"A final test was given to the mice after three weeks' rest. While the experimental mice continued to navigate the maze faster than the controls, the results were no longer statistically significant, suggesting the effect is temporary."
Instead of being "smarter", the effect seems to be one of clearing the mind, thus allowing better concentration on the task at hand. To me, that's a better interpretation of the study's results.
-----
Word verification: heighour. What cud chewing animals celebrate after a hard day's work.
I spent three days this past weekend in Joshua Tree, and must have inhaled a lot of bacteria. Great time.
All I have to say to this study is "neat!"
I definitely find myself thinking better and feeling better when I'm in nature. So it's very interesting to hear there's a scientific reason.
Though I wonder if there's a ceiling to the effect. Seems like a lot of people can spend a lot of time around nature and be fairly miserable. Indeed most of history has been a story of people trying to overcome nature.
Am I evil to find it funny that the mothers of the post-boomer generation may be making their kids dumber by keeping their environment so sanitary? As well as more allergy prone with less discriminating immune systems? (That last from earlier studies.)
Support the Althouse blog by doing your Amazon shopping going in through the Althouse Amazon link.
Amazon
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for me to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Support this blog with PayPal
Make a 1-time donation or set up a monthly donation of any amount you choose:
9 comments:
In all too many cases, we can only hope...
Obviously, the editors at Science Daily do not spend enough time outdoors.
From the linked story:
"A final test was given to the mice after three weeks' rest. While the experimental mice continued to navigate the maze faster than the controls, the results were no longer statistically significant, suggesting the effect is temporary."
Instead of being "smarter", the effect seems to be one of clearing the mind, thus allowing better concentration on the task at hand. To me, that's a better interpretation of the study's results.
-----
Word verification: heighour. What cud chewing animals celebrate after a hard day's work.
I hate articles like this:
here's a interesting/neat/quirkly/unexpected _____________ (your adjective here) study that tells us _______________ (fill in your narrative here)
At most the research suggests that something about the bacteria makes MICE smarter.
I'm sure we'll see this Mycobacteria's extract in the health food stores in the future.
Only 4 comments? I guess you're all out there inhaling dirt.
I spent three days this past weekend in Joshua Tree, and must have inhaled a lot of bacteria. Great time.
All I have to say to this study is "neat!"
I definitely find myself thinking better and feeling better when I'm in nature. So it's very interesting to hear there's a scientific reason.
Though I wonder if there's a ceiling to the effect. Seems like a lot of people can spend a lot of time around nature and be fairly miserable. Indeed most of history has been a story of people trying to overcome nature.
Am I evil to find it funny that the mothers of the post-boomer generation may be making their kids dumber by keeping their environment so sanitary? As well as more allergy prone with less discriminating immune systems? (That last from earlier studies.)
Actually its the bacteria that get smarter, not the mice.
Ah, yes, it's the week of General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology. Time for our annual shot of weird microbe stories.
Post a Comment