April 3, 2019

"Karma is an unkind mistress. However, suffering couldn't be better visited on any other group than they who sought to impose suffering upon others to enrich themselves."

"Enjoy, Islamic State crazies. Let's talk when you're ready to permanently give up trying to kill and oppress others."

That's the top-rated comment on the Washington Post article "The Islamic State’s refugees are facing a humanitarian calamity." To the commenter who pushes back with "these are people. women and children caught in the middle of something you'll never understand," he comes back with, "I understand far better than your crude mind that these folks were part of the extremist clan who sought to rob, kill, and enslave everyone they thought they could get away with robbing, killing, and enslaving. Go on over and offer them your assistance if you believe otherwise. Meanwhile, leave the purported 'thinking' to adults."

Another highly rated comment is: "Zero sympathy for these terrorists. The atrocities that they committed should not be overlooked. My friends Uncle was a Syrian man living a quiet life. As my friend tells it he was tortured and forced to dig his own grave. No sympathy for terrorists." And: "ISIS brought calamity to every town, village or city it conquered. Mass graves of victims are still being uncovered. The survivors of their savagery deserve help...but these, these are the perps. Foreign women who joined the caliphate were active participants in this evil...and they had no mercy towards anyone else's children. They went to Syria voluntarily... this is the world they wanted. I hope they stay there."

63 comments:

wendybar said...

Hear, Hear to the commenters!! Let the Isis brides sleep in beds they made.

Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...

Every once in a while I'd like to read something offered by the wretched DNC-hack arm to the democratic party Democracy Dies In Darkness bird cage liner.

But I refuse to pay for it. EVER.

Nonapod said...

Wow. Reads more like the comment section of PJ Media or Breitbart article than a WaPoo one.

gspencer said...

Quite pleased to see that some WP readers know the time of day about Islam. Despite the best efforts of the left to sugarcoat Islam.

Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...

The idea that we know who is a radical and who is an innocent victim - from where we sit.. how?

Washington Post article "The Islamic State’s refugees are facing a humanitarian calamity."

Question:
The "Islamic State's refugees" - are these ordinary people enslaved by the Islamic State or are these former Islamic State militants?

rhhardin said...

"They" is the subject of "sought," they think.

Ann Althouse said...

It's time to disaggregate "women and children."

Lucid-Ideas said...

In more ancient - and far more recently than people would probably like to think - times surrendered ISIL fighters would have been impaled alive on posts dug into the earth lining a major road all the way to Damascus. And rightfully and justifiably so.

They gave no quarter. They delighted in sadism. There is video evidence a plenty. They should suffer live on television and their suffering broadcast globally free-of-charge.

Any mercy their 'dependents' receive should be of exceedingly marginal quality. They should be allowed to live - if you can call 'survival' living.

The message should be of a 'historical' nature. This is what acting like beasts will provide you.

Rick.T. said...

I use the same rational for rejecting refugees from countries with democratically elected offices.

roesch/voltaire said...

The IS women should be introduced to the Yazidis who were raped or witnessed their fathers and brothers being killed to understand what a humanitarian crisis looks like.

Henry said...

It is unclear from the article how many were residents of the region caught in the fighting and how many emigrated to the temporary caliphate.

The majority of the refugees are children.

There's a pretty strong utilitarian reason to attempt to deradicalize this cohort.

Quaestor said...

There's that damned word again.

Sebastian said...

"Foreign women who joined the caliphate were active participants in this evil"

"Women and children" is rhetorical shield. Not that there's an easy solution.

Quaestor said...

It's time to disaggregate "women and children."

Children can be thoroughly evil. Just ask Stephen King.

exhelodrvr1 said...

I was assured that the issues in Syria were unrelated to Islam.

Inga...Allie Oop said...

Take the young children away from them and have them be raised in Jewish or Christian homes.

Howard said...

Ann let the mask slip. Disaggregation of women and children was the primary goal of Marxist Rabbinical Feminazis. Signed S.Thomas

Howard said...

No Inga, send them to Iowa and make them eat pork. It's the most effective conversion process

Anonymous said...

At some point, the sane world will have make that 7th century stuff too big a price to pay.

Inga...Allie Oop said...

“Wow. Reads more like the comment section of PJ Media or Breitbart article than a WaPoo one.”

Why are you surprised? Goes to show that rightist people really do NOT know how liberals think. I really don’t understand why you people think that liberals have EVER been in the side of ISIS. Maybe you listened to a Drago too much.

n.n said...

