২৮ মার্চ, ২০১৭

I resist Glenn Loury's label for — me — "contrarian," explain why, and offer an alternative label, which he then readily slaps on himself.



The label is...

... "sly trickster."

২১টি মন্তব্য:

Sebastian বলেছেন...

Yeah, we got it the first time. Not that there's anything wrong with that, allowing for a bit of Dunning-Kruger.

Henry বলেছেন...

To have some mischievous idea in your mind is sometimes very agreeable. Shunryu Suzuki

Suzuki has a high opinion of mischievousness. He often counsels against the effort to be good or to try to make others be good. Mischievnous is better.

Henry বলেছেন...

sic

JackWayne বলেছেন...

So Loury sees himself as Loki? Not buying it.

Lem Vibe Bandit বলেছেন...

Professor Loury needs to lose a few pounds.

Richard Dillman বলেছেন...

Coyote, Raven, or Loki? Or Nanaboujou?

Earnest Prole বলেছেন...

Professor Loury needs to lose a few pounds.

We all need to lose a few pounds.

traditionalguy বলেছেন...

Trickster I can do. But I can't do the sly part compared to The Professor. She is magnificently sly.

n.n বলেছেন...

With a spirit yearning for a dawn where principles are internally, externally, and mutually consistent.

Lawcruiter বলেছেন...

Sly trickster sounds a lot better than "annoying"

Luke Lea বলেছেন...

You may have told Glenn you were a "sly trickster" but you were only being a sly trickster when you did. I think you could more accurately be described as a perceptively independent observer who enjoys pointing out where a generally accepted opinion is, if not wrong necessarily, at least questionable. Contrarians are more indiscriminate. Maybe the word you were looking for was impish.

Henry বলেছেন...

I quoted a Buddhist above, but given the canyons and red-rock spires, the other reference that comes to mind for "sly trickster" is "coyote."

Inga বলেছেন...

I think Loury was right about Althouse being a contrarian. I've thought so myself many times, but we both could be wrong, who knows. For her to take a position that isn't her own, she defends it ferociously. I tend to think it is her position but she doesn't like being buttonholed in that position.

sparrow বলেছেন...

Odd, why would you want to be known as a trickster? Sly or not I read it as an unalloyed negative.

bagoh20 বলেছেন...

The sly trickster is as vulnerable to manipulation as most others, but uniquely immune to noticing it.

Roughcoat বলেছেন...

Better the sly trickster than the tar baby.

Sparrow: Trickster-and-tar baby myths are thought by anthropologists to be the first and oldest stories that humans told themselves, predating religion, shamanism, etc., appearing at the very dawn of language and the development of the cognitive faculties that made language possible.

Jaq বলেছেন...

Funny how many people throw around Dunning Kruger when they don't seem to know on which side they fall.

Lucien বলেছেন...

Forget Coyote and go with Foxy.

sparrow বলেছেন...

Roughcoat,
Thanks for reminder of the tar baby history, but still don't see it as a positive just because it has ancient resonance. The choice is between clever and brutish, but the choices are tactical not moral. In our current context, I associate tricksters with liars, and we already have a vast oversupply.

William বলেছেন...

I listened to the discussion with interest. It's easy to have a polite, civil discussion with someone with whom you are in fundamental agreement. No need to be Loki or Brer Rabbit in such situations......I was kind of surprised when the discussion unfolded to discover that both parties were so conservative. What are the odds that two academics--one a woman with feminist leanings and the other a black man old enough to have primal scream memories--should both hold conservative opinions and should espouse them on the same day and on the same site. The odds of this happening must be astronomical.

dreams বলেছেন...

"Professor Loury needs to lose a few pounds."

I'm no MD, still it's my diagnosis that Professor Loury has a fatty liver.

একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন

Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.