November 18, 2010

"Adam Liptak has a somewhat puzzling critique of Supreme Court opinions in the New York Times..."

Says Orin Kerr, taking it all very seriously.

3 comments:

traditionalguy said...

I concur. But what has this to do with today's theme? Oh yeah, the Lady Justice statue is a Dike with a great Thorax.

former law student said...

No one mentioned that brevity was a virtue when each and every word of an opinion had to be typed and retyped. Word processors invite bloat. Excess verbiage muddles the reasoning.

George said...

Aren't we stuck with the quest for "diversity" by reason of a concurring opinion of Justice Powell?

Post a Comment

Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.