’t insult the rest of us who see how different and blessed America is and has been. The reason normal Americans hate DC is they seem to share your disdain for our founding documents and the strong desire to adhere to them ingrained in “middle America” (which I am part of here in a semi-rural zone in the formerly free state of California).
"In wartime, truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies." - Churchill
Jeez. “Nautical miles” spellcheck, not Mikes!
For example, Mitchy China-wife McConnell no longer cares what his constituents want. Primary time in the big KY.
WaPo: "Trump lies about Biden banning fracking"
Biden: I will ban Fracking.
Who is the liar, here? What is the 'truth'?
If you wonder why the old-timey libertarians referred to the Cult of the State, the article quoted can clue you in.
If you wonder why the old-timey libertarians referred to the Cult of the State, the article quoted can clue you in.
Mike (MJB Wolf) said...
For example, Mitchy China-wife McConnell no longer cares what his constituents want. Primary time in the big KY.
I think Cocaine Mitch is planning on retiring once his term is up.
Hes there till 2026, or whenever captain pike dissolves the senate.
The older I get, the more elusive truth seems to be. I often think “opinion” when someone claims the truth. As we’ve seen with science, things change, and truth shouldn’t be changing, by definition. Opinions can change, and alternative facts (thank you Kellyanne) are real things. People choose which facts to prioritize in their opining, and always ignore the inconvenient ones to get to their desired end. That is our natural right to do. Nothing wrong with opinions - bring them on - but don’t try to claim the top spot of truth.
"In wartime, truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies." - Churchill
A pretty slick justification for lying by governments.
It does seem to be the case that confirmation bias is a feature of today's journalism. And, unfortunately, it's reflected in both (all) political spheres.
One of Trumps errors here was misunderstanding women. The truth of a lot of women is that they roll someone like Trump into their personal dating couch. Trump gets no vote from them because he treats women poorly. No flowers. No chocolates. No cards. The constant publication of his denigration of bullies in the swamp would hit low self esteem women with the thought that he was talking about them. Strong men and women would ride through the Trumpisms. Weak men and women unable to create their own identity would succumb to them. Trump sort of knows this. He went on a suburban mom with kids law and order tactic when what they really wanted something else from him.
Mike (MJB Wolf) said...
Jeez. “Nautical miles” spellcheck, not Mikes!
1/22/21, 9:44 AM seems like a good unit to use as any.
I don't know how much more of this "Biden the Love God" erotica I can take.
Glasser loathes Trump, but Trump was full of old patriotic clichés, aspirations, and optimism are not truth.
True. But you may need to talk to your English teacher about the sentence.
Blogger narciso said...
Hes there till 2026, or whenever captain pike dissolves the senate.
1/22/21, 10:20 AM
Yep. Just voted for him in 2020. Big mistake. Amy McGrath would have been a disaster. So, essentially a toss up between 2 Democrats, and a meh Independent.
Truth? Two plus two equals five, comrade. And don't ever forget it.
Kevin Williamson, finally curing his TDS by focusing on Biden, has a good piece on Joe's persistent lying about the supposedly drunk driver who killed his first wife--a particularly gratuitous, nasty piece of work. The truth, indeed.
Kevin Williamson, finally curing his TDS by focusing on Biden, has a good piece on Joe's persistent lying about the supposedly drunk driver who killed his first wife--a particularly gratuitous, nasty piece of work. The truth, indeed.
Indeed. The facts of the case suggest that if anyone was drunk, it was Mrs. Biden.
"But you may need to talk to your English teacher about the sentence."
Here's a guess:
Althouse copied and pasted a sentence fragment and accidentally included the final section which included the words "are not truth."
It was a typo, not a grammatical error due to an ineffective education. Criticizing it as an error in sentence construction, considering the two people involved, is possibly an error in judgement.
Additional guess:
She used the copy function so she wouldn't have to call up a character map to get the little mark above cliché in the right place.
---possibly an error in judgement.
That would be your judgment?
"That would be your judgment?"
Absolutely - incorrectly criticizing Althouse's grasp of sentence structure in the comments to her blog is not a good call, with or without the e.
"Absolutely - incorrectly criticizing Althouse's grasp of sentence structure in the comments to her blog is not a good call, with or without the e."
Agreed...that woman (AA) has ninja-Catholic nun diagramming skills.
She a badass (or is that bad-ass?).
: )
Looks like Truth has packed on a few pounds. She's been sitting around binging on CNN and Netflix while emptying boxes of Twinkies. No wonder she has stopped appearing in public.
That wasn't a "criticism," just a heads-up. And I didn't say it wasn't a typo.
I got things pointed out to me umpteen times in school. Even if I knew the rules I didn't always follow them and the reason why didn't really matter.
considering the two people involved
Like you know me.
***
About Biden's first wife. Nobody had to be drinking. Accidents do happen.
Oh look it here. A chance to share a fav gif.
Red Table Talk
https://media.giphy.com/media/XozMRemPkeruRsNqVq/giphy.gif
Heh. Gotta love this girl, Ann Althouse.
The NYT does propaganda well...as does the WaPoo. They be "IN with the IN Crowd", doncha know.
Ann:
What a wonderful lesson in high school!
Attending a public high school in Rockford, IL, I had a few very good teachers, but I can't remember a lesson this wise.
Jim Lindgren
Post a Comment