Anderson Cooper: He was showing you his own picture on the cover of a magazine.
Stormy Daniels: Right, right. And so I was like, "Does this-- does this normally work for you?" And he looked very taken-- taken back, like, he didn't really understand what I was saying. Like, I was-- does, just, you know, talking about yourself normally work?" And I was like, "Someone should take that magazine and spank you with it." (LAUGH) And I'll never forget the look on his face. He was like--
Anderson Cooper: What-- what was his look?
Stormy Daniels: Just, I don't think anyone's ever spoken to him like that, especially, you know, a young woman who looked like me. And I said, you know, "Give me that," and I just remember him going, "You wouldn't." "Hand it over." And-- so he did, and I was like, turn around, drop 'em."
Anderson Cooper: You-- you told Donald Trump to turn around and take off his pants.
Stormy Daniels: Yes.
Anderson Cooper: And did he?
Stormy Daniels: Yes. So he turned around and pulled his pants down a little -- you know had underwear on and stuff and I just gave him a couple swats.
Anderson Cooper: This was done in a joking manner....
২৫ মার্চ, ২০১৮
I watched the Stormy Daniels show on "60 Minutes." Did you?
Video and transcript here, in case you need to catch up.
এতে সদস্যতা:
মন্তব্যগুলি পোস্ট করুন (Atom)
পোস্টগুলি
২২০টি মন্তব্য:
220 এর 1 – থেকে 200 আরও নতুন» সবচেয়ে নতুন»The important question for Anderson Cooper was the size of his member.
Do you think it was bigger than Barack Obama? Bill Clinton? Webster Hubbell?
The MSM is descending into madness.
A rather contemptuous act, don't you think? Isn't the contract still legally binding?
I thought Anderson's question about teabagging went a little too far.
Right, right. And so I was like, "Does this-- does this normally work for you?"
Sounds like it worked to me.
Lets face it. Sex with a stranger can be an awkward activity requiring a sense of humor. But did The Donald score using that cooperativly tactical tactic? That's all we really want to know. The heroic part is he has spent $200,000 on Stormy by now just to win the 2016 election over Hillar, all for our benefit.
Daniels' lawyer is betting the Trump camp won't help him keep Daniels in the news by countersuing for breach of contract.
I'm not sure why anybody cares about this whore on television.
Or Stormy Daniels.
It's as far as a germaphobe would go with a porn star. Maybe a I should repeat the list of Bill Clinton's (not a germaphobe) hundred women.
I am so very glad that all important issues in the world have been settled so that time can be devoted to things like this. Maybe I'll call an old girlfriend from my freshman college year and have her discuss my fumbling attempts to undo her bra with Anderson Cooper, next.
Coin Slot!
This story does 2 things:
First it demonstrates the people who own the democrats and the media think Anderson Cooper is a tool and a whore.
The second thing is it shows the democrat tools don't mind being tools and don't believe a single thing they say.
Ann Althouse: wading through the sludge so we don't have to.
He banged a porn star ten years ago. This is breaking news?
He also disarmed a rogue nuclear state without firing a shot.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I didn't watch the Stormy Daniels interview because I could care less what two consenting adults do in the bedroom. Also, I haven't watched 60 minutes since they stopped being journalists and started their useful idiot act.
Funny thing is that today it suddenly bcame depressingly clear to me the everything on Cable News and NetWork News has become a pure propaganda productions. It used to be 60/40 propaganda, but now it's gone 100/0 propaganda.
I think the story makes Stormy, her lawyer, and Anderson Cooper look far worse than Trump. Some of the things she and her lawyer said were absurdly self serving, and Cooper let them pass without raising an eyebrow. The subtext of Trump's campaign and presidency is that the media are untrustworthy and biased. This interview is supportive of Trump's position on media bias.
Anderson Cooper He's your guy for serious sex journalism. Not going to watch but I bet he had his intense shit eating face on.
No I didn't watch, didn't read your post except the first line and didn't read any comments. I bet I didn't miss squat.
So, what actually was in Capone’s vault? What was the anticipated shocker?
From the transcript:
In May 2011, Daniels agreed to tell her story to a sister publication of In Touch magazine for $15,000 dollars. Two former employees of the magazine told us the story never ran because after the magazine called Mr. Trump seeking comment, his attorney Michael Cohen threatened to sue. Daniels says she was never paid, and says a few weeks later, she was threatened by a man who approached her in Las Vegas.
Stormy Daniels: I was in a parking lot, going to a fitness class with my infant daughter. T-- taking, you know, the seats facing backwards in the backseat, diaper bag, you know, gettin' all the stuff out. And a guy walked up on me and said to me, "Leave Trump alone. Forget the story." And then he leaned around and looked at my daughter and said, "That's a beautiful little girl. It'd be a shame if something happened to her mom." And then he was gone.
We now have a credible claim that an associate of the President of the United States threatened violence against a woman in order to silence her. This seems to be a pretty big story.
We now have a credible claim
So what makes it credible? The fact that she is a glory seeking porn star, or the fact that she's selling her story?
The lying ARM said: "We now have a credible claim that an associate of the President of the United States threatened violence against a woman in order to silence her. This seems to be a pretty big story. "
You are despicable.
Reasonable? Are you serious?
"... feel free to spew what you like."
Well then, I can feel free to spew puke on this post.
The lying ARM said: "We now have a credible claim that an associate of the President of the United States threatened violence against a woman in order to silence her. This seems to be a pretty big story. "
You are despicable.
Reasonable? Are you serious?
Credible . . . how, ARM? Just because you believe a thing does not make it credible.
Credible would be if a police report was filed, if the threatening individual was identified, and if his connection to Trump was verified.
Just saying a thing is "credible" does not make it so.
Why didn't she just say no?
Gahrie said...
So what makes it credible?
The bulk of her story is verifiable. To date, at least, nothing in the In Touch interview has been disproved. There are two new elements in this interview: the threat of physical violence and the threat of legal action against In Touch if they ran her earlier interview, which explains why that never ran. This second element has been verified by former In Touch employees. So, in a multi-element story, everything other than the threat of violence has passed at least some level of verification. Why would she tell a lie about this one element in the context of otherwise being apparently truthful?
Why lie about the physical threat that can’t be verified?
New news / facts, to stay in the news is one potential reason.
This was done in a joking manner....
No, Andy. It was done in Trump Tower's penthouse conference room, in the middle of legal negotiations with the lawyers & support staff present.
Sheesh (pardon my French).
Ray said...
to stay in the news is one potential reason.
It's possible. There will presumably be some follow up to assess the truthfulness of this aspect of her story.
A queer interviewing a whore on prime time TV.
Wouldn't have been fun to hear the interviews with Obama's white girlfriends from university on "60 Minutes" with Cooper:
"And then I said 'Ooooh, baby, whip out the black snake! Whip out the black snake!'"
Strange that we never saw any of that. I guess because it would have been seen by the media as invasive, demeaning, & uncouth.
Just like this.
I would guess Trump haters are feeling very disappointed right now.
"We now have a credible claim..."
Did she file a police report?
Im thinking Peter Thiel -style lawsuit.
May be worthwhile, if payments, or promises, turn up.
