January 17, 2021

"Mr. Biden’s team has developed a raft of decrees that he can issue on his own authority after the inauguration on Wednesday..."

"... to begin reversing some of President Trump’s most hotly disputed policies. Advisers hope the flurry of action, without waiting for Congress, will establish a sense of momentum for the new president even as the Senate puts his predecessor on trial. On his first day in office alone, Mr. Biden intends a flurry of executive orders that will be partly substantive and partly symbolic. They include rescinding the travel ban on several predominantly Muslim countries, rejoining the Paris climate change accord, extending pandemic-related limits on evictions and student loan payments, issuing a mask mandate for federal property and interstate travel and ordering agencies to figure out how to reunite children separated from families after crossing the border, according to a memo circulated on Saturday by Ron Klain, his incoming White House chief of staff, and obtained by The New York Times. The blueprint of executive action comes after Mr. Biden announced that he will push Congress to pass a $1.9 trillion package of economic stimulus and pandemic relief, signaling a willingness to be aggressive on policy issues and confronting Republicans from the start to take their lead from him. He also plans to send sweeping immigration legislation on his first day in office providing a pathway to citizenship for 11 million people in the country illegally."


Aggressive and confrontational... that's the tone they want to set. 

I say "they" because it's "Mr. Biden's team" putting these things together. What part of this is the actual man, Joe Biden, choosing and acting? 

Here's a sentence that's about Biden personally: 
After a lifetime in Washington, the restless, gabby man of consuming ambition who always had something to say and something to prove seems to have given way to a more self-assured 78-year-old who finally achieved his life’s dream.
A man got what he wanted. He was "restless" when he didn't have it yet, and now that he's achieved his dream — getting the position — he's "self-assured." The struggle is over, I guess, and he can relax.
“He is much calmer,” said Representative James E. Clyburn, Democrat of South Carolina and a close ally. “The anxiety of running and the pressure of a campaign, all that’s behind him now. Even after the campaign was over, the election was over, all the foolishness coming from the Trump camp, you don’t know how all this stuff is going to play out. You may know how it’s going to end, but you’re anxious about how it plays out. So all that’s behind him now.”

227 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 227 of 227
Ambrose said...

"obtained by The NYT" - they are back in their role as press agent for the Democrats.

Narayanan said...

Sebastian said...
"Aggressive and confrontational... that's the tone they want to set."
-----------============
Professora >>>> those descriptor words imply an /opposition/

where do you see any?

Lurker21 said...

The man apprehended near the Capitol with a fake ID, gun, and ammunition turned out to be a private security guard with a valid "non-government" ID. No word yet on retractions from the media or legal action against them.

9,000 "mostly peaceful" Honduran asylum seekers have overcome Guatemalan border guards and are on their way to the US. Now that Biden and Harris are taking charge be sure to have your large "Welcome Migrants" signs out and visible to authorities.

Obama wasn't even in control when he was President, and even less so today. He was too busy playing golf then and his interest hasn't picked up any since then. Biden's staffers are in charge, which means there is a vacuum in the executive branch, which means Pelosi and Schumer will most likely be dictating the general course of the administration.

cf said...

Strange that everyone seems to be talking all calm, all normal.

Seems to me the republic is Done.

Civilization as we know it is over.

I thought, said so here, if the double puppets were installed we would be 17 years to Pol Pot, after a few easy years headed to Venezuela.

In fact, with the assistance of our WWW-Wired Up Gurus becoming our freedom of speech police, we seem heading to Pol Pot first, and not even waiting to inauguration day.

my husband and I are preparing our house to sell, aim to list by March, get out of Portland and Oregon as soon as we can, but seems to me we are too late.

Day 38: Prayer parade in my heart for our duly-elected President and all the good he established and set in motion in the world; plus of course, lifting my song that this American election be resolved fairly and clearly and Donald Trump gets his deserved second term. (alas, seems this is my Ghost Dance, so be it) ॐ

Gahrie said...