People's wickedness is motivated by logical and secular incentives. Men can be wicked by chance and choice. Women can be wicked by chance and choice. Children can be wicked by chance and choice. During the three trimesters before leaving our mother's womb, we are likely innocent for reasons of causal limitations, sensory deprivation, and logical constraints.

traditionalguy said...

The Japanese Army in Nanking still wins #1 in torture killing as a sport. Now everyone go turn in their Assault Weapons. Why would you need one living peacefully in the Muslim’s currently most targeted conquest.

readering said...

If we could rebuild Germany after the Nazis, I think we can help these folks.

Anonymous said...

In more ancient - and far more recently than people would probably like to think - times surrendered ISIL fighters would have been impaled alive on posts dug into the earth lining a major road all the way to Damascus. And rightfully and justifiably so.

Short stakes.

A line from one of S M Stirling's books about the Draka.

"There is no heroic way to die on a stake"

Honestly,

I would put the kids out for adoption and execute the men and women. They were animals. Let the Jordanians have them if we are too squeamish. I remember the Jordanian pilot drenched in gasoline, imprisoned in a cage. Burned alive, while the ISIS troops laughed.

hombre said...

But, but the “vast” majority of Muslims are peaceful. Remember when they rallied and marched worldwide to protest the abuses of Isis? Me neither.

Hagar said...

This is what tribal warfare with modern weapons look like.

Something has happened in the Middle East that I would like to read more about. Since WWII, countries that had substantial Jewish populations before Mohammed was even born have now been almost emptied of Jews. Just how did this happen and why?

Rick said...

The majority of the refugees are children.

That's what leftists claimed about refugees in Europe also. It turns out men in their thirties were claiming to by 17 and since the left supported the political outcome their institutions supported this fraud.

jg said...

Finally some healthy human responses.

Human nature may be flawed, but I believe more evil has been done in elites attempting to suppress it.

We need more natural and honest relations among and between peoples.

(counterpoint: the natural way of doing things doesn't make sense above Dunbar's tribe of ~200 or so people)

jg said...

These people are quite honestly incidental in the war between liberal goodwhites and deplorables. No one really cares besides women seeing photos of dirty syrian boys, women whose caring is reflex and meaningless.

gilbar said...

people really do NOT know how liberals think.

"liberals Think?" assumes facts not in evidence

Henry said...

Rick -- I suspect there's fewer economic refugees in the middle of nowhere.

William said...

Isis definitely has a branding problem. It's hard to put a positive spin on enslaving women and killing children. Here's what they have working for them so far as image goes: There will never be any movies made detailing their atrocities. Such movies would lead to Islamophobia. That's a far worse crime than anything perpetrated by the followers of Islam. Better far to discuss and dramatize the sins of white supremacists. The victims and villains of the Isis saga after this small ripple will pass into obscurity like all those starved peasants and fanatical Communists during the Russian revolution. We'll learn more about the pathology of white people in New Zealand than the craziness of Islamophiliacs in Syria.

Rick said...

I suspect there's fewer economic refugees in the middle of nowhere.

This isn't relevant. The point is that charities and NGOs managing refugees classify adults as children because it advances their political preferences. Since they've proven they cannot be trusted their assertions mean nothing.

Hagar said...

Individuals leave to greener pastures, but everybody do not pick up and leave without also a powerful push from behind.
The first four caliphs established the rules for Sunni, Shia, Jews, Christians, and adherents of assorted other infidel faiths should live together in peace, which they more or less did for 1400 years.
So what changed with WWII?

One thing, of course, is the Age of Oil, which brought enormous amounts of money and new technologies and promises to the few who controlled the guns.

Milwaukie guy said...

A lot of young women marry men not like daddy. Post WW2 there were still a lot of big white ethnic groups of which Jews were one. For WASPs, Italians, Polish and Jews, etc., were sort of exotic, or Catholics even.

Referencing the above, does one think "My grandparents died in the camps" was a good pickup line?

Hagar said...

The armies of the world rode into WWI on horseback, but rode out in trucks - and mostly American made.

Leland said...

Seems odd to test Karma by praising it occurring in the form of injury and death to others. I would think it wiser to just point out your hatred for some group and leave aside mystical faith lest it be real and strikes you.

HoodlumDoodlum said...

Ann Althouse said...It's time to disaggregate "women and children."

Yes, but thinking deeply about it...maybe. If the women remain with the children it's not such an easy thing to separate them intellectually.