Very deep pockets behind this.
I guess Melania is saving herself for Trump's big coronation, er, coronary. With Trump confined to his sickbed in the Lincoln Bedroom, Melania can run the country from the Oval Office unencumbered by Trump's inanities. She will become the first de facto woman president. Good luck, Madame President!
"The bulk of her story is verifiable."
So the part where Trump bangs her is verifiable? Or is that, somehow, the only part that is not verifiable?
Bill Clinton would never have been impeached if Monica hadn't kept the stained dress. The most important part of her story was unverifiable until it was produced, and tested positive for Bill Clinton's DNA. Until that moment, Clinton denied everything, and the press took his side.
Daniels is on record refuting everything in her In Touch interview. It was not published at the time. Either because she got the desired hush money from NBC or In Touch got cold feet because of potential legal action. Now, when "resistance" is a top virtue, In Touch published the piece. So, credible claim? Right. Just like Stormy's denials.
Why the condom question? Aimed at Melania?
I'm checking out 4chan like I normally do, seeing what crazy shit people are up to, and of course there is a lot about Stormy Daniels, and some of it is pretty funny. Some of it could be seen as a spirited discussion of the philosophical similarities and differences between being a prostitute and being a porn star, and some of it is just pictures of chicks spreading their ass cheeks and showing their asshole. So it is kinda like an Althouse comment thread, except with pictures of chicks spreading their ass cheeks and showing their asshole.
Some of the 4chan commenters express the opinion that all sex with women is essentially a transaction involving money in one way or another. Mostly by calling women whore, pretty much. Which I think is a little overboard, but if 4chan wasn't overboard you wouldn't have anime cartoons of women being fucked by tentacles and you wouldn't have pictures of chicks spreading their ass cheeks and showing their asshole, so you take the good with the bad.
And taking the good with the bad happens when reading Althouse comments, so that pretty much happens everywhere, just not with pictures of chicks spreading their ass cheeks and showing their asshole.
But after I left 4chan and went to the earlier post on Stormy here at Althouse it hit me: I've seen the asshole of a woman who had sex with the President of the United States. I mean, maybe one of Bill Clinton's women had nude pictures out there, but I bet at most it was hairy 90s bush, not pictures of her asshole.
Like, could you even picture that happening with John Kennedy? Like you could see a picture of his head being blown apart in Dallas AND a picture of Jackie's asshole? It's hard to imagine, I know.
But you can watch videos of Stormy being fucked in the ass by black men with big black cocks. And it doesn't even cost you any money, you can see it for free. I bet if there WAS a picture of Jackie Kennedy's asshole you would've had to pay a lot of money to see it. Especially in the 60s.
I mean, maybe there is some video that shows Michelle Obama being fucked in the ass by Barack with his black cock, but she's black too, so it doesn't have the interracial thing going for it, which some people find hot and shit. And I bet there are more gay men that would want to see a picture of Barack's asshole than straight men that want to see a picture of Michelle's asshole, but I'm just guessing there, really.
So I've seen the asshole of a woman who had sex with the President of the United States, which is pretty cool. But I think it's just the idea that is cool, because Stormy Daniels' asshole looks pretty much like most girls' assholes in pictures of them spreading their ass cheeks. Maybe there are pictures of Anderson Cooper's asshole out there on the internet, and people just don't know it's him. I wouldn't be that surprised, really.
"A queer interviewing a whore on prime time TV."
Your epithets are so charming.
Lewis Wetzel said...
So the part where Trump bangs her is verifiable?
Trump can sue her for slander and stand up under oath and deny that he did it. In the absence of that statement one can reasonably assume that he did what she said he did. He has certainly taken steps to keep the story out of public view, which doesn't improve perceptions of credibility on his part.
You know, I know that the media think that they're doing this to demean Trump, & if you loath Trump, I guess it works. But, unless you're already a loather, the question becomes: Is this how any human being, much less the president, should be treated? With his most intimate moments discussed on national TV?
I mean, do we get to do this to Anderson Cooper & the rest of the media? Are their sex lives fair game? What's next -- "On the Down Low, with Morley Safer"?
I tuned in, expecting to witness a gay conversion video, Stormy setting Anderson straight.
The poor production values were promising, as was the simple-minded dialogue. But no cable repairman came knocking at the door of the set, nor was Stormy appropriately attired to answer the door, much less demonstrate to Anderson what he'd been missing all these years (much less illustrating that anal is always available here too!).
Biggest disappointment since Geraldo opened Al Jolson's vault.
@ARM:
I bet you still have your Move On T shirt hanging in your closet, don't you?
"Trump can sue her for slander and stand up under oath and deny that he did it. In the absence of that statement one can reasonably assume that he did what she said he did."
Lulz
This sounds shockingly similar to the time Margaret Thatcher spanked Christopher Hitchens -- Google it if you don't believe me.
YoungHegelian said...
the question becomes: Is this how any human being, much less the president, should be treated? With his most intimate moments discussed on national TV?
This is a fair point but Trump helped create this world when he dragged Bill Clinton's accusers into the debate with Hillary Clinton. It was an audacious, anti-PC act, but it was also begging for blow-back. Live by the sword and die by the sword, or at least expect to take a few cuts.
Well, wouldn't you always know it.
Sadists are always masochists.
Doms are always subs.
It's the republican way. Kiss up kick down.
Trump loved it.
Fucking weirdo.
YoungHegelian said...
the question becomes: Is this how any human being, much less the president, should be treated? With his most intimate moments discussed on national TV?
LOL.
The Republican begs for decency, civility and discretion.
Ok, Ken Starr supporter.
Didn't I tell everyone here that Trump would be the Republican Bill Clinton? Didn't I?
It's being discussed on national TV because of the lengths to which he goes to trap people in NDAs. We know that there is much that he doesn't want publicized. He has a long history of treating people unethically or abusing his legal resources to terrorize them and that makes this story at least as newsworthy as the salaciousness of his boinking a big-titted porn star.
Now, truth be told, the Playboy bunny was sexier than any piece o' ass that Clinton got with and much respect for that. Plus, she seemed very sweet, even. (Although she was a Republican. No one's perfect).
I respected him for that. But he needs to have the Stormy Daniels David Dennison crap thrown at him with full force. You guys might shrug off all his lies as a function of the post-truth internet age, but his reliance on NDAs is important. He can only be allowed to hide from so much. And BTW what about those tax releases? Who else has something on him?
@TTR/ARM,
Wait?! You guys thought Trump started the "sex business" against the Clintons?
Nope. He started the "Crooked Hillary" alright, but it was the Clintonistas who started the sex stuff in the hopes of disgracing Trump in front of the Christian Right.
Think about it -- who had more to gain by smearing the other with charges of sexual misconduct?
Sorry, check your timetable & you'll see who started the "sex troubles" charges first.
I mean, do we get to do this to Anderson Cooper & the rest of the media? Are their sex lives fair game?
Does he force people to sign NDAs or sue them into oblivion because of it?
You people have no concept of what corruption even is.
"...better put some ice on that" she said, after swatting him with the magazine.
I don't care about him trotting out Clinton's accusers. I think that was a smart move and fair game.