Trust Big Mike to completely miss Althouse's contempt for Biden, which comes through loud and clear.

Yeah, she is so contemptuous of Biden she even refused to vote against him.

n.n said...

The HCQ cocktail complements immune system function early in disease progression. HCQ works in two modes as a Zn ionophore and changes the spike protein to inhibit cellular infection. HCQ is an inexpensive, widely available, widely used drug to treat SARS-CoV-2 and likely other viruses in this class.

I wonder who advised Trump of the HCQ cocktail. Whoever it was, was right. HCQ has a low risk profile assessed over around half a century and for only a small number of people globally, and that is at high doses that were given in some of the early official trials to treat Covid-19 at late stage disease progression.

Since April and with larger medical and clinical coverage since summer, there is the Ivermectin protocol, which has demonstrated even greater efficacy at all stages of disease progression.

GAME'S OVER *******S: Indictments NOW

"NIH has upgraded their recommen­da­tion and now considers Ivermectin an option for use in COVID-19."

The vaccine... vaccine(s) are a relatively novel choice, which may be suitable for some patients, in some environments, in some circumstances.

n.n said...

9,000 "mostly peaceful" Honduran asylum seekers have overcome Guatemalan border guards and are on their way to the US.

Thus the mutual interest of authorities in America, Mexico, etc. to pursue emigration reform to mitigate progress of [catastrophic] [anthropogenic] immigration reform (e.g. refugee crises, illegal immigration) and collateral damage at both ends of the bridge and throughout.

Michael K said...

Jim at said... Interesting. When you shitheads don't get your way, you threaten to move to Canada.
And when you shitheads DO get your way, you tell us to move to Canada.


The "Jims" are confusing me. Do we have a lefty Jim and a center right Jim?

Canada is cold. There is a reason why a lot of Canadians, including my grandmother, headed south. I understand they are all clustered near the US border, like baby chicks hiding under their mother, but it still cold.

Humperdink said...

Michael asked: "The "Jims" are confusing me. Do we have a lefty Jim and a center right Jim?".

They could be Mitt.

Terry Ott said...

The “pressures of a campaign” … on Biden? I must not have noticed. Is there any video or any witnesses who saw him in person?

Michael said...

Biden has as much influence over the actions of his administration as the figurehead of a Yankee Clipper had over where the ship was sailing.

Greg The Class Traitor said...

After a lifetime in Washington, the restless, gabby man of consuming ambition who always had something to say and something to prove seems to have given way to a more self-assured 78-year-old who finally achieved his life’s dream.A man got what he wanted

So, he doesn't want to be President. He doesn't want to help make American a better place.

He just wanted to "win" the election, By Any Means Necessary.

Joe Biden: a man so wretched, that not even his sycophants can actually make him look good, or even decent.

Greg The Class Traitor said...

"Mr. Biden’s team has developed a raft of decrees that he can issue on his own authority after the inauguration on Wednesday to begin reversing some of President Trump’s most hotly disputed policies."

I'm really looking forward to the Nationwide Injunctions stopping those rulings.

Remember, Trump was not able to overturn DACA, because his executive order did not give enough reasons as to why Obama's Executive Order should be overturned.

I expect that case to be quoted, a lot, over the next month.

Greg The Class Traitor said...

The case is
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ET AL. v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.

Assuming there's any justice in the world, and any honesty in US Court, that decision is going to be the most cited decision of the year, as the Biden* Admin gets repeatedly blocked in the courts

Tina Trent said...

No response yet, coward Howard? Really, I expect everyone to live by their beliefs.

Michelle Dulak Thomson said...

Jamie and MadisonMan, I too wonder how a ban on interstate non-masked travel will be enforced. Stop all cars at state borders, to see that the drivers are wearing masks? But what's the point of wearing a mask while driving? Make sure that icky out-of-staters aren't carrying their icky verminous germs into your nice clean state? Airlines -- what's left of them -- already require masks; I don't see any point in making cars follow suit, b/c cars are generally occupied by one person, or members of one family group.

