Assume that a corrupt music file is a legitimate threat to a system (I think that is likely). The customer should still be able to choose -- assume that risk -- to have their system infected.
Of course, users had probably already checked those pages-long incredibly dense user consent forms that pop up whenever you install software (Who has hours to read through them?) that allowed Apple to do this.
Apple would display an error message and instruct the user to restore the factory settings
MM, this is apparently what they did. I am very leery before I restore factory settings, usually.
Meanwhile, apple has apparently been a busy bee, and everything I ever put into itunes is now available for download in my songs list on my phone and I'm not sure how to remove it. It's cluttery.
How was the value of your iPod diminished because you couldn't do something with your iPod that Apple never said you could do?
You could always rip CDs into iTunes and Apple had no problem with that. And you could drop MP3 files into iTunes you had downloaded from various places with no problem.
So what kind of files were in the competing music stores? Were they standard MP3s? Were they trying to mimic the Apple proprietary formats or did they have their own proprietary format? I think that's crucial to the case.
"When the user restored the settings, the music from rival services would disappear, he said."
I've never used any Apple anything - is it impossible to make backups? (i.e., copy music files from the little gizmo to a real computer, and then back to the gizmo).
*If it's impossible to make backups, the people are dumb for using the service. If it's possible, they were dumb for not doing it.
One more reason why I will NEVER use anything from Apple.
I once made the mistake of installing I-Tunes on a Laptop. It fucked up a bunch of stuff and I could not remove it. I finally had to wipe the drive, reformat it and reinstall everything. There's a day of my life I won't get back.
If I had to use an I-Pod I'd go back to a Walkman and cassette tapes instead.
If I had to use a Mac or I-Pad I'd go back to typewriters and mail.
If I had to use an I-Phone I'd go tin cans and a string.
They're still sticking free music (as a lure to buy more) into my iPhone music app lineup without asking. All kinds of crap I would never listen to and, because the app just cycles through it along with everything else I have to go to the trouble of deleting it which ain't so simple as you might expect. Of course not. It's Apple. I'm gonna get a 'droid.
They're still sticking free music (as a lure to buy more) into my iPhone music app lineup without asking
Odd, I've never seen anything other than that (yes, stupid and infuriating) U2 album appear in either iTunes or my phone.
(Contra other people above, note that an iPod circa 2007-9 is fed only from iTunes on a computer - so anything deleted from it on a "wipe" is automatically already backed up.
I can't figure out what this suit is even supposed to be about, from what is presented. I don't know if it's the source mangling it, or just the suit being badly drafted or what.)
So what kind of files were in the competing music stores?
Since they specifically mentioned it's a decade-old suit, I assume it's about RealNetworks's 2004 "Harmony" technology, under which the RealPlayer Music Store sold DRM-protected music files compatible with Apple's "FairPlay" DRM. Apple denounced RealNetworks as having "adopted the tactics and ethics of a hacker to break into the iPod" and subsequently broke the compatibility of "Harmony" files.
The record labels didn't want to give up DRM, but given Apple's post-Harmony position as the monopoly store for iPod-compatible DRM, they eventually had to authorize DRM-free music downloads.
Steven has it right, this about Apple protecting their DRM (which the market forced them to drop after Amazon mp3 started taking market share).
Apple wanted to have their own method of being the music industry's toad and forcing people to re-buy music every time a format changed (and forcing them to remain within the iTunes system with locked files that only play on Apple stuff).
Apple deserves to lose this, though time and no Steve Jobs will likely take care of Apple.
Support the Althouse blog by doing your Amazon shopping going in through the Althouse Amazon link.
Amazon
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for me to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Support this blog with PayPal
Make a 1-time donation or set up a monthly donation of any amount you choose:
17 comments:
Assume that a corrupt music file is a legitimate threat to a system (I think that is likely). The customer should still be able to choose -- assume that risk -- to have their system infected.