I'm talking about Trump the corrupt, lying NDA-signature-seeking cooze hound. If he can't admit who he had sex with that's one thing (although a pussy-ass move). But it shows his pattern of intimidating anyone to lie for him that he doesn't want to tell the truth. I couldn't care less that it starts with a "sexual" NDA other than for how salacious it is. If he has to take hits for his NDA shenanigans in the balls first then so be it. And oh yeah fuck you too Michael Cohen. These assholes who will lie to the end for Trump should be garroted. Poor schmuck never even got his 130 grand reimbursed. Just goes to show you that the most loyal to Trump get screwed over the most. Same problem Hillary had. They're both cancers on the body politic and need to go away.
Corruption is signing an NDA, getting handsomely paid for it, and not abiding by it. Corruption is interviewing someone on TV for the sole purpose of getting that person to violate an NDA to smear a political enemy and undermine a duly elected president.
If you are working on getting an NDA, make sure it is from a reputable, fully accredited Whore School.
Ritmo and Beclowned Commenter ARM are into coprophilia--in every sense of the term. Who are we to judge?
This interview was a real bust. Cooper gave her no support. It was just a bunch of tit for tat. I try to keep abreast of the news but more and more everthing just seems falsified, augmented for ratings. If I were to rate this broadcast, I give it a D.
I expected more from "60 Minutes" but the boob tube is just the boob tube, I guess.
"Trump can sue her for slander and stand up under oath and deny that he did it. In the absence of that statement one can reasonably assume that he did what she said he did."
Do you really believe this, ARM? Do you think that A Reasonable Man would believe that, if a public figure does not sue his accusers, it means that they are telling the truth?
Have the Clinton's sued every person who accused them of some wickedness for slander? Did Obama sue the people who said he was born in Kenya (like Trump) for slander? Do we then have to believe the accuser?
Thinking this through should be child's play for A Reasonable Man.
Whoever removed Toothless' teeth prior to their intimate act apparently didn't pay him to sign an NDA. So now NDAs are the worst corruption ever.
Meh. Even my trump hating friends could care less and are watching NCAA March madness. Im trying to understand what the scandal here is, can someone help me out? Two people having sex? Or just a duly elected republican president having sex 12 years ago? Asking for a friend.
Louche? Yes. Out of character? No. Exploitative? Yes. Trivial? Yes. Ten years out of date? Yes. Interesting? No. Self-revealing? Yes.
Why does CBS discredit itself this way?
I'm sure Whore School taught Toothless not to get lowballed on NDAs, just as I'm sure being toothless ups the asking price.
Bill Clinton was credibly accused of sexual harassment of state employees, rape, & using state employees as sexual procurers when governor. As President, he was accused of lying under oath about an affair with an employee very much his junior.
All of which is both immoral & illegal.
If Trump is guilty of something illegal here, point it out. If he's not, then why exactly are we doing this?
ABC has a photo of a tweet from her lawyer that shows a DVD in a safe.
That would be extortion in my book.
A DVD in a safe is what they teach in Whore School. A reputable Whore School teaches not to show it in a tweet or on TV before you get paid.
ARM descends into the levels plumbed by Andy Sullivan re Sarah Palin.
Oh, lots of right-wing hate here tonight.
They must know I'm right.
Assholes, every single one of them. Trump is going down. First term, too. Not the second.
He'll be Clintonized quicker than you can say Ken Starr.
I only caught part of the interview with the lawyer, and he was lame. He would answer the question, and then throw a curve, but the curves were pretty much ignored by Cooper. After a few minutes I clicked to a documentary about ancient Rome on PBS.
Lewis Wetzel said...
if a public figure does not sue his accusers, it means that they are telling the truth?
Straw man. There is quite a bit of supporting evidence in the form of friends testimony, corroboration of dates, and the actions of Trump or at least of Trump's legal team/thugs. This supporting evidence, together with Stormy's own statements suggests that she is a credible witness. But, if Trump came out and made a sworn statement that it was all a pack of lies, that would obviously have to be taken into consideration. How much it would count in the court of public opinion is open to debate. For a lot of people the whore has more credibility than the President.
This seems to be as silly as the "Obama was born in Kenya" thing. What did the "birthers" hope to accomplish? Did they think that producing a Kenyan birth certificate or Kenyan witnesses would result in Obama being led out of the White House in cuffs?
Dream on. I used to tell those guys that I thought the real story was that Barack H. Obama was born on August 4, 1961, at Queen's in Honolulu, but the the person we know as Barack H. Obama is really a cousin that was born at the same time, but in Kenya, and the infants were swapped.
The infamy!
If Trump is guilty of something illegal here, point it out. If he's not, then why exactly are we doing this?
Because it shows the lengths he goes to to cover up. Anyone who knows anything about the presidency knows it's not a one-person job and this fuckface has a habit of pushing out all the human leashes on him and replacing them with yes-men. It's dangerous. Self-delusion is the most dangerous trait one can have in a president. Have we ever had one as self-delusional and allegedly omnipotent as Trump. He's going down. Everything about him is a lie. Someone who goes to this many lengths to conceal everything simply has no business being president. A country cannot be governed on making self-serving, reputation-saving, desperate lies out of everything. Much as Republicans have made a habit out of thinking the exact opposite.
Wait! I didn't watch but I tho't there was going to be video I could watch via Politico, Puffington Host, Media Mutters. Sadly disappointed that MSM again served up a nothingburger. BTW, gotta love all the little pajama boyz getting their pebbles off fantasizing they can get Trump level sex.
Because it shows the lengths he goes to to cover up.
Much better to let her suffocate in a car while you wait until you sober up to call for help, or God knows what happened to Marilyn Monroe, or to turn the entire press into an attack machine calling her a nut and a slut, the way the Clintons would deal with this.
At least Trump didn't go to those lengths.
Straw man. There is quite a bit of supporting evidence in the form of friends testimony, corroboration of dates, and the actions of Trump or at least of Trump's legal team/thugs.
This from a guy who ignores the multiple witnesses under oath that Juanita brought forward, including the one who found her crying and bleeding with torn clothes in the hotel room.
Sorry, guys. You are not treating the propaganda as propaganda. It's about showing Trump as the uber-cad, screwing porn stars and Playboy centerfolds, to make the nice suburban married women think twice about submitting to their husbands (you know they did, right?) and vote for that uncouth alpha male or his supposed GOP allies again.
Yeah, yeah, so Clinton was worse. But that's not how it plays. Aided and abetted, of course, by the left's eager and useful idiots.
Beloved Commenter AReasonableMan said...
Ray said...
to stay in the news is one potential reason.
It's possible. There will presumably be some follow up to assess the truthfulness of this aspect of her story.
3/25/18, 9:19 PM
Right. If I am a shyster lawyer looking for big bucks and a way to make Sit look like a thug approached Stormy, I would hire a guy to do it in a parking lot with video cameras. Daniels doen't need to be in on it. That way, she believes it came from a Trump supporter.
So, expect video
I skimmed through the transcript and gave up after 3 minutes.
So, in other words: Trump had sex with a porn star. 12 years ago. Why is this news?
