Montana, Context man, context. The "god have mercy on your soul" is the last line from the link I provided which so aptly describes you content free narrative.
Since you're not going to the link to see the context I'll just quote it from you. Yes it's from a bad Adam Sandler movie,but it's still a great line, and in any case is perfectly apropos for your incoherent ramblings.
"Principal: Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
You've really offered nothing in response but a steaming load of horseshit. I'd respond, but there's nothing to respond to. It's plainly obvious to everyone that you don't have a clue what you're talking about.
Consider, for example, one thread of out argument:
Obama cleverly turned Russia against Iran, which implies that Russia and Iran were in some kind of alliance, no matter how soft.
Then, later, you insisted that the belief that Russia was in the process of building alliances with unaligned countries as outmoded Cold War thinking.
Do I need to point out the hilarious inconsistency there?
It was pointless to argue with you. I knew that going in, but it was fun while it lasted.
It's true, monty, you are worthless like Alec Baldwin (to quote another amusing film which you probably did not like). You certainly don't compensate for your low quality with any attractive personality or character traits.
Actually you're known to be a right bastard (no offense to people who are actually born out of wedlock), but as I say, I would try to ignore that if, like Cedarford, you ever had a point.
One wonders what it would take to get through to you; but you are pretty much stuck on nonfalsifiable, therefore there is no possibility of honest debate. And nobody likes you enough to indulge your whims. There's no percentage in playing with you. You have indeed - and this is a word I try not to overuse - achieved trolldom.
Maybe if you hed certain posts in future with, "No, this time I'm serious, please pay attention," I will bother to look at them; otherwise I don't think I'll be missing much when I ignore you.
TW: "emptedis" - Exactly my point about your posts. Any one of them can be described as "Empty, this." Like your soul, actually. Was the Brazilian chick you just were trying to objectify with pseudo-diagnoses (noted on Trooper York's blog) the same one you were bragging about a little while ago? She sounds like a worthy mate for you.
Support the Althouse blog by doing your Amazon shopping going in through the Althouse Amazon link.
Amazon
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for me to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Support this blog with PayPal
Make a 1-time donation or set up a monthly donation of any amount you choose:
208 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 208 of 208Montana,
Context man, context. The "god have mercy on your soul" is the last line from the link I provided which so aptly describes you content free narrative.
Since you're not going to the link to see the context I'll just quote it from you. Yes it's from a bad Adam Sandler movie,but it's still a great line, and in any case is perfectly apropos for your incoherent ramblings.
"Principal: Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
Montana Urban Legend,
You've really offered nothing in response but a steaming load of horseshit. I'd respond, but there's nothing to respond to. It's plainly obvious to everyone that you don't have a clue what you're talking about.
Consider, for example, one thread of out argument:
Obama cleverly turned Russia against Iran, which implies that Russia and Iran were in some kind of alliance, no matter how soft.
Then, later, you insisted that the belief that Russia was in the process of building alliances with unaligned countries as outmoded Cold War thinking.
Do I need to point out the hilarious inconsistency there?
It was pointless to argue with you. I knew that going in, but it was fun while it lasted.
Obama thinks we could be the good guys.
You know, if only we do what he wants us to do.
It's true, monty, you are worthless like Alec Baldwin (to quote another amusing film which you probably did not like). You certainly don't compensate for your low quality with any attractive personality or character traits.
Actually you're known to be a right bastard (no offense to people who are actually born out of wedlock), but as I say, I would try to ignore that if, like Cedarford, you ever had a point.
One wonders what it would take to get through to you; but you are pretty much stuck on nonfalsifiable, therefore there is no possibility of honest debate. And nobody likes you enough to indulge your whims. There's no percentage in playing with you. You have indeed - and this is a word I try not to overuse - achieved trolldom.
Maybe if you hed certain posts in future with, "No, this time I'm serious, please pay attention," I will bother to look at them; otherwise I don't think I'll be missing much when I ignore you.
TW: "emptedis" - Exactly my point about your posts. Any one of them can be described as "Empty, this." Like your soul, actually. Was the Brazilian chick you just were trying to objectify with pseudo-diagnoses (noted on Trooper York's blog) the same one you were bragging about a little while ago? She sounds like a worthy mate for you.
May I recommend reading these posts in an e-mail reader? Then you can use filters / rules to simply skip over people like C4.
They can argue in silence, but no one hears.
"May I recommend reading these posts in an e-mail reader? Then you can use filters / rules to simply skip over people like C4. "
wonderful - how?
When you post a response, you can select the checkbox that says "e-mail replies to this e-mail address" (or something like that).
Then they go to your e-mail address.
You can then use your e-mail client to set up rules to strike out or delete e-mails that come from the distasteful commenters.
I simply delete everything C4 writes.
(S)He might say something useful that I miss, but I don't miss his general anti-semitism or racism.
I'm OK with his freedom to post; I just don't have to read the swill.
NicNice article. Please check office workstations for best deal.
Post a Comment