Freder Frederson,

At least no one was killed [in January 2017], unlike January 6 of this year. And the police treated the Jan 6 protesters a lot less harshly than they did the protesters at Trump's inauguration.

If they were treated "a lot less harshly" on 1/6, how is it that a protester was shot this time? And I keep hearing of "many deaths." These include one heart attack and one stroke; the aforementioned woman killed by Capitol police; a woman possibly trampled in the riot; a police officer (a Trump supporter, but guarding the Capitol) who may or may not have died by being hit over the head with a fire extinguisher; and another police officer who seems to have killed himself.

The first two didn't die of violence at all. The third was a shooting victim -- of the police. The fourth was likely killed accidentally by co-protesters/rioters; the fifth, likely killed deliberately by rioters. The last I don't understand at all, but especially I do not understand how a suicide after a riot can be blamed on the rioters.

Again, this "much less harsh" treatment seems to have killed someone; on Inauguration Day 2017, no one died. Unless, of course, there were heart attacks and strokes that day too; we weren't tabulating those as "deaths due to riot" four years ago.

Michelle Dulak Thomson said...

Freder, to follow up: What is the proper response to a riot? Or does that depend on what the topic is, and who the rioters are? We now have 26K troops around the Capitol and the WH (a ridiculous number, bigger than the number of troops in Iraq and Afghanistan combined), and spiffy brand-new walls (they can be built very quickly, if you feel like it), and the entire Mall behind barbed wire, and people saying that Biden can't even trust his own troops, b/c some of them are alleged to have liked Trump. And you can't even say "banana republic," b/c that's racist.

It goes on, doesn't it? All too soon, those plywood barriers decorated with nice, flowery designs just become the way things ought to be, if not indeed the way they always were.

Bilwick said...

And you'd better submit, peasants.

Largo said...

//Howard said...
Awwww. Having a nice cry ladies?//

Lo, it has been said unto you: 'ignore the troll'.

I say undo you: ignore the snarker.


--Largo

Largo said...

Inga said...

//Canada doesn’t want these people.//

Indeed. Strange that people think countries are sentient creatures.

Largo said...

@Inga:

//When I speak to my Canadian relatives they make that very clear.//

Just to be sure, Inga, what do they make clear? That *Canada* does not want the people you described, or that *they* (your family) do not want the people you described?

(If the made the former clear, I would be very interested in hearing what cites they have.)

Cheers!

Largo said...

@Lurker21:

//On Canada: I guess they don't want the deplorables, but it's hard to say who they really do want? ... Saying who or what a whole country wants is a tricky business.//

You can poll your family, like Inga! :)

Largo said...

//I Callahan said...//

"Therapists are trained to notice when people use such words and recognise that when folks use such extreme language they are responding emotionally rather than logically."

Therapists are also trained to notice that when people don’t have an argument, they usually resort to either ad-hominem or snide arrogance without broaching the subject matter.

So both should be kept in mind, yes? And when applied, applied with explicit reference to the behaviours that are (at least purportedly) indicate the phenomenon (as I see our Assistant Village Idiot did), right?

Cheers!
--Largo

Largo said...

Freder Frederson said...
//For the dullards, here is a record of the left's behavior when Trump was inaugurated.

At least no one was killed, unlike January 6 of this year. And the police treated the Jan 6 protesters a lot less harshly than they did the protesters at Trump's inauguration.//

Except for the one they shot.

Cheers! :)

Largo said...

Jim [1/17/21, 2:02 PM] wins the thread!

Largo said...

Gahrie said...

Yeah, [Althouse] she is so contemptuous of Biden she even refused to vote against him.

I'm contemptuous of Biden and I didn't vote against him.

Largo said...

Michael K said...

"Canada is cold. There is a reason why a lot of Canadians, including my grandmother, headed south. I understand they are all clustered near the US border, like baby chicks hiding under their mother, but it still cold."

Like a child running home, whenever darkness comes.
-- 'California', by Stan Rogers.

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 227 of 227   Newer› Newest»