60 Minutes would NEVER have done this to Clinton or Obama. I know it, you know it, even Bob Dole Knows it.
The real purpose: Humiliate the FLOTUS. Next 60 minutes interviews a Baron Trump classmate who claims he peed his pants in kindergarten.
Gut feeling is the media is over playing this sex scandal, and it demeans them and hurts their reputation / credibility even more.
Everyone knows Trump is an adulter / cheater, and the sudden moral police act by the press is hypocrisy. It’s interest to watch.
You've switched from saying that Daniels' story is credible ("We now have a credible claim that an associate of the President of the United States threatened violence against a woman in order to silence her.")
To a suggestion that her story is credible ("his supporting evidence, together with Stormy's own statements suggests that she is a credible witness")
Trump has denied that Daniel's story is true.
And anyway, you are retreating from your statement that if a public figure disputes a damaging story, but does not sue the story teller for slander, it is reasonable to assume that the story is true.
Porn actresses are hookers. They perform sex acts for money. I suppose that they make poor witnesses. Believing a porn actress's story because because she sounds credible -- I wish that there was a better emoji for laughter.
Much better to let her suffocate in a car while you wait until you sober up to call for help, or God knows what happened to Marilyn Monroe
Wut?
Oh.. right. The Kennedys.
I guess now it's not enough to run 2018 as if he were still stuck in the 2016 election but his guys now have to convince themselves that they're running against dead politicians from the 1960s.
Oh well. Whatever it takes to avoid addressing the relevant issue of today. What's next? Comparing him favorably to Pontius Pilate? You cucks will do anything to avoid the point, won't you.
"Think about it -- who had more to gain by smearing the other with charges of sexual misconduct? "
You're asking Ritmo to think ?
HAHAHAHAHA
Feeding trolls is an exercise similar to interviewing whores on TV.
@TTR,
Self-delusion is the most dangerous trait one can have in a president. Have we ever had one as self-delusional and allegedly omnipotent as Trump.
So, Trump's a shit. As opposed to who else who's been president? Carter was a nice guy, but you see where that got him.
Everything you said may be true, but it isn't illegal. It's not impeachable. Period. Work to vote him out of office the next time around.
Buuuuut, in going after Trump liberals (& I mean liberals not lefties) have sacrificed the principle that justice requires the respect of procedure. The child murderer walks when the police fail to read him him his rights on arrest because procedure works to guarantee principle. In their treatment of Trump, liberals have burned every procedural bridge that stood in their way. They had better win, because if not, they will reap their whirlwind.
Michael K should know. He's both fed whores and interviewed trolls.
So, Trump's a shit.
He's dangerously self-deluded. It's a problem of competence, not just character.
In his former lives, he could get anyone to lie for him. This wasn't a problem when he ran a marketing empire or tv show - other than for bankrupting AC and stiffing the contractors. -- OH< THIS IS WHY FULL MOON LOVES HIM!!! TRUMP WAS A "PIMP" AND STIFFED HIS CONTRACTORS!!! GREAT! SHOWS HOW SMART HE IS!!! - ok, back to the thread.
If you think a country of 300 million can be run on lies all designed to pay homage to and kiss ass of the would-be king, you must want to think we should transform ourselves into an economy based on reality tv and real estate. Soft industries.
At some point, to succeed we're going to need a nation that's better than one that could be "led" by a pathological liar and delusional narcissist. A republic where facts don't matter and lies and flattery get you everywhere is definitely one that's ready to fall.
@TTR,
A republic where facts don't matter and lies and flattery get you everywhere is definitely one that's ready to fall.
You know very well that the response of most commenters here to that would be "You mean, like for the last eight years?"
"Revolutionary" says:
In his former lives, he could get anyone to lie for him. This wasn't a problem when he ran a marketing empire or tv show - other than for bankrupting AC and stiffing the contractors. -- OH< THIS IS WHY FULL MOON LOVES HIM!!! TRUMP WAS A "PIMP" AND STIFFED HIS CONTRACTORS!!! GREAT! SHOWS HOW SMART HE IS!!! - ok, back to the thread.
Don't know why he would stiff contractors. Just needs some of those "million dollar cash advance" credit card you believe people used to crash the housing market
Hahaha, what an idiot !
We are behind here on the West Coast but it would have been more interesting if Trump had done it in the White House pool.
You know very well that the response of most commenters here to that would be "You mean, like for the last eight years?"
That's cause they don't think and respond emotionally.
Obama was pretty open-minded on policy. The fact that he was charismatic is just something that gets under their skin. Show me a single policy that he could just be persuaded to go with based on what the last person said and how they flattered him.
Don't know why he would stiff contractors.
Well, you don't know much. But I guess you could always ask him. You two are real buddy-buddy, aren't you? I mean, he lets his belly flab over his belt and you show him your overall wearing ass crack and have a few beers over KFC and it's all good, right?
Just needs some of those "million dollar cash advance" credit card you believe people used to crash the housing market.
Link to where what you put in quotes was said, SILLY BOY! AND BTW YOU STILL WERE DELETED!
But that quote didn't happen. You did say you were buying a million dollar property, though. I can get the comment on where it was (6 miles from Google?) before you deleted it and figured bragging about specific personal investments just to pull your put was kind of a stupid thing to do.
I feel more comfortable with Presidents like Carter and the Bushes--guys who can make their marriage work. That said, the historical record shows that the American public doesn't consider infidelity a deal breaker. There's nothing much to admire in Trump's marital history, but there have been recent presidents who scandals were greater. The big difference is in the way the media has covered or covered up the different scandals. This story doesn't make Trump look good, but it makes the media look worse.......Does anyone believe that that lawyer has Stormy's best interests in mind? Stormy reminds me of Monica Lewinsky? She thought she could play the game to her advantage but ended up hors de combat.
The Toothless Revolutionary said...
********************
Not toothless, just gormless.
Trump should at least be criticized for not wearing a condom.
Toothless subtly says:
Oh... HAAA ... AHHEEE HONEY.... ROLLL YOUR EYES AT ME AND HAND ME OVER THE SAVINGS TO GET ME THE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS TO PURCHASE THAT HOUSE! FUCK THESE COLLEGE EDUCATED KIDS AND THEIR TECHNOLOGY. I"M GETTING LAID TONIGHT AND LEARNING BIG WORDS LIKE "APPEAL TO AUTHORITY!" MAN, I"M SO COOL!!!! NOW HOW COME EVERYONE HERE HATES ME? SAN FRANCISCO SUCKS BUT IT"S AWESOME AND IT HAS LOTS OF MONEY BUT TOO MANY COLLEGE EDUCATED AASSHOLES BUT I HATE COLLEGE DROPOUTS AND ACCUS EEVERYONE OF BEING ONE (LIKE ME) AND NO ONE HAS AS MUCH SEX AS ME HOOO OHAAAAAHAA AND I READ A BLOG ALL DAY AND NIGHT WHERE PEOPLE TALK ABOUT POLITICS AND POLICY BUT NOT SAWING TWO BY FOURS OH FUCK THEM AND LOVE ME AND I SAVE ALL KINDS OF COMMENTS FOR YEARS BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE STUPID BUT I"M SUCH A GENIOUSSSSSSSS$$$$$$
Not crazy.