I listened to an NPR story this morning on Yazidi women who were kept for 3-5 years as sex slaves to ISIS men and have recently been freed--they are being forced to leave the children they had with ISIS men behind when they return to their homes. Yazidis consider the offspring of a Muslim and an Yazidi to be Muslim and will not accept such a child, so a woman who brings that baby back will be socially ostracized. The story was about an orphanage and the harrowing decision the women were making to leave their kids there. It was heartbreaking! (The orphanage was run by Kurds who said the children would be given good home with Kurdish families, and most of the kids were too young to really understand what was going on).
Anyway I was struck by the bronze-age nature of the ISIS problem. I read a fair amount of ancient history and the rules for conquering back then were such that the winning side would often enslave/sell off or murder all the men and old women and kidnap and rape the younger women of the defeated side. They imposed their victory on the bodies of the defeated women and forced them to assimilate by co-opting their very children! That's a degree of total war that's difficult to comprehend...until you realize that's exactly what ISIS did and would happily continue to do.

Those, of course, were women taken against their will. For women who volunteered to join ISIS and wanted to perpetuate that idea--in part by raising their children to be ISIS members/fighters...I'm not sure that should be forgiven and I'm not sure we should allow such people to keep their children. I mean, the kids themselves are innocent, sure. But I would not allow the mother and child back into society together just for the sake of the child. I would say "you were a fighter for this barbaric group and bear the guilt of their horrible crimes. You will never be allowed back in. Your child is innocent of your crimes and we will accept your child--if you give up custody we'll place them with someone here (possibly even someone in your family who did NOT decide to join ISIS). If you insist on keeping your child then you must both remain outside of our society forever."

Achilles said...

Every single Muslim country has committed genocide.

95% of adult Muslims alive today aided and participated in the elimination of at least one minority.

The religion and the culture are the problem.

Jim at said...

I really don’t understand why you people think that liberals have EVER been in the side of ISIS.

Maybe it was when you were openly cheering for the ISIS/freedom fighters during the Iraq War?

Michael said...

The quoted commenters are a sign, people, that there is a move to tell smug sanctimonious jackasses to sod the fuck off. Seeing it all around. New hope.

Michael said...

"Goes to show that rightist people really do NOT know how liberals think."
Goes to show that dim lefties are unaware that rightist people read the Washington Post. And the NYT. And the Boston Globe. And the Wall Street Journal. And the Financial Times. And The Times of London.

Inga...Allie Oop said...

“Goes to show that dim lefties are unaware that rightist people read the Washington Post. And the NYT. And the Boston Globe...”

How many many many times have we heard from rightist commenters here, “Thanks for reading the NYT, WaPo, etc. Althouse, so I don’t have to” after Althouse has linked to them in her blogpost.

Anonymous said...

Almost a test here (been a long time).

One thing that changed post-1948 is that Jewish communities from all parts of the Islamic world left/were forced out by the (usually) Baath Party dictatorships that came to infest it.

The Jews had been in these lands longer than the Muslims in most cases, and played a part in urban and economic life cognate with parts of Europe, with the added wrinkle that the European imperial powers often found the local Jews useful in administration.

The process took decades, and is almost unknown in the West.

As to someone's comment on US trucks powering victory in WWI--wrong war.

Better see if I can prove I'm not a robot . . .

Narr

Rick said...

"Goes to show that rightist people really do NOT know how liberals think."

It's odd she asserts not knowing how the other thinks is a character failing. Remember this comes from someone who claims all Republicans believe as Todd Akin does (among other idiocies).

Earnest Prole said...

Washington Post readers are culturally illiterate on both karma and Isis: With a death cult, even your own death is a feature, not a bug.

Big Mike said...

Goes to show that rightist people really do NOT know how liberals think. I really don’t understand why you people think that liberals have EVER been in the side of ISIS.

Well, I have spoken directly with a liberal Democrat who airily informed me that my objection to honor killings was Islamophobic. So that’s one data point. Also we get input from women like Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, and Linda Sarsour, and we can infer the feelings of mainstream liberal Democrats by their unwillingness to reign in these monsters.

Hagar said...

Right war.
"Most" probably is an exaggeration, but American business sold a lot of materiel to the warring countries in WWI - also to the Germans.

effinayright said...

People by the billions should jeer at these moronic monsters and ask them, "See what happens when you...

"Submit"?

JAORE said...

Do over. All I want is a do over.....

C'mon, ya big meanie.

Yeah.... no.

effinayright said...

Hagar said...
Right war.
"Most" probably is an exaggeration, but American business sold a lot of materiel to the warring countries in WWI - also to the Germans.
*********************

We traded with the Brits, Russians and French, as well as with the opposing Germans and the Austro-Hungarians.