Of course, users had probably already checked those pages-long incredibly dense user consent forms that pop up whenever you install software (Who has hours to read through them?) that allowed Apple to do this.
C'mon - you know it feels right when they force it on you...
Apple would display an error message and instruct the user to restore the factory settings
MM, this is apparently what they did. I am very leery before I restore factory settings, usually.
Meanwhile, apple has apparently been a busy bee, and everything I ever put into itunes is now available for download in my songs list on my phone and I'm not sure how to remove it. It's cluttery.
I'm pretty sure that agreement you've never read, but you always click "accept" mentions this feature.
A Class Action with no class.
iFascism.
How was the value of your iPod diminished because you couldn't do something with your iPod that Apple never said you could do?
You could always rip CDs into iTunes and Apple had no problem with that. And you could drop MP3 files into iTunes you had downloaded from various places with no problem.
So what kind of files were in the competing music stores? Were they standard MP3s? Were they trying to mimic the Apple proprietary formats or did they have their own proprietary format? I think that's crucial to the case.
"Apple deleted music ..."
No, dumb people* deleted their own music.
"When the user restored the settings, the music from rival services would disappear, he said."
I've never used any Apple anything - is it impossible to make backups? (i.e., copy music files from the little gizmo to a real computer, and then back to the gizmo).
*If it's impossible to make backups, the people are dumb for using the service. If it's possible, they were dumb for not doing it.
Them Apple guys are bad apples.
The whole notion of "licensing" needs to be revisited. Ownership ain't what it used to be.
Fernandinande said..."Apple deleted music ..."
No, dumb people* deleted their own music.
There's a difference between "dumb" and "not tech savvy."
One more reason why I will NEVER use anything from Apple.
I once made the mistake of installing I-Tunes on a Laptop. It fucked up a bunch of stuff and I could not remove it. I finally had to wipe the drive, reformat it and reinstall everything. There's a day of my life I won't get back.
If I had to use an I-Pod I'd go back to a Walkman and cassette tapes instead.
If I had to use a Mac or I-Pad I'd go back to typewriters and mail.
If I had to use an I-Phone I'd go tin cans and a string.
NEVER, NEVER, NEVER use Apple products.
John Henry
They're still sticking free music (as a lure to buy more) into my iPhone music app lineup without asking. All kinds of crap I would never listen to and, because the app just cycles through it along with everything else I have to go to the trouble of deleting it which ain't so simple as you might expect. Of course not. It's Apple. I'm gonna get a 'droid.
This may perversely mark me as a luddite of sorts, but I love my Windows phone.
They're still sticking free music (as a lure to buy more) into my iPhone music app lineup without asking
Odd, I've never seen anything other than that (yes, stupid and infuriating) U2 album appear in either iTunes or my phone.
(Contra other people above, note that an iPod circa 2007-9 is fed only from iTunes on a computer - so anything deleted from it on a "wipe" is automatically already backed up.
I can't figure out what this suit is even supposed to be about, from what is presented. I don't know if it's the source mangling it, or just the suit being badly drafted or what.)
So what kind of files were in the competing music stores?
Since they specifically mentioned it's a decade-old suit, I assume it's about RealNetworks's 2004 "Harmony" technology, under which the RealPlayer Music Store sold DRM-protected music files compatible with Apple's "FairPlay" DRM. Apple denounced RealNetworks as having "adopted the tactics and ethics of a hacker to break into the iPod" and subsequently broke the compatibility of "Harmony" files.
The record labels didn't want to give up DRM, but given Apple's post-Harmony position as the monopoly store for iPod-compatible DRM, they eventually had to authorize DRM-free music downloads.
Steven has it right, this about Apple protecting their DRM (which the market forced them to drop after Amazon mp3 started taking market share).
Apple wanted to have their own method of being the music industry's toad and forcing people to re-buy music every time a format changed (and forcing them to remain within the iTunes system with locked files that only play on Apple stuff).
Apple deserves to lose this, though time and no Steve Jobs will likely take care of Apple.
Post a Comment