That's good with the bold font. Not sure how anyone would notice it otherwise and obviously you had to further embellish it somehow, right?
Nope, you're not anywhere near being deleted. Copying comments that mock you over and over again really are necessary and add to the discussion, contractor.
Now go build me a mini-bar, pronto! And pick up your overalls! They're sagging again and no one wants to see your hairy ass crack.
Stormy is now 39 years old - for porn stars, that's getting up there in age. Lotta miles on those tires. What do porn stars do for a second act in their lives?
I'm dead serious. Does she settle down and get married? Well, she's already on husband no. 3, so that's a good thing, I reckon. What's Stormy's husband do for a living? I wonder if it's hard being hitched to a porn star.
So many questions.
10 year old consensual, adulterous sex plus an NDA.
Sorry, doesn't amount to a hill o' beans. Alas, the Get Trump Squad may peel away a few gullible Trump voters in Nov. That's the goal.
Politics 24/7
I think contractor moon hates SF because he figures he can rip those buyers/sellers off even worse and as a contractor he's already an unethical scumbag who overcharges enough as is already.
Oh Honey! Go get me a house! And some friends to hang out with! Am I getting laid tonight! Can't I do it Trump style with a porn star or Playboy bunny? Would that be sexist? Contractors need to be very politically correct on the job!
Of course, TOOTHLESS was not done:
NOW WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT? HAHAHAHAHAH! WHAT A LOSER! HONEY GO ROLL YOUR EYES AT THIS SHITBAG FULLMOON! LOL LOLOLOLOLO!!!! I'm SO FUNNY! MAYBE I SHOULD RENOUNCE MY DEGREE AND TELL MY COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY TO HELP ME SAW TWO BY FOURS AND BUILD SHIT! GET ME SOME CARHARTS AND FIT RIGHT IN WITH TEH BAY AREA ASSHOLES!!!! THEY BELIEVE SCIENCE AND WHAT THEY LEARN IN SCHOOL WHAT A BUNCH OF FOOL! THEY DRIVE MY SALARY UP BUT FUCK THEM - THNKING THEY"RE SO IMPORTATN! MY WIFE KNOWS MORE AND SHE DIDN"T RUN ANYTHING BUT AN ALL-GIRLS' PRISON SQUAD BACK IN TIJUANA! Oh! OH! OHHHHHH> I"M SO AWESOME BUT I HATE ASSHOLES!!!! GO GET AN EDUCATION - NO WAIT COLLEGE SUCKS -- NO WAIT - I"M NOT A LOSER EVERYONE LOVES THEIR CONTRACTOR THEY"RE KNOWN FOR BEING GREAT GUYS!!!! REALLY INTERESTING TRUMP RULES AGW IS A MYTH I NEVER WENT TO SCHOOL AND I MAKE ALL THE ROOLZ ON THIS BLOG BUT I'm NOT SURE IF I SHOULD BE NICE TO ALTHOUSE OR MEAN. SOMEONE HELP ME OUT HEREEEEEEE
3/25/18, 11:34 PM
Life is good.
That was neat.
Can you blow up the font, a few sizes now?
I mean, you are a contractor, after all. Can't do your own work, just pay someone else to make it smaller or bigger.
And charge an arm and a leg.
Contractors should learn how to not cross-post. What was posted in one thread shouldn't be blown up into another. It's kind of like building a toilet in the kitchen. I'm sure FullMooch has made this mistake many times. It was like the time he installed that garbage disposal in the living room. What a fiasco.
Dude, tell us about CO2 and the climate, again. That was a riot.
I imagine you teaching kids this shit while your denim overalls fall off and your belly flab and ass crack start to show. Well Kids, ya see here, it's kind of like the T-square. Plus, ya gotta insulate it or else the buyer will sue.
Toothless claims a credit card will give a million dollar cash advance.
Let that sink in.
The Toothless Revolutionary said..."Follow the Rules"
What a 'revolutionary". Follow the rules, LOL
Contractors should learn how to not cross-post. What was posted in one thread shouldn't be blown up into another. It's kind of like building a toilet in the kitchen.....
"Build a toilet" LOL!
Stop, you're killin' me !
Oh, you're still claiming I said that.
Still claiming you never got deleted, either, I bet.
This is why everyone thinks their contractor's a scumbag.
Yep, you let your lies sink in. Like putty.
Do you like to caulk? Do you like the black caulk or the white caulk?
Stop, you're killin' me !
Could you please die already, then?
Build a toilet, install a toilet, wood, would.
You wood know the difference. Make sure that on career day you show up and tell those kids that you just install toilets. You NEVER build them.
It's late and I'm arguing with a contractor who obviously never spends a waking hour on his projects. Damn, I guess it's true all those shows I've seen where the contractor is out to lunch.
Mark my words - FULLMOON is heading for an episode of Home Inspection Nightmares, no doubt.
Well, Bye !
Go build that toilet, moon.
Tote that bale. Rule Breaker
Bay Area Guy said...
Stormy is now 39 years old - for porn stars, that's getting up theree in age. Lotta miles on those tires. What do porn stars do for a second act in their lives?
A couple of decades ago I had a girlfriend who had been a porn actress. The sex was good, but she was crazy. Drug use was a symptom, not a cause, of the craziness. Daddy issues, ran away from home when she was thirteen & started doing porn.
We broke up after a few months & then took it up again a few years later. Then broke up again. She hadn't changed. Hope she's okay, but I expect she had a bad end. A good girl, at heart. Poor little rich girl from Malibu.
It is fun to watch TTR pretend that Daniels willingly signing an NDA for $130,000 is somehow proof that Trump is a bad person. Or that that makes this a legitimate attack.
The leftists don't believe a word they say. They don't have a single principle except power over other people.
In other news TTR's ideological allies in South Africa are taking all of the farmer's land and equipment. Only the white farmers though. That makes it ok. Why do the lefties want their political opponents disarmed?
Total mystery.
"Why didn't she just say no?"
She said she thought it was what she deserved for meeting him in his room. She thought, "oh here we go, ugh!"
Porn may be consenting, but it draws in people who do not value themselves. Actions can be legal, but doesn't mean they are moral. Consent doesn't mean the actions do not hurt others and oneself.
He didn't use a condom. She didn't say anything. Again, not valuing herself enough.
He didn't value himself or Melania enough, if his marriage is sexual.
"Does anyone believe that that lawyer has Stormy's best interests in mind? Stormy reminds me of Monica Lewinsky? She thought she could play the game to her advantage but ended up hors de combat."
Stormy comes across as more damaged but stronger then Monica. Monica was just a kid, what, 21? and Stormy is now 39, so big age and experience difference.
Lawyers gonna lawyer. Depends what we mean by best interests. I wouldn't be surprised if he makes it rain for Stormy.
Oh I know. South Africa. Somehow it has a thing at all to do with Trump's cover ups.
DO me a favor Achilles Babe and think of me when you hit that hash pipe and jam that T shot into your ass tonight.
"Stormy is now 39 years old"
She looks a lot older than that. Rode hard and put away wet many times, although she looks pretty dried out now.
Kinda disappointed that Trump didn't use a cigar on her.