We were officially NEUTRAL, you see, up til the date we declared war.

Do you expect businesses to be more moral and ethical than their government?

Alex said...

I wonder if we'll find out in a few years that ISIS murdered millions in Syria/Iraq and it was covered up by the UN.

Be said...

My mother, my worst and original abuser (don't get me started on that), told me once that she was praying for and lighting candles for OBL. I asked her why, and she told me that, if he Hated That Much, and Hurt So Much, He Obviously Was Hurting.


rcocean said...

Women and children are women and children. Anyone who goes for this "Lets kill 'em all and let God sort 'em out" is a moral pygmy. No surprise that all the "Bleeding heart" Liberals at Wapo are really merciless kid killers. As long as they're "the wrong sort".

Meanwhile, some ax-murderer might die on Death row. Oh the humanity!

FIDO said...

Shrug.

These things are simple to solve. That does not mean EASY.

Every man who is over the age of 15 who went to a Madras is to be executed. These Madras' will be burned and blown up.

Any man above the age of 16 who was in any leadership position above sergeant will be executed.

The men who were responsible for destroying the ancient artifacts will be used to destroy mosques and madrases.

Men who wish clemency for them and their families can do so by personally executing one of the Imans, leaders, and turn in all his families Korans.

They need a permanent marker to write the word 'Criminals of Islam' on their foreheads. It won't last forever, but it will warm people if groups of known violent malcontents are seen gathering so they can forestall it accordingly.

They must know that they LOST.


This is not to play nice. These people are rapists, murderers, and destroyers of other cultures.

Michael K said...

Anyone who goes for this "Lets kill 'em all and let God sort 'em out" is a moral pygmy.

Just call me General Tom Thumb.

FIDO said...

I always love the statement of how many 'children' die by gun violence a year.

That these 'children' were wearing gang colors, carrying guns and drugs, and were engaged in tribal ethnic cleansing is somehow overlooked in the details.

And the women? What moral responsibility do women own? When Sharifa was looking at the rings on her fingers that her husband cut off the hands of some woman he murdered, when she berated and abused the Christian female slaves for not doing the housework to her satisfaction...what kind of 'mulligan' are such women owed?


This is not to say that these women were fully autonomous women with political strength. But before we just give wholesale forgiveness to them, maybe we ask their slaves how these women comported themselves before Althouse talks us into going all weepy eyed and soft for them.


Equality means that women can be horrible, monument destroying, enslaving, murdering and gay son murdering advocates as easily as men. And the hand that rocks the cradle is the hand that rules the world.


I do not fully push for this, but a good counter argument needs to be made.

FIDO said...

What clemency is Hoda Mothana owed? She left America to fight for ISIS. She spread her legs for not just one, but THREE ISIS fighters (I assume the men went on to their virgins before she moved on to the next man. After all, just because she is a terrorist doesn't mean she is a SLUT!)

She is a woman who attacked people and America. She has a child. She picked Syria over America and has no comment as to why.

What is this woman and her child owed?

MB said...

The Syria they are living in is no worse, in many ways better, than the Syria they were trying to build for everyone else.
Had their men fought harder, now the Alawite men would be dead and the women and children would probably not even be in refugee camps, but rather sold as slaves at the caliphate slave markets.

They are pulling at gullible Westerners' heartstrings. However, the same Saudi, Omani, Qatari, Emirati, and perhaps Kuwaiti Islamic charities that propped this absurd endeavor (ISIS) should properly be the ones to take care of these widows and orphans now. The Persian states are rich, they can afford it. I just don't see why the West should be on the hook for this one.

They took their chances and earned their prize. Better luck next time.

FIDO said...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qQza2eHQeQ

"God bless the IS and may He give them protection and permanence." said one Iraqi woman with child. "Look at her! Her clothes are a pathway to Hell." said about a female producer in a sweatshirt and baggy jeans.

I wish things were easy enough to say 'women and children'.

FIDO said...

Whatever aid we give them, it should be far less than 5.7 billion. Since we can't afford that much money for our own people.

Just saying.

narciso said...

There was an episode of le femme nikita, from 1999, where the protagonist is lured against section, by a fmr founder with the detail that outfit has as much as sponsored Saddam as well as other warlords. The successor tells her they had to so this to prevent greater horrors. This was two years before September 11th and four years before the invasion. Of course ota a European outfit likely dgese

narciso said...

Which in reality had very cozy ties with the baathists at least since the 70s, were likely involved in the oil for food program concessions along with German and Russian outfits