Positive or negative feedbacks to that warming could accelerate or decelerate the warming but climate science is not close to being able to model those feedbacks accurately.
They also take the same set of data and surmise the exact opposite, as in the case of cloud coverage and temps. I recently read an article about the in which two separate teams came to two separate conclusions based on the same data simply because they suspected different causes for what they were observing.
On to He3, I say. The solar system has enough for several Earths.
The climate system is so incredibly complex and there is so much that remains to be discovered that it is understandable that climate scientists have a long way to go and don't always agree. Unfortunately, it is a very politicized science which slows things down.
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for me to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Encourage Althouse by making a donation:
Make a 1-time donation or set up a monthly donation of any amount you choose:
202 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 202 of 202Positive or negative feedbacks to that warming could accelerate or decelerate the warming but climate science is not close to being able to model those feedbacks accurately.
They also take the same set of data and surmise the exact opposite, as in the case of cloud coverage and temps. I recently read an article about the in which two separate teams came to two separate conclusions based on the same data simply because they suspected different causes for what they were observing.
On to He3, I say. The solar system has enough for several Earths.
The climate system is so incredibly complex and there is so much that remains to be discovered that it is understandable that climate scientists have a long way to go and don't always agree. Unfortunately, it is a very politicized science which slows things down.
Post a Comment
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.