HowardKurtz
✔
@HowardKurtz
So Stormy's 2 key allegations, involving hush money & alleged threat, can't be proven. She says she doesn't know who's behind them
5:23 PM - Mar 25, 2018
HowardKurtz
✔
@HowardKurtz
Oh, and Stormy Daniels didn't produce any photos or other documentation regarding Trump, as he lawyer implied she would
5:27 PM - Mar 25, 2018
I see we are done here.
Perhaps Stormy has more "evidence" laid out in a "dossier" somewhere.
Fake dossiers are the best. They can even be used to initiate counterintelligence investigations into opposition politicians!
Magic.
@TTR: Bill’s DNA vs. Trump’s NDA are different animals. One is flesh AND the other is just words.
Make the words become flesh and you get a gold Starr.
I read the transcript- so much of it makes Daniels and Cooper look worse than it does Trump, which is tough to do. Also, it appears that there was nothing to the hinted CD reveal, which again makes Daniels and her lawyer look even worse.
However, as I wrote many times now- this isn't going to help the Left defeat Trump- his supporters don't care what he did with Daniels 10 years ago, and they don't care about any NDA they might have had her sign. The Left fought and won this war about consensual sexual liaisons and politicians 20 years ago and the Right's voters have made their peace with it. The Left set the rules here, and the Right is playing by them- which is driving the Left to distraction.
Anderson Cooper: Did you view it as this is a potential opportunity. "I'm gonna see where it goes?"
Stormy Daniels: I thought of it as a business deal.
And she apparently still does.
Kinda disappointed that Trump didn't use a cigar on her
Fist made with a small hand. Wearing elbow-length chem-resistant latex gloves--available at AA Amazon portal for around $12.00.
WOW!! Breaking News!! What a GIANT Joke this was.
I missed the interview but the best moment must have been watching Anderson Cooper turn 60 Minutes into Current Affair.
She said she thought it was what she deserved for meeting him in his room. She thought, "oh here we go, ugh!"
too bad for Broaddrick that she didn't understand what Bill was up to when he suggested they move their meeting from the lobby to her room.
Stormy's moving to the hard-hitting disctict attorney role from the prostitute with the heart of gold role.
He[McCabe] admitted under oath that the FBI had started an internal investigation into [FBI agent] Gritz's personal conduct after learning that she "had filed or intended to file" a sex discrimination complaint against her supervisors.
Yeah, Trump's consensual sex with a prostitute ("It was a business arrangement") is the problem here, and all of the attacks on the FBI are unpatriotic! Imagine if McCabe had been a Trump appointee, what the press would do with this.
And yes, I know it's 2018 and that means the rules are different this year, on account of its fiercely urgent that we get the Republican out of the White House! The rules have been different in the past because we were trying to keep a Democrat IN the White House. Only an idiot would be unable to see that!
No dish on size? The "short fingers" thing has been going on for two years now. Beloved has to be so disappointed.
This is why beta males are beta males.
Ya had ritmo et al at "pornstar"
Rumor has it Stormy was high during the interview.
I guess the real value of this "story" is that it whips the Democrats/Lifelong Republican Trump haters into more intense paroxysms of rage. As a thought experiment, try to imagine the mind of a hypothetical independent voter who is considering Trump strongly, but goes for the Democrat because of Stormy Daniels. What kind of person would that possibly be?
60 Minutes is still on TV?
"the mind of a hypothetical independent voter who is considering Trump strongly, but goes for the Democrat because of Stormy Daniels. What kind of person would that possibly be?"
I assume the prime target is white married women. They don't have to go for the Democrat. They just have to not vote for Trump, or anybody associated with Trump (i.e., Republicans).
A scene out of "Blazing Saddles."
Very embarrassing for Trump, but people may feel it is even more embarrassing for the Democrats as an official political campaign operation.
I hope Anderson Cooper got some tips on taking a load.
It's not "Make America Chaste Again"
This is just the warm up.
Next up:
President Groper! Coming to cable soon, to be followed near the midterms on the much more watched ABC, NBC, and CBS, with serious, and ominous tones.
Well, Barbara Walters did interview Juanita Broadrrick, once. They have some cover.
I wonder if NOW is going to make a comeback?
Three hot wives, a POTY, and a porn star.
Alpha dog.
I, Stormy.
Well, I guess you could call Donald J Trump a fucker, and you'd be correct.
Paco,
I don't know if that is true. I mean, seriously, who out there is shocked by the revelation that Trump had sex with a porn star? During the election, nude modelling photos of Melania were put out there along with the claim she was a porn star. She was his third wife, and he had cheated on the previous two.
Is there anyone out there that is going to say that this is the last straw?
As for the threats, legal and physical, the guy had a successful tv franchise at the time. I wouldn't put anything outside the possible actions of mainstream media companies.
Possible headlines…
Republican Gets Consent
TV Star Gets Consent
I Was Not a Victim
Polite Adultery From 1952
Even the Spanking Was Gentle
Saint Croix said...
Republican Gets Consent etc.
You left out the legal and physical intimidation.
Letter Revealed During 60 Minutes Stormy Daniels Segment Could Be Nail in Coffin for Trump FEC Case
"Beloved Commenter AReasonableMan said...
Letter Revealed During 60 Minutes Stormy Daniels Segment Could Be Nail in Coffin for Trump FEC Case"
Sad. Even for you.
Now you know. Shark Week is a mood killer.
It is the end of March and past time to get serious about campaigning for the November elections.
Starting with Stormy Daniels and the March for our Lives, it does not look like the Democrats are planning to campaign on any actual policy issues.
Whatever happened to "Obamacare," etc.?
Let’s accept, arguendo, the notion that the affair was consensual, that it is old news, and irrelevant to current policy questions.
Let’s further assume that Trump fans are umoved by the story and would not hesitate to vote for Trump again.
What about Trump’s denial of the entire affair? Where does Trump get license to lie about it?
"Where does Trump get license to lie about it?"
Two things:
At this point it's her word against his, isn't it?
How many times did the Dems and the press insist "Everybody lies about sex"?
Lying about sex is only OK when Bill Clinton does it. Full on rape is OK, too, when you have a D behind your name.
McCabe is confused and distracted.
Deep state is satisfied with that explanation.
I think we can all agree that Trump's lawyer is in some trouble now. Trump, less so. He lies all the time, why would this time be any different.
At this point it's her word against his, isn't it?
No, it isn’t.
Not with the documented records of payments, the NDA, the statements from Cohen about what he did and why, etc., etc.
And indeed this is my point; we can agree or disagree about much of this. But only a fool would try to claim that nothing ever happened.
This is a fair assessment of how we got here:
Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton And Stormy Daniels
Jumping in here 140 comments down without reading, I'll just make an observation. There once was a current in journalism that had "DO NOT HUMANIZE HIM" as it's guiding force. Now we have women saying how nice he was, how much they loved the guy. And I gotta tell the Progs, this whole thing might not turn out the way you all expected. Just saying.
I see the left and their LLR allies are now in the process of transferring guilt over Kennedy's murder of a girl and Clinton's rape of a girl to Trump.
It's a sexual Southern Strategy argument.
LLR Chuck is sure to love that one.
Unexpectedly.
Lying about sex was not okay for Bill Clinton. He suffered a big civil settlement; virtually punitive in comparison to the alleged victim’s actual damages. And he lost his law license for a time. And he was impeached.
Of course, Clinton’s most ardent supporters didn’t care.
Just like Trump fans now, as seen on this page.
The strategic error LLR Chuck and his lefty allies made was not having Stormy represented by Russian spokespersons.
That alone could have spun off another 73 investigations into Trump, his entire family, all business associates and everyone he has said hello to on the street.
Lost opportunities can haunt you sometimes.
LLR and #AstonishinglyStrongDemDefender Chuck: "Lying about sex was not okay for Bill Clinton."
LOL
Who could have guessed that LLR Chuck would be obfuscating and minimizing the actions of a dem and trying to create legal equivalence to this story where there is none.
Who. Could. Have. Guessed. That?
Besides every living being on the planet, that is.....
You can tell that LLR Chuck has, once again, had his heart broken by reality.
At this rate, LLR Chuck might, might, run out of dem/lefty narratives to push prior to the 2018 elections.
I personally have faith that there will always be another dem/lefty talking point LLR Chuck can conjure up.
Lets all wish him luck.
ZZZzzzzzzzzz.. huh what? Storm? It's stormy? ZZzzzzzz... oh, huh.. a stormy day? Uh.. who cares?
Zzzzzzzzz....
"Not with the documented records of payments, the NDA, the statements from Cohen about what he did and why, etc., etc."
That's true.
I think it's also true that the Dems have given Trump a license to lie about sex.
But Trump supporters and other Americans, those who aren't filled with an irrational and unreasoning hatred of Trump, will weigh the relative importance of Trump's sex life in the big picture then dismiss these stories as a distraction.
It looks like the dem/lefty narrative LLR Chuck is pushing is going to require some significant narrative building support.
I think LLR Chuck is going to have "break the glass" in order to use the FULL "Blumenthal Stolen Valor/Li'l Dickie Durbin US Troops are Nazi's" Defense, which is literally just one step away from the "Chewbacca Defense".
I can't wait to see how our LLR poster pulls it off...
Good thing we know about sex with Trump 12 years ago.
The media don't care about Seth Rich, the Las Vegas shooter, the shooter who shot Steve Scalise, etc...
Personally, I'm surprised LLR Chuck and his lefty allies didn't try to work in an explicit Trump connection to Mary Jo Kopechne in the movie "Chappaquiddick".
The good news is that can be "corrected" when they release the Directors Cut.
TTR and LLR Chuck will be on here shortly arguing that the very same people who let Kennedy get away with murder are the Trump supporters today.
That's sort of a "thing" the lefties and their LLR allies do nowadays.
What happened to Monica Lewinsky and supporters by the legal eagle bulldogs was more shameful than what Bill did with her in the Oval Office and the lies told. What the legal sharks did to Karl Rove, Scooter Libby and company was also shameful. This new round of "investigations" by legal/lawyer political adversaries to get Trump is also shameful and diminishes the standing of all involved. The Watergate show and the Clarence Thomas show was great political theater and I believed there was value in the process at the time (although I did not believe Anita Hill) but that belief is now gone.
Compare and contrast Trump's women with Bill Clinton's women.
The best Clinton ever did was Monica. She wasn't quite the prettiest, but she was a gentleman's 7 and quite young, which raises her up notch or two in the desirability department.
Clinton has been credibly accused of rape and assault multiple times in incidents with witnesses and plenty of evidence to corroborate the charges.
Clinton ended up married to a seriously witchy woman with near-zero sex appeal who's aging like a beaten horse.
Clinton's one daughter might not even be his.
Meanwhile, Trump has plowed his way through supermodels, movie stars, porn actresses, and other varieties of hot, young, famous, sexy women - many of whom are also surprisingly intelligent.
Trump has had claims of sexual assault leveled against him, but these were bought and paid for by the Clinton campaign and the DNC, and have virtually no corroborating evidence or anything at all in the way of witnesses.
Trump has married three times, each time to a hotter woman than the ones prior. Caddish? Yes. Absolutely baller? Also yes. Indicative of successful genes and the ability and opportunity to spread them, and therefore indicative of evolutionary success? Also yes. The Trump genes are #winning genes - the results speak for themselves. Trump's current wife is an absolute smokeshow and way smarter than most people give her credit for.
Trump has multiple children and grandchildren. Most are quite handsome and/or beautiful. Don Jr is a good looking fellow, who despite his pending divorce still sired multiple children with a woman who was really hot until she hit The Wall in recent years. Eric Trump is kinda weird looking, but still bagged a smoking hot wife and now they have a child together, a son. More genes to pass on. Tiffany Trump is hot in a kind of trashy way, and Ivanka is a goddamn supermodel. So, the important bases are covered - the Trump sons are intelligent and suave enough to marry hot women, and the Trump daughters are pretty and charming enough to marry rich men (Tiffany is still single as far as I know, but she could easily bag a well-off husband if she wanted to given her looks and reported personality).
The fact is, most men with successful genes and limited impulse control are bound to be cads. Doesn't matter if they're decent people at heart or not, fact is that biologically speaking, men are designed - DESIGNED - by either evolution or God or both to spread their seed to multiple partners and ensure survival of their genetic line. Women - not so much. Women cheat to be with an Alpha male. Men cheat because the sex was available. A man dating a 9 will cheat with a 6-7-8 if he thinks it will be discreet, unless he has better than normal impulse control. A woman dating an Alpha will not cheat on him with a Beta (or TTR, but I repeat myself) UNLESS the Beta is rich or well-connected and she plans to use him and dump him. And even then, the woman will have to think very hard about losing her Alpha male mate if she were to be discovered.
Biologically speaking, Trump is a winner.
Still not very much on Facebook from my uberliberal pals. Lots of March of Life nonsense and about how that is going to turn things around but nuthin' on Stormy Daniels. They are going to tire themselves out at this rate. But then again, I thought they had peaked at the "two scoops of ice cream" scandal.
The single phrase that demonstrates the entire story is fiction is this episode taken from 100 crime novels and as many B movies:
"That's a beautiful little girl. It'd be a shame if something happened to her mom."
Where's Lazlo when we need him?
Q: Why would she lie about the threat?
A: Because a claim of duress would help her escape the contract, even if it would otherwise bind her.
I swear, ARM, you can be better than this.
Why do you treat your own reputation so poorly?
Seems remarkably stupid to lie in such a high profile case in such a high profile forum. Not impossible but remarkably stupid. She didn't come across as remarkably stupid.
ARM, who thinks that Trump is an idiot, didn't think that Stormy came across as remarkably stupid. Lulz
Highest 60 Mins ratings in 10 years.
who thinks that Trump is an idiot
Paying off a hooker in such an asinine way immediately before an election strikes me as pretty idiotic. But maybe you can explain the brilliance of his actions to me.
readering: "Highest 60 Mins ratings in 10 years."
Wow. Trump can even get folks to tune into that dog of a show.
Amazing.
Looks like ARM and LLR Chuck are going to focus on Trumps violation of the anti-sex clause of the Constitution to try and impeach Trump.
Dont worry about that clause not really existing. There are zillions of penumbras floating about.
ARM: "Paying off a hooker in such an asinine way immediately before an election strikes me as pretty idiotic."
Colluding with Putins pals and foreign agents while accepting bribes and abusing intelligence and law enforcement agencies to attack domestic political opponents is totally cool for the left.
Unexpectedly.
Now she's a "hooker", ARM? Quit while you're behind. Lulz
Still waiting for you to explain how 'brilliant' this move was. How completely non-idiotic.
We don't know all the facts yet, ARM. Unlike you, I'll wait for those before assessing relative intelligence.
Based upon the allegations we've heard, I'd say Trump's actions were "non-idiotic" as he was elected president, and 60 Minutes has been reduced to the Maury Povic show. Win-win.
abi: "Quit while you're behind. Lulz"
ARM and LLR Chuck cannot quit as there is literally nothing left for them and the rest of their lefty allies to work with.
Transferring Weinstein and Clinton and Kennedy et al to republicans in general and Trump in particular is fallung flat but must be doubled and tripled down on.
"Lying about sex was not okay for Bill Clinton."
Nonsense. Clinton lied about MANY sexual incidents.
He got in trouble for lying UNDER OATH.
See the difference?
Bottom line, women who are adulterers should have an A carved into their forehead.
Still waiting .....
JAORE: "ee the difference?"
Lol
LLR Chucks "job" here is to make sure all differences are competely blurred in the dems favor.
Fabi said...
We don't know all the facts yet
Given current trends, how do you feel more facts will contribute to illuminating the 'brilliance' of Trump?
I thought what happened between two, consenting adults was none of our business.
What changed?
ARM:
I literally told you why Daniels would have claimed duress.
Imagine this scenario and it should make sense.
Daniels: I want out of this contract. But I signed an NDA and cashed the check.
Attorney: Here is a list of reasons that might help us escape a legally binding contract. Do you see anything on this list that happened?
Daniels: Well...
Attorney: Look closely. Try to remember. Is there anything on this list.
Daniels: I don't remember.
Attorney: Try to remember something on this list. *wink*
Daniels: Well, I got threatened by a guy, now that you mention it.
Attorney: We can win that argument in court.
JAORE said...
"Lying about sex was not okay for Bill Clinton."
Nonsense. Clinton lied about MANY sexual incidents.
He got in trouble for lying UNDER OATH.
See the difference?
I have no idea what you think you are schooling me about. Yeah, I think Bill Clinton was a disgraceful liar, and he continued to lie the moment that they got him under oath. And yeah, that lying under oath got him into deeper trouble than his everyday lying did.
Ditto Trump. He's another disgraceful liar. I am really looking forward, to several civil litigants, and the FBI and the Department of Justice all getting chances at Trump while he's under oath. I read Trump's deposition in the Trump University case. Hilarious.
Actually, "hilarious nonsense" is how I'd describe what I've read from Trump's testimony in that case as well as Trump's defamation case against Tim O'Brien.
And I described exactly how Bill Clinton's lying and perjury got him into trouble. Clinton was never criminally charged with perjury; but he had to settle the civil case (even though the plaintiff's case for damages was frankly weak) and the idea of perjury, and obstruction, was the leading basis for Clinton's impeachment and his Arkansas Bar Association discipline.
Again, ditto Trump! One of the nice things about the 60 Minutes story last night was that well beyond the interview with Stormy Daniels, they spoke with former FEC Chairman Trevor Potter, who detailed how the payoff to Stormy could be a major FEC violation; one in which Trump and Michael Cohen would be -- how can I say this? -- intimately involved. Just one more in a long list of good reasons to get Trump under oath and in front of a court reporter, with a skilled investigative attorney asking Trump questions.
Just like Trump fans now, as seen on this page.
Clinton was POTUS at the time of his misdeeds, you stupid ass.
This crap was from 12 years ago.
Good gawd. The temper tantrum never stops, does it.
"Given current trends, how do you feel more facts will contribute to illuminating the 'brilliance' of Trump?"
Don't know 'bout Trump, but current trends indicate the ARM is letting his mouth get ahead of the facts.
Jim at said...
I thought what happened between two, consenting adults was none of our business.
What changed?
A $130,000 payoff, using assumed names; and potentially involving breaches of campaign finance law, legal ethics, tax liability and numerous other potential areas of legal jeopardy.
I've heard rumors that Trump checked a book out of the school library at Wharton and never returned it.
Impeach now!
Jim at said...
I thought what happened between two, consenting adults was none of our business.
What happened between Bill and Monica happened between two consenting adults.
Jim at said...
"Just like Trump fans now, as seen on this page."
Clinton was POTUS at the time of his misdeeds, you stupid ass.
This crap was from 12 years ago.
Good gawd. The temper tantrum never stops, does it.
Right; Clinton was President, when he lied under oath.
And now, let's see President Trump, under oath. First question: Do you deny having had a sexual affair with Stephanie Clifford a/k/a "Stormy Daniels"? Second question: Did you authorize your attorney to issue a public statement denying that affair? Third question: Did you have any understanding with your attorney Michael Cohen that you would reimburse him for his having advanced a payment of $130,000 to her?
It goes downhill after that. Now. While Trump is in office as President.
And now, let's see President Trump, under oath. First question: Do you deny having had a sexual affair with Stephanie Clifford a/k/a "Stormy Daniels"? Second question: Did you authorize your attorney to issue a public statement denying that affair? Third question: Did you have any understanding with your attorney Michael Cohen that you would reimburse him for his having advanced a payment of $130,000 to her?
You've got quite the imagination, Chuck.
What do you think Daniels would 'fess up to under oath? She's the one in legal jeapory here, isn't she? SHe has violated the terms of an NDA.
Imagine how easy it would be to destroy the credibility of a witness who is a middle-aged porn actress/hooker.
Tax liability?
It wasn't a gift so any tax problems are Daniels', if any exist.
Legal ethics?
Not Trump's problem here either.
Campaign finance?
A billionaire pays $130,000 and somebody thinks it's a campaign issue?
Fopdoodle cannot stop fopdoodling himself thinking about Trump's junk.
Chuck.
you realize that all this went down when Trump was a private citizen and most of Clintons occurred while he held public office.
So him admitting under oat that he schtuped Stormy is really immaterial. Except for beta males such as yourself.
It isn't important. And does not effect the Trump presidency.
Lewis I don't give a rip about Stormy Daniels. I don't effing care, if Trump and Michael Cohen sue her for $20 million. I don't expect that they will get $20 million from her. And I don't care if Trump sues CBS, CNN, and the Roman Catholic Church to get their $20 million.
What I want is Trump under oath, in front of skilled lawyers.
The question as to whether Trump had sex with Stormy Daniels and then wanted to pay her off doesn't live or die with Stormy Daniels testimony and credibility. Maybe, she's got photos, and audio/video recordings. We've got the laughable record of Michael Cohen's shenanigans. There's all kinds of evidence.
I'm hoping that Stephanie Clifford says to Trump and Michael Cohen; "So sue me. And oh by the way when you do sue me, my lawyers say to give us a date for your depositions."